Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 531-542.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210808
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Minyu1, DAI Zhigang3, YU Defang4, WANG Xiangping5, GUAN Shaohua6, SHAO Yuangang7, ZHANG Jiaxue8, LI Xiaokun1,2()
Received:
2021-08-16
Revised:
2022-02-21
Online:
2022-09-10
Published:
2022-09-09
Contact:
LI Xiaokun
王敏羽1, 戴志刚3, 余德芳4, 王向平5, 关绍华6, 邵远刚7, 张家学8, 李小坤1,2()
通讯作者:
李小坤
基金资助:
WANG Minyu, DAI Zhigang, YU Defang, WANG Xiangping, GUAN Shaohua, SHAO Yuangang, ZHANG Jiaxue, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Simplified Application of Dedicated Fertilizer on Yield, Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Rice-ratoon Rice System[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 531-542.
王敏羽, 戴志刚, 余德芳, 王向平, 关绍华, 邵远刚, 张家学, 李小坤. “水稻-再生稻”种植模式专用肥轻简施用对产量、肥料利用率及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 531-542.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210808
试验点 Experimental site | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg−1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen /(g·kg−1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus /(mg·kg−1) | 速效钾 Available potassium /(mg·kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 6.3 | 27.3 | 1.4 | 15.8 | 151.2 |
钟祥双桥 SQ | 6.3 | 22.9 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 51.2 |
钟祥马祠 MC | 7.1 | 27.1 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 52.8 |
应城潘马 PM | 5.1 | 18.7 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 64.0 |
应城方集 FJ | 5.2 | 12.1 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 46.8 |
蕲春魏河 WH | 6.1 | 30.9 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 9.2 |
蕲春张铺 ZP | 5.7 | 29.3 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 48.4 |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | 5.3 | 36.2 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 70.4 |
洪湖万岭 WL | 6.5 | 21.3 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 52.4 |
Table 1. Basic physical and chemical properties of soil at different experimental sites.
试验点 Experimental site | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg−1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen /(g·kg−1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus /(mg·kg−1) | 速效钾 Available potassium /(mg·kg−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 6.3 | 27.3 | 1.4 | 15.8 | 151.2 |
钟祥双桥 SQ | 6.3 | 22.9 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 51.2 |
钟祥马祠 MC | 7.1 | 27.1 | 1.3 | 8.9 | 52.8 |
应城潘马 PM | 5.1 | 18.7 | 0.9 | 4.3 | 64.0 |
应城方集 FJ | 5.2 | 12.1 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 46.8 |
蕲春魏河 WH | 6.1 | 30.9 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 9.2 |
蕲春张铺 ZP | 5.7 | 29.3 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 48.4 |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | 5.3 | 36.2 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 70.4 |
洪湖万岭 WL | 6.5 | 21.3 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 52.4 |
试验点 Experimental site | 基肥 Basal fertilizer | 追肥 Topdressing | 促苗肥 Tillering fertilizer | 促芽肥 Booting fertilizer |
---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 26-10-12 | - | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 |
钟祥双桥 SQ | 25-5-5 | - | 25-5-5 | 25-5-5 |
钟祥马祠 MC | 26-10-12 | - | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 |
应城潘马 PM | 20-9-6 | - | - | - |
应城方集 FJ | 17-6-8 | - | - | - |
蕲春魏河 WH | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 | - | - |
蕲春张铺 ZP | 15-7-8 | 15-15-15 | - | - |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | 15-15-15 | - | - | - |
洪湖万岭 WL | 24-6-10 | - | - | - |
Table 2. Fertilizer nutrient ratio of the farmers’ fertilization practice treatment at each sites.
