中国水稻科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 475-484.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.8013
孙涛, 同拉嘎, 赵书宇, 王海微, 韩云飞, 张忠臣, 金正勋*()
收稿日期:
2018-01-29
修回日期:
2018-04-23
出版日期:
2018-09-10
发布日期:
2018-09-10
通讯作者:
金正勋
基金资助:
Tao SUN, Laga TONG, Shuyu ZHAO, Haiwei WANG, Yunfei HAN, Zhongchen ZHANG, Zhengxun JIN*()
Received:
2018-01-29
Revised:
2018-04-23
Online:
2018-09-10
Published:
2018-09-10
Contact:
Zhengxun JIN
摘要:
【目的】旨在为阐明灌浆成熟期氮素营养对水稻淀粉品质影响机理以及建立优质高产水稻栽培技术提供理论依据。【方法】选用4个籽粒直链淀粉含量差异显著的粳稻品种,通过盆栽试验研究氮素营养对稻米淀粉组分和蛋白质含量及稻米蛋白质水解对淀粉黏滞特性的影响,并分析氮素营养对灌浆过程中籽粒蔗糖合酶(SuSy)、蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)、蔗糖酸性转化酶(AI)活性及OsGBSSⅠ、OsISAⅠ、OsSBEⅠ、OsSBEⅡ基因转录表达量的影响。【结果】结果表明,籽粒支链淀粉含量对氮素营养很敏感,灌浆成熟期氮素营养能改变籽粒淀粉组分含量;施氮条件下,高直链淀粉含量品种蒸煮食味品质下降更加明显,去除稻米蛋白质可明显提高稻米黏滞特性,蛋白质对淀粉黏滞特性的影响很大;增加灌浆成熟期氮素营养能显著或极显著提高籽粒SuSy和AI活性,显著抑制籽粒SPS活性;灌浆成熟期氮素营养能改变灌浆不同时期籽粒OsGBSSⅠ、OsISAⅠ和OsSBEⅡ基因转录表达量,以致灌浆过程中这些基因的转录表达量变化动态发生改变,但OsSBEⅠ基因转录表达量不因氮素营养而发生改变;受氮素营养的影响,灌浆起始期籽粒OsGBSSⅠ基因表达量明显上调,而灌浆中后期明显下调;氮素营养明显抑制灌浆成熟期籽粒OsISAⅠ基因和灌浆中后期的OsSBEⅠ基因转录表达,显著提高灌浆前期和中期的籽粒OsSBEⅠ基因转录表达量;氮素营养能抑制灌浆起始期籽粒OsSBEⅡ基因的转录表达,而提高灌浆中后期的基因转录表达。【结论】灌浆成熟期氮素营养除了通过蛋白质含量对淀粉品质产生影响外,还通过调控淀粉合成相关的酶活性和基因表达量等生理环节对淀粉含量和精细结构起作用,最终改变稻米黏滞特性和食味品质。
中图分类号:
孙涛, 同拉嘎, 赵书宇, 王海微, 韩云飞, 张忠臣, 金正勋. 氮肥对水稻胚乳淀粉品质、相关酶活性及基因表达量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(5): 475-484.
Tao SUN, Laga TONG, Shuyu ZHAO, Haiwei WANG, Yunfei HAN, Zhongchen ZHANG, Zhengxun JIN. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Starch Quality, Activities and Gene Expression Levels of Related Enzymes in Rice Endosperm[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(5): 475-484.
基因名称 Gene name | 登录号 Accession number | 上游引物(5′-3′) Forward primer(5′-3′) | 下游引物(5′-3′) Reverse primer(5′-3′) | 产物片段 Production size/bp |
---|---|---|---|---|
OsGBSSⅠ | XM_015789006.1 | AGCGTTGTGGCTGAGATCAA | CTTCTCACCGGTCTTTCCCC | 138 |
OsISAⅠ | XM_015794756.1 | GTGGCCTTCTCCACGAAAGA | CTCTGGGAGTCCAACAACCG | 90 |
OsSBEⅠ | XM_015787625.1 | CGTGGCCTGGAAAGGTCAA | TCAGGCATTTCTGGTCGAGGC | 183 |
OsSBEⅡ | XM_015772017.1 | CCGCAGGAGAAATCCCATAC | GGAAGCACCTCATCCCTAA | 181 |
OsActin1 | AK100267 | TCTCAACCCCAAGGCCAATC | ATGAGTAACCACGCTCCGTC | 272 |
表1 qRT-PCR目的基因引物
Table 1 Target gene and sequence of qRT-PCR primers.
