
中国水稻科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 386-402.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.250804
陈雪芳1, 曹云1, 汤菁莎1, 黄兴海1, 何咨霆1, 王岚芃1, 李瑞杰1, 陆焘1, 孙园园2, 廖琴1, 王仲林1, 杨志远1, 马均1, 孙永健1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-08-18
修回日期:2025-12-12
出版日期:2026-05-10
发布日期:2026-05-13
通讯作者:
*email:yongjians1980@163.com基金资助:
CHEN Xuefang1, CAO Yun1, TANG Jingsha1, HUANG Xinghai1, HE Ziting1, WANG Lanpeng1, LI Ruijie1, LU Tao1, SUN Yuanyuan2, LIAO Qin1, WANG Zhonglin1, YANG Zhiyuan1, MA Jun1, SUN Yongjian1,*(
)
Received:2025-08-18
Revised:2025-12-12
Online:2026-05-10
Published:2026-05-13
摘要:
【目的】明确无人机高效减量喷洒农药与氮肥对机插稻产量形成与能效的影响,提出氮肥农药减量适配无人机作业效率的最佳模式,为无人机肥药综合生产模式提供理论基础和实践依据。【方法】设置无人机飞行速度与肥药综合减施随机区组试验,2种无人机飞行速度分别为5.0 m/s (F1)和5.5 m/s (F2);4种氮肥农药同比例减施处理分别为氮肥农药综合常规用量处理(N1)、减量10% (N2)、减量20% (N3)、减量30% (N4),并设人工常规氮肥农药处理(CK1)和不施肥药处理(CK2)为对照,研究无人机飞行速度与氮肥农药综合减施处理对机插稻产量、群体质量及能效的影响,并探讨无人机肥药综合生产模式下机插稻产量形成与能效间的关系。【结果】与CK1处理相比,F1N1、F2N1、F1N2和F2N2处理增产1.22%~1.96%,各处理产量差异不显著且对病害防治效果均达84%以上。尤其是F1N2和F2N2处理,在肥药减量10%条件下,群体干物质转运量、转运率和氮素转运量、转运率增加了1.73%~13.24%,氮肥偏生产力、氮肥吸收利用率和氮素收获指数分别增加12.48%~12.89%、17.84%~18.75%、1.86%~2.30%,能量产出、净能量、能量利用效率分别增加0.54%~0.66%、0.98%~1.11%、5.47%~5.52%。同一肥药模式下,无人机飞行提速10%电能耗量增加5.19%~10.11%,但缩短了劳动力工作时间,可补偿电能成本,净收益以F2N2处理8848.94 元/hm2最高。表明无人机提速10%配合氮肥农药减量10% (F2N2处理),在保障净收益的基础上提高工作效率和节省生产成本(劳动力),达到节本增效,为本研究氮肥农药减量适配无人机作业效率的最佳生产模式。【结论】提高无人机作业速度10%且配合氮肥农药综合减量10%模式,可驱动机插稻通过优化模式补偿机制实现产量、生态、能效的协同优化,达到节肥节药丰产高效的协同统一,为水稻全程机械化绿色生产提供了理论与技术支撑。
陈雪芳, 曹云, 汤菁莎, 黄兴海, 何咨霆, 王岚芃, 李瑞杰, 陆焘, 孙园园, 廖琴, 王仲林, 杨志远, 马均, 孙永健. 无人机飞行速度与氮肥农药减施模式对机插稻产量形成和能效的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 386-402.
CHEN Xuefang, CAO Yun, TANG Jingsha, HUANG Xinghai, HE Ziting, WANG Lanpeng, LI Ruijie, LU Tao, SUN Yuanyuan, LIAO Qin, WANG Zhonglin, YANG Zhiyuan, MA Jun, SUN Yongjian. Effects of UAV Flight Speed and Reduced Application of Nitrogen Fertilizers and Pesticides on Yield Formation and Energy Efficiency in Machine-transplanted Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(3): 386-402.
| 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施用 N application (kg/hm2) | 农药施用 Pesticide application (mL/hm2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基肥 (移栽前1 d) Basal fertilizer (1 day before transplanting) | 蘖肥 (移栽后7 d) Tillering fertilizer (7 days after transplanting) | 穗肥 (幼穗分化期) Topdressing for panicle initiation | 分蘖期 (移栽后22 d) Tillering stage (22 days after transplanting) | 分蘖临界期 -拔节期 Critical tillering stage-jointing stage | 抽穗 破口期 Heading stage | |||||
| F1N1 | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N2 | 40.50 | 40.50 | 54.00 | 90% (A+B) | 90% (A+C) | 90%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N3 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 48.00 | 80% (A+B) | 80% (A+C) | 80%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N4 | 31.50 | 31.50 | 42.00 | 70% (A+B) | 70% (A+C) | 70%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N1 | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N2 | 40.50 | 40.50 | 54.00 | 90% (A+B) | 90% (A+C) | 90%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N3 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 48.00 | 80% (A+B) | 80% (A+C) | 80%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N4 | 31.50 | 31.50 | 42.00 | 70% (A+B) | 70% (A+C) | 70%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| CK1(人工) | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| CK2(空白) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
表1 氮药综合减施处理
Table 1. Integrated N fertilizer reduction treatment
| 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施用 N application (kg/hm2) | 农药施用 Pesticide application (mL/hm2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基肥 (移栽前1 d) Basal fertilizer (1 day before transplanting) | 蘖肥 (移栽后7 d) Tillering fertilizer (7 days after transplanting) | 穗肥 (幼穗分化期) Topdressing for panicle initiation | 分蘖期 (移栽后22 d) Tillering stage (22 days after transplanting) | 分蘖临界期 -拔节期 Critical tillering stage-jointing stage | 抽穗 破口期 Heading stage | |||||
