中国水稻科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 193-199.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5039
习敏1,2, 林赵淼1, 赵艳岭1, 张新城1, 杨小雨1, 刘正辉1,*(), 李刚华1, 王绍华1, 丁艳锋1
收稿日期:
2015-03-04
修回日期:
2015-09-06
出版日期:
2016-03-10
发布日期:
2016-03-10
通讯作者:
刘正辉
基金资助:
Min XI1,2, Zhao-miao LIN1, Yan-ling ZHAO1, Xin-cheng ZHANG1, Xiao-yu YANG1, Zheng-hui LIU1,*(), Gang-hua LI1, Shao-hua WANG1, Yan-feng DING1
Received:
2015-03-04
Revised:
2015-09-06
Online:
2016-03-10
Published:
2016-03-10
Contact:
Zheng-hui LIU
摘要:
为探讨不同类型垩白水稻对氮肥的响应差异,以武育粳3号的高腹白突变体(WBRK)和高心白突变体(WCRK)为材料,设置不施氮肥(对照)和两个不同的基肥与穗肥比例处理(N5-5和N10-0)共3个处理,分析施氮对腹白米和心白米的发生及籽粒生化组分的影响。结果表明,施用氮肥显著增加了腹白米率和心白米率,且腹白较心白更易受氮肥影响。施氮对WBRK籽粒总淀粉、直链淀粉和支链淀粉含量无显著影响,显著增加了WCRK籽粒淀粉组分的含量,改善了WBRK和WCRK的碾磨品质。与对照相比,N5-5处理显著增加了WBRK籽粒蛋白质及其组分中球蛋白、醇溶蛋白和谷蛋白含量以及WCRK籽粒蛋白质含量。N10-0处理显著降低了WBRK和WCRK籽粒中的蛋白质和谷蛋白含量。N5-5处理下,WBRK和WCRK籽粒中大多数氨基酸含量有所增加,但组氨酸和精氨酸含量有所降低,WCRK表现得更明显。研究表明,氮素对不同类型垩白水稻品种腹白和心白发生及籽粒贮藏物质积累的影响存在差异,显示出生产中采用不同调优栽培措施的必要性。
中图分类号:
习敏, 林赵淼, 赵艳岭, 张新城, 杨小雨, 刘正辉, 李刚华, 王绍华, 丁艳锋. 氮肥对粳稻籽粒腹白和心白发生及生化组成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2): 193-199.
Min XI, Zhao-miao LIN, Yan-ling ZHAO, Xin-cheng ZHANG, Xiao-yu YANG, Zheng-hui LIU, Gang-hua LI, Shao-hua WANG, Yan-feng DING. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on the Formation of White-belly and White-core as Well as Biochemical Composition of japonica Rice Grains[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(2): 193-199.
突变体 Mutant | 垩白米率 Percent of chalky grains/% | 垩白大小 Area of chalkiness/% | 垩白度 Degree of chalkiness/% | 腹白米率 Percent of white-belly rice gains/% | 心白米率 Percent of white-core rice gains/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 61.78±3.67 | 26.74±1.56 | 16.52±0.96 | 61.78±3.67 | 0.00±0.00 |
WCRK | 59.67±0.94 | 80.63±2.76 | 45.56±1.56 | 3.17±1.65 | 56.50±0.71 |
表1 供试材料的垩白性状
Table 1 Chalky characteristics of the materials used in the experiment.