基因名称 Gene name | 登录号 Accession number | 上游引物(5′-3′) Forward primer(5′-3′) | 下游引物(5′-3′) Reverse primer(5′-3′) | 产物片段 Production size/bp |
---|---|---|---|---|
OsGBSSⅠ | XM_015789006.1 | AGCGTTGTGGCTGAGATCAA | CTTCTCACCGGTCTTTCCCC | 138 |
OsISAⅠ | XM_015794756.1 | GTGGCCTTCTCCACGAAAGA | CTCTGGGAGTCCAACAACCG | 90 |
OsSBEⅠ | XM_015787625.1 | CGTGGCCTGGAAAGGTCAA | TCAGGCATTTCTGGTCGAGGC | 183 |
OsSBEⅡ | XM_015772017.1 | CCGCAGGAGAAATCCCATAC | GGAAGCACCTCATCCCTAA | 181 |
OsActin1 | AK100267 | TCTCAACCCCAAGGCCAATC | ATGAGTAACCACGCTCCGTC | 272 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 增幅 Increased/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 增幅 Increased/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 96.11 aA | 1.15 | 26.77 aA | 2.17 |
对照Contrast | 95.02 bB | 0.00 | 26.20 bB | 0.00 | |
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 95.48 aA | 1.66 | 27.62 aA | 5.74 |
对照Contrast | 93.92 bB | 0.00 | 26.12 bB | 0.00 | |
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 86.18 aA | 1.99 | 31.39 aA | 2.90 |
对照Contrast | 84.50 bB | 0.00 | 30.48 bB | 0.00 | |
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 97.81 aA | 0.34 | 26.23 aA | 3.47 |
对照Contrast | 97.48 aA | 0.00 | 25.35 bB | 0.00 |
表2 灌浆成熟期氮素营养对水稻产量性状的影响
Table 2 Effect of nitrogen nutrition on rice grain yield during grain filling stage.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 增幅 Increased/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 增幅 Increased/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 96.11 aA | 1.15 | 26.77 aA | 2.17 |
对照Contrast | 95.02 bB | 0.00 | 26.20 bB | 0.00 | |
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 95.48 aA | 1.66 | 27.62 aA | 5.74 |
对照Contrast | 93.92 bB | 0.00 | 26.12 bB | 0.00 | |
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 86.18 aA | 1.99 | 31.39 aA | 2.90 |
对照Contrast | 84.50 bB | 0.00 | 30.48 bB | 0.00 | |
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 97.81 aA | 0.34 | 26.23 aA | 3.47 |
对照Contrast | 97.48 aA | 0.00 | 25.35 bB | 0.00 |
品种与处理 Variety and treatment | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 支链淀粉含量 Amylopectin content | 总淀粉含量 Starch content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | 10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | 10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | |||
东农423 Dongnong 423 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 6.30 cC | 15.50 bB | 15.84 dC | 42.64 eE | 56.98 eE | 59.46 eE | 48.94 fF | 72.48 cC | 75.30 bB | ||
对照Contrast | 6.42 cC | 15.93 bB | 16.29 cC | 41.76 fF | 55.46 gG | 56.94 Ff | 48.29 gG | 71.08 dD | 72.91 eD | ||
增幅Increased/% | -1.87 | -2.70 | -2.76 | 2.11 | 2.74 | 4.43 | 1.35 | 1.97 | 3.28 | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 9.74 bB | 16.91 cC | 17.88 bB | 46.25 cC | 60.63 bB | 61.58 cC | 56.00 aA | 75.24 aA | 76.46 aA | ||
对照Contrast | 10.05 aA | 17.87 aA | 19.20 aA | 45.00 dD | 56.62 fF | 56.86 gFG | 55.54 bB | 74.49 bB | 75.16 cB | ||
增幅Increased/% | -3.08 | -5.37 | -6.88 | 2.78 | 7.08 | 8.30 | 0.83 | 1.01 | 1.73 | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 3.53 dD | 7.55 eE | 7.75 fDE | 50.75 aA | 61.56 aA | 66.21 aA | 54.27 cC | 68.81 eE | 73.96 dC | ||
对照Contrast | 3.70 dD | 8.00 dD | 8.27 fE | 48.69 bB | 59.26 cC | 63.67 bB | 52.58 dD | 66.76 fF | 71.33 fE | ||
增幅Increased/% | -4.59 | -5.63 | -6.29 | 4.23 | 3.88 | 3.99 | 3.21 | 3.07 | 3.69 | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 2.56 gF | 5.05 gG | 7.28 gF | 48.48 bB | 59.16 dD | 59.87 dD | 50.64 eE | 64.11 gG | 67.15 gF | ||
对照Contrast | 2.71 fE | 5.46 fF | 7.88 eD | 46.05 cC | 56.61 fF | 56.69 hG | 48.76 fF | 62.08 hH | 63.57 hG | ||
增幅Increased/% | -5.54 | -7.51 | -7.61 | 5.28 | 4.50 | 5.61 | 3.86 | 3.27 | 5.63 |
表3 灌浆不同时期处理间籽粒中总淀粉、直链淀粉、支链淀粉含量应比较
Table 3 Comparison of starch, amylose, amylopectin contents in grains during different grain filling stage.