| F1N1 | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N2 | 40.50 | 40.50 | 54.00 | 90% (A+B) | 90% (A+C) | 90%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N3 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 48.00 | 80% (A+B) | 80% (A+C) | 80%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F1N4 | 31.50 | 31.50 | 42.00 | 70% (A+B) | 70% (A+C) | 70%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N1 | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N2 | 40.50 | 40.50 | 54.00 | 90% (A+B) | 90% (A+C) | 90%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N3 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 48.00 | 80% (A+B) | 80% (A+C) | 80%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| F2N4 | 31.50 | 31.50 | 42.00 | 70% (A+B) | 70% (A+C) | 70%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| CK1(人工) | 45.00 | 45.00 | 60.00 | 100% (A+B) | 100% (A+C) | 100%(B+C+D+E) | ||||
| CK2(空白) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 项目 Parameter | 单位 Unit | 能量系数 Energy equivalent | 价格(元) Price (yuan) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杂交稻种Hybrid rice seeds | kg | 14.70 | 70.51 |
| 劳动力Labor | h | 1.96 | 18.15 |
| 燃料Fuel | L | 56.31 | 6.66 |
| 电Electricity | kWh | 3.60 | 0.55 |
| 氮肥N fertilizer | kg | 66.14 | 3.26 |
| 磷肥Phosphate fertilizer | kg | 12.44 | 2.76 |
| 钾肥Potash fertilizer | kg | 11.15 | 2.35 |
| 杀虫剂Insecticide | kg | 101.20 | 332.30 |
| 杀菌剂Fungicide | kg | 216.00 | 461.42 |
| 稻谷Paddy rice | kg | 17.00 | 2.60 |
| 秸秆Rice straw | kg | 12.50 | 0.30 |
| 机械Mechinery | h | 62.70 | - |
表2 能量系数和投入要素的单位价格
Table 2. Energy coefficient and unit price of input factors
| 项目 Parameter | 单位 Unit | 能量系数 Energy equivalent | 价格(元) Price (yuan) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 杂交稻种Hybrid rice seeds | kg | 14.70 | 70.51 |
| 劳动力Labor | h | 1.96 | 18.15 |
| 燃料Fuel | L | 56.31 | 6.66 |
| 电Electricity | kWh | 3.60 | 0.55 |
| 氮肥N fertilizer | kg | 66.14 | 3.26 |
| 磷肥Phosphate fertilizer | kg | 12.44 | 2.76 |
| 钾肥Potash fertilizer | kg | 11.15 | 2.35 |
| 杀虫剂Insecticide | kg | 101.20 | 332.30 |
| 杀菌剂Fungicide | kg | 216.00 | 461.42 |
| 稻谷Paddy rice | kg | 17.00 | 2.60 |
| 秸秆Rice straw | kg | 12.50 | 0.30 |
| 机械Mechinery | h | 62.70 | - |
| 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 No. of grains per panicle | 总颖花数 Total spikelets (×106/hm2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight (g) | 稻谷产量 Grain yield (kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 265.00±0.30 a | 178.38±1.06 a | 472.72±2.85 a | 83.54±0.24 ab | 28.74±0.06 ab | 10334.50±104.98 a |
| F1N2 | 264.21±0.49 a | 173.95±2.05 b | 459.60±7.42 b | 84.47±0.23 a | 29.12±0.55 a | 10298.45±148.61 a |
| F1N3 | 256.07±1.48 b | 165.08±1.79 c | 422.74±6.77 c | 83.13±0.84 ab | 28.37±0.28 b | 9164.36±189.56 b |
| F1N4 | 244.22±0.94 c | 158.95±4.27 d | 388.19±11.18 e | 81.22±0.79 cd | 27.48±0.40 c | 8175.73±207.25 c |
| F2N1 | 265.15±0.79 a | 174.97±1.81 ab | 463.95±6.18 ab | 83.45±0.34 ab | 28.25±0.59 b | 10276.27±105.65 a |
| F2N2 | 263.79±0.70 a | 173.28±1.29 b | 453.04±4.56 b | 83.84±0.62 a | 28.75±0.10 ab | 10259.44±68.81 a |
| F2N3 | 256.57±0.78 b | 157.40±2.38 de | 403.83±5.84 d | 82.34±0.29 bc | 28.36±0.19 b | 9143.78±63.26 b |
| F2N4 | 244.97±2.46 c | 154.23±2.46 ef | 377.83±8.85 e | 80.02±0.63 d | 27.39±0.32 c | 8154.63±251.64 c |
| CK1 | 265.60±1.10 a | 174.14±1.48 b | 462.52±4.59 ab | 83.41±0.49 ab | 28.47±0.11 ab | 10135.71±175.53 a |
| CK2 | 215.44±0.72 d | 151.50±1.88 f | 326.39±4.89 f | 77.28±0.18 e | 27.17±0.56 c | 6330.49±90.91 d |
| F值 F value | 581.62** | 57.97** | 156.67** | 53.85** | 9.31** | 227.97** |
表3 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻产量及其构成的影响