突变体 Mutant | 垩白米率 Percent of chalky grains/% | 垩白大小 Area of chalkiness/% | 垩白度 Degree of chalkiness/% | 腹白米率 Percent of white-belly rice gains/% | 心白米率 Percent of white-core rice gains/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 61.78±3.67 | 26.74±1.56 | 16.52±0.96 | 61.78±3.67 | 0.00±0.00 |
WCRK | 59.67±0.94 | 80.63±2.76 | 45.56±1.56 | 3.17±1.65 | 56.50±0.71 |
突变体与处理 Mutant and treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 单位面积穗数 Number of panicles per 1m2 | 每穗粒数 Number of spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | ||||||
对照CK | 14.46±0.3 c | 312.68±17.3 b | 89.41±5.3 b | 86.18±0.2 c | 27.38±0.5 a | 6614.38±816.1 b |
N5-5 | 17.16±0.4 a | 419.57±47.9 a | 111.80±4.0 a | 89.23±1.4 b | 26.20±0.4 b | 10991.99±1053.7 a |
N10-0 | 15.56±0.1 b | 440.86±14.3 a | 105.54±8.6 a | 91.71±2.2 a | 26.75±0.5 ab | 11383.11±469.9 a |
平均Mean | 15.73 | 391.04 | 102.25 | 89.04 | 26.78 | 9663.16 |
WCRK | ||||||
对照CK | 13.72±0.2 c | 308.10±15.4 b | 92.09±6.6 b | 78.70±1.4 b | 27.38±0.4 a | 6102.68±313.8 b |
N5-5 | 16.30±0.3 a | 430.21±31.1 a | 100.18±3.5 a | 86.16±1.0 a | 26.82±0.2 b | 9966.34±892.6 a |
N10-0 | 15.14±0.1 b | 420.82±58.0 a | 100.76±2.0 a | 85.99±1.3 a | 27.09±0.3 ab | 9896.93±1144.9 a |
平均Mean | 15.06 | 386.38 | 97.68 | 83.62 | 27.10 | 8655.32 |
表2 氮肥对水稻产量及构成因素的影响
Table 2 Effect of nitrogen application on grain yield and its components.
突变体与处理 Mutant and treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 单位面积穗数 Number of panicles per 1m2 | 每穗粒数 Number of spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | ||||||
对照CK | 14.46±0.3 c | 312.68±17.3 b | 89.41±5.3 b | 86.18±0.2 c | 27.38±0.5 a | 6614.38±816.1 b |
N5-5 | 17.16±0.4 a | 419.57±47.9 a | 111.80±4.0 a | 89.23±1.4 b | 26.20±0.4 b | 10991.99±1053.7 a |
N10-0 | 15.56±0.1 b | 440.86±14.3 a | 105.54±8.6 a | 91.71±2.2 a | 26.75±0.5 ab | 11383.11±469.9 a |
平均Mean | 15.73 | 391.04 | 102.25 | 89.04 | 26.78 | 9663.16 |
WCRK | ||||||
对照CK | 13.72±0.2 c | 308.10±15.4 b | 92.09±6.6 b | 78.70±1.4 b | 27.38±0.4 a | 6102.68±313.8 b |
N5-5 | 16.30±0.3 a | 430.21±31.1 a | 100.18±3.5 a | 86.16±1.0 a | 26.82±0.2 b | 9966.34±892.6 a |
N10-0 | 15.14±0.1 b | 420.82±58.0 a | 100.76±2.0 a | 85.99±1.3 a | 27.09±0.3 ab | 9896.93±1144.9 a |
平均Mean | 15.06 | 386.38 | 97.68 | 83.62 | 27.10 | 8655.32 |
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 腹白米率 Percentage of white-belly rice/% | 心白米率 Percentage of white-core rice/% | 完善米率 Percentage of perfect rice/% | 其他米率 Percentage of other rice/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 47.29±1.9 b | 0.00±0.0 a | 51.88±2.2 a | 0.83±0.6 b |
N5-5 | 64.50±2.8 a | 0.00±0.0 a | 30.21±4.1 b | 5.29±2.1 a | |
N10-0 | 63.17±2.8 a | 0.00±0.5 a | 32.04±2.2 b | 4.79±1.2 a | |
平均Mean | 58.32 | 0.00 | 38.04 | 3.64 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 3.50±1.4 c | 51.96±3.4 b | 43.46±4.0 a | 1.08±0.6 a |
N5-5 | 8.17±3.2 b | 58.46±4.0 a | 31.79±4.8 b | 1.58±1.0 a | |
N10-0 | 11.13±2.7 a | 54.38±3.1 b | 32.92±3.9 b | 1.58±1.4 a | |
平均Mean | 7.60 | 54.93 | 36.06 | 1.41 |
表3 不同氮肥处理下腹白米率和心白米率
Table 3 Percentages of white-belly and white-core rice grains under different Nitrogen treatments.