品种与处理 Variety and treatment | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 支链淀粉含量 Amylopectin content | 总淀粉含量 Starch content | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | 10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | 10 DAF | 20 DAF | 30 DAF | |||
东农423 Dongnong 423 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 6.30 cC | 15.50 bB | 15.84 dC | 42.64 eE | 56.98 eE | 59.46 eE | 48.94 fF | 72.48 cC | 75.30 bB | ||
对照Contrast | 6.42 cC | 15.93 bB | 16.29 cC | 41.76 fF | 55.46 gG | 56.94 Ff | 48.29 gG | 71.08 dD | 72.91 eD | ||
增幅Increased/% | -1.87 | -2.70 | -2.76 | 2.11 | 2.74 | 4.43 | 1.35 | 1.97 | 3.28 | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 9.74 bB | 16.91 cC | 17.88 bB | 46.25 cC | 60.63 bB | 61.58 cC | 56.00 aA | 75.24 aA | 76.46 aA | ||
对照Contrast | 10.05 aA | 17.87 aA | 19.20 aA | 45.00 dD | 56.62 fF | 56.86 gFG | 55.54 bB | 74.49 bB | 75.16 cB | ||
增幅Increased/% | -3.08 | -5.37 | -6.88 | 2.78 | 7.08 | 8.30 | 0.83 | 1.01 | 1.73 | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 3.53 dD | 7.55 eE | 7.75 fDE | 50.75 aA | 61.56 aA | 66.21 aA | 54.27 cC | 68.81 eE | 73.96 dC | ||
对照Contrast | 3.70 dD | 8.00 dD | 8.27 fE | 48.69 bB | 59.26 cC | 63.67 bB | 52.58 dD | 66.76 fF | 71.33 fE | ||
增幅Increased/% | -4.59 | -5.63 | -6.29 | 4.23 | 3.88 | 3.99 | 3.21 | 3.07 | 3.69 | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | |||||||||||
施氮肥Fertilization | 2.56 gF | 5.05 gG | 7.28 gF | 48.48 bB | 59.16 dD | 59.87 dD | 50.64 eE | 64.11 gG | 67.15 gF | ||
对照Contrast | 2.71 fE | 5.46 fF | 7.88 eD | 46.05 cC | 56.61 fF | 56.69 hG | 48.76 fF | 62.08 hH | 63.57 hG | ||
增幅Increased/% | -5.54 | -7.51 | -7.61 | 5.28 | 4.50 | 5.61 | 3.86 | 3.27 | 5.63 |
品种 Variety | 施肥处理 Treatment | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Max. viscosity | 最低黏度 Min. viscosity | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 消减值 Setback | 蛋白质含量 Protein / % | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose / % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 321.5 gG | 114.8 kK | 225.2 jI | 206.8 eE | -96.4 hG | 2.57 fE | 22.45 aA |
对照Contrast | 263.0 lL | 174.5 dD | 285.2 dD | 88.6 lL | 22.2 dC | 10.28 aA | 20.80 cD | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 279.8 kJ | 125.1 hH | 241.9 iH | 154.7 jJ | -37.9 gF | 2.52 fE | 22.59 aA | |
对照Contrast | 277.8 kK | 198.9 aA | 322.8 aA | 79.0 mM | 45.0 cB | 8.90 cB | 20.94 cC | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 287.0 iI | 127.9 gG | 257.8 eE | 159.1 iI | -29.2 fE | 2.48 fE | 21.87 bB |
对照Contrast | 221.3 nN | 164.2 fF | 286.3 dD | 57.1 oO | 65.0 aA | 8.98 cB | 20.41 dD | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 282.5 jJ | 118.0 jI | 254.4 fF | 164.5 hH | -28.1 fE | 2.50 fE | 21.92 bB | |
对照Contrast | 248.4 mM | 178.2 cC | 310.1 cC | 70.2 nN | 61.7 bA | 7.59 eD | 20.86 cD | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥 Fertilizaton | 水解Hydrolyzed | 407.5 bB | 110.0 lL | 181.4 nM | 297.5 bB | -226.1 nM | 2.54 fE | 12.21 eF |
对照Contrast | 350.1 eE | 186.7 bB | 248.9 gG | 163.4 hH | -101.2 iH | 9.40 bB | 11.44 jK | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 430.3 aA | 113.3 kK | 194.8 mL | 317.0 aA | -235.5 oN | 2.64 fE | 12.64 eE | |
对照Contrast | 359.1 dD | 185.4 bB | 246.2 hG | 173.7 fF | -112.9 jI | 8.48 dC | 11.80 hH | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 403.7 cC | 120.1 iI | 195.6 mL | 283.6 cC | -208.1 mL | 2.48 fE | 12.02 gG |
对照Contrast | 315.2 hH | 199.4 aA | 318.1 bB | 115.9 kK | 2.9 eD | 9.04 cB | 11.15 kK | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 348.8 eE | 117.2 jJ | 214.7 lK | 231.6 dD | -134.1 lK | 2.59 fE | 12.53 fG | |
对照Contrast | 338.6 fF | 169.4 eE | 220.9 kJ | 169.3 hH | -117.8 kJ | 8.95 cB | 11.67 iI |
表4 蛋白质水解对稻米RVA谱特性的影响
Table 4 Comparison of RVA properties of de-protein rice.