Table 3. Effects of N fertilizer and pesticide application methods on yield and yield components
| 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 No. of grains per panicle | 总颖花数 Total spikelets (×106/hm2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight (g) | 稻谷产量 Grain yield (kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 265.00±0.30 a | 178.38±1.06 a | 472.72±2.85 a | 83.54±0.24 ab | 28.74±0.06 ab | 10334.50±104.98 a |
| F1N2 | 264.21±0.49 a | 173.95±2.05 b | 459.60±7.42 b | 84.47±0.23 a | 29.12±0.55 a | 10298.45±148.61 a |
| F1N3 | 256.07±1.48 b | 165.08±1.79 c | 422.74±6.77 c | 83.13±0.84 ab | 28.37±0.28 b | 9164.36±189.56 b |
| F1N4 | 244.22±0.94 c | 158.95±4.27 d | 388.19±11.18 e | 81.22±0.79 cd | 27.48±0.40 c | 8175.73±207.25 c |
| F2N1 | 265.15±0.79 a | 174.97±1.81 ab | 463.95±6.18 ab | 83.45±0.34 ab | 28.25±0.59 b | 10276.27±105.65 a |
| F2N2 | 263.79±0.70 a | 173.28±1.29 b | 453.04±4.56 b | 83.84±0.62 a | 28.75±0.10 ab | 10259.44±68.81 a |
| F2N3 | 256.57±0.78 b | 157.40±2.38 de | 403.83±5.84 d | 82.34±0.29 bc | 28.36±0.19 b | 9143.78±63.26 b |
| F2N4 | 244.97±2.46 c | 154.23±2.46 ef | 377.83±8.85 e | 80.02±0.63 d | 27.39±0.32 c | 8154.63±251.64 c |
| CK1 | 265.60±1.10 a | 174.14±1.48 b | 462.52±4.59 ab | 83.41±0.49 ab | 28.47±0.11 ab | 10135.71±175.53 a |
| CK2 | 215.44±0.72 d | 151.50±1.88 f | 326.39±4.89 f | 77.28±0.18 e | 27.17±0.56 c | 6330.49±90.91 d |
| F值 F value | 581.62** | 57.97** | 156.67** | 53.85** | 9.31** | 227.97** |
| 处理 Treatment | 纹枯病 Sheath blight disease | 稻曲病 Green smut | 二化螟 Striped stem borer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病株率 Disease incidence rate (%) | 病情 指数 Desease index | 防治效果 Control effect (%) | 病穗率 Disease incidence rate(%) | 病情 指数 Desease index | 防治效果 Control effect (%) | 枯鞘(心)率 Dead sheath (heart) rate(%) | 白穗率 White head rate(%) | |||
| F1N1 | 6.91±0.18 cd | 0.97±0.02 c | 84.27±0.40 a | 1.33±0.02 e | 0.35±0.03 de | 88.80±0.96 a | 0.57±0.33 a | 0.13±0.05 a | ||
| F1N2 | 7.45±0.08 c | 0.94±0.03 c | 84.64±0.48 a | 1.15±0.15 e | 0.30±0.03 e | 90.35±1.00 a | 0.64±0.30 a | 0.13±0.06 a | ||
| F1N3 | 6.27±0.14 e | 0.88±0.08 c | 85.66±1.31 a | 1.99±0.33 c | 0.47±0.04 c | 84.82±1.19 c | 0.69±0.12 a | 0.20±0.11 a | ||
| F1N4 | 8.94±0.49 b | 1.41±0.16 b | 77.07±2.58 b | 2.54±0.10 b | 0.57±0.02 b | 81.65±0.61 d | 0.72±0.13 a | 0.25±0.12 a | ||
| F2N1 | 7.24±0.64 cd | 0.97±0.03 c | 84.15±0.48 a | 1.37±0.43 e | 0.36±0.13 de | 88.32±4.20 a | 0.57±0.19 a | 0.16±0.05 a | ||
| F2N2 | 6.09±0.31 e | 0.95±0.04 c | 84.51±0.65 a | 1.22±0.06 e | 0.33±0.01 e | 89.45±0.36 a | 0.71±0.11 a | 0.17±0.06 a | ||
| F2N3 | 6.71±0.39 de | 0.90±0.01 c | 85.35±0.18 a | 1.97±0.44 c | 0.49±0.06 c | 84.28±2.10 c | 0.83±0.21 a | 0.24±0.12 a | ||
| F2N4 | 8.64±0.44 b | 1.46±0.06 b | 76.29±0.87 b | 2.59±0.17 b | 0.59±0.01 b | 81.12±0.34 e | 0.94±0.14 a | 0.29±0.16 a | ||
| CK1 | 7.02±0.23 cd | 0.98±0.05 c | 84.05±0.77 a | 1.52±0.16 de | 0.39±0.01 de | 87.52±0.41 ab | 0.57±0.19 a | 0.13±0.06 a | ||
| CK2 | 28.80±0.21 a | 6.14±0.09 a | - | 9.25±0.41 a | 3.12±0.20 a | - | 1.03±0.49 a | 0.32±0.18 a | ||
| F值 F value | 1132.10** | 1638.40** | 31.68** | 236.03** | 341.19** | 11.99** | 1.25ns | 1.27ns | ||
表4 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻病害防治效果的影响
Table 4. Effect of N fertilizer and pesticide application methods on disease control
| 处理 Treatment | 纹枯病 Sheath blight disease | 稻曲病 Green smut | 二化螟 Striped stem borer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 病株率 Disease incidence rate (%) | 病情 指数 Desease index | 防治效果 Control effect (%) | 病穗率 Disease incidence rate(%) | 病情 指数 Desease index | 防治效果 Control effect (%) | 枯鞘(心)率 Dead sheath (heart) rate(%) | 白穗率 White head rate(%) | |||
| F1N1 | 6.91±0.18 cd | 0.97±0.02 c | 84.27±0.40 a | 1.33±0.02 e | 0.35±0.03 de | 88.80±0.96 a | 0.57±0.33 a | 0.13±0.05 a | ||
| F1N2 | 7.45±0.08 c | 0.94±0.03 c | 84.64±0.48 a | 1.15±0.15 e | 0.30±0.03 e | 90.35±1.00 a | 0.64±0.30 a | 0.13±0.06 a | ||