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 腹白米率 Percentage of white-belly rice/% | 心白米率 Percentage of white-core rice/% | 完善米率 Percentage of perfect rice/% | 其他米率 Percentage of other rice/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 47.29±1.9 b | 0.00±0.0 a | 51.88±2.2 a | 0.83±0.6 b |
N5-5 | 64.50±2.8 a | 0.00±0.0 a | 30.21±4.1 b | 5.29±2.1 a | |
N10-0 | 63.17±2.8 a | 0.00±0.5 a | 32.04±2.2 b | 4.79±1.2 a | |
平均Mean | 58.32 | 0.00 | 38.04 | 3.64 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 3.50±1.4 c | 51.96±3.4 b | 43.46±4.0 a | 1.08±0.6 a |
N5-5 | 8.17±3.2 b | 58.46±4.0 a | 31.79±4.8 b | 1.58±1.0 a | |
N10-0 | 11.13±2.7 a | 54.38±3.1 b | 32.92±3.9 b | 1.58±1.4 a | |
平均Mean | 7.60 | 54.93 | 36.06 | 1.41 |
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 81.63±0.4 b | 69.11±0.5 b | 65.54±0.8 a |
N5-5 | 84.34±0.4 a | 71.53±0.6 a | 65.97±1.2 a | |
N10-0 | 84.24±0.1 a | 71.39±0.5 a | 67.21±2.3 a | |
平均Mean | 83.40 | 70.68 | 66.24 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 80.28±1.5 b | 67.38±1.5 b | 63.61±2.0 c |
N5-5 | 84.01±0.2 a | 70.52±0.5 a | 67.85±1.4 a | |
N10-0 | 84.19±0.4 a | 70.78±0.8 a | 65.95±2.3 b | |
平均Mean | 82.82 | 69.56 | 65.80 |
表4 氮肥对腹白米和心白米碾磨品质的影响
Table 4 Effect of nitrogen application on milling quality of white-belly and white-core rice.
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 81.63±0.4 b | 69.11±0.5 b | 65.54±0.8 a |
N5-5 | 84.34±0.4 a | 71.53±0.6 a | 65.97±1.2 a | |
N10-0 | 84.24±0.1 a | 71.39±0.5 a | 67.21±2.3 a | |
平均Mean | 83.40 | 70.68 | 66.24 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 80.28±1.5 b | 67.38±1.5 b | 63.61±2.0 c |
N5-5 | 84.01±0.2 a | 70.52±0.5 a | 67.85±1.4 a | |
N10-0 | 84.19±0.4 a | 70.78±0.8 a | 65.95±2.3 b | |
平均Mean | 82.82 | 69.56 | 65.80 |
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 总淀粉含量 Total tarch content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content /% | 支链淀粉含量 Amylopectin content/% | 直链淀粉/支链淀粉 Amylose/ Amylopectin | 蛋白质含量 Protein content /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 78.72±1.44 ab | 14.82±1.46 a | 63.89±1.13 ab | 0.23±0.03 a | 6.42±0.16 b |
N5-5 | 77.21±0.79 b | 14.68±1.36 a | 62.53±2.34 b | 0.24±0.03 a | 6.77±0.15 a | |
N10-0 | 79.86±1.84 a | 14.91±1.24 a | 64.95±1.09 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 5.98±0.04 c | |
平均Mean | 78.59 | 14.80 | 63.79 | 0.23 | 6.39 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 78.42±2.12 b | 15.19±0.41 b | 63.22±2.12 b | 0.24±0.01 b | 6.48±0.18 a |
N5-5 | 82.63±1.20 a | 16.69±0.68 a | 65.88±1.12 a | 0.26±0.01 ab | 6.71±0.14 a | |
N10-0 | 84.27±1.53 a | 17.33±0.38 a | 66.94±1.55 a | 0.26±0.01 a | 5.92±0.18 b | |
平均Mean | 81.77 | 16.40 | 65.35 | 0.25 | 6.37 |
表5 不同氮肥处理下籽粒生化组分分析
Table 5 Grain chemical composition in seeds under nitrogen fertilizer application.
