中国水稻科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 265-275.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220809
马兆惠1, 石一涵1, 程海涛1, 宋文雯1, 路连吉1, 刘仁广2, 吕文彦1,*()
收稿日期:
2022-08-25
修回日期:
2022-12-26
出版日期:
2023-05-10
发布日期:
2023-05-16
通讯作者:
*email:lwyzxr@syau.edu.cn
基金资助:
MA Zhaohui1, SHI Yihan1, CHENG Haitao1, SONG Wenwen1, LU Lianji1, LIU Renguang2, LÜ Wenyan1,*()
Received:
2022-08-25
Revised:
2022-12-26
Online:
2023-05-10
Published:
2023-05-16
Contact:
*email:lwyzxr@syau.edu.cn
摘要:
【目的】稻米留胚能够提高稻米营养品质,但稻米留胚特性与胚性状、胚乳成分的关系等相关生物学机制并不明确。因此,有必要深入研究不同类型稻米品种留胚率差异及其影响因素。【方法】选取粳稻中软米型和普通型两类典型留胚材料及非留胚材料为试材,首先切片观察两类品种籽粒胚发育特点,继而对比表观直链淀粉含量(apparent amylose content, AAC)和离层果胶含量,最后以外源细胞分裂素(cytokinin, CTK)调控,比较胚性状、胚乳组成及留胚率差异。【结果】与非留胚材料相比,软米型和普通型留胚材料具有胚内幅和外幅较大,胚发育速度快,胚体积较大的特点;籽粒充实度好,粒形更宽、厚;同时离层果胶含量也较高。外施CTK后,软米型留胚材料中后期胚发育速度加快,普通型材料胚发育减缓;两类材料的AAC、果胶含量、胚比重及留胚率均提高。【结论】除胚性状对两类品种留胚率均有明显影响外,胚乳组成主要影响软米型材料留胚特性,而粒形是影响普通型材料留胚特性的重要因素。CTK则通过影响籽粒不同性状对不同类型材料留胚率进行调控。这为后续高留胚水稻品种的培育和栽培调控提供了理论依据和指导方向。
马兆惠, 石一涵, 程海涛, 宋文雯, 路连吉, 刘仁广, 吕文彦. 水稻种子胚形态与胚乳组成对稻米留胚特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 265-275.
MA Zhaohui, SHI Yihan, CHENG Haitao, SONG Wenwen, LU Lianji, LIU Renguang, LÜ Wenyan. Effects of Embryo Morphology and Endosperm Composition on Embryo-remaining Characteristics in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 265-275.
图1 供试材料在不同发育时期胚部形态 EA-胚面积;En-胚乳;L-胚长;I-胚芽;IW-内幅;OW-外幅;R-胚根。DAF-花后天数。
Fig. 1. Embryo-specific morphologies of different materials at different developmental stages. EA, Embryo area; En, Endosperm; L, Embryo length; I, Germ; IW, Inner width; OW, Outer width; R, Radicle. DAF, Days after flowering.
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 材料 Material | 内幅 Inner width/μm | 胚长 Embryo length/μm | 外幅 Outer width/μm | 胚面积 Area/μm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花后9 d 9 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 56.34±1.40 d | 424.23±2.65 c | 82.47±0.02 c | 49105.01±2104.97 c |
1419-8 | 36.11±0.19 g | 258.21±1.47 f | 68.07±0.13 d | 19954.39±345.44 d | ||
2045-5 | 40.99±0.58 f | 249.13±2.11 g | 53.95±2.43 e | 18986.12±539.21 d | ||
19-3 | 89.64±1.50 a | 513.19±4.52 b | 160.25±1.42 a | 83755.56±2479.67 b | ||
H | YJRY1 | 84.22±1.45 b | 660.09±1.46 a | 142.81±7.84 b | 102768.61±5854.01 a | |
1419-8 | 33.84±0.99 g | 205.09±0.47 h | 67.04±2.13 d | 12899.56±408.27 e | ||
2045-5 | 52.62±1.59 e | 267.64±4.06 e | 73.02±1.39 d | 23286.60±1340.44 d | ||
19-3 | 60.01±2.51 c | 342.42±2.08 d | 143.12±1.25 b | 47501.99±800.05 c | ||
花后12 d 12 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 155.96±2.69 a | 781.79±4.54 a | 243.50±3.97 a | 204859.15±4693.79 a |
1419-8 | 82.84±1.19 f | 407.71±6.19 f | 91.96±0.18 f | 55642.64±1324.35 e | ||
2045-5 | 110.06±7.88 d | 683.42±17.16 b | 131.83±5.35 d | 113832.48±3559.10 d | ||