| F1N3 | 6.27±0.14 e | 0.88±0.08 c | 85.66±1.31 a | 1.99±0.33 c | 0.47±0.04 c | 84.82±1.19 c | 0.69±0.12 a | 0.20±0.11 a | ||
| F1N4 | 8.94±0.49 b | 1.41±0.16 b | 77.07±2.58 b | 2.54±0.10 b | 0.57±0.02 b | 81.65±0.61 d | 0.72±0.13 a | 0.25±0.12 a | ||
| F2N1 | 7.24±0.64 cd | 0.97±0.03 c | 84.15±0.48 a | 1.37±0.43 e | 0.36±0.13 de | 88.32±4.20 a | 0.57±0.19 a | 0.16±0.05 a | ||
| F2N2 | 6.09±0.31 e | 0.95±0.04 c | 84.51±0.65 a | 1.22±0.06 e | 0.33±0.01 e | 89.45±0.36 a | 0.71±0.11 a | 0.17±0.06 a | ||
| F2N3 | 6.71±0.39 de | 0.90±0.01 c | 85.35±0.18 a | 1.97±0.44 c | 0.49±0.06 c | 84.28±2.10 c | 0.83±0.21 a | 0.24±0.12 a | ||
| F2N4 | 8.64±0.44 b | 1.46±0.06 b | 76.29±0.87 b | 2.59±0.17 b | 0.59±0.01 b | 81.12±0.34 e | 0.94±0.14 a | 0.29±0.16 a | ||
| CK1 | 7.02±0.23 cd | 0.98±0.05 c | 84.05±0.77 a | 1.52±0.16 de | 0.39±0.01 de | 87.52±0.41 ab | 0.57±0.19 a | 0.13±0.06 a | ||
| CK2 | 28.80±0.21 a | 6.14±0.09 a | - | 9.25±0.41 a | 3.12±0.20 a | - | 1.03±0.49 a | 0.32±0.18 a | ||
| F值 F value | 1132.10** | 1638.40** | 31.68** | 236.03** | 341.19** | 11.99** | 1.25ns | 1.27ns | ||
| 处理 Treatment | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 齐穗后15 d 15 days after full-heading | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 42.51±0.94 a | 39.46±0.97 a | 30.69±0.18 a |
| F1N2 | 42.44±0.39 a | 39.34±0.14 a | 30.45±0.64 a |
| F1N3 | 40.55±0.90 b | 36.44±0.57 b | 27.31±0.56 b |
| F1N4 | 39.80±0.55 b | 34.49±0.26 c | 25.75±0.76 b |
| F2N1 | 42.17±0.33 a | 38.94±0.42 a | 30.41±1.39 a |
| F2N2 | 42.04±0.35 a | 38.77±0.67 a | 30.27±0.92 a |
| F2N3 | 40.47±0.46 b | 36.25±0.32 b | 27.18±1.01 b |
| F2N4 | 39.78±0.56 b | 34.34±0.12 c | 25.65±0.49 b |
| CK1 | 42.27±0.18 a | 39.28±0.70 a | 30.17±0.96 a |
| CK2 | 39.75±0.77 b | 34.22±0.48 c | 22.56±1.72 c |
| F值 F value | 12.57** | 53.96** | 25.37** |
表5 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻剑叶SPAD值的影响
Table 5. Effect of N fertilizer and pesticide application management methods on SPAD value
| 处理 Treatment | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 齐穗后15 d 15 days after full-heading | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 42.51±0.94 a | 39.46±0.97 a | 30.69±0.18 a |
| F1N2 | 42.44±0.39 a | 39.34±0.14 a | 30.45±0.64 a |
| F1N3 | 40.55±0.90 b | 36.44±0.57 b | 27.31±0.56 b |
| F1N4 | 39.80±0.55 b | 34.49±0.26 c | 25.75±0.76 b |
| F2N1 | 42.17±0.33 a | 38.94±0.42 a | 30.41±1.39 a |
| F2N2 | 42.04±0.35 a | 38.77±0.67 a | 30.27±0.92 a |
| F2N3 | 40.47±0.46 b | 36.25±0.32 b | 27.18±1.01 b |
| F2N4 | 39.78±0.56 b | 34.34±0.12 c | 25.65±0.49 b |
| CK1 | 42.27±0.18 a | 39.28±0.70 a | 30.17±0.96 a |
| CK2 | 39.75±0.77 b | 34.22±0.48 c | 22.56±1.72 c |
| F值 F value | 12.57** | 53.96** | 25.37** |
| 处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数Leaf area index | 高效叶面积 Efficient leaf area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 高效叶面积指数 Efficient leaf area index | 高效叶面积率 Efficient leaf area ratio (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 5.10±0.08 a | 6.18±0.09 a | 2.89±0.08 a | 3.89±0.09 a | 62.95±0.60 d | |
| F1N2 | 5.05±0.02 a | 5.87±0.27 a | 2.85±0.02 a | 3.84±0.10 a | 64.89±0.41 c | |
| F1N3 | 4.75±0.17 b | 5.45±0.14 c | 2.64±0.03 b | 3.52±0.10 b | 65.71±0.65 bc | |
| F1N4 | 4.63±0.05 b | 4.98±0.05 d | 2.51±0.16 b | 3.34±0.17 c | 66.76±0.29 b | |
| F2N1 | 5.07±0.02 a | 6.11±0.22 a | 2.90±0.04 a | 3.83±0.15 a | 62.06±0.41 d | |
| F2N2 | 5.04±0.23 a | 5.83±0.20 a | 2.82±0.10 a | 3.73±0.18 a | 63.33±1.19 d | |
| F2N3 | 4.73±0.13 b | 5.34±0.39 b | 2.63±0.18 b | 3.48±0.23 b | 65.36±1.31 c | |
| F2N4 | 4.58±0.25 b | 4.95±0.21 c | 2.49±0.11 b | 3.30±0.15 c | 67.02±0.55 b | |
| CK1 | 5.12±0.12 a | 6.09±0.19 a | 2.89±0.15 a | 3.80±0.12 a | 62.50±0.20 d | |
| CK2 | 3.46±0.04 c | 3.88±0.10 d | 1.92±0.08 c | 2.64±0.06 d | 70.41±0.51 a | |