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 总淀粉含量 Total tarch content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content /% | 支链淀粉含量 Amylopectin content/% | 直链淀粉/支链淀粉 Amylose/ Amylopectin | 蛋白质含量 Protein content /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 78.72±1.44 ab | 14.82±1.46 a | 63.89±1.13 ab | 0.23±0.03 a | 6.42±0.16 b |
N5-5 | 77.21±0.79 b | 14.68±1.36 a | 62.53±2.34 b | 0.24±0.03 a | 6.77±0.15 a | |
N10-0 | 79.86±1.84 a | 14.91±1.24 a | 64.95±1.09 a | 0.23±0.02 a | 5.98±0.04 c | |
平均Mean | 78.59 | 14.80 | 63.79 | 0.23 | 6.39 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 78.42±2.12 b | 15.19±0.41 b | 63.22±2.12 b | 0.24±0.01 b | 6.48±0.18 a |
N5-5 | 82.63±1.20 a | 16.69±0.68 a | 65.88±1.12 a | 0.26±0.01 ab | 6.71±0.14 a | |
N10-0 | 84.27±1.53 a | 17.33±0.38 a | 66.94±1.55 a | 0.26±0.01 a | 5.92±0.18 b | |
平均Mean | 81.77 | 16.40 | 65.35 | 0.25 | 6.37 |
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白含量 Albumin content/% | 球蛋白含量 Globulin content/% | 醇溶蛋白含量 Prolamin content/% | 谷蛋白含量 Glutelin content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 0.73±0.03 a | 0.44±0.01b | 0.70±0.03 b | 4.55±0.12 b |
N5-5 | 0.72±0.02 a | 0.48±0.02 a | 0.77±0.02 a | 4.81±0.14 a | |
N10-0 | 0.70±0.01 a | 0.42±0.01 b | 0.72±0.02 b | 4.14±0.03 c | |
平均Mean | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.73 | 4.50 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 0.80±0.02 a | 0.44±0.01 ab | 0.76±0.03 a | 4.49±0.17 a |
N5-5 | 0.78±0.02 a | 0.45±0.02 a | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.70±0.11 a | |
N10-0 | 0.78±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 b | 0.78±0.03 a | 3.94±0.16 b | |
平均Mean | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 4.37 |
表6 不同氮肥处理对籽粒中蛋白质组分含量的影响
Table 6 Effects of nitrogen application level on grain protein composition.