试验点 Experimental site | 基肥 Basal fertilizer | 追肥 Topdressing | 促苗肥 Tillering fertilizer | 促芽肥 Booting fertilizer |
---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 26-10-12 | - | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 |
钟祥双桥 SQ | 25-5-5 | - | 25-5-5 | 25-5-5 |
钟祥马祠 MC | 26-10-12 | - | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 |
应城潘马 PM | 20-9-6 | - | - | - |
应城方集 FJ | 17-6-8 | - | - | - |
蕲春魏河 WH | 15-15-15 | 15-15-15 | - | - |
蕲春张铺 ZP | 15-7-8 | 15-15-15 | - | - |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | 15-15-15 | - | - | - |
洪湖万岭 WL | 24-6-10 | - | - | - |
养分配比 Nutrient ratio | 试验点Test sites | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 钟祥双桥 SQ | 钟祥马祠 MC | 应城潘马 PM | 应城方集 FJ | 蕲春魏河 WH | 蕲春张铺 ZP | 蕲春龚大围 GDW | 洪湖万岭 WL | |
基肥Basal fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 156.0+0.0 | 150.0+0.0 | 175.5+0.0 | 222.0+0.0 | 128.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 223.5+0.0 |
P2O5 | 60 | 30 | 67.5 | 85 | 37.5 | 90 | 42 | 90 | 60 |
K2O | 72 | 30 | 81 | 64 | 60 | 90 | 48 | 90 | 96 |
分蘖肥Tillering fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.5 | 22.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | - | 52 | 34.5 | 17.5 |
追肥Top dressing | |||||||||
N | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+22.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 34.0+0.0 | 13.0+0.0 | 0.0+34.5 | 0.0+17.5 |
P2O5 | - | - | - | - | - | 34 | 13 | - | - |
K2O | - | - | - | - | - | 34 | 13 | - | - |
促苗肥Tillering fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.0+26.0 | 47.0+0.0 | 17.0+26.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+52.0 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+69.0 | 0.0+46.0 |
P2O5 | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K2O | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
促芽肥Booting fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.0+26.0 | 47.0+0.0 | 17.0+26.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+52.0 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+69.0 | 0.0+46.0 |
P2O5 | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K2O | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
总养分量Total amount of nutrients | |||||||||
N | 277 | 289 | 296.5 | 267 | 173 | 228 | 190 | 297 | 350.5 |
P2O5 | 94 | 49 | 101.5 | 85 | 37.5 | 124 | 55 | 90 | 60 |
K2O | 106 | 49 | 115 | 64 | 60 | 124 | 61 | 90 | 96 |
Table 3. Fertilizer application amount of the farmers’ fertilization practice treatment at each sites. kg/hm2
养分配比 Nutrient ratio | 试验点Test sites | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | 钟祥双桥 SQ | 钟祥马祠 MC | 应城潘马 PM | 应城方集 FJ | 蕲春魏河 WH | 蕲春张铺 ZP | 蕲春龚大围 GDW | 洪湖万岭 WL | |
基肥Basal fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 156.0+0.0 | 150.0+0.0 | 175.5+0.0 | 222.0+0.0 | 128.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 90.0+0.0 | 223.5+0.0 |
P2O5 | 60 | 30 | 67.5 | 85 | 37.5 | 90 | 42 | 90 | 60 |
K2O | 72 | 30 | 81 | 64 | 60 | 90 | 48 | 90 | 96 |
分蘖肥Tillering fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.5 | 22.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | - | 52 | 34.5 | 17.5 |
追肥Top dressing | |||||||||
N | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+22.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+17.5 | 34.0+0.0 | 13.0+0.0 | 0.0+34.5 | 0.0+17.5 |
P2O5 | - | - | - | - | - | 34 | 13 | - | - |
K2O | - | - | - | - | - | 34 | 13 | - | - |
促苗肥Tillering fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.0+26.0 | 47.0+0.0 | 17.0+26.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+52.0 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+69.0 | 0.0+46.0 |
P2O5 | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K2O | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
促芽肥Booting fertilizer | |||||||||
N | 17.0+26.0 | 47.0+0.0 | 17.0+26.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+5.0 | 0.0+52.0 | 0.0+17.5 | 0.0+69.0 | 0.0+46.0 |
P2O5 | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K2O | 17 | 9.5 | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
总养分量Total amount of nutrients | |||||||||
N | 277 | 289 | 296.5 | 267 | 173 | 228 | 190 | 297 | 350.5 |
P2O5 | 94 | 49 | 101.5 | 85 | 37.5 | 124 | 55 | 90 | 60 |
K2O | 106 | 49 | 115 | 64 | 60 | 124 | 61 | 90 | 96 |
Fig. 2. Effects of application of dedicated fertilizer on the rice yield in rice-ratoon rice system. The data in the figure were from seven experimental sites with yield increasing effect. The middle solid line represents the median value and the hollow rectangle represents the mean value. The upper and lower vertexes of the box and the upper and lower solid lines represent the upper and lower vertexes of the boxes, the maximum and the minimum, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among the three treatments in the same growing season.