| F值 F value | 61.82** | 36.02** | 32.20** | 20.58** | 39.79** | |
表6 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻叶面积指数的影响
Table 6. Effect of N fertilizer and pesticide application management methods on the LAI
| 处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数Leaf area index | 高效叶面积 Efficient leaf area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 高效叶面积指数 Efficient leaf area index | 高效叶面积率 Efficient leaf area ratio (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 5.10±0.08 a | 6.18±0.09 a | 2.89±0.08 a | 3.89±0.09 a | 62.95±0.60 d | |
| F1N2 | 5.05±0.02 a | 5.87±0.27 a | 2.85±0.02 a | 3.84±0.10 a | 64.89±0.41 c | |
| F1N3 | 4.75±0.17 b | 5.45±0.14 c | 2.64±0.03 b | 3.52±0.10 b | 65.71±0.65 bc | |
| F1N4 | 4.63±0.05 b | 4.98±0.05 d | 2.51±0.16 b | 3.34±0.17 c | 66.76±0.29 b | |
| F2N1 | 5.07±0.02 a | 6.11±0.22 a | 2.90±0.04 a | 3.83±0.15 a | 62.06±0.41 d | |
| F2N2 | 5.04±0.23 a | 5.83±0.20 a | 2.82±0.10 a | 3.73±0.18 a | 63.33±1.19 d | |
| F2N3 | 4.73±0.13 b | 5.34±0.39 b | 2.63±0.18 b | 3.48±0.23 b | 65.36±1.31 c | |
| F2N4 | 4.58±0.25 b | 4.95±0.21 c | 2.49±0.11 b | 3.30±0.15 c | 67.02±0.55 b | |
| CK1 | 5.12±0.12 a | 6.09±0.19 a | 2.89±0.15 a | 3.80±0.12 a | 62.50±0.20 d | |
| CK2 | 3.46±0.04 c | 3.88±0.10 d | 1.92±0.08 c | 2.64±0.06 d | 70.41±0.51 a | |
| F值 F value | 61.82** | 36.02** | 32.20** | 20.58** | 39.79** | |
| 处理 Treatment | 干物质积累Dry matter accumulation(kg/hm2) | 干物质转运Dry matter transport | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Transport amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Transport rate (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 5171.19±95.18 a | 15585.97±81.49 a | 19786.57±167.86 a | 3538.68±79.12 a | 27.39±0.41 d | |
| F1N2 | 5166.02±90.99 a | 15578.02±92.12 ab | 19760.21±92.24 a | 3526.66±128.32 a | 27.44±0.85 d | |
| F1N3 | 4816.18±106.07 b | 12791.72±159.86 c | 17467.83±66.32 b | 3251.53±183.52 b | 28.90±1.03 bc | |
| F1N4 | 4452.45±172.93 c | 11483.67±82.80 d | 15684.20±36.01 c | 2989.52±160.61 c | 29.89±1.12 b | |
| F2N1 | 5161.81±111.01 a | 15571.11±93.90 ab | 19739.24±127.75 a | 3509.87±73.80 a | 27.36±0.55 d | |
| F2N2 | 5154.63±91.73 a | 15546.28±127.44 ab | 19734.48±59.99 a | 3500.67±79.80 a | 27.41±0.47 d | |
| F2N3 | 4802.99±83.65 b | 12759.74±81.61 c | 17450.93±20.13 b | 3204.31±99.14 b | 28.62±0.65 c | |
| F2N4 | 4438.80±73.40 c | 11477.43±76.99 d | 15657.75±65.40 c | 2867.82±17.34 c | 29.02±0.27 bc | |
| CK1 | 5145.28±81.41 a | 15405.96±55.66 b | 19663.94±49.79 a | 3441.15±17.81 a | 26.94±0.15 d | |
| CK2 | 3558.91±95.83 d | 8459.91±11.49 e | 11662.88±77.60 d | 2467.78±11.68 d | 32.63±0.19 a | |
| F值 F value | 75.64** | 2087.74** | 3146.91** | 36.67** | 21.16** | |
表7 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻各生育时期干物质积累与转运的影响
Table 7. Effects of N fertilizer and pesticide application management methods on dry matter accumulation and transport
| 处理 Treatment | 干物质积累Dry matter accumulation(kg/hm2) | 干物质转运Dry matter transport | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Transport amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Transport rate (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 5171.19±95.18 a | 15585.97±81.49 a | 19786.57±167.86 a | 3538.68±79.12 a | 27.39±0.41 d | |
| F1N2 | 5166.02±90.99 a | 15578.02±92.12 ab | 19760.21±92.24 a | 3526.66±128.32 a | 27.44±0.85 d | |
| F1N3 | 4816.18±106.07 b | 12791.72±159.86 c | 17467.83±66.32 b | 3251.53±183.52 b | 28.90±1.03 bc | |
| F1N4 | 4452.45±172.93 c | 11483.67±82.80 d | 15684.20±36.01 c | 2989.52±160.61 c | 29.89±1.12 b | |
| F2N1 | 5161.81±111.01 a | 15571.11±93.90 ab | 19739.24±127.75 a | 3509.87±73.80 a | 27.36±0.55 d | |
| F2N2 | 5154.63±91.73 a | 15546.28±127.44 ab | 19734.48±59.99 a | 3500.67±79.80 a | 27.41±0.47 d | |
| F2N3 | 4802.99±83.65 b | 12759.74±81.61 c | 17450.93±20.13 b | 3204.31±99.14 b | 28.62±0.65 c | |