突变体 Mutant | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白含量 Albumin content/% | 球蛋白含量 Globulin content/% | 醇溶蛋白含量 Prolamin content/% | 谷蛋白含量 Glutelin content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBRK | 对照CK | 0.73±0.03 a | 0.44±0.01b | 0.70±0.03 b | 4.55±0.12 b |
N5-5 | 0.72±0.02 a | 0.48±0.02 a | 0.77±0.02 a | 4.81±0.14 a | |
N10-0 | 0.70±0.01 a | 0.42±0.01 b | 0.72±0.02 b | 4.14±0.03 c | |
平均Mean | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.73 | 4.50 | |
WCRK | 对照CK | 0.80±0.02 a | 0.44±0.01 ab | 0.76±0.03 a | 4.49±0.17 a |
N5-5 | 0.78±0.02 a | 0.45±0.02 a | 0.79±0.03 a | 4.70±0.11 a | |
N10-0 | 0.78±0.01 a | 0.43±0.01 b | 0.78±0.03 a | 3.94±0.16 b | |
平均Mean | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 4.37 |
氨基酸 Amino acid | WBRK | WCRK | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照CK | N5-5 | N10-0 | ±N5-5 | ±N10-0 | 对照CK | N5-5 | N10-0 | ±N5-5 | ±N10-0 | ||
天冬氨酸Asp | 0.64 a | 0.69 a | 0.64 a | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.62 a | 0.63 a | 0.59 b | 0.01 | -0.03 | |
苏氨酸Thr | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | 0.33 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.32 a | 0.32 a | 0.31 b | 0.00 | -0.01 | |
丝氨酸Ser | 0.44 a | 0.49 a | 0.46 a | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.43 a | 0.43 a | 0.41 a | 0.00 | -0.02 | |
谷氨酸Glu | 1.54 a | 1.71 a | 1.58 a | 0.17 | 0.04 | 1.50 a | 1.52 a | 1.45 b | 0.02 | -0.05 | |
甘氨酸Gly | 0.36 a | 0.39 a | 0.36 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.35 a | 0.36 a | 0.33 b | 0.01 | -0.02 | |
丙氨酸Ala | 0.44 a | 0.47 a | 0.44 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.44 a | 0.44 a | 0.41 b | 0.00 | -0.03 | |
半胱氨酸Cys | 0.10 a | 0.10 a | 0.09 a | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.08 a | 0.09 a | 0.09 a | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
缬氨酸Val | 0.40 a | 0.45 a | 0.40 a | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.39 a | 0.40 a | 0.38 a | 0.01 | -0.01 | |
蛋氨酸Met | 0.22 a | 0.18 a | 0.16 a | -0.04 | -0.06 | 0.18 a | 0.22 a | 0.19 a | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
异亮氨酸Ile | 0.30 a | 0.32 a | 0.28 a | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.27 a | 0.29 a | 0.28 a | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
亮氨酸Leu | 0.64 a | 0.69 a | 0.62 a | 0.05 | -0.02 | 0.60 a | 0.62 a | 0.59 a | 0.02 | -0.03 | |
酪氨酸Tyr | 0.36 a | 0.41 a | 0.35 a | 0.05 | -0.01 | 0.35 a | 0.35 a | 0.34 a | 0.00 | -0.01 | |
苯丙氨酸Phe | 0.50 a | 0.54 a | 0.50 a | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.49 a | 0.47 a | 0.46 a | -0.02 | -0.03 | |
赖氨酸Lys | 0.50 a | 0.46 a | 0.45 a | -0.04 | -0.05 | 0.50 a | 0.45 b | 0.47 ab | -0.05 | -0.03 | |
组氨酸His | 0.39 a | 0.29 a | 0.30 a | -0.10 | -0.09 | 0.39 a | 0.29 a | 0.36 a | -0.10 | -0.03 | |
精氨酸Arg | 0.69 a | 0.68 a | 0.65 a | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.72 a | 0.62 b | 0.64 b | -0.10 | -0.08 | |
脯氨酸Pro | 0.32 a | 0.34 a | 0.31 a | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.30 a | 0.31 a | 0.28 b | 0.01 | -0.02 | |
总含量Total | 8.15 a | 8.61 a | 7.94 a | 0.46 | -0.21 | 7.93 a | 7.80 a | 7.56 a | -0.13 | -0.37 |
表7 不同氮肥处理下籽粒中的氨基酸含量
Table 7 Amino acid contents in brown rice under different N treatments %
氨基酸 Amino acid | WBRK | WCRK | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照CK | N5-5 | N10-0 | ±N5-5 | ±N10-0 | 对照CK | N5-5 | N10-0 | ±N5-5 | ±N10-0 | ||
天冬氨酸Asp | 0.64 a | 0.69 a | 0.64 a | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.62 a | 0.63 a | 0.59 b | 0.01 | -0.03 | |
