Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 557-564.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.8034
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhanghua HU1, Xiuyan LIU2, Yufeng WANG3, Yu PENG3, Xiaoliang SHI3, Sheng TENG3,*()
Received:
2018-03-23
Revised:
2018-06-04
Online:
2018-11-27
Published:
2018-11-10
Contact:
Sheng TENG
胡张华1, 刘秀艳2, 王玉锋3, 彭瑜3, 史晓亮3, 滕胜3,*()
通讯作者:
滕胜
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhanghua HU, Xiuyan LIU, Yufeng WANG, Yu PENG, Xiaoliang SHI, Sheng TENG. Agronomic Traits of Marker-free Transgenic japonica Rice with Overexpression of OsPHF1 Under Low Phosphorus Environment[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(6): 557-564.
胡张华, 刘秀艳, 王玉锋, 彭瑜, 史晓亮, 滕胜. 低磷条件下过表达OsPHF1基因对粳稻农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(6): 557-564.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.8034
引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列(5′-3′) Primer sequence(5′-3′) |
---|---|
PHF1-full-S | GCTCTAGAATGGCAGGCGGCGGAGGTGGCGAG(XbaⅠ) |
PHF1-full-A | GCGTCGACTCACCAGGGGTTCTGGTCCTCAGG(SalⅠ) |
HYB-3S | TGAAAAAGCCTGAACTCACCG |
HYB-4A | TATTTCTTTGCCCTCGGACG |
PHF1-7S | GATGGGAAGTATCTGGCTTTGGG |
PHF1-10A | AACAGGATGGCTGACACTAGGAA |
PHF-418S | CTCAGAATATTTCATTGGCCGAGC |
PHF-633A | CCTAGAAAAGCGGCAACATTCAATCTTC |
Ubi-S | GACGGACGCACCCTGGCTGACTAC |
Ubi-A | TGCTGCCAATTACCATATACCACGAC |
Table 1 Primers used in the study.
引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列(5′-3′) Primer sequence(5′-3′) |
---|---|
PHF1-full-S | GCTCTAGAATGGCAGGCGGCGGAGGTGGCGAG(XbaⅠ) |
PHF1-full-A | GCGTCGACTCACCAGGGGTTCTGGTCCTCAGG(SalⅠ) |
HYB-3S | TGAAAAAGCCTGAACTCACCG |
HYB-4A | TATTTCTTTGCCCTCGGACG |
PHF1-7S | GATGGGAAGTATCTGGCTTTGGG |
PHF1-10A | AACAGGATGGCTGACACTAGGAA |
PHF-418S | CTCAGAATATTTCATTGGCCGAGC |
PHF-633A | CCTAGAAAAGCGGCAACATTCAATCTTC |
Ubi-S | GACGGACGCACCCTGGCTGACTAC |
Ubi-A | TGCTGCCAATTACCATATACCACGAC |
Fig. 1. Construction of overexpression vector of pCDMAR- OsPHF1.^ LB1 and LB2, Left border of T-DNA; RB1 and RB2, Right border of T-DNA; Hygromycin(R), Hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT), resistant to hygromycin B; MAR, Matrix attachment regions; CaMV 35S, 35S promoter of CaMV.
Fig. 2. Confirmation of recombinant plasmid pCDMAR- OsPHF1 by double enzyme digestion.^ Confirmation of recombinant plasmid pCDMAR-OsPHF1 by double enzyme digestion. Lanes 1-5, Five independent clones of recombinant plasmid. M represents DNA marker; A band about 1 kb appears at lanes 1, 2, 4 and 5, indicating that they are positive cloneion.
株系名称 Line name | 检测的总株数 Total number of detected plants | 含有插入的OsPHF1株数 Plant number containing inserted OsPHF1 | 不含插入的OsPHF1株数 Plant number without inserted OsPHF1 | χ2 (3:1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
F18 | 57 | 39 | 18 | 1.32 |
F22 | 56 | 45 | 11 | 0.86 |
F25 | 56 | 40 | 16 | 0.38 |
F32 | 60 | 43 | 17 | 0.36 |
Table 2 Identification of separation ratio for the inserted gene OsPHF1 in T1 generation transgenic rice.