| F2N4 | 4438.80±73.40 c | 11477.43±76.99 d | 15657.75±65.40 c | 2867.82±17.34 c | 29.02±0.27 bc | |
| CK1 | 5145.28±81.41 a | 15405.96±55.66 b | 19663.94±49.79 a | 3441.15±17.81 a | 26.94±0.15 d | |
| CK2 | 3558.91±95.83 d | 8459.91±11.49 e | 11662.88±77.60 d | 2467.78±11.68 d | 32.63±0.19 a | |
| F值 F value | 75.64** | 2087.74** | 3146.91** | 36.67** | 21.16** | |
| 处理 Treatment | 氮素积累N accumulation (kg/hm2) | 氮素转运N transport | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Transport amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Transport rate (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 75.37±1.71 a | 156.00±0.66 a | 173.00±5.00 a | 68.39±1.93 a | 51.45±1.10 bc | |
| F1N2 | 73.44±0.39 b | 152.55±0.60 b | 170.32±5.13 a | 67.98±1.11 a | 51.87±1.24 bc | |
| F1N3 | 66.97±0.75 d | 127.08±0.55 e | 150.36±2.94 b | 55.56±2.39 d | 52.38±0.91 b | |
| F1N4 | 62.36±0.96 f | 112.24±1.01 g | 139.31±4.32 c | 48.91±1.37 f | 55.52±1.31 a | |
| F2N1 | 72.07±0.55 bc | 150.25±1.48 c | 169.11±2.00 a | 64.12±0.77 b | 50.57±0.57 bc | |
| F2N2 | 71.09±1.01 c | 149.51±0.59 c | 167.42±6.09 a | 63.63±0.54 b | 50.64±0.41 bc | |
| F2N3 | 64.97±0.52 e | 124.77±1.47 f | 148.65±0.65 b | 51.86±0.63 e | 51.64±0.45 bc | |
| F2N4 | 60.96±1.84 f | 109.23±1.91 h | 138.48±2.01 c | 48.15±1.69 f | 55.13±1.31 a | |
| CK1 | 70.49±1.11 c | 145.18±1.48 d | 165.86±5.88 a | 60.03±2.27 c | 49.69±0.28 c | |
| CK2 | 52.80±0.81 g | 96.19±0.54 i | 120.84±1.04 d | 43.27±1.22 g | 56.98±1.00 a | |
| F值 F value | 125.52** | 1070.60** | 57.84** | 140.04** | 24.40** | |
表8 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻氮素积累与转运的影响
Table 8. Effects of N fertilizer and pesticide application management methods on N accumulation and transport
| 处理 Treatment | 氮素积累N accumulation (kg/hm2) | 氮素转运N transport | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full-heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Transport amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Transport rate (%) | ||
| F1N1 | 75.37±1.71 a | 156.00±0.66 a | 173.00±5.00 a | 68.39±1.93 a | 51.45±1.10 bc | |
| F1N2 | 73.44±0.39 b | 152.55±0.60 b | 170.32±5.13 a | 67.98±1.11 a | 51.87±1.24 bc | |
| F1N3 | 66.97±0.75 d | 127.08±0.55 e | 150.36±2.94 b | 55.56±2.39 d | 52.38±0.91 b | |
| F1N4 | 62.36±0.96 f | 112.24±1.01 g | 139.31±4.32 c | 48.91±1.37 f | 55.52±1.31 a | |
| F2N1 | 72.07±0.55 bc | 150.25±1.48 c | 169.11±2.00 a | 64.12±0.77 b | 50.57±0.57 bc | |
| F2N2 | 71.09±1.01 c | 149.51±0.59 c | 167.42±6.09 a | 63.63±0.54 b | 50.64±0.41 bc | |
| F2N3 | 64.97±0.52 e | 124.77±1.47 f | 148.65±0.65 b | 51.86±0.63 e | 51.64±0.45 bc | |
| F2N4 | 60.96±1.84 f | 109.23±1.91 h | 138.48±2.01 c | 48.15±1.69 f | 55.13±1.31 a | |
| CK1 | 70.49±1.11 c | 145.18±1.48 d | 165.86±5.88 a | 60.03±2.27 c | 49.69±0.28 c | |
| CK2 | 52.80±0.81 g | 96.19±0.54 i | 120.84±1.04 d | 43.27±1.22 g | 56.98±1.00 a | |
| F值 F value | 125.52** | 1070.60** | 57.84** | 140.04** | 24.40** | |
| 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity | 氮肥吸收利用率 N use efficiency (%) | 氮肥贡献率 N contribution rate (%) | 氮素收获指数 N harvest index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 68.90±0.70 b | 34.77±2.64 a | 38.74±0.88 a | 62.94±1.47 cd |
| F1N2 | 76.28±1.10 a | 36.65±3.03 a | 38.53±1.16 a | 63.00±1.71 cd |
| F1N3 | 76.37±0.15 a | 24.60±1.58 c | 30.86±1.10 b | 64.42±0.93 cd |
| F1N4 | 77.86±0.60 a | 17.59±3.12 d | 22.19±1.59 c | 69.78±2.65 b |
| F2N1 | 68.51±0.71 b | 32.18±0.64 ab | 38.40±0.41 a | 62.49±1.14 cd |
| F2N2 | 76.00±0.51 a | 34.50±3.73 ab | 38.29±0.37 a | 62.73±3.02 cd |
| F2N3 | 76.20±0.53 a | 23.18±0.33 c | 30.76±0.66 b | 65.58±0.22 c |
| F2N4 | 77.66±2.39 a | 16.80±0.92 d | 22.28±2.41 c | 69.55±0.58 b |
| CK1 | 67.57±0.54 b | 30.01±3.23 b | 37.54±0.81 a | 61.59±1.64 d |
| CK2 | - | - | - | 72.98±1.21 a |
| F值 F value | 327.85** | 28.23** | 30.07** | 16.33** |
表9 氮肥农药施用方式对机插稻氮素利用效率的影响