19-3 | 91.31±3.51 e | 605.43±15.06 e | 169.63±5.38 bc | 113111.26±1822.26 d | ||
H | YJRY1 | 129.04±2.31 c | 663.43±3.88 c | 242.38±14.35 a | 175852.57±1232.70 b | |
1419-8 | 136.10±2.74 b | 635.14±6.00 d | 160.63±4.84 c | 129999.88±4063.04 c | ||
2045-5 | 78.45±0.10 f | 418.05±3.84 f | 110.74±3.95 e | 52124.91±114.01 e | ||
19-3 | 110.70±2.44 d | 616.158±5.62 de | 181.32±4.63 b | 117309.32±532.26 d | ||
花后30 d 30 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 164.85±23.44 cd | 932.45±74.40 b | 258.85±25.49 ab | 266226.18±36850.46 bc |
1419-8 | 180.27±19.28 bc | 966.58±17.01 ab | 229.17±18.67 cd | 286081.75±33558.01 ab | ||
2045-5 | 163.53±17.54 cd | 927.89±62.79 b | 221.33±30.02 cd | 250100.33±30413.79 c | ||
19-3 | 191.12±2.44 ab | 947.01±5.62 b | 205.77±4.63 cd | 255104.21±532.26 c | ||
H | YJRY1 | 190.00±25.78 ab | 1002.21±46.36 a | 263.29±8.15 a | 299395.46±33433.78 a | |
1419-8 | 208.64±27.04 a | 1011.39±26.63 a | 233.47±34.12 bc | 298319.09±25404.60 a | ||
2045-5 | 153.52±17.51 b | 923.88±61.48 b | 216.31±17.43 cd | 242886.23±24922.29 c | ||
19-3 | 165.71±19.80 cd | 946.25±15.97 b | 202.24±21.67 d | 247532.44±30002.13 c | ||
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 材料 Material | 内幅增速 Growing speed of inner width /(μm−2·d−1) | 胚长增速 Growing speed of embryo length /(μm−2·d−1) | 外幅增速 Growing speed of outer width /(μm−2·d−1) | 胚面积增速 Growing speed of embryo area/(μm−2·d−1) |
9DAF-12DAF | CK | YJRY1 | 33.21±0.48 a | 119.19±0.79 b | 53.68±1.32 a | 51918.05±862.99 a |
1419-8 | 23.02±2.44 b | 144.76±5.07 a | 25.96±0.97 c | 31615.45±1007.57 c | ||
2045-5 | 15.58±0.33 c | 49.84±1.57 d | 7.96±0.02 e | 11896.08±326.31 e | ||
19-3 | 0.56±0.33 e | 30.75±1.16 e | 3.13±2.27 f | 9785.23±734.58 f | ||
H | YJRY1 | 14.94±0.29 c | 1.11±0.81 f | 33.19±1.23 b | 24361.32±734.58 d | |
1419-8 | 8.61±0.50 d | 50.14±0.07 d | 12.57±0.86 d | 9612.77±408.81 f | ||
2045-5 | 34.08±0.26 a | 143.35±2.01 a | 31.20±1.08 b | 39033.44±918.77 b | ||
19-3 | 16.89±0.02 c | 91.25±1.18 c | 12.73±0.97 d | 23269.11±89.27 d | ||
9DAF-12DAF | CK | YJRY1 | 0.49±0.06 d | 8.36±0.81 f | 0.85±0.16 f | 3409.28±177.23 e |
1419-8 | 2.97±0.20 c | 13.56±0.46 e | 4.97±0.96 bc | 7570.44±121.62 d | ||
2045-5 | 5.41±0.18 ab | 31.02±0.52 a | 7.62±0.27 a | 12802.17±799.14 a | ||
19-3 | 5.52±0.34 a | 18.99±0.62 cd | 2.01±0.47 d | 7888.50±7.09 d | ||
H | YJRY1 | 3.39±0.83 c | 18.82±0.87 cd | 1.16±0.28 de | 6863.49±258.68 d | |
1419-8 | 4.17±0.19 abc | 28.10±2.23 b | 5.86±0.61 b | 10597.85±434.95 b | ||
2045-5 | 4.03±1.37 bc | 20.90±0.80 c | 4.05±0.22 c | 9351.07±130.49 c | ||
19-3 | 3.06±0.71 c | 18.34±0.25 d | 1.16±0.12 de | 7234.62±1196.18 d |
表1 施用细胞分裂素后不同时期留胚和非留胚材料胚部性状及发育速率对比
Table 1. Comparison of embryo characters and growth rate of various types of material at different growth stages after cytokinin application.