株系名称 Line name | 检测的总株数 Total number of detected plants | 含有插入的OsPHF1株数 Plant number containing inserted OsPHF1 | 不含插入的OsPHF1株数 Plant number without inserted OsPHF1 | χ2 (3:1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
F18 | 57 | 39 | 18 | 1.32 |
F22 | 56 | 45 | 11 | 0.86 |
F25 | 56 | 40 | 16 | 0.38 |
F32 | 60 | 43 | 17 | 0.36 |
Fig. 3. PCR analysis of OsPHF1 gene and selective marker HPT in T1 transgenic plants.^ M, DNA marker. Lane 1, Kongyu 131(control); 2-10, PCR results for different OsPHF1 transgenic T1 lines’ genomic DNA. Upper row is the amplification of OsPHF1 gene, and the amplified product of the inserted OsPHF1 is 215 bp, while the endogenous OsPHF1 in the genome is 600 bp. The bottom row represents the amplification of HPT gene, and the product is 1000 bp. Lanes 2, 3, 5 and 6 represent transgenic lines of F18, F22, F25 and F32, respectively.
株系名称 Line name | OsPHF1相对表达量(叶) Relative expression of OsPHF1 (Leaf) | OsPHF1相对表达量(根) Relative expression of OsPHF1 (Root) |
---|---|---|
F18-18 | 0.38±0.03 b | 0.05±0.00 a |
F22-32 | 16.17±4.57 d | 1.42±0.94 b |
F25-6 | 12.92±1.11 c | 1.28±0.89 b |
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 0.20±0.03 a | 0.07±0.01 a |
Table 3 The total relative expression of OsPHF1 in three independent overexpression transgenic plants by real-time PCR.
株系名称 Line name | OsPHF1相对表达量(叶) Relative expression of OsPHF1 (Leaf) | OsPHF1相对表达量(根) Relative expression of OsPHF1 (Root) |
---|---|---|
F18-18 | 0.38±0.03 b | 0.05±0.00 a |
F22-32 | 16.17±4.57 d | 1.42±0.94 b |
F25-6 | 12.92±1.11 c | 1.28±0.89 b |
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 0.20±0.03 a | 0.07±0.01 a |
施磷肥量 P application /(kg∙hm-2) | 株系名称 Line name | T3植株, 上海基地 T3 at Shanghai base | T4植株, 海南省三亚基地 T4 at Sanya base, Hainan Province | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖数 Tiller number | 单株产量 Yield per plant /g | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 分蘖数 Tiller number | 单株产量 Yield per plant /g | |||
112.5 | F22-32 | 16.44±4.16 a | 13.26±2.71 b | 27.64±2.29 a | 94±4 a | 23.33±2.94 ab | 40.36±6.32 b | |
F25-6 | 16.20±5.16 a | 12.61±2.50 b | 26.98±2.71 a | 93±6 a | 22.83±3.49 ab | 38.62±8.21 b | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 15.20±4.62 a | 10.90±2.75 a | 27.29±2.36 a | 95±4 a | 19.83±1.47 a | 29.70±5.31 a | ||
225.0 | F22-32 | 23.60±6.33 a | 19.18±5.13 b | 30.13±2.39 a | 91±8 a | 23.60±2.61 ab | 36.91±4.02 b | |
F25-6 | 21.50±4.30 a | 17.89±3.43 b | 29.23±2.10 a | 92±6 a | 22.67±4.18 ab | 37.29±7.91 b | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 15.15±3.20 b | 14.27±2.00 a | 28.41±2.33 a | 94±5 a | 20.67±3.08 a | 31.74±6.39 a | ||
450.0 | F22-32 | 21.75±2.14 a | 20.83±3.76 a | 29.37±2.03 a | 92±6 a | 25.60±4.33 a | 40.91±4.52 a | |
F25-6 | 21.91±3.44 a | 20.02±3.06 a | 29.97±2.84 a | 93±7 a | 24.67±3.78 a | 39.29±5.31 a | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 22.89±3.76 a | 22.28±3.61 a | 30.52±2.54 a | 95±5 a | 29.67±3.28 a | 42.70±6.11 a |
Table 4 Agronomic traits of OsPHF1 transgenic plants (T3 generation) at Shanghai base.