品种 Variety | 施肥处理 Treatment | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Max. viscosity | 最低黏度 Min. viscosity | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 消减值 Setback | 蛋白质含量 Protein / % | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose / % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 321.5 gG | 114.8 kK | 225.2 jI | 206.8 eE | -96.4 hG | 2.57 fE | 22.45 aA |
对照Contrast | 263.0 lL | 174.5 dD | 285.2 dD | 88.6 lL | 22.2 dC | 10.28 aA | 20.80 cD | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 279.8 kJ | 125.1 hH | 241.9 iH | 154.7 jJ | -37.9 gF | 2.52 fE | 22.59 aA | |
对照Contrast | 277.8 kK | 198.9 aA | 322.8 aA | 79.0 mM | 45.0 cB | 8.90 cB | 20.94 cC | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 287.0 iI | 127.9 gG | 257.8 eE | 159.1 iI | -29.2 fE | 2.48 fE | 21.87 bB |
对照Contrast | 221.3 nN | 164.2 fF | 286.3 dD | 57.1 oO | 65.0 aA | 8.98 cB | 20.41 dD | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 282.5 jJ | 118.0 jI | 254.4 fF | 164.5 hH | -28.1 fE | 2.50 fE | 21.92 bB | |
对照Contrast | 248.4 mM | 178.2 cC | 310.1 cC | 70.2 nN | 61.7 bA | 7.59 eD | 20.86 cD | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥 Fertilizaton | 水解Hydrolyzed | 407.5 bB | 110.0 lL | 181.4 nM | 297.5 bB | -226.1 nM | 2.54 fE | 12.21 eF |
对照Contrast | 350.1 eE | 186.7 bB | 248.9 gG | 163.4 hH | -101.2 iH | 9.40 bB | 11.44 jK | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 430.3 aA | 113.3 kK | 194.8 mL | 317.0 aA | -235.5 oN | 2.64 fE | 12.64 eE | |
对照Contrast | 359.1 dD | 185.4 bB | 246.2 hG | 173.7 fF | -112.9 jI | 8.48 dC | 11.80 hH | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥 Fertilization | 水解Hydrolyzed | 403.7 cC | 120.1 iI | 195.6 mL | 283.6 cC | -208.1 mL | 2.48 fE | 12.02 gG |
对照Contrast | 315.2 hH | 199.4 aA | 318.1 bB | 115.9 kK | 2.9 eD | 9.04 cB | 11.15 kK | ||
对照 Contrast | 水解Hydrolyzed | 348.8 eE | 117.2 jJ | 214.7 lK | 231.6 dD | -134.1 lK | 2.59 fE | 12.53 fG | |
对照Contrast | 338.6 fF | 169.4 eE | 220.9 kJ | 169.3 hH | -117.8 kJ | 8.95 cB | 11.67 iI |
酶活性 Enzyme activity | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 抽穗后天数 Days after heading/d | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
SuSy | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 46.89 aA | 48.75 cC | 52.93 cB | 37.54 cC | 35.81dD | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 40.85 cC | 42.54 eE | 44.63 fE | 33.55 dD | 32.60 fF | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 40.28 dD | 67.15 aA | 56.17 aA | 48.38 bB | 47.24 bB | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 31.30 gF | 38.43 hG | 42.09 gF | 37.47 cC | 36.86 eE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 39.48 fE | 41.46 fE | 50.61 dC | 48.07 bB | 46.06 fF | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 30.01 hG | 40.05 gF | 35.69 hG | 29.17 fF | 28.03 hH | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 46.42 bB | 53.63 bB | 55.58 bA | 51.82 aA | 50.69 aA | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 39.93 eD | 45.87 dD | 46.75 eD | 30.81 eE | 29.19 gG | ||||||||||||
SPS | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 2.03 gG | 5.81 gF | 1.71gF | 1.54 eE | 1.57 eD | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 8.07 dD | 11.01 bB | 3.18 eE | 2.74 cC | 1.81 dC | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 3.58 eE | 8.54 eD | 2.82 fE | 2.75 cC | 1.97 cC | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 13.27 aA | 14.63 aA | 3.71 dD | 2.01 dD | 1.25 fE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10.34 cC | 6.97 fE | 4.90 cC | 4.15 bB | 2.98 bB | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 10.93 bB | 9.59 cC | 8.91 aA | 6.22 aA | 3.23 aA | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 3.23 fF | 2.53 hG | 1.42 hF | 1.21 fF | 0.87 gF | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 10.35 cC | 9.39 dC | 6.52 bB | 4.01 bB | 2.88 bB | ||||||||||||
AI | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 12.07 bB | 14.04 cC | 7.92 aA | 7.01 aA | 3.90 cB | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 4.44 gG | 5.08 hG | 2.67 bB | 2.23 hH | 1.02 hF | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10.02 cC | 18.05 aA | 7.39 bB | 4.06 dD | 1.68 gE | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 4.51 gG | 6.58 fE | 3.78 gF | 2.32 gG | 1.99 fE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 14.35 aA | 14.36 bB | 6.67 cC | 6.07 bB | 4.22 bB | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 4.77 fF | 6.59 eE | 6.02 dD | 3.26 eE | 3.06 dC | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 9.30 dD | 9.66 dD | 5.83 eD | 5.19 cC | 4.98 aA | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 5.38 eE | 5.51 gF | 4.23 fE | 2.97 dD | 2.45 eD |