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 材料 Material | 内幅 Inner width/μm | 胚长 Embryo length/μm | 外幅 Outer width/μm | 胚面积 Area/μm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
花后9 d 9 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 56.34±1.40 d | 424.23±2.65 c | 82.47±0.02 c | 49105.01±2104.97 c |
1419-8 | 36.11±0.19 g | 258.21±1.47 f | 68.07±0.13 d | 19954.39±345.44 d | ||
2045-5 | 40.99±0.58 f | 249.13±2.11 g | 53.95±2.43 e | 18986.12±539.21 d | ||
19-3 | 89.64±1.50 a | 513.19±4.52 b | 160.25±1.42 a | 83755.56±2479.67 b | ||
H | YJRY1 | 84.22±1.45 b | 660.09±1.46 a | 142.81±7.84 b | 102768.61±5854.01 a | |
1419-8 | 33.84±0.99 g | 205.09±0.47 h | 67.04±2.13 d | 12899.56±408.27 e | ||
2045-5 | 52.62±1.59 e | 267.64±4.06 e | 73.02±1.39 d | 23286.60±1340.44 d | ||
19-3 | 60.01±2.51 c | 342.42±2.08 d | 143.12±1.25 b | 47501.99±800.05 c | ||
花后12 d 12 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 155.96±2.69 a | 781.79±4.54 a | 243.50±3.97 a | 204859.15±4693.79 a |
1419-8 | 82.84±1.19 f | 407.71±6.19 f | 91.96±0.18 f | 55642.64±1324.35 e | ||
2045-5 | 110.06±7.88 d | 683.42±17.16 b | 131.83±5.35 d | 113832.48±3559.10 d | ||
19-3 | 91.31±3.51 e | 605.43±15.06 e | 169.63±5.38 bc | 113111.26±1822.26 d | ||
H | YJRY1 | 129.04±2.31 c | 663.43±3.88 c | 242.38±14.35 a | 175852.57±1232.70 b | |
1419-8 | 136.10±2.74 b | 635.14±6.00 d | 160.63±4.84 c | 129999.88±4063.04 c | ||
2045-5 | 78.45±0.10 f | 418.05±3.84 f | 110.74±3.95 e | 52124.91±114.01 e | ||
19-3 | 110.70±2.44 d | 616.158±5.62 de | 181.32±4.63 b | 117309.32±532.26 d | ||
花后30 d 30 days after flowering (DAF) | CK | YJRY1 | 164.85±23.44 cd | 932.45±74.40 b | 258.85±25.49 ab | 266226.18±36850.46 bc |
1419-8 | 180.27±19.28 bc | 966.58±17.01 ab | 229.17±18.67 cd | 286081.75±33558.01 ab | ||
2045-5 | 163.53±17.54 cd | 927.89±62.79 b | 221.33±30.02 cd | 250100.33±30413.79 c | ||
19-3 | 191.12±2.44 ab | 947.01±5.62 b | 205.77±4.63 cd | 255104.21±532.26 c | ||
H | YJRY1 | 190.00±25.78 ab | 1002.21±46.36 a | 263.29±8.15 a | 299395.46±33433.78 a | |
1419-8 | 208.64±27.04 a | 1011.39±26.63 a | 233.47±34.12 bc | 298319.09±25404.60 a | ||
2045-5 | 153.52±17.51 b | 923.88±61.48 b | 216.31±17.43 cd | 242886.23±24922.29 c | ||
19-3 | 165.71±19.80 cd | 946.25±15.97 b | 202.24±21.67 d | 247532.44±30002.13 c | ||
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 材料 Material | 内幅增速 Growing speed of inner width /(μm−2·d−1) | 胚长增速 Growing speed of embryo length /(μm−2·d−1) | 外幅增速 Growing speed of outer width /(μm−2·d−1) | 胚面积增速 Growing speed of embryo area/(μm−2·d−1) |
9DAF-12DAF | CK | YJRY1 | 33.21±0.48 a | 119.19±0.79 b | 53.68±1.32 a | 51918.05±862.99 a |
1419-8 | 23.02±2.44 b | 144.76±5.07 a | 25.96±0.97 c | 31615.45±1007.57 c | ||
2045-5 | 15.58±0.33 c | 49.84±1.57 d | 7.96±0.02 e | 11896.08±326.31 e | ||
19-3 | 0.56±0.33 e | 30.75±1.16 e | 3.13±2.27 f | 9785.23±734.58 f | ||
H | YJRY1 | 14.94±0.29 c | 1.11±0.81 f | 33.19±1.23 b | 24361.32±734.58 d | |
1419-8 | 8.61±0.50 d | 50.14±0.07 d | 12.57±0.86 d | 9612.77±408.81 f | ||
2045-5 | 34.08±0.26 a | 143.35±2.01 a | 31.20±1.08 b | 39033.44±918.77 b | ||
19-3 | 16.89±0.02 c | 91.25±1.18 c | 12.73±0.97 d | 23269.11±89.27 d | ||
9DAF-12DAF | CK | YJRY1 | 0.49±0.06 d | 8.36±0.81 f | 0.85±0.16 f | 3409.28±177.23 e |
1419-8 | 2.97±0.20 c | 13.56±0.46 e | 4.97±0.96 bc | 7570.44±121.62 d | ||
2045-5 | 5.41±0.18 ab | 31.02±0.52 a | 7.62±0.27 a | 12802.17±799.14 a | ||
19-3 | 5.52±0.34 a | 18.99±0.62 cd | 2.01±0.47 d | 7888.50±7.09 d | ||
H | YJRY1 | 3.39±0.83 c | 18.82±0.87 cd | 1.16±0.28 de | 6863.49±258.68 d | |
1419-8 | 4.17±0.19 abc | 28.10±2.23 b | 5.86±0.61 b | 10597.85±434.95 b | ||
2045-5 | 4.03±1.37 bc | 20.90±0.80 c | 4.05±0.22 c | 9351.07±130.49 c | ||
19-3 | 3.06±0.71 c | 18.34±0.25 d | 1.16±0.12 de | 7234.62±1196.18 d |
材料 Material | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage/% | 留胚率 Embryo retention rate/% | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
软米型 Soft rice | ||||||||
YJRY 1 1419-8 | 1.94±0.22 a | 85±0.82 a | 0.61±0.05 a | 4.06±0.08 a | ||||
0.42±0.12 b | 23±4.50 b | 0.50±0.02 b | 4.57±0.21 a | |||||
普通型Common | ||||||||
2045-5 19-3 | 1.90±0.11 a | 82±3.27 a | 0.52±0.05 a | 14.24±1.46 a | ||||
0.33±0.20 b | 26±3.88 b | 0.45±0.06 a | 10.00±1.26 a | |||||
材料 Material | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 长宽比 Length-width ratio | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | 粒厚 Grain thickness/mm | |||
软米型Soft rice | ||||||||
YJRY 1 1419-8 | 22.07±0.13 a | 1.82±0.01 a | 4.99±0.29 a | 2.76±0.22 a | 2.19±0.07 a | |||
21.46±0.21 b | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.07±0.31 a | 2.73±0.23 a | 2.07±0.06 b | ||||
普通型Common | ||||||||
2045-5 19-3 | 22.38±0.25 a | 1.84±0.01 b | 5.03±0.33 b | 2.76±0.22 a | 2.11±0.07 a | |||
19.33±0.42 b | 1.98±0.04 a | 5.16±0.47 a | 2.63±0.31 b | 1.87±0.05 b |
表2 不同类型材料留胚特性及籽粒性状比较
Table 2. Comparison of embryo-remaining traits and grain characters in different types of materials.