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 头季稻 Main rice | 再生稻 Ratoon rice | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield /(kg·hm−2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm−2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | |||
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | 5729 | 159 | 170 | 82.4 | 26.3 | 1618 | 98 | 102 | 76.6 | 25.3 | |
T2 | 7536 | 188 | 193 | 83.5 | 26.0 | 3291 | 132 | 140 | 73.8 | 26.0 | ||
T3 | 8734 | 193 | 212 | 83.6 | 26.5 | 3997 | 165 | 149 | 72.2 | 25.7 | ||
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | 4623 | 147 | 155 | 80.5 | 25.9 | 1634 | 108 | 103 | 70.5 | 25.2 | |
T2 | 6038 | 178 | 177 | 81.6 | 26.7 | 3315 | 142 | 134 | 68.6 | 25.9 | ||
T3 | 7569 | 194 | 195 | 82.3 | 26.3 | 3564 | 168 | 151 | 66.7 | 25.3 | ||
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | 5058 | 161 | 156 | 81.1 | 26.0 | 2035 | 108 | 111 | 70.3 | 25.4 | |
T2 | 8158 | 199 | 187 | 83.4 | 26.4 | 3441 | 138 | 151 | 70.3 | 24.9 | ||
T3 | 9380 | 208 | 203 | 82.5 | 27.1 | 3840 | 159 | 162 | 71.8 | 25.6 | ||
应城潘马 PM | T1 | 7821 | 196 | 185 | 83.9 | 25.9 | 1491 | 134 | 76 | 76.0 | 21.4 | |
T2 | 9153 | 209 | 208 | 84.7 | 25.2 | 2742 | 163 | 124 | 65.2 | 21.0 | ||
T3 | 11005 | 229 | 233 | 86.7 | 25.7 | 3452 | 191 | 132 | 63.4 | 21.8 | ||
应城方集 FJ | T1 | 5097 | 156 | 168 | 83.0 | 24.6 | 1541 | 138 | 100 | 72.9 | 23.8 | |
T2 | 7574 | 189 | 193 | 85.1 | 24.8 | 3171 | 166 | 136 | 71.8 | 23.7 | ||
T3 | 8862 | 198 | 201 | 90.3 | 25.0 | 3883 | 183 | 153 | 70.2 | 22.6 | ||
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | 4029 | 166 | 133 | 80.0 | 26.5 | 1718 | 92 | 103 | 85.2 | 23.6 | |
T2 | 7019 | 206 | 181 | 71.5 | 26.4 | 3891 | 127 | 159 | 89.1 | 23.4 | ||
T3 | 8334 | 218 | 206 | 75.9 | 26.3 | 3797 | 153 | 168 | 80.3 | 22.3 | ||
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | 3523 | 138 | 157 | 82.6 | 24.5 | 2364 | 119 | 101 | 88.7 | 22.8 | |
T2 | 6338 | 188 | 196 | 79.5 | 24.5 | 3740 | 138 | 149 | 80.5 | 23.7 | ||
T3 | 8069 | 204 | 224 | 80.1 | 24.1 | 4049 | 161 | 159 | 84.7 | 22.8 | ||
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | 5258 | 168 | 171 | 82.9 | 24.9 | 1718 | 124 | 93 | 81.4 | 22.6 | |
T2 | 9358 | 230 | 211 | 84.2 | 24.4 | 3891 | 176 | 169 | 66.2 | 21.3 | ||
T3 | 9180 | 222 | 207 | 82.6 | 25.8 | 3797 | 162 | 158 | 75.8 | 21.8 | ||
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | 5641 | 170 | 144 | 94.1 | 26.2 | 2364 | 133 | 111 | 75.7 | 23.8 | |
T2 | 11790 | 262 | 205 | 90.7 | 25.3 | 3740 | 175 | 142 | 75.8 | 22.9 | ||
T3 | 10884 | 258 | 193 | 87.7 | 26.5 | 4049 | 181 | 154 | 70.5 | 23.1 | ||
T1 | 平均Mean | 5126±1291 c | 160±17 b | 161±15 c | 81.9±1.3 a | 25.7±0.7 a | 1772±292 c | 114±16 c | 99±10 b | 77.2±6.6 a | 23.9±1.4 a | |
T2 | 平均Mean | 7402±987 b | 194±10 a | 191±10 b | 81.3±4.4 a | 25.7±0.8 a | 3370±350 b | 144±14 b | 142±11 a | 74.2±7.5 a | 24.1±1.6 a | |
T3 | 平均Mean | 8850±1032 a | 206±12 a | 211±13 a | 83.1±4.3 a | 25.9±0.9 a | 3797±202 a | 169±13 a | 153±11 a | 72.8±6.9 a | 23.7±1.6 a |
Table 4. Effect of application of dedicated fertilizer on the yield components of rice-ratoon rice system.