施磷肥量 P application /(kg∙hm-2) | 株系名称 Line name | T3植株, 上海基地 T3 at Shanghai base | T4植株, 海南省三亚基地 T4 at Sanya base, Hainan Province | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖数 Tiller number | 单株产量 Yield per plant /g | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 分蘖数 Tiller number | 单株产量 Yield per plant /g | |||
112.5 | F22-32 | 16.44±4.16 a | 13.26±2.71 b | 27.64±2.29 a | 94±4 a | 23.33±2.94 ab | 40.36±6.32 b | |
F25-6 | 16.20±5.16 a | 12.61±2.50 b | 26.98±2.71 a | 93±6 a | 22.83±3.49 ab | 38.62±8.21 b | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 15.20±4.62 a | 10.90±2.75 a | 27.29±2.36 a | 95±4 a | 19.83±1.47 a | 29.70±5.31 a | ||
225.0 | F22-32 | 23.60±6.33 a | 19.18±5.13 b | 30.13±2.39 a | 91±8 a | 23.60±2.61 ab | 36.91±4.02 b | |
F25-6 | 21.50±4.30 a | 17.89±3.43 b | 29.23±2.10 a | 92±6 a | 22.67±4.18 ab | 37.29±7.91 b | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 15.15±3.20 b | 14.27±2.00 a | 28.41±2.33 a | 94±5 a | 20.67±3.08 a | 31.74±6.39 a | ||
450.0 | F22-32 | 21.75±2.14 a | 20.83±3.76 a | 29.37±2.03 a | 92±6 a | 25.60±4.33 a | 40.91±4.52 a | |
F25-6 | 21.91±3.44 a | 20.02±3.06 a | 29.97±2.84 a | 93±7 a | 24.67±3.78 a | 39.29±5.31 a | ||
空育131 Kongyu 131 | 22.89±3.76 a | 22.28±3.61 a | 30.52±2.54 a | 95±5 a | 29.67±3.28 a | 42.70±6.11 a |
[1] | Schachtman D P, Reid R J, Ayling S M.Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell.Plant Physiol, 1998, 116(2): 447-453. |
[2] | Wang F, Deng M J, Xu J M, Zhu X L, Mao C Z.Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport and signaling in higher plants.Sem Cell & Dev Biol, 2018, 74: 114-122. |
[3] | Muchhal U S, Pardo J M, Raghothama K G.Phosphate transporters from the higher plantArabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93(19): 10519-10523. |
[4] | Rae A L, Cybinski D H, Jarmey J M, Smith F W.Characterization of two phosphate transporters from barley: Evidence for diverse function and kinetic properties among members of the Pht1 family.Plant Mol Biol, 2003, 53(1): 27-36. |
[5] | Raghothama K G.Phosphate transport and signaling.Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2000, 3(3): 182-187. |
[6] | Mudge S R, Rae A L, Diatloff E, Smith F W.Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters inArabidopsis. Plant J, 2002, 31(3): 341-353. |
[7] | Jia H, Zhang S, Wang L, Yang Y, Zhang H, Cui H, Shao H, Xu G.OsPht1;8, a phosphate transporter, is involved in auxin and phosphate star vation response in rice.J Exp Bot, 2017, 68(18): 5057-5068. |
[8] | Shin H, Shin H S, Dewbre G R, Harrison M J.Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high- phosphate environments. Plant J, 2004, 39(4): 629-642. |
[9] | Wang C, Yue W, Ying Y, Wang S, Secco D, Liu Y, Whelan J, Tyerman S D, Shou H.Rice SPX-Major facility superfamily3, a vacuolar phosphate efflux transporter, is involved in maintaining phosphate homeostasis in rice.Plant Physiol, 2015, 169(4): 2822-2831. |
[10] | Karthikeyan A S, Varadarajan D K, Mukatira U T,D'Urzo M P,Damsz B, Raghothama K G. Regulated expression of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130(1): 221-233. |
[11] | Barlowe C, Schekman R.SEC12 encodes a guanine- nucleotide-exchange factor essential for transport vesicle budding from the ER. Nature, 1993, 365(6444): 347-349. |
[12] | Barlowe C.Signals for COPII-dependent export from the ER: What’s the ticket out?Trends Cell Biol, 2003, 13(6): 295-300. |
[13] | Gonzalez E, Solano R, Rubio V, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J.PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER TRAFFIC FACILITATOR1 is a plant-specific SEC12-related protein that enables the endoplasmic reticulum exit of a high-affinity phosphate transporter inArabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2005, 17(12): 3500-3512. |
[14] | Chen J, Liu Y, Ni J, Wang Y, Bai Y, Shi J, Gan J, Wu Z, Wu P.OsPHF1 regulates the plasma membrane localization of low- and high-affinity inorganic phosphate transporters and determines inorganic phosphate uptake and translocation in rice. Plant Physiol, 2011, 157(1): 269-278. |
[15] | Wu P, Shou H X, Xu G H, Lian X M.Improvement of phosphorus efficiency in rice on the basis of understanding phosphate signaling and homeostasis.Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2013, 16(2): 205-212. |
[16] | Gilbert N.Environment: The disappearing nutrient.Nature, 2009, 461(7265): 716-718. |