Table 9. Effect of N fertilizer and pesticide application management methods on NUE
| 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity | 氮肥吸收利用率 N use efficiency (%) | 氮肥贡献率 N contribution rate (%) | 氮素收获指数 N harvest index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 68.90±0.70 b | 34.77±2.64 a | 38.74±0.88 a | 62.94±1.47 cd |
| F1N2 | 76.28±1.10 a | 36.65±3.03 a | 38.53±1.16 a | 63.00±1.71 cd |
| F1N3 | 76.37±0.15 a | 24.60±1.58 c | 30.86±1.10 b | 64.42±0.93 cd |
| F1N4 | 77.86±0.60 a | 17.59±3.12 d | 22.19±1.59 c | 69.78±2.65 b |
| F2N1 | 68.51±0.71 b | 32.18±0.64 ab | 38.40±0.41 a | 62.49±1.14 cd |
| F2N2 | 76.00±0.51 a | 34.50±3.73 ab | 38.29±0.37 a | 62.73±3.02 cd |
| F2N3 | 76.20±0.53 a | 23.18±0.33 c | 30.76±0.66 b | 65.58±0.22 c |
| F2N4 | 77.66±2.39 a | 16.80±0.92 d | 22.28±2.41 c | 69.55±0.58 b |
| CK1 | 67.57±0.54 b | 30.01±3.23 b | 37.54±0.81 a | 61.59±1.64 d |
| CK2 | - | - | - | 72.98±1.21 a |
| F值 F value | 327.85** | 28.23** | 30.07** | 16.33** |
图1 不同飞行速度下氮药减施和人工模式总能量投入(A)与能量产出(B) 柱上不同小写字母表示在 0.05 水平上差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Fig. 1. Total energy input for reduced N fertilizer and pesticide application at different flight speeds (A) and manual management(B) Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate a statistically significant difference at the 0.05 level (P < 0.05)
| 处理 Treatment | 净能量 Net energy (MJ/hm2) | 能量利用效率 Energy utilization efficiency (MJ/MJ) | 能量生产力 Energy productivity (kg/MJ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 271034.00±1497.99 ab | 12.89±0.09 c | 0.45±0.01 c |
| F1N2 | 271560.84±1216.13 a | 13.47±0.05 b | 0.47±0.02 b |
| F1N3 | 238824.04±1523.66 c | 12.50±0.04 d | 0.44±0.02 c |
| F1N4 | 213107.54±1404.85 d | 11.80±0.16 e | 0.41±0.03 d |
| F2N1 | 270359.41±1592.87 ab | 12.86±0.08 c | 0.45±0.01 c |
| F2N2 | 271206.13±1059.51 a | 13.46±0.03 b | 0.47±0.02 b |
| F2N3 | 238537.84±1110.31 c | 12.50±0.01 d | 0.44±0.01 c |
| F2N4 | 212693.88±1552.54 d | 11.78±0.11 e | 0.41±0.03 d |
| CK1 | 268574.97±1619.00 b | 12.76±0.04 c | 0.44±0.02 c |
| CK2 | 164456.23±1146.88 e | 17.75±0.02 a | 0.64±0.01 a |
| F值 F value | 2044.05** | 1469.88** | 71.45** |
表10 不同飞行速度下氮药减施和人工模式对能量利用效率的影响
Table 10. Differences in energy utilization rates of N fertilizer and pesticide application and manual management at different flight speeds
| 处理 Treatment | 净能量 Net energy (MJ/hm2) | 能量利用效率 Energy utilization efficiency (MJ/MJ) | 能量生产力 Energy productivity (kg/MJ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1N1 | 271034.00±1497.99 ab | 12.89±0.09 c | 0.45±0.01 c |
| F1N2 | 271560.84±1216.13 a | 13.47±0.05 b | 0.47±0.02 b |
| F1N3 | 238824.04±1523.66 c | 12.50±0.04 d | 0.44±0.02 c |
| F1N4 | 213107.54±1404.85 d | 11.80±0.16 e | 0.41±0.03 d |
| F2N1 | 270359.41±1592.87 ab | 12.86±0.08 c | 0.45±0.01 c |
| F2N2 | 271206.13±1059.51 a | 13.46±0.03 b | 0.47±0.02 b |
| F2N3 | 238537.84±1110.31 c | 12.50±0.01 d | 0.44±0.01 c |
| F2N4 | 212693.88±1552.54 d | 11.78±0.11 e | 0.41±0.03 d |
| CK1 | 268574.97±1619.00 b | 12.76±0.04 c | 0.44±0.02 c |
| CK2 | 164456.23±1146.88 e | 17.75±0.02 a | 0.64±0.01 a |
| F值 F value | 2044.05** | 1469.88** | 71.45** |
图2 不同飞行速度下氮药减施和人工模式总能量投入占比
Fig. 2. Proportion of total energy input for N fertilizer and pesticide application and manual management at different speeds
| 处理 Treatment | 常规/减量后用量 Application rate (kg/hm2 or mL/hm2) | 节约量 Amount saved (kg/hm2 or mL/hm2) | 节约百比 Saving percentage (%) | 平均产量变化幅度 Range of variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | 150.00 | — | — | +1.61 |
| 756.50 | — | |||
| N2 | 135.00 | 15.00 | 10.00 | +1.41 |
| 680.85 | 75.65 | |||
| N3 | 120.00 | 30.00 | 20.00 | −9.68 |
| 605.20 | 151.30 | |||
| N4 | 105.00 | 45.00 | 30.00 | −19.44 |
| 529.55 | 226.95 | |||
| CK1 | 150.00 | — | — | — |
| 756.50 | — | — | ||
| CK2 | 0.00 | 150.00 | 100 | −37.54 |
| 0.00 | 756.50 | 100 |
表11 无人机和人工模式下氮药减量下机插稻氮肥农药节量比较