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 头季稻 Main rice | 再生稻 Ratoon rice | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 Yield /(kg·hm−2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm−2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | |||
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | 5729 | 159 | 170 | 82.4 | 26.3 | 1618 | 98 | 102 | 76.6 | 25.3 | |
T2 | 7536 | 188 | 193 | 83.5 | 26.0 | 3291 | 132 | 140 | 73.8 | 26.0 | ||
T3 | 8734 | 193 | 212 | 83.6 | 26.5 | 3997 | 165 | 149 | 72.2 | 25.7 | ||
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | 4623 | 147 | 155 | 80.5 | 25.9 | 1634 | 108 | 103 | 70.5 | 25.2 | |
T2 | 6038 | 178 | 177 | 81.6 | 26.7 | 3315 | 142 | 134 | 68.6 | 25.9 | ||
T3 | 7569 | 194 | 195 | 82.3 | 26.3 | 3564 | 168 | 151 | 66.7 | 25.3 | ||
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | 5058 | 161 | 156 | 81.1 | 26.0 | 2035 | 108 | 111 | 70.3 | 25.4 | |
T2 | 8158 | 199 | 187 | 83.4 | 26.4 | 3441 | 138 | 151 | 70.3 | 24.9 | ||
T3 | 9380 | 208 | 203 | 82.5 | 27.1 | 3840 | 159 | 162 | 71.8 | 25.6 | ||
应城潘马 PM | T1 | 7821 | 196 | 185 | 83.9 | 25.9 | 1491 | 134 | 76 | 76.0 | 21.4 | |
T2 | 9153 | 209 | 208 | 84.7 | 25.2 | 2742 | 163 | 124 | 65.2 | 21.0 | ||
T3 | 11005 | 229 | 233 | 86.7 | 25.7 | 3452 | 191 | 132 | 63.4 | 21.8 | ||
应城方集 FJ | T1 | 5097 | 156 | 168 | 83.0 | 24.6 | 1541 | 138 | 100 | 72.9 | 23.8 | |
T2 | 7574 | 189 | 193 | 85.1 | 24.8 | 3171 | 166 | 136 | 71.8 | 23.7 | ||
T3 | 8862 | 198 | 201 | 90.3 | 25.0 | 3883 | 183 | 153 | 70.2 | 22.6 | ||
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | 4029 | 166 | 133 | 80.0 | 26.5 | 1718 | 92 | 103 | 85.2 | 23.6 | |
T2 | 7019 | 206 | 181 | 71.5 | 26.4 | 3891 | 127 | 159 | 89.1 | 23.4 | ||
T3 | 8334 | 218 | 206 | 75.9 | 26.3 | 3797 | 153 | 168 | 80.3 | 22.3 | ||
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | 3523 | 138 | 157 | 82.6 | 24.5 | 2364 | 119 | 101 | 88.7 | 22.8 | |
T2 | 6338 | 188 | 196 | 79.5 | 24.5 | 3740 | 138 | 149 | 80.5 | 23.7 | ||
T3 | 8069 | 204 | 224 | 80.1 | 24.1 | 4049 | 161 | 159 | 84.7 | 22.8 | ||
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | 5258 | 168 | 171 | 82.9 | 24.9 | 1718 | 124 | 93 | 81.4 | 22.6 | |
T2 | 9358 | 230 | 211 | 84.2 | 24.4 | 3891 | 176 | 169 | 66.2 | 21.3 | ||
T3 | 9180 | 222 | 207 | 82.6 | 25.8 | 3797 | 162 | 158 | 75.8 | 21.8 | ||
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | 5641 | 170 | 144 | 94.1 | 26.2 | 2364 | 133 | 111 | 75.7 | 23.8 | |
T2 | 11790 | 262 | 205 | 90.7 | 25.3 | 3740 | 175 | 142 | 75.8 | 22.9 | ||
T3 | 10884 | 258 | 193 | 87.7 | 26.5 | 4049 | 181 | 154 | 70.5 | 23.1 | ||
T1 | 平均Mean | 5126±1291 c | 160±17 b | 161±15 c | 81.9±1.3 a | 25.7±0.7 a | 1772±292 c | 114±16 c | 99±10 b | 77.2±6.6 a | 23.9±1.4 a | |
T2 | 平均Mean | 7402±987 b | 194±10 a | 191±10 b | 81.3±4.4 a | 25.7±0.8 a | 3370±350 b | 144±14 b | 142±11 a | 74.2±7.5 a | 24.1±1.6 a | |
T3 | 平均Mean | 8850±1032 a | 206±12 a | 211±13 a | 83.1±4.3 a | 25.9±0.9 a | 3797±202 a | 169±13 a | 153±11 a | 72.8±6.9 a | 23.7±1.6 a |
Fig. 3. Correlation analysis between yield and yield components of main rice and ratoon rice. GY, Grain yield; EP, Effective panicles; SPP, Spikelets per panicle; GF, Grain filling; GW, 1000-grain weight; SN, Straw N; SP, Straw P; SK, Straw K; GN, Grain N; GP, Grain P; GK, Grain K.