材料 Material | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage/% | 留胚率 Embryo retention rate/% | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
软米型 Soft rice | ||||||||
YJRY 1 1419-8 | 1.94±0.22 a | 85±0.82 a | 0.61±0.05 a | 4.06±0.08 a | ||||
0.42±0.12 b | 23±4.50 b | 0.50±0.02 b | 4.57±0.21 a | |||||
普通型Common | ||||||||
2045-5 19-3 | 1.90±0.11 a | 82±3.27 a | 0.52±0.05 a | 14.24±1.46 a | ||||
0.33±0.20 b | 26±3.88 b | 0.45±0.06 a | 10.00±1.26 a | |||||
材料 Material | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 长宽比 Length-width ratio | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | 粒厚 Grain thickness/mm | |||
软米型Soft rice | ||||||||
YJRY 1 1419-8 | 22.07±0.13 a | 1.82±0.01 a | 4.99±0.29 a | 2.76±0.22 a | 2.19±0.07 a | |||
21.46±0.21 b | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.07±0.31 a | 2.73±0.23 a | 2.07±0.06 b | ||||
普通型Common | ||||||||
2045-5 19-3 | 22.38±0.25 a | 1.84±0.01 b | 5.03±0.33 b | 2.76±0.22 a | 2.11±0.07 a | |||
19.33±0.42 b | 1.98±0.04 a | 5.16±0.47 a | 2.63±0.31 b | 1.87±0.05 b |
材料 Material | 内幅 Inner width | 胚长 Embryo length | 外幅 Outer width | 胚面积 Area | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight | 长宽比 Length-width ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YJRY 1 | 0.996** | −0.077 | 0.988* | −0.991** | 0.676 | −0.606 |
1419-8 | 0.822 | 0.961* | −0.994** | −0.491 | 0.353 | −0.866 |
2045-5 | −0.608 | −0.992** | −0.970* | 0.994** | −0.461 | 0.990** |
19-3 | 1.000** | −0.988* | −0.792 | −0.500 | 0.848 | −0.182 |
材料 Material | 粒长 Grain length | 粒宽 Grain width | 粒厚 Grain thickness | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content |
YJRY 1 | −0.444 | 0.141 | 0.097 | 0.789 | 0.582 | −0.650 |
1419-8 | 0.423 | 0.520 | 0.775 | 0.187 | 0.780 | −0.235 |
2045-5 | −0.099 | −0.854 | −0.657 | 0.756 | −0.569 | 0.227 |
19-3 | −0.648 | −0.945 | −0.011 | 0.844 | −0.969* | −0.412 |
表3 不同类型材料籽粒性状与留胚率的关系
Table 3. Relationship between seed characters and embryo-remaining rate of different types of material.
材料 Material | 内幅 Inner width | 胚长 Embryo length | 外幅 Outer width | 胚面积 Area | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight | 长宽比 Length-width ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YJRY 1 | 0.996** | −0.077 | 0.988* | −0.991** | 0.676 | −0.606 |
1419-8 | 0.822 | 0.961* | −0.994** | −0.491 | 0.353 | −0.866 |
2045-5 | −0.608 | −0.992** | −0.970* | 0.994** | −0.461 | 0.990** |
19-3 | 1.000** | −0.988* | −0.792 | −0.500 | 0.848 | −0.182 |
材料 Material | 粒长 Grain length | 粒宽 Grain width | 粒厚 Grain thickness | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content |
YJRY 1 | −0.444 | 0.141 | 0.097 | 0.789 | 0.582 | −0.650 |
1419-8 | 0.423 | 0.520 | 0.775 | 0.187 | 0.780 | −0.235 |
2045-5 | −0.099 | −0.854 | −0.657 | 0.756 | −0.569 | 0.227 |
19-3 | −0.648 | −0.945 | −0.011 | 0.844 | −0.969* | −0.412 |
图2 外施细胞分裂素后不同留胚特性材料胚形态的比较 EA-胚面积;En-胚乳;L-胚长;I-胚芽;IW-内幅;OW-外幅;R-胚根。
Fig. 2. Comparison of embryo morphology of different types of embryo-remaining material after cytokinin application. EA, Embryo area; En, endosperm; L, Embryo length; I, Germ; IW, Inner width; OW, Outer width; R, Radicle.