表5 灌浆不同时期处理间籽粒蔗糖合酶(SuSy)、蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)和蔗糖酸性转化酶(AI)活性比较
Table 5 Comparison of SuSy, SPS and AI activities in grains under various treatments during different grain filling periods. mol/(g·min)
酶活性 Enzyme activity | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 抽穗后天数 Days after heading/d | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | ||||||||||||||
SuSy | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 46.89 aA | 48.75 cC | 52.93 cB | 37.54 cC | 35.81dD | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 40.85 cC | 42.54 eE | 44.63 fE | 33.55 dD | 32.60 fF | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 40.28 dD | 67.15 aA | 56.17 aA | 48.38 bB | 47.24 bB | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 31.30 gF | 38.43 hG | 42.09 gF | 37.47 cC | 36.86 eE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 39.48 fE | 41.46 fE | 50.61 dC | 48.07 bB | 46.06 fF | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 30.01 hG | 40.05 gF | 35.69 hG | 29.17 fF | 28.03 hH | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 46.42 bB | 53.63 bB | 55.58 bA | 51.82 aA | 50.69 aA | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 39.93 eD | 45.87 dD | 46.75 eD | 30.81 eE | 29.19 gG | ||||||||||||
SPS | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 2.03 gG | 5.81 gF | 1.71gF | 1.54 eE | 1.57 eD | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 8.07 dD | 11.01 bB | 3.18 eE | 2.74 cC | 1.81 dC | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 3.58 eE | 8.54 eD | 2.82 fE | 2.75 cC | 1.97 cC | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 13.27 aA | 14.63 aA | 3.71 dD | 2.01 dD | 1.25 fE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10.34 cC | 6.97 fE | 4.90 cC | 4.15 bB | 2.98 bB | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 10.93 bB | 9.59 cC | 8.91 aA | 6.22 aA | 3.23 aA | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 3.23 fF | 2.53 hG | 1.42 hF | 1.21 fF | 0.87 gF | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 10.35 cC | 9.39 dC | 6.52 bB | 4.01 bB | 2.88 bB | ||||||||||||
AI | 东农423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 12.07 bB | 14.04 cC | 7.92 aA | 7.01 aA | 3.90 cB | |||||||||||
Dongnong 423 | 对照Contrast | 4.44 gG | 5.08 hG | 2.67 bB | 2.23 hH | 1.02 hF | ||||||||||||
东农1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10.02 cC | 18.05 aA | 7.39 bB | 4.06 dD | 1.68 gE | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1706 | 对照Contrast | 4.51 gG | 6.58 fE | 3.78 gF | 2.32 gG | 1.99 fE | ||||||||||||
藤系180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 14.35 aA | 14.36 bB | 6.67 cC | 6.07 bB | 4.22 bB | ||||||||||||
Toukei 180 | 对照Contrast | 4.77 fF | 6.59 eE | 6.02 dD | 3.26 eE | 3.06 dC | ||||||||||||
东农1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 9.30 dD | 9.66 dD | 5.83 eD | 5.19 cC | 4.98 aA | ||||||||||||
Dongnong 1712 | 对照Contrast | 5.38 eE | 5.51 gF | 4.23 fE | 2.97 dD | 2.45 eD |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 抽穗后天数 Days after heading/d | GBSSⅠ | ISAⅠ | SBEⅠ | SBEⅡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 fF | 1.000 bB | 1.000 eD | 1.000 bB |
20 | 7.157 aA | 2.275 aA | 6.864 bA | 3.703 aA | ||
30 | 2.638 dD | 0.074 dD | 4.293 cB | 0.748 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 3.584 bB | 0.162 cC | 1.110 dC | 0.425 dD | |
20 | 3.171 cC | 0.154 cC | 6.935 aA | 3.746 aA | ||
30 | 2.125 eE | 0.004 eD | 0.864 fE | 3.750 aA | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 fE | 1.000 bB | 1.000 fF | 1.000 dD |
20 | 3.463 bB | 3.216 aA | 3.386 bB | 1.643 cC | ||
30 | 1.422 dD | 0.983 bB | 2.490 cC | 1.638 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 3.748 aA | 0.778 cC | 1.361 eE | 1.029 dD | |
20 | 2.695 cC | 0.670 dC | 4.544 aA | 1.929 bB | ||
30 | 1.338 eD | 0.217 eD | 1.855 dD | 2.412 aA | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 eE | 1.000 bB | 1.000 cC | 1.000 cC |
20 | 5.579 bB | 1.305 aA | 1.788 aA | 2.119 bB | ||
30 | 4.777 cC | 0.019 dD | 0.369 dD | 0.074 eE | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 5.757 aA | 0.491 cC | 1.360 bB | 0.290 dD | |
20 | 5.522 bB | 0.432 cC | 1.373 bB | 2.301 aA | ||
30 | 4.572 dD | 0.006 dD | 0.126 eE | 2.319 aA | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 bB | 1.000 aA | 1.000 dD | 1.000 dD |
20 | 4.965 aA | 0.282 cB | 6.737 bB | 3.481 bB | ||
30 | 0.686 dD | 0.005 dC | 0.701 fF | 1.165 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 1.051 bB | 0.909 bA | 2.269 cC | 0.936 dD | |
20 | 0.879 cC | 0.008 dC | 6.831 aA | 3.511 bB | ||
30 | 0.479 eE | 0.003 dC | 0.835 eE | 3.732 aA |
表6 灌浆不同时期籽粒OsGBSSⅠ、OsISAⅠ、OsSBEⅠ、OsSBEⅡ基因转录表达量比较