季别 Growing season | 部位 Position | 养分 Nutrient | 处理 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 最小值 Minimum | 1/4位点 Q1 | 中位数 Median | 3/4位点 Q3 | 最大值 Maximum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 Main rice | 稻草 Straw | N | T1 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.90 | ||
T2 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 1.00 | |||||
T3 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.77 | 0.81 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.16 | ||||
T2 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.17 | |||||
T3 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.13 | |||||
K | T1 | 2.93 | 0.64 | 2.28 | 2.41 | 2.71 | 3.31 | 4.03 | ||||
T2 | 2.99 | 0.62 | 2.28 | 2.42 | 2.97 | 3.35 | 4.04 | |||||
T3 | 3.12 | 0.84 | 1.77 | 2.55 | 3.02 | 3.69 | 4.56 | |||||
籽粒 Grain | N | T1 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 1.07 | |||
T2 | 1.01 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 1.19 | |||||
T3 | 1.04 | 0.16 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.02 | 1.13 | 1.35 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.34 | ||||
T2 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.32 | |||||
T3 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.28 | |||||
K | T1 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.67 | ||||
T2 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.42 | |||||
T3 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.41 | |||||
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 稻草 Straw | N | T1 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.79 | ||
T2 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.94 | |||||
T3 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.78 | 1.17 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 | ||||
T2 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.12 | |||||
T3 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.18 | |||||
K | T1 | 1.88 | 0.41 | 1.41 | 1.49 | 1.85 | 2.25 | 2.48 | ||||
T2 | 1.93 | 0.61 | 1.09 | 1.50 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 3.13 | |||||
T3 | 2.08 | 0.56 | 1.50 | 1.68 | 1.90 | 2.23 | 3.15 | |||||
籽粒 Grain | N | T1 | 0.96 | 0.17 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 1.32 | |||
T2 | 1.02 | 0.20 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.29 | |||||
T3 | 1.04 | 0.14 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 1.18 | 1.22 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.26 | ||||
T2 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.26 | |||||
T3 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.29 | |||||
K | T1 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.47 | ||||
T2 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.42 | |||||
T3 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
Table 5. Descriptive characteristics statistics of the nutrient concentration of rice-ratoon rice system under different fertilizer treatments. %
季别 Growing season | 部位 Position | 养分 Nutrient | 处理 Treatment | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 最小值 Minimum | 1/4位点 Q1 | 中位数 Median | 3/4位点 Q3 | 最大值 Maximum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 Main rice | 稻草 Straw | N | T1 | 0.51 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.57 | 0.90 | ||
T2 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.80 | 1.00 | |||||
T3 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.77 | 0.81 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.16 | ||||
T2 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.17 | |||||
T3 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.13 | |||||
K | T1 | 2.93 | 0.64 | 2.28 | 2.41 | 2.71 | 3.31 | 4.03 | ||||
T2 | 2.99 | 0.62 | 2.28 | 2.42 | 2.97 | 3.35 | 4.04 | |||||
T3 | 3.12 | 0.84 | 1.77 | 2.55 | 3.02 | 3.69 | 4.56 | |||||
籽粒 Grain | N | T1 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 1.07 | |||
T2 | 1.01 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 1.19 | |||||
T3 | 1.04 | 0.16 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.02 | 1.13 | 1.35 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.34 | ||||
T2 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.32 | |||||
T3 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.28 | |||||
K | T1 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.67 | ||||
T2 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.42 | |||||
T3 | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.41 | |||||
再生稻 Ratoon rice | 稻草 Straw | N | T1 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.79 | ||
T2 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.94 | |||||
T3 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.78 | 1.17 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 | ||||
T2 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.12 | |||||
T3 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.18 | |||||
K | T1 | 1.88 | 0.41 | 1.41 | 1.49 | 1.85 | 2.25 | 2.48 | ||||
T2 | 1.93 | 0.61 | 1.09 | 1.50 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 3.13 | |||||
T3 | 2.08 | 0.56 | 1.50 | 1.68 | 1.90 | 2.23 | 3.15 | |||||
籽粒 Grain | N | T1 | 0.96 | 0.17 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 1.32 | |||
T2 | 1.02 | 0.20 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.29 | |||||
T3 | 1.04 | 0.14 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 1.02 | 1.18 | 1.22 | |||||
P | T1 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.26 | ||||
T2 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.26 | |||||
T3 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.29 | |||||
K | T1 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.47 | ||||
T2 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.42 | |||||
T3 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN/(kg·kg−1) | 氮肥农学利用率 AEN/(kg·kg−1) | 氮肥回收利用率 REN/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 39.09 | 12.56 | 22.75 | |
T3 | 46.38 | 19.61 | 31.71 | |
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 32.36 | 10.71 | 26.54 | |
T3 | 40.56 | 17.76 | 25.20 | |
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 39.12 | 15.20 | 18.05 | |
T3 | 48.16 | 22.32 | 43.98 | |
应城潘马 PM | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.55 | 9.67 | 45.94 | |
T3 | 52.67 | 18.74 | 26.40 | |
应城方集村 FJ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 62.11 | 23.74 | 21.38 | |
T3 | 46.43 | 22.25 | 14.37 | |
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 47.85 | 22.64 | 32.74 | |
T3 | 44.19 | 23.26 | 44.04 | |
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 53.04 | 22.06 | 23.77 | |
T3 | 44.15 | 22.70 | 21.55 | |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.61 | 21.12 | 26.00 | |
T3 | 47.27 | 21.86 | 31.76 | |
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.31 | 21.47 | 35.65 | |
T3 | 54.40 | 25.24 | 44.59 |
Table 6. Effects of application of dedicated fertilizer on the nitrogen use efficiency in “rice-ratoon rice” system.