类型 Type | 处理Treatment | 材料 Material | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 长宽比 Length-width ratio | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
软米型 Soft rice | CK | YJRY1 | 22.07±0.13 a | 1.82±0.01 b | 4.99±0.29 bc | 2.76±0.22 a | |||||
1419-8 | 21.46±0.21 b | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.07±0.31 a | 2.73±0.23 a | |||||||
H | YJRY1 | 21.92±0.10 a | 1.83±0.01 b | 4.96±0.22 c | 2.72±0.19 a | ||||||
1419-8 | 21.07±0.36 c | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.04±0.33 ab | 2.74±0.27 a | |||||||
普通型Common | CK | 2045-5 | 22.38±0.25 a | 1.84±0.01 b | 5.03±0.33 a | 2.76±0.22 a | |||||
19-3 | 19.33±0.42 b | 1.98±0.04 a | 5.16±0.47 a | 2.63±0.31 c | |||||||
H | 2045-5 | 22.32±0.09 a | 1.85±0.01 b | 5.05±0.30 a | 2.74±0.21 ab | ||||||
19-3 | 19.04±0.29 b | 1.97±0.04 a | 5.19±0.57 a | 2.66±0.38 bc | |||||||
类型 Type | 处理Treatment | 材料 Material | 粒厚 Grain thickness /mm | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage/% | 留胚率 Embryo remaining rate/% | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content /% | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content/% | ||||
软米型 | CK | YJRY1 | 2.19±0.07 a | 1.94±0.22 a | 85±0.82 a | 0.61±0.05 a | 4.06±0.08 b | ||||
Soft rice | 1419-8 | 2.07±0.06 b | 0.42±0.12 b | 23±4.50 c | 0.50±0.02 b | 4.57±0.21 ab | |||||
H | YJRY1 | 2.18±0.08 a | 1.97±0.18 a | 90±4.78 a | 0.61±0.04 a | 4.71±0.27 ab | |||||
1419-8 | 2.04±0.06 b | 0.58±0.10 b | 32±3.09 b | 0.53±0.02 ab | 4.82±0.44 a | ||||||
普通型 | CK | 2045-5 | 2.11±0.07 a | 1.90±0.11 a | 82±3.27 a | 0.52±0.05 b | 14.24±1.46 ab | ||||
Common | 19-3 | 1.87±0.05 b | 0.33±0.20 b | 26±3.88 b | 0.45±0.06 b | 10.00±1.26 c | |||||
H | 2045-5 | 2.12±0.06 a | 2.06±0.20 a | 89±1.41 a | 0.68±0.04 a | 15.35±0.30 a | |||||
19-3 | 1.87±0.07 b | 0.44±0.06 b | 40±2.57 b | 0.49±0.04 b | 11.71±1.70 bc |
表4 不同类型材料外施细胞分裂素后籽粒性状及理化性质的变化
Table 4. Changes of grain characters and physicochemical properties of different types of material after cytokinin application.
类型 Type | 处理Treatment | 材料 Material | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 长宽比 Length-width ratio | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
软米型 Soft rice | CK | YJRY1 | 22.07±0.13 a | 1.82±0.01 b | 4.99±0.29 bc | 2.76±0.22 a | |||||
1419-8 | 21.46±0.21 b | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.07±0.31 a | 2.73±0.23 a | |||||||
H | YJRY1 | 21.92±0.10 a | 1.83±0.01 b | 4.96±0.22 c | 2.72±0.19 a | ||||||
1419-8 | 21.07±0.36 c | 1.86±0.01 a | 5.04±0.33 ab | 2.74±0.27 a | |||||||
普通型Common | CK | 2045-5 | 22.38±0.25 a | 1.84±0.01 b | 5.03±0.33 a | 2.76±0.22 a | |||||
19-3 | 19.33±0.42 b | 1.98±0.04 a | 5.16±0.47 a | 2.63±0.31 c | |||||||
H | 2045-5 | 22.32±0.09 a | 1.85±0.01 b | 5.05±0.30 a | 2.74±0.21 ab | ||||||
19-3 | 19.04±0.29 b | 1.97±0.04 a | 5.19±0.57 a | 2.66±0.38 bc | |||||||
类型 Type | 处理Treatment | 材料 Material | 粒厚 Grain thickness /mm | 胚比重 Embryo weight percentage/% | 留胚率 Embryo remaining rate/% | 总果胶含量 Total pectin content /% | 直链淀粉含量 Apparent amylose content/% | ||||
软米型 | CK | YJRY1 | 2.19±0.07 a | 1.94±0.22 a | 85±0.82 a | 0.61±0.05 a | 4.06±0.08 b | ||||
Soft rice | 1419-8 | 2.07±0.06 b | 0.42±0.12 b | 23±4.50 c | 0.50±0.02 b | 4.57±0.21 ab | |||||
H | YJRY1 | 2.18±0.08 a | 1.97±0.18 a | 90±4.78 a | 0.61±0.04 a | 4.71±0.27 ab | |||||
1419-8 | 2.04±0.06 b | 0.58±0.10 b | 32±3.09 b | 0.53±0.02 ab | 4.82±0.44 a | ||||||
普通型 | CK | 2045-5 | 2.11±0.07 a | 1.90±0.11 a | 82±3.27 a | 0.52±0.05 b | 14.24±1.46 ab | ||||
Common | 19-3 | 1.87±0.05 b | 0.33±0.20 b | 26±3.88 b | 0.45±0.06 b | 10.00±1.26 c | |||||
H | 2045-5 | 2.12±0.06 a | 2.06±0.20 a | 89±1.41 a | 0.68±0.04 a | 15.35±0.30 a | |||||
19-3 | 1.87±0.07 b | 0.44±0.06 b | 40±2.57 b | 0.49±0.04 b | 11.71±1.70 bc |
![]() |
表5 CTK施用量与不同类型材料籽粒性状及留胚率的相关性
Table 5. Relationship between CTK application amount and seed characters and embryo-remaining rate of different types of material.