Table 6 Comparation of expression levels of OsGBSSⅠ、OsISAⅠ、OsSBEⅠ、OsSBEⅡ in grains under different nitrogen nutrition conditions at different filling stages.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 抽穗后天数 Days after heading/d | GBSSⅠ | ISAⅠ | SBEⅠ | SBEⅡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农423 Dongnong 423 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 fF | 1.000 bB | 1.000 eD | 1.000 bB |
20 | 7.157 aA | 2.275 aA | 6.864 bA | 3.703 aA | ||
30 | 2.638 dD | 0.074 dD | 4.293 cB | 0.748 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 3.584 bB | 0.162 cC | 1.110 dC | 0.425 dD | |
20 | 3.171 cC | 0.154 cC | 6.935 aA | 3.746 aA | ||
30 | 2.125 eE | 0.004 eD | 0.864 fE | 3.750 aA | ||
东农1706 Dongnong 1706 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 fE | 1.000 bB | 1.000 fF | 1.000 dD |
20 | 3.463 bB | 3.216 aA | 3.386 bB | 1.643 cC | ||
30 | 1.422 dD | 0.983 bB | 2.490 cC | 1.638 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 3.748 aA | 0.778 cC | 1.361 eE | 1.029 dD | |
20 | 2.695 cC | 0.670 dC | 4.544 aA | 1.929 bB | ||
30 | 1.338 eD | 0.217 eD | 1.855 dD | 2.412 aA | ||
藤系180 Toukei 180 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 eE | 1.000 bB | 1.000 cC | 1.000 cC |
20 | 5.579 bB | 1.305 aA | 1.788 aA | 2.119 bB | ||
30 | 4.777 cC | 0.019 dD | 0.369 dD | 0.074 eE | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 5.757 aA | 0.491 cC | 1.360 bB | 0.290 dD | |
20 | 5.522 bB | 0.432 cC | 1.373 bB | 2.301 aA | ||
30 | 4.572 dD | 0.006 dD | 0.126 eE | 2.319 aA | ||
东农1712 Dongnong 1712 | 施氮肥Fertilization | 10 | 1.000 bB | 1.000 aA | 1.000 dD | 1.000 dD |
20 | 4.965 aA | 0.282 cB | 6.737 bB | 3.481 bB | ||
30 | 0.686 dD | 0.005 dC | 0.701 fF | 1.165 cC | ||
对照Contrast | 10 | 1.051 bB | 0.909 bA | 2.269 cC | 0.936 dD | |
20 | 0.879 cC | 0.008 dC | 6.831 aA | 3.511 bB | ||
30 | 0.479 eE | 0.003 dC | 0.835 eE | 3.732 aA |
[1] | 沈鹏, 金正勋, 罗秋香, 金学泳, 孙艳丽. 水稻灌浆过程中籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性与蒸煮食味品质的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(1): 58-64. |
Shen P, Jin Z X, Luo Q X, Jin X Y, Sun Y L.Relationship between activity of key starch synthetic enzymes during grain filling and quality of eating and cooking in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2006, 20(1): 58-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 李晓光, 金正勋, 刘海英, 赵书宇, 徐美兰, 张忠臣, 沈鹏, 张海彬. 水稻杂种后代籽粒直链淀粉和蛋白质含量选择对产量和品质性状的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4): 13-17. |
Li X G, Jin Z X, Liu H Y, Zhao S Y, Xu M L, Zhang Z C, Shen P, Zhang H B.Effect of amylose and protein content selection on yield and quality traits of hybrid progenies in rice.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2011, 42(4): 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张欣, 施利利, 刘晓宇, 丁得亮, 王松文, 崔晶. 不同施肥处理对水稻产量、食味品质及蛋白质组分的响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(4): 104-108. |
Zhang X, Shi L L, Liu X Y, Ding D L, Wang S W, Cui J.Effect of different fertilizer treatments on rice yield, grain quality and protein fraction content.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 26(4): 104-108. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 谢黎虹, 罗炬, 唐绍清, 陈能, 焦桂爱, 邵高能, 魏祥进, 胡培松. 蛋白质影响水稻米饭食味品质的机理. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(1): 91-96. |
Xie L H, Luo J, Tang S Q, Chen N, Jiao G A, Shao G N, Wei X J, Hu P S.Proteins affect rice eating quality properties and its mechanism.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(1): 91-96. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 阳剑, 时亚文, 李宙炜, 陶优生, 唐启源. 水稻碳氮代谢研究进展. 作物研究, 2011, 25(4): 383-387. |
Yang J, Shi Y W, Li Z Y, Tao Y S, Tang Q Y.Research progress of rice carbon and nitrogen metabolism.Crop Res, 2011, 25(4): 383-387. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 朱方旭, 郭雪冬, 同拉嘎, 张玉磊, 潘冬, 李明月, 李丹, 张忠臣, 金正勋. 蘖穗氮肥追施比例对水稻灌浆成熟期Rubisco和GS同工型基因表达量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 324-332. |
Zhu F X, Guo X D, Tong L G, Zhang Y L,Pan D, Li M Y, Li D, Zhang Z C, Jin Z X.Expression response of Rubisco and GS isoform gene to the ratio of tillering and heading nitrogen fertilization at rice filling stage.J Plant Nutr Fert, 2017, 23(2): 324-332. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 金正勋, 郭雪冬, 朱方旭, 张忠臣. 灌浆成熟期氮素营养对粳稻品质性状及籽粒蔗糖代谢相关酶活性影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47(9): 1-6. |
Jin Z X, Guo X D, Zhu F X, Zhang Z C.Effect of nitrogen nutrition in japonica quality characters and grain sucrose-metabolizing enzymes activity during grouting mature stage.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2016, 47(9): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 从夕汉, 施伏芝, 阮新民, 罗玉祥, 马廷臣, 罗志祥. 氮肥水平对不同基因型水稻氮素利用率、产量和品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4): 1219-1226. |