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN/(kg·kg−1) | 氮肥农学利用率 AEN/(kg·kg−1) | 氮肥回收利用率 REN/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 39.09 | 12.56 | 22.75 | |
T3 | 46.38 | 19.61 | 31.71 | |
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 32.36 | 10.71 | 26.54 | |
T3 | 40.56 | 17.76 | 25.20 | |
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 39.12 | 15.20 | 18.05 | |
T3 | 48.16 | 22.32 | 43.98 | |
应城潘马 PM | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.55 | 9.67 | 45.94 | |
T3 | 52.67 | 18.74 | 26.40 | |
应城方集村 FJ | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 62.11 | 23.74 | 21.38 | |
T3 | 46.43 | 22.25 | 14.37 | |
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 47.85 | 22.64 | 32.74 | |
T3 | 44.19 | 23.26 | 44.04 | |
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 53.04 | 22.06 | 23.77 | |
T3 | 44.15 | 22.70 | 21.55 | |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.61 | 21.12 | 26.00 | |
T3 | 47.27 | 21.86 | 31.76 | |
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | - | - | - |
T2 | 44.31 | 21.47 | 35.65 | |
T3 | 54.40 | 25.24 | 44.59 |
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 产值 Output /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 施肥增加产值 Increased production value /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 增加肥料投入 Increased fertilizer input /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 人工投入 Manual input /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 纯收入 Net income /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | 32.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.22 |
T2 | 54.01 | 21.79 | 2.99 | 1.75 | 49.27 | |
T3 | 64.43 | 32.20 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 60.43 | |
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | 29.28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.28 |
T2 | 50.06 | 20.77 | 2.62 | 1.75 | 45.69 | |
T3 | 56.83 | 27.55 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 52.83 | |
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | 34.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.51 |
T2 | 57.25 | 22.74 | 2.99 | 1.75 | 52.51 | |
T3 | 64.66 | 30.15 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 60.66 | |
应城潘马 PM | T1 | 36.81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.81 |
T2 | 53.05 | 16.24 | 2.48 | 1.75 | 48.82 | |
T3 | 65.33 | 28.53 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 61.33 | |
应城方集村 FJ | T1 | 29.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.68 |
T2 | 52.92 | 23.24 | 1.77 | 1.75 | 49.4 | |
T3 | 63.64 | 33.96 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.64 | |
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | 28.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.46 |
T2 | 58.56 | 30.10 | 2.68 | 1.40 | 54.48 | |
T3 | 61.31 | 32.84 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 57.31 | |
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | 33.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.50 |
T2 | 55.15 | 21.64 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 51.60 | |
T3 | 63.08 | 29.58 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.08 | |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | 31.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.90 |
T2 | 65.11 | 33.21 | 2.52 | 1.75 | 60.84 | |
T3 | 63.67 | 31.77 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.67 | |
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | 39.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.43 |
T2 | 70.41 | 30.98 | 2.95 | 1.75 | 65.71 | |
T3 | 70.97 | 31.53 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 66.97 |
Table 7. Effects of application of dedicated fertilizer on the economic benefits in “rice-ratoon rice” system.
试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 产值 Output /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 施肥增加产值 Increased production value /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 增加肥料投入 Increased fertilizer input /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 人工投入 Manual input /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) | 纯收入 Net income /(×103 Yuan·hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钟祥银钱 YQ | T1 | 32.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32.22 |
T2 | 54.01 | 21.79 | 2.99 | 1.75 | 49.27 | |
T3 | 64.43 | 32.20 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 60.43 | |
钟祥双桥 SQ | T1 | 29.28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.28 |
T2 | 50.06 | 20.77 | 2.62 | 1.75 | 45.69 | |
T3 | 56.83 | 27.55 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 52.83 | |
钟祥马祠 MC | T1 | 34.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34.51 |
T2 | 57.25 | 22.74 | 2.99 | 1.75 | 52.51 | |
T3 | 64.66 | 30.15 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 60.66 | |
应城潘马 PM | T1 | 36.81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.81 |
T2 | 53.05 | 16.24 | 2.48 | 1.75 | 48.82 | |
T3 | 65.33 | 28.53 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 61.33 | |
应城方集村 FJ | T1 | 29.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.68 |
T2 | 52.92 | 23.24 | 1.77 | 1.75 | 49.4 | |
T3 | 63.64 | 33.96 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.64 | |
蕲春魏河 WH | T1 | 28.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.46 |
T2 | 58.56 | 30.10 | 2.68 | 1.40 | 54.48 | |
T3 | 61.31 | 32.84 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 57.31 | |
蕲春张铺 ZP | T1 | 33.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.50 |
T2 | 55.15 | 21.64 | 1.80 | 1.75 | 51.60 | |
T3 | 63.08 | 29.58 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.08 | |
蕲春龚大围 GDW | T1 | 31.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.90 |
T2 | 65.11 | 33.21 | 2.52 | 1.75 | 60.84 | |
T3 | 63.67 | 31.77 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 59.67 | |
洪湖万岭 WL | T1 | 39.43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.43 |