![]() |
图3 留胚材料和非留胚材料在不同碾磨时间下留胚类型的变化 A-全胚, 糙米研磨后,胚几乎没有磨损;B-平胚,糙米碾碎后,剩下的胚与米尖相切;C-半胚, 糙米磨碎后,将一半胚磨掉;D-残胚, 糙米研磨后,只剩下部分胚;E-无胚, 糙米研磨后,所有的胚都被研磨掉,没有任何残留物。
Fig. 3. Changes of embryo remaining types of embryo-remaining rice and non-embryo-remaining rice under different milling time. A, Whole embryo(After the brown rice is ground, the embryo is barely worn away); B, Flat embryo(After the brown rice is ground, the remained embryo is tangent to the tip of rice); C, Semi-embryo(After the brown rice is ground, half of the embryo is ground off); D, Residual embryos(After the brown rice is ground, only part of the embryo remains); E, Embryo-free(After the brown rice is ground, all the embryos are ground off, without any residue).
[1] | 朱一帆, 冯亚斌, 林轩, 周美圆, 王中华. 胚芽米营养成分研究[J]. 科技通报, 2013, 29(9): 51-54. |
Zhu Y F, Feng Y B, Lin X, Zhou M Y, Wang Z H. Nutritional components analysis of germ-remaining rice[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2013, 29(9): 51-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 宋幼良, 吴殿星. 高留胚糯稻突变体原胚糯的选育与营养成分分析[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(9): 1672-1677. |
Song Y L, Wu D X. Breeding and nutrient content analysis of glutinous rice mutant Yuanpeinuo with high remained germ[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Science, 2017, 31(9): 1672-1677. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | Liang J, Li Z, Tsuji K. Milling characteristics and distribution of phytic acid and zinc in long-, medium-and short-grain rice[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2008, 48(1): 83-91. |
[4] | Tanda Y. Research on embryo detachment by polishing early cultivated rice[J]. Science Note, 1962, 30: 9-13. (in Japanese) |
[5] | Yang W, Gao M, Yin X, Liu J, Xu Y, Zeng L, Li Q, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhang X, He Z. Control of rice embryo development, shoot apical meristem maintenance, and grain yield by a novel cytochrome P450[J]. Molecular Plant, 2013, 6(6): 1945-1960. |
[6] | Wan Z, Xia J, Kang D. The Research progress and prospect analysis of germ-remaining rice whitener[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University: English Edition, 2008, 15(2): 84-87. |
[7] | Kong X, Zhu P, Sui Z, Bao J. Physicochemical properties of starches from diverse rice cultivars varying in apparent amylose content and gelatinization temperature combinations[J]. Food Chemistry, 2015, 172: 433-440. |
[8] | Zhou L, Sheng W, Jun W, Wang C, Liu Q, Deng Q. Differential expressions among five Waxy alleles and their effects on the eating and cooking qualities in specialty rice cultivars[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(6): 1153-1162. |
[9] | Müller-Maatsch J, Bencivenni M, Caligiani A, Tedeschi T, Bruggeman G, Bosch M, Petrusan J, Droogenbroeck BV, Elstf K, Sforza S. Pectin content and composition from different food waste streams[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 201: 37-45. |
[10] | Yuan R C, Burns J K. Temperature factor affecting the abscission, response of mature fruit and leaves to CMN-Pyrazole and ethephon in Hamlin oranges[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticulture Science, 2004, 129(3): 287-293. |
[11] | Jameson P E, Song J. Cytokinin: A key driver of seed yield[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 67: 593-606. |
[12] | Han Y, Yang H, Jiao Y. Regulation of inflorescence architecture by cytokinins[J]. Front Plant Science, 2014, 5: 669. |
[13] | 李爱华. 米胚的营养价值和胚芽米的加工技术[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 1997(5): 9-12. |
Li A H. The nutritive value of rice germ and the processing technology of germ-remaining rice[J]. Cereal &Feed Industry, 1997(5): 9-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 张雪丹. 苹果果胶制备工艺及研究进展[J]. 落叶果树, 2009, 41(2): 22-25. |
Zhang X D. Preparation technology and research progress of apple pectin[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2009, 41(2): 22-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李娜. ZmEG1基因对小穗花器官发育的影响研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2015. |
Li N. Functional analysis of ZmEG1 gene in spikelet development[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 杨弘远. 水稻生殖生物学[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2005: 102-125. |
Yang H Y. Rice Reproductive Biology[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2005: 102-125. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 王敏. 关于水稻颖界发育的研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2011. |