苏氨酸Thr | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | 0.33 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.32 a | 0.32 a | 0.31 b | 0.00 | -0.01 | |
丝氨酸Ser | 0.44 a | 0.49 a | 0.46 a | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.43 a | 0.43 a | 0.41 a | 0.00 | -0.02 | |
谷氨酸Glu | 1.54 a | 1.71 a | 1.58 a | 0.17 | 0.04 | 1.50 a | 1.52 a | 1.45 b | 0.02 | -0.05 | |
甘氨酸Gly | 0.36 a | 0.39 a | 0.36 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.35 a | 0.36 a | 0.33 b | 0.01 | -0.02 | |
丙氨酸Ala | 0.44 a | 0.47 a | 0.44 a | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.44 a | 0.44 a | 0.41 b | 0.00 | -0.03 | |
半胱氨酸Cys | 0.10 a | 0.10 a | 0.09 a | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.08 a | 0.09 a | 0.09 a | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
缬氨酸Val | 0.40 a | 0.45 a | 0.40 a | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.39 a | 0.40 a | 0.38 a | 0.01 | -0.01 | |
蛋氨酸Met | 0.22 a | 0.18 a | 0.16 a | -0.04 | -0.06 | 0.18 a | 0.22 a | 0.19 a | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
异亮氨酸Ile | 0.30 a | 0.32 a | 0.28 a | 0.02 | -0.02 | 0.27 a | 0.29 a | 0.28 a | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
亮氨酸Leu | 0.64 a | 0.69 a | 0.62 a | 0.05 | -0.02 | 0.60 a | 0.62 a | 0.59 a | 0.02 | -0.03 | |
酪氨酸Tyr | 0.36 a | 0.41 a | 0.35 a | 0.05 | -0.01 | 0.35 a | 0.35 a | 0.34 a | 0.00 | -0.01 | |
苯丙氨酸Phe | 0.50 a | 0.54 a | 0.50 a | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.49 a | 0.47 a | 0.46 a | -0.02 | -0.03 | |
赖氨酸Lys | 0.50 a | 0.46 a | 0.45 a | -0.04 | -0.05 | 0.50 a | 0.45 b | 0.47 ab | -0.05 | -0.03 | |
组氨酸His | 0.39 a | 0.29 a | 0.30 a | -0.10 | -0.09 | 0.39 a | 0.29 a | 0.36 a | -0.10 | -0.03 | |
精氨酸Arg | 0.69 a | 0.68 a | 0.65 a | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.72 a | 0.62 b | 0.64 b | -0.10 | -0.08 | |
脯氨酸Pro | 0.32 a | 0.34 a | 0.31 a | 0.02 | -0.01 | 0.30 a | 0.31 a | 0.28 b | 0.01 | -0.02 | |
总含量Total | 8.15 a | 8.61 a | 7.94 a | 0.46 | -0.21 | 7.93 a | 7.80 a | 7.56 a | -0.13 | -0.37 |
[1] | Lanning S B, Siebenmorgen T J, Counce P A, et al.Extreme nighttime air temperatures in 2010 impact rice chalkiness and milling quality.Field Crops Res, 2011, 124: 132-136. |
[2] | Cheng F M, Zhong L J, Wang F, et al.Differences in cooking and eating properties between chalky and translucent parts in rice grains.Food Chem, 2005, 90: 39-46. |
[3] | Areum C, Jin S, Kee-Jong K,et al.Quality of head and chalky rice and deterioration of eating quality by chalky rice.J Crop Sci Biotechnol, 2009, 12(4): 239-244. |
[4] | Singh N,Sodhi N S, Kaur M, et al.Physico-chemical, morphological, thermal, cooking and textural properties of chalky and translucent rice kernels.Food Chem, 2003, 82(3): 433-439. |
[5] | Hoshikawa K.Rice grain texture and grading standard//Matsuo T, Hoshikawa K, ed. Science of the rice plant. Volume One, Morphology. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 1993: 383-389. |
[6] | 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 等. 氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1): 31-35. |
Jin Z X, Qiu T Q, Sun Y L, et al.Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chalkiness ratio and cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain. Plant Nytr Fert Sci, 2001, 7(1): 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[7] | Xiong F, Wang Z, Gu Y J, et al.Effects of nitrogen application time on caryopsis development and grain quality of rice variety Yangdao 6.Rice Sci, 2008, 15(1): 57-62. |