T2 | 70.41 | 30.98 | 2.95 | 1.75 | 65.71 | |
T3 | 70.97 | 31.53 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 66.97 |
[1] | 柴如山, 王擎运, 叶新新, 江波, 赵强, 王强, 章力干, 郜红建. 我国主要粮食作物秸秆还田替代化学氮肥潜力[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(11): 2583-2593. |
Chai R S, Wang Q Y, Ye X X, Jiang B, Zhao Q, Wang Q, Zhang L G, Gao H J. Nitrogen resource quantity of main grain crop staw in China and the synthetic nitrogen substitution under straw returning[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2019, 38(11): 2583-2593. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 林贤青, 陈惠哲. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. |
Zhu D F, Cheng S H, Zhang Y P, Lin H Q, Chen H Z. Analysis of status and constraints of rice production in the world[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 彭少兵. 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2014, 44(8): 845-850. |
Peng S B. Reflection on China’s rice production strategies during the transition period[J]. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2014, 44(8): 845-850. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 彭少兵. 转型时期杂交水稻的困境与出路[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(3): 313-319. |
Peng S B. Dilemma and way-out of hybrid rice during the transition period in China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(3): 313-319. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 王飞, 彭少兵. 水稻绿色生产栽培技术研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2018, 30(10): 1129-1136. |
Wang F, Peng SB. Research progress in rice green and high-yield management practices[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 2018, 30(10): 1129-1136. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 李经勇, 张洪松, 唐永群. 中国再生稻研究与应用[J]. 南方农业, 2009(5): 88-92. |
Li J Y, Zhang H S, Tang Y Q. Research and application of ratoon rice in China[J]. South China Agriculture, 2009(5): 88-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 罗昆. 湖北省再生稻产业发展现状及对策[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(12): 3001-3002. |
Luo K. The development status and strategy of ratooning rice industry in Hubei Province[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 55(12): 3001-3002. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Santos A B, Fageria N K, Prabhu A S. Rice ratooning management practices for higher yields[J]. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2003, 34: 891-918. |
[9] | 解振兴, 卓传营, 林祁, 姜照伟. 头季氮肥不同施用量对再生稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2017, 32(8): 849-853. |
Xie Z X, Zhuo C Y, Li Q, Jiang Z W. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on growth and grain yield of ratoon-rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(8): 849-853. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 俞道标, 赵雅静, 黄顽春, 李小萍, 姜照伟, 陈双龙. 低桩机割再生稻生育特性和氮肥施用技术研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(5): 485-490. |
Yu D B, Zhao Y J, Huang W C, Li X P, Jiang Z W, Chen S L. Growth characteristics and nitrogen application technique of ratoon rice with machine harvest in low cutting[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 27(5): 485-490. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森, Roland B, Christian W. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. |
Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Roland B, Christian W. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 徐新朋, 王寅, 刘双全, 胡仁, 侯云鹏, 雷秋良, 仇少君, 赵士诚, 何萍. 基于产量反应的东北一季稻推荐施肥方法的可行性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1818-1826. |
Xu X P, Wang Y, Liu S Q, Hu R, Hou Y P, Lei Q L, Chou S J, Zhao S C, He P. Availability and effect of fertilizer recommendation based on crop yield response for single-season rice in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1818-1826. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 王森, 莫菁华, 汪洋, 游秋香, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤. 水稻-再生稻体系干物质积累及氮磷钾养分的吸收利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. |
Wang S, Mo J H, Wang Y, You Q X, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K. Dry matter accumulation and N, P, K absorption and utilization in rice-ratoon rice system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
Bao S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. | |
[15] | 张桂莲, 屠乃美. 再生稻研究现状与展望[J]. 作物研究, 2001, 15(3): 64-69. |
Zhang G L, Tu N M. Status and prospects of studies on regenerating rice[J]. Crop Research, 2001, 15(3): 64-69. | |
[16] | 李如海, 张满利, 李全英, 潘义东. 辽宁省主栽水稻产量构成因素分析[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2019(5): 31-34. |
Li R H, Zhang M L, Li Q Y, Pan Y D. The relationship between yield components and rice yield under the different yield levels[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2019(5): 31-34. | |
[17] | 姜照伟, 卓传营, 林文, 郑景生, 李义珍. 再生稻产量构成因素分析[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2002, 20(2): 8-9. |
Jiang Z W, Zhuo C Y, Lin W, Zheng J S, Li Y Z. Analysis on yield components of ratooning rice[J]. Fujian Science and Technology of Rice and Wheat, 2002, 20(2): 8-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 蒋龙, 汪雨萍, 刘海平, 谢芳腾, 钟晓英, 张璞, 欧阳春荣, 李德悦, 谢建萍, 章萍, 张家健, 欧阳真程, 杨福权, 席建才, 张红林. 赣南地区杂交水稻组合再生稻筛选及产量构成因素分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(12): 16-20. |
Jiang L, Wang Y P, Liu H P, Xie F T, Zhong X Y, Zhang P, Ouyang C R, Li D Y, Xie J P, Zhang P, Zhang J J, Ouyang Z C, Yang F Q, Xi J C, Zhang H L. Screening and yield component analysis of hybrid rice combination for ratooning rice in Southern Jiangxi province[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2020, 32(12): 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 林强, 王颖姮, 林祁, 卓芳梅, 张建福. 轻简栽培再生稻的产量形成及关键筛选指标[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2020, 48(10): 38-47. |