Cong X H, Shi F Z, Ruan X M, Luo Y X, Ma T C, Luo Z X.Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield and quality of different rice varieties.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(4): 1219-1226. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 王龙, 仲维君, 张丽微, 黄成亮, 潘世驹, 姜玉伟, 赵婷婷, 宋泽, 周健, 钱永德. 结实期施氮对水稻空育131品质的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2016, 31(1): 19-23. |
Wang L, Zhong W J, Zhang L W, Huang C L, Pan S J, Jiang Y W, Zhao T T, Song Z, Zhou J, Qian Y D.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the quality of the Kongyu 131 in seed setting stage.J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2016, 31(1): 19-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 李运祥, 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 陈召洲. 施氮处理对稻米淀粉积累的影响. 南京师大学报: 自然科学版, 2003, 26(3): 31-35. |
Li Y X, Wang Z, Gu Y J,Chen Z Z.Effects of various nitrogen treatments on starch accumulation in caryopsis during the rice grain filling.J Nanjing Nor Univ: Nat Sci Ed, 2003, 26(3): 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 朱立楠, 刘海英, 孙璐璐, 孙涛, 郭雪冬, 朱方旭, 张忠臣, 金正勋. 水稻灌浆过程中胚乳异淀粉酶基因家族表达特性及其与淀粉含量间关系分析. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(5): 528-534. |
Zhu L N, Liu H Y, Sun L L, Sun T, Guo X D, Zhu F X, Zhang Z C, Jin Z X.Analysis of expression characteristics of isoamylase and the correlation with starch content during grain filling in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(5): 528-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 杜晓东, 赵宏伟, 王敬国, 刘化龙, 杨亮, 许晶, 宋谨同. 氮素运筹对寒地粳稻淀粉合成关键酶活性及淀粉积累的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 159-167. |
Du X D, Zhao H W, Wang J G, Liu H L, Yang L, Xu J, Song J T.Changes in starch accumulation and activity of enzymes associated with starch synthesis under different nitrogen applications in japonica rice in cold region.Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(1): 159-167. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 中华人民共和国农业部部颁标准NY147–88.米质测定方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1988. |
Ministry of Agriculture, the Peoples Republic of China. Measuring Method of Rice Quality Characteristics. NY147–88. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1988. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 何照范. 谷物淀粉组份分离及测试方法评述. 粮食储藏, 1985, 65(6): 32-38. |
He Z F,A review of the separation and test methods of cereal starch.Grain Stor, 1985, 65(6): 32-38. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | American Association of Cereal Chemist (AACC). Approved methods of analysis. 11th edn. Methods 61-02. 01. Determination of the Pasting Properties of Rice with the Rapid Visco Analyser. The Association: St. Paul, MN, 1999. |
[16] | 杨玉玲, 许时婴. 籼米为基质的脂肪替代品—糊化工艺研究. 中国粮油学报, 2002, 17(6): 48-50. |
Yang Y L, Xu S Y.Rice based fat substitute: Study on gelatinization.Chin Cereals Oils Assoc, 2002, 17(6): 48-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | Chrastil J.Protein-starch interactions in rice grains. Influence of storage on oryzenin and starch.J Agric Food Chem, 1990, 38(9): 1804-1809. |
[18] | 金正勋, 朱方旭, 郭雪冬, 张忠臣. 不同施氮方法对粳稻灌浆成熟期蔗糖代谢相关酶活性及品质性状影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2016, 47(6): 1-7. |
Jin Z X, Zhu F X, Guo X D, Zhang Z C.Effect of different nitrogen application methods on metabolism correlation enzymes and quality in rice.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2016, 47(6): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Rajeevan M S, Ranamukhaarachchi D G, Vernon S D, Unger E R.Use of real-time quantitative PCR to validate the results of cDNA array and differential display PCR technologies.Methods(San Diego, Calif.), 2001, 25(4): 443-451. |
[20] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 李旭毅, 郭翔, 马均. 水氮互作下水稻氮代谢关键酶活与氮素利用的关系. 作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 2055-2063 |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Li X Y, Guo X, Ma J.Relationship of activities of key enzymes involved in nitrogen metabolism with nitrogen utilization in rice under water-nitrogen interaction.Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(11): 2055-2063. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 苗红霞, 孙佩光, 张凯星, 金志强, 徐碧玉. 植物颗粒结合淀粉合成酶(GBSS)基因的表达调控机制研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(3): 18-23 . |
Miao H X, Sun P G, Zhang K X, Jin Z Q, Xu B Y.Research progress on expression regulation mechanism of genes encoding granule-bound starch synthase in plants.Biotech Bull, 2016, 32(3): 18-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 陈书强, 杨丽敏, 赵海新, 杜晓东, 周通, 薛菁芳, 单莉莉, 王翠, 张献国.穗粒肥用氮比例对寒地不同类型水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国稻米. 2017, 23(4):151-156. |
Chen S Q, Yang L M, Zhao H X, Du X D, Zhou T, Xue J F, Shan L L, Wang C, Zhang X G.Effects of the spike-grain nitrogen ratio on yield and quality of different types of rice in cold region.China Rice, 2017, 23(4): 151-156. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | Kim W, Johnson J W, Graybosch R A, Gaines C S.Physicochemical properties and end-use quality of wheat starch as a function of waxy protein alleles. J Cereal Sci, 2003, 37(2): 195-204. |