[8] | 马群, 顾海永, 张庆, 等. 不同生育期类型粳稻品种垩白性状对施氮水平的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6): 1341-1350. |
Ma Q, Gu H Y, Zhang Q, et al.Response of grain chalky traits to nitrogen application levels for different growth-period japonica cultivars.Plant Nutr Fertil Sci, 2010, 16(6): 1341-1350 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[9] | Juliano B O.A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose.Cereal Sci Today, 1971, 16: 334-340. |
[10] | Liu Z H, Cheng F M, Cheng W D, et al.Positional variations in phytic acid and protein content within a panicle of japonica rice.J Cereal Sci, 2005, 41: 297-303. |
[11] | Bollag D M, Edelstein S J. Protein Methods.New York:Wiley-Liss, Inc, 1990, 50-56. |
[12] | Holme D J, Peck H. Analytical Biochemistry.3 ed. New York, USA:Addison Wesley Longman, 1998: 388-393. |
[13] | Cheng F M, Liu Y, Liu Z H, et al.Positional variations in chalky occurrence within a rice panicle and its relation to grain nutritional quality.Aust J Agric Res, 2007, 58: 95-103. |
[14] | Tsukaguchi T, Iida Y.Effects of assimilate supply and high temperature during grain-filling period on the occurrence of various types of chalky kernels in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.).Plant Prod Sci, 2008, 11(2): 203-210. |
[15] | Taira H.Physicochemical properties and quality of rice grains. //Matsuo T, Kumazawa K, Ishii R, et al. Science of the Rice Plant, Volume Two, Physiology. Tokyo:Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 1995. |
[16] | Qiao J F, Liu Z H, Deng S Y, et al.Occurrence of perfect and imperfect grains of six japonica rice cultivars as affected by nitrogen fertilization.Plant Soil, 2011, 349: 191-202. |
[17] | Xi M, Lin Z M, Zhang X C, et al.Endosperm structure of white-belly and white-core rice grains shown by scanning electron microscopy.Plant Prod Sci, 2014, 17: 285-290. |
[18] | Zhou L, Chen L, Jiang L,et al.Fine mapping of the grain chalkiness QTL qPGWC-7 in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118: 581-590. |
[19] | Yang Q,Suk-Man K, Jae-Keun S.Genetic analysis and QTL mapping for grain chalkiness characteristics of brown rice (Oryza sativa L.).Gene Genom, 2009, 31(2): 155-164. |
[20] | Peng B, Wang L Q, Fan C C, et al.Comparative mapping of chalkiness components in rice using five populations across two environments.BMC Genet, 2014, 15: 49. |
[21] | Lawlor D W.Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: Mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems.J Exp Bot, 2002, 53(370): 773-787. |
[22] | Buchanan B,Gruissem W J, Russell L.Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants. Rockville, MD, USA:American Society of Plant Physiologists, 2002: 358-361. |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[6] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[7] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[8] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[9] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[10] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[11] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[12] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[13] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
[14] | 许用强, 姜宁, 奉保华, 肖晶晶, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 水稻开花期高温热害响应机理及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 111-126. |
[15] | 吕海涛, 李建忠, 鲁艳辉, 徐红星, 郑许松, 吕仲贤. 稻田福寿螺的发生、危害及其防控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 127-139. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||