[17] | Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T.Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J, 1996, 10(1): 165-74. |
[18] | 韩兆雪, 曹墨菊, 朱祯, 荣廷昭. DREB基因双T-DNA植物表达载体的构建及验证. 分子植物育种, 2004, 2(1): 7-12. |
Han Z X, Cao M J, Zhu Z, Rong T Z.Construction and verification of double T-DNA plant expression vector of the DREB gene. Mol Plant Breed, 2004, 2(1): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 胡张华, 吴关庭, 金卫, 王伏林, 陈锦清. 农杆菌介导的水稻转化及bar基因稳定遗传. 浙江农业学报, 2003, 15(6): 327-331. |
Hu Z H, Wu G T, Jin W, Wang F L, Chen J Q.Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice and stable inheritance of bar gene. Acta Agric Zhejiang, 2003, 15(6): 327-331. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 于恒秀, 陆美芳, 陈秀花, 龚志云, 刘巧泉, 顾铭洪. 不同转化方法培育无抗性选择标记转基因水稻效率的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(2): 120-126. |
Yu H X, Lu M F, Che X H, Gong Z Y, Liu Q Q, Gu M H.Comparison on efficiency of generating selectable marker-free transgenic rice by different transformation methods.Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23(2): 120-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[2] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[3] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[4] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[5] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[6] | LIN Dan, JIANG Min, MIAO Bo, GUO Meng, SHI Chunlin. Research on Simulation Model of High Temperature Stress on Rice and Its Application in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[7] | PEI Feng, WANG Guangda, GAO Peng, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, CHEN Hongqi, CUI Ao, ZUO Shimin. Evaluation of New japonica Rice Lines with Low Cadmium Accumulation and Good Quality Generated by Knocking Out OsNramp5 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 16-28. |
[8] | ZHANG Lu, LIANG Qingduo, WU Longlong, HUANG Jing, TIAN Cang, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, JIN Qianyu, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Nitrogen-reducing and Oxygen-increasing Irrigation on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 78-88. |
[9] | WANG Yingheng, CHEN Lijuan, CUI Lili, ZHAN Shengwei, SONG Yu, CHEN Shian, XIE Zhenxing, JIANG Zhaowei, WU Fangxi, ZHUO Chuanying, CAI Qiuhua, XIE Huaan, ZHANG Jianfu. Effects of Nitrogen Rate on Photosynthesis, Yield and Grain Quality of Superior Quality Rice “Fuxiangzhan” [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 89-101. |
[10] | REN Weichen, CHANG Qingxia, ZHANG Yajun, ZHU Kuanyu, WANG Zhiqin, YANG Jianchang. Characteristics and Physiological Mechanism of Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation of japonica Rice Varieties Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[11] | WEI Xiaodong, ZHANG Yadong, SONG Xuemei, CHEN Tao, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Qinyong, ZHAO Ling, LU Kai, LIANG Wenhua, HE Lei, HUANG Shengdong, XIE Yinfeng, WANG Cailin. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of High Yield japonica Rice Variety Nanjingjinggu [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 611-622. |
[12] | WANG Minyu, DAI Zhigang, YU Defang, WANG Xiangping, GUAN Shaohua, SHAO Yuangang, ZHANG Jiaxue, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Simplified Application of Dedicated Fertilizer on Yield, Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Rice-ratoon Rice System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 531-542. |
[13] | ZENG Wenjing, QIU Lanying, CHEN Junjie, QIAN Haoyu, ZHANG Nan, DING Yanfeng, JIANG Yu. Effect of Elevated CO2 Concentration on Rice Growth and CH4 Emission from Paddy Fields Under Straw Incorporation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 543-550. |
[14] | ZHANG Yujie, WANG Zhiqiang, MA Peng, YANG Zhiyuan, SUN Yongjian, MA Jun. Effects of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Nitrogen Uptake, Utilization and Yield of Rice Under Wheat Straw Returning [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(4): 388-398. |
[15] | CHEN Yun, LIU Kun, LI Tingting, LI Siyu, LI Guoming, ZHANG Weiyang, ZHANG Hao, GU Junfei, LIU Lijun, YANG Jianchang. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Moderate Soil Drying Irrigation on Root Traits, Grain Yield and Soil Properties in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||