Lin Q, Wang Y H, Lin Q, Zhuo F M, Zhang J F. Yield formation and key screening indicators ratooning rice under simplified cultivation[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2020, 48(10): 38-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 侯云鹏, 韩立国, 孔丽丽, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 李前, 谢佳贵. 不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮素平衡[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4): 836-845. |
Hou Y P, Han G L, Kong L L, Yin C X, Qin Y B, Li Q, Xie J G. Nutrient absorption, translocation in rice and soil nitrogen equilibrium under different nitrogen applications doses[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(4): 836-845. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 隽英华, 汪仁, 孙文涛, 邢月华. 春玉米产量、氮素利用及矿质氮平衡对施氮的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(3): 544-551. |
Juan Y H, Wang R, Sun W T, Xing Y H. Response of spring maize to nitrogen application in grain yield, nitrogen utilization and mineral nitrogen balance[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(3): 544-551. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 王西娜, 于金铭, 谭军利, 张佳群, 魏照清, 王朝辉. 宁夏引黄灌区春小麦氮磷钾需求及化肥减施潜力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23): 4891-4903. |
Wang X N, Yu J M, Tan J L, Zhang J Q, Wei Z Q, Wang Z H. Requirement of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and potential of reducing fertilizer application of spring wheat in Yellow River irrigation area of Ningxia[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4891-4903. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | Islam M S, Hasanuzzaman M, Rokonuzzaman M. Ratoon rice response to different fertilizer doses in irrigated condition[J]. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientifics, 2008, 73: 197-202. |
[24] | Wang Y C, Zheng C, Xiao S, Sun Y T, Huang J L, Peng S B. Agronomic response of ratoon rice to nitrogen management in central China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 241: 1-8. |
[25] | 张江林, 侯文峰, 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤. 不同施氮量和移栽密度对水稻产量及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(2): 75-85. |
Zhang J L, Hou W F, Lu J W, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K. Effects of nitrogen application rates and planting density on rice yield and grain-filling properties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 19(2): 75-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 朱兆良. 推荐氮肥适宜施用量的方法论刍议[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(1): 1-4. |
Zhu Z L. On the methodology of recommendation for the application rate of chemical fertilizer nitrogen to crops[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2006, 12(1): 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 陈萍, 迟海峰, 张骞, 谷传申, 杜婉君. 缓控释肥对水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012(6): 71-72. |
Chen P, Chi H F, Zhang Q, Gu C S, Du W J. Effects of applying controlled releasing fertilizer on yield and its components of rice[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012(6): 71-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 蒋琪, 陈少杰, 王飞, 秦方锦, 俞国君, 汪东东. 不同缓(控)释肥料及运筹对双季稻生产特性及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 21(1): 85-88. |
Jiang Q, Chen S J, Wang F, Qin F J, Yu G J, Wang D D. Effects of slow (controlled) release fertilizers on production and economic efficiency of double cropping rice[J]. China Rice, 2021, 21(1): 85-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 麦日桂, 冯时钦. 施用锌肥对水稻试验报告[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(7): 50-51. |
Mai R G, Feng S Q. Experimental report on application of zine fertilizer on rice[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2020, 40(7): 50-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | Ji C C, Li J L, Jiang C C, Zhang L, Shi L, Xu F S, Cai HM. Zinc and nitrogen synergistic act on root-to-shoot translocation and preferential distribution in rice[J]. Journal of Advanced Research, 2021, 4, 1-35. |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | ZHOU Tian, WU Shaohua, KANG Jianhong, WU Hongliang, YANG Shenglong, WANG Xingqiang, LI Yu, HUANG Yufeng. Effects of Planting Patterns on Starch Content and Activities of Key Starch Enzymes in Rice Grains [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | LIU Huimin, ZHOU Jieqiang, HU Yuanyi, TIAN Yan, LEI Bin, LI Jianwu, WEI Zhongwei, TANG Wenbang. Super-high Yield Characteristics of Two-line Hybrid Rice Zhuoliangyou 1126 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 160-171. |
[7] | PENG Xianlong, DONG Qiang, ZHANG Chen, LI Pengfei, LI Bolin, LIU Zhilei, YU Cailian. Effects of Straw Return Rate on Soil Reducing Substances and Rice Growth Under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[8] | ZHU Wang, ZHANG Xiang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Yinglong, WEI Huanhe, DAI Qigen, XU Ke, ZHU Guanglong, ZHOU Guisheng, MENG Tianyao. Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Rice Roots Under Combined Salinity-Drought Stress and Their Relationships with Yield Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[9] | ZOU Yuao, WU Qixia, ZHOU Qianshun, ZHU Jianqiang, YAN Jun. Response of Middle-season Hybrid Rice to Flooding Stress at the Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[10] | YUAN Pei, ZHOU Xuan, YANG Wei, YIN Lingjie, JIN Tuo, PENG Jianwei, RONG Xiangmin, TIAN Chang. Effects of Combined Application of Chemical Fertilizers and Nitrogen Reduction on the Yield of Double-cropping Rice and the Risk of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Field Water in Dongting Lake Area [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[11] | XIAO Dakang, HU Ren, HAN Tianfu, ZHANG Weifeng, HOU Jun, REN Keyu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Consumption and Operation on Rice Yield and Its Components in China:A Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[12] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[13] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[14] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[15] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||