Wang M. Caryopsis development of rice[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | Itoh J I, Nonomura K I, Ikeda K. Rice plant development: From zygote to spikelet[J]. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2005, 46(1): 23-47. |
[19] | Xu H, Zhang W, Gao Y, Zhao Y, Guo L, Wang J. Proteomic analysis of embryo development in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Planta, 2012, 235(4): 687-701. |
[20] | 章清杞, 陈健勇, 黄荣华, 张书标. 巨胚稻胚发育的解剖学观察[J]. 核农学报, 2008(2): 122-126. |
Zhang Q Q, Chen J Y, Huang R H, Zhang S B. Anatomical observations on the developmental process of embryo in giant embryo rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Science, 2008(2): 122-126 (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 陈恒雪, 石一涵, 吕文彦, 马兆惠, 程海涛, 陈云. 稻米留胚率测定方法筛选及留胚米相关特性研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2018, 49(3): 337-341. |
Chen H X, Shi Y H, Lü W Y, Ma Z H, Cheng H T, Chen Y. Determination methods of rice plumule ratio and related characteristics of germ-remained rice[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018, 49(3): 337-341. | |
[22] | Michal P, Joanna K, Marcin L, Magdalena W, Mateusz K, Jolanta J, Anna P. Red currant pectin: The physicochemical characteristic of pectin solutions in dilute and semi dilute regimes[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 113: 106420. |
[23] | Ma Z H, Chen H X, Lü W Y, Cheng H T, Chen Y, Wang Y B. Comparison of the chemical and textural properties of germ-remaining soft rice grains from different spikelet positions[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2019, 96: 1137-1147. |
[24] | 熊海铮, 张宁, 孙健, 王寅, 舒小丽, 吴殿星. 水稻留胚米的营养价值、加工技术及产品开发研究进展[J]. 核农学报, 2012, 26(7): 1031-1036. |
Xiong H Z, Zhang N, Sun J, Wang Y, Shu X L, Wu D X. Research progress on nutritional value, processing technology and product exploration of embryo-retaining milled rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Science, 2012, 26(7): 1031-1036. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Ahmed N, Tetlow I, Nawaz S, Iqbal A, Mubin M, Rehman M, Butt A, Lightfootc D, Maekawa M. Effect of high temperature on grain filling period, yield, amylase content and activity of starch biosynthesis enzymes in endosperm of basmati rice[J]. Journal of Food and Agriculture and Environment, 2015, 95: 2237-2243. |
[26] | Teng B, Zeng R, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Zhu H, Ding X, Li W, Zhang G. Detection of allelic variation at the Wx locus with single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L)[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 30 (1): 583-595. |
[27] | Xing F, Owen G J, Bradley L R, Osvaldo H C. Soluble pectin acts as a particle stabilizer of tomato suspensions: The impact on tomato products rheological characterization[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2021, 139(3): 110508. |
[28] | 周海庆. 水稻粒形及千粒重的遗传研究[D]. 吉林省延边市: 延边大学, 2014. |
Zhou H Q. Genetic studies on the rice grain shape and 1000-grain weight[D]. Yanbian: Yanbian University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 赵飞. 粳稻稻米品质及其与产量关系的遗传分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学. 2014. |
Zhao F. Genetic analysis on relationship between quality and yield of Japanese rice[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 王少元, 孟庆虹, 严松, 张志宏, 高扬, 袁超, 卢淑雯, 河野元信. 北方粳稻留胚米碾磨工艺的研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2014, 20(5): 31-35. |
Wang S Y, Meng Q H, Yan S, Zhang Z H, Gao Y, Yuan C, Lu S W, Motonibu K. Research on the milling processing with germ- remained japonica rice of northern China[J]. China Rice, 2014, 20(5): 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 张标金, 魏益华, 张祥喜, 罗林广. 育成巨胚稻与其亲本的糙米粒型性状和矿物质含量的比较分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(6): 182-185. |
Zhang BJ, Wei YH, Zhang XL, Luo LG. Comparative analysis on grain traits and mineral elements of brown rice from bred giant embryo rice and its parents[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(6): 182-185. | |
[32] | 李志康, 严冬, 薛张逸, 顾逸彪, 李思嘉, 刘立军, 张耗, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 顾骏飞. 细胞分裂素对植物生长发育的调控机理研究进展及其在水稻生产中的应用探讨[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(4): 311-324. |