[24] | 言普, 沈文涛, 黎小瑛, 周鹏. 植物hpRNA干扰载体构建的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2013(9):7-12. |
Yan P, Shen W T, Li X Y, Zhou P.Progress in Construction of hpRNA vector for plant RNAi.Biotechnol Bull, 2013(9): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Sasaki T, Yasui T, Matsuki J.Effect of amylose content on gelatinization, retrogradation, and pasting properties of starches from waxy and nonwaxy wheat and their F1 seeds.Cereal Chem, 2000, 77(1): 58-63. |
[26] | Wang J C, Xu H, Zhu Y, Liu Q Q, Cai X L.OsbZIP58, a basic leucine zipper transcription factor, regulates starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm//2012 National Conference on Plant Biology. 2012: 3453-3466. |
[27] | 方先文, 姜东, 戴廷波, 曹卫星. 小麦淀粉组分的积累规律. 江苏农业学报, 2002, 18(3): 139-142. |
Fang X W, Jiang D, Dai T B, Cao W X.Accumulation regularity of starch components in wheat varieties.Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2002, 18(3): 139-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H.Organ Specificity of isoforms of starch branching enzyme (Q-enzyme) in rice.Plant Cell Physiol, 1992, 33(7): 985-991. |
[29] | Satoh H, Nishi A, Yamashita K, Takemoto Y.Alteration of the structural properties of starch components by the lack of an isoforms of starch branching enzyme in rice seeds.J Biol Chem, 1993, 268(25): 19084-19091. |
[30] | Kawasaki T, Mizuno K, Baba T, Shimada H.Molecular analysis of the gene encoding a rice starch branching enzyme.Mol Gen Genet, 1993, 237(1): 10-16. |
[31] | Guan H P, Preiss J.Differentiation of the properties of the branching isozymes from maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiol, 1993, 102(4): 1269-1273. |
[32] | Morell M K, Blennow A, Kosar-Hasherni B, Samuel M S.Differential expression and Properties of starch branching enzyme isoforms in developing wheat endosperm.Plant Physiol, 1997, 113(1): 201-208. |
[33] | Satoh H, Nishi A, Yamashita K, Takemoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hosaka Y, Sakurai A, Fujita N, Nakamura Y.Starch-branching enzyme I deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm.Plant Physi, 2003, 133: 1111-1121. |
[34] | Utsumi Y, Utsumi C, Sawada T, Fujita N, Nakamura Y.Functional diversity of isoamylase oligomers: The ISA1 homo-oligomer is essential for amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm.Plant Physiol, 2011, 156(1): 61-77. |
[35] | Kubo A, Rahman S, Utsumi Y.Complementation of sugary-1phenotype in rice endosperm with the wheat isoamy-lase1gene supports a direct role forisoamylase1 in amylopectin biosynthesis.Plant Physiol, 2005, 137(1): 43-56. |
[36] | 钟连进, 董虎, 蔡小波,封言柠,任凭,程方民. 控制水稻胚乳淀粉合成代谢若干关键酶基因对花后高温的响应表达. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(3): 745-750. |
Zhong L J, Dong H, Cai X B, Feng Y N, Ren P, Cheng F M.Gene expression of the key enzymes controlling starch synthesis and metabolism in rice grain endosperm under effects of high temperature after anthesis.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23(3): 745-750. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 钟连进, 程方民, 张国平, 孙宗修. 灌浆结实期不同温度下早籼稻米淀粉链长分布与结构特征差异分析. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(2): 272-276. |
Zhong L J, Cheng F M, Zhang G P, Sun Z X.Differences in starch chain length distribution and structure characteristics of early-indica rice under different temperature treatments during grain-filling.Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38(2): 272-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | Delatte T, Trevisan M, Parker M L, Zeeman S C.Arabidopsis mutants Atisa1 and Atisa2 have identical phenotypes and lack the same multimeric isoamylase, which influences the branch point distribution of amylopectin during starch synthesis. Plant J, 2005, 41(6): 815-830. |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[6] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[7] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[8] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[9] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[10] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[11] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[12] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[13] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
[14] | 许用强, 姜宁, 奉保华, 肖晶晶, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 水稻开花期高温热害响应机理及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 111-126. |
[15] | 吕海涛, 李建忠, 鲁艳辉, 徐红星, 郑许松, 吕仲贤. 稻田福寿螺的发生、危害及其防控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 127-139. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||