Li Z K, Yan D, Xue Z Y, Gu Y B, Li S J, Liu L J, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Gu J F. Regulations of plant growth and development by cytokinins and their applications in rice production[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(4): 311-324. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | Werner T, Schmülling T. Cytokinin action in plant development[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2009, 12(5): 527-538. |
[34] | 孙贝贝. 生长素和细胞分裂素的内源合成控制根从头发生的机制研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2017. |
Sun B B. Mechanism of specific function of plant hormones auxin and cytokinin during adventitious root regeneration[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University. 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | Hudson D, Guevara D R, Hand A J. Rice cytokine in GATA transcription Factor1 regulates chloroplast development and plant architecture[J]. Plant Physiology, 2013, 162(1): 132-144. |
[36] | Li J, Nie X, Tan J L. Integration of epigenetic and genetic controls of seed size by cytokine in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110 (38): 15479-15484. |
[37] | Ashikari M, Wu J, Yano M. Rice gibberellin-in-sensitive dwarf mutant gene Dwarf 1 encodes the alpha-subunit of GTP-binding protein[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999, 96(18): 10284-10289. |
[38] | Fujisawa Y, Kato T, Ohki S. Suppression of the hetero trimetric G protein causes abnormal morphology, including dwarfism, in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999, 96(13): 7575-7580. |
[39] | Nayar S, Sharma R, Tyagi A, Kapoor S. Functional delineation of rice MADS29 reveals its role in embryo and endosperm development by affecting hormone homeostasis[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64: 4239-4253. |
[40] | Zhao Y, Hu Y, Dai M, Huang L, Zhou D. The WUSCHEL-Related homeobox gene WOX11 is required to activate Shoot-Borne crown root development in rice[J]. Plant Cell, 2009, 21(3): 736-748. |
[41] | 朱艳梅, 罗兴录, 樊吴静. 木薯内源细胞分裂素含量对块根淀粉积累的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2016, 47(8): 1279-1284. |
Zhu Y M, Luo X L, Fan W J. Effects of endogenous cytokinin content on starch accumulation in root tuber of cassava[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016, 47(8): 1279-1284.. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 侯本福, 杨传铭, 张喜娟, 杨贤莉, 王立志, 王嘉宇, 李红宇, 姜树坤. 利用龙稻5号/中优早8号RIL群体定位粒形QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 13-24. |
[2] | 王石光, 陆展华, 刘维, 卢东柏, 王晓飞, 方志强, 巫浩翔, 何秀英. 应用CRISPR/Cas9技术与分子标记辅助选择创制广东丝苗米新种质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(1): 29-36. |
[3] | 龚柯, 薛炮, 温小霞, 廖飞飞, 孙滨, 彭泽群, 程式华, 曹立勇, 张迎信, 吴玮勋, 孙廉平, 占小登. 水稻特大粒种质BG1和优质恢复系华占的粒形基因研究及相关功能标记开发[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 543-553. |
[4] | 曹煜东, 肖湘谊, 叶乃忠, 丁晓雯, 易晓璇, 刘金灵, 肖应辉. 生长素调控因子OsGRF4协同调控水稻粒形和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 629-638. |
[5] | 杜成兴, 张华丽, 戴冬青, 吴明月, 梁敏敏, 陈俊宇, 马良勇. 水稻粒重粒形QTL的定位及qTGW1.2/qGL1.2的验证[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(4): 359-372. |
[6] | 邓雪梅, 胡鹏, 王月影, 文艺, 谭义青, 伍豪, 吴凯雄, 王俊格, 侯琳琳, 朱黎欣, 朱丽, 陈光, 曾大力, 张光恒, 郭龙彪, 高振宇, 任德勇, 钱前, 胡江. 水稻粒宽突变体gw4的鉴定与基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 259-268. |
[7] | 朱安东, 孙志超, 朱玉君, 张荟, 牛小军, 樊叶杨, 张振华, 庄杰云. 应用剩余杂合体衍生群体定位水稻粒重粒形QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 144-151. |
[8] | 李志康, 严冬, 薛张逸, 顾逸彪, 李思嘉, 刘立军, 张耗, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 顾骏飞. 细胞分裂素对植物生长发育的调控机理研究进展及其在水稻生产中的应用探讨[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(4): 311-324. |
[9] | 田青兰, 刘波, 孙红, 何莎, 钟晓媛, 赵敏, 任万军. 不同播栽方式下杂交籼稻茎秆生长和穗粒形成特点及与气象因子的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 507-524. |
[10] | 裔传灯, 王德荣, 蒋伟, 李玮, 成晓俊, 王颖, 周勇, 梁国华, 顾铭洪. 水稻粒宽基因GS5的功能标记开发和单倍型鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 487-492. |
[11] | 张亚东1,2 ,梁彦丽1,2 ,郑佳2 ,丁丹1,2 ,赵春芳2 ,陈涛2 ,赵庆勇2 ,朱镇2 ,周丽慧2 ,姚姝2 ,赵凌2 ,于新2 ,王才林2,*. 极端粒形水稻粒宽基因GW2的序列分析和效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(6): 581-588. |
[12] | 高方远1,#,邱玲1,2,# ,陆贤军1 ,任鄄胜1 ,吴贤婷1 ,任光俊1 ,曾礼华2,*. 杂交籼稻骨干保持系岗46B稻谷粒形及垩白的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(3): 235-242. |
[13] | 杨占烈1,2,戴高兴3,翟荣荣1,林泽川1,王会民4,曹立勇1,*,程式华1,*. 多环境条件下超级杂交稻协优9308 重组自交系群体粒形性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(5): 482-490. |
[14] | 李生强, 崔国昆, 关成冉, 王俊, 梁国华. 基于水稻单片段代换系的粒形QTL定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(2): 163-168 . |
[15] | 杨亚春 ,倪大虎,宋丰顺,李泽福,易成新,杨剑波,. 不同生态地点下稻米外观品质性状的QTL定位分析 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(1): 43-51 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||