Table 11. Comparison of N fertilizer and pesticide application in machine-planted rice under UAV and manual management with N and pesticide reduction
| 处理 Treatment | 常规/减量后用量 Application rate (kg/hm2 or mL/hm2) | 节约量 Amount saved (kg/hm2 or mL/hm2) | 节约百比 Saving percentage (%) | 平均产量变化幅度 Range of variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | 150.00 | — | — | +1.61 |
| 756.50 | — | |||
| N2 | 135.00 | 15.00 | 10.00 | +1.41 |
| 680.85 | 75.65 | |||
| N3 | 120.00 | 30.00 | 20.00 | −9.68 |
| 605.20 | 151.30 | |||
| N4 | 105.00 | 45.00 | 30.00 | −19.44 |
| 529.55 | 226.95 | |||
| CK1 | 150.00 | — | — | — |
| 756.50 | — | — | ||
| CK2 | 0.00 | 150.00 | 100 | −37.54 |
| 0.00 | 756.50 | 100 |
图4 水稻产量及各项指标相关性分析 *、**分别表示在 0.05 和 0.01 水平相关显著。Yield: 产量;LAI:叶面积指数;DMA:干物质积累量;DMT:干物质转运量;DTR:干物质转运率;NA:氮素积累量;NT:氮素转运量;NTR:氮素转运率;NCR:氮肥贡献率;NUE:氮肥利用效率;PFPN:氮肥偏生产力;EI:总能量投入;EO:能量产出;NE:净能量;EP:能量生产力;NUE:能量利用效率;PC:生产成本;PO:生产产出;OIR:产出投入比;NI:净收益。
Fig. 4. Correlation analysis of rice yield and indicators *, ** indicate significant correlation at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. LAI, Leaf area index; DMA, Dry matter accumulation; DMT, Dry matter transport amount; DTR, Dry matter transport rate; NA, N accumulation; NT, N transportation; NTR, N transport rate; NCR, N contribution rate; NUE, N use efficiency; PFPN, Partial factor productivity; EI, Energy input; ED, energy output; NE, Net Energy; EP, Energy productivity; NUE, Energy utilization efficiency; PC, production cost; PD, Production output; OIR, Output-input ratio; NI, Net income.
| [1] | 宋开付, 张广斌, 徐华, 马静. 中国再生稻种植的影响因素及可持续性研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(6): 1365-1377. |
| Song K F, Zhang G B, Xu H, Ma J. A review of research on influencing factors and sustainability of ratoon rice cultivation in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(6): 1365-1377. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | Liu Q, Wu T Y, Pu L, SUN J. Comparison of fertilizer use efficiency in grain production between developing countries and developed countries[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2022, 102(6): 2404-2412. |
| [3] | Yadav K, Kumar M, Gulaiya S, Singh N, Singh S, Salar A, Joshi M, Pal S S, Singh P P. Adverse impacts of lodging and strategies for management in cereal crops: A comprehensive review[J]. Plant Archives, 2024, 24(2): 495-503. |
| [4] | 张小祥, 邵士梅, 赵步洪, 张耗, 季红娟, 肖宁, 潘存红, 李育红, 吴云雨, 蔡跃, 刘建菊, 吉春明, 张秀琴, 刘广青, 周长海, 黄年生, 李爱宏. 氮肥减施模式对不同穗型迟熟中粳水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 278-294. |
| Zhang X X, Shao S M, Zhao B H, Zhang H, Ji H J, Xiao N, Pan C H, Li Y H, Wu Y Y, Cai Y, Liu J J, Ji C M, Zhang X Q, Liu G Q, Zhou C H, Huang N S, Li A H. Effects of nitrogen reduction model on yield and nitrogen absorption and utilization of late-maturing mid-japonica rice with different panicle types[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 278-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 罗颖菡, 李波, 孙永健, 郭长春, 邢梦文, 李飞杰, 刘芳艳, 杨志远, 徐富贤, 马均. 氮肥后移对杂交籼稻产量及不同粒位稻米垩白与食味品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(5): 54-58, 63. |
| Luo Y H, Li B, Sun Y J, Guo C C, Xing M W, Li F J, Liu F Y, Yang Z Y, Xu F X, Ma J. Effects of postponing nitrogen topdressing on yield, chalkiness in different grain positions and tasting quality of hybrid indica rice[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(5): 54-58, 63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | 刘秋蒙, 刘静文, 张满, 舒晨晖, 季雅岚, 吴文革, 束维正, 任兰天. 缓控释肥料对水稻产量、品质及土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(9): 136-142. |
| Liu Q M, Liu J W, Zhang M, Shu C H, Ji Y L, Wu W G, Shu W Z, Ren L T. Impacts of slow and controlled release fertilizers on yield, quality and soil microbial diversity of rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(9): 136-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 杨标. 氮肥减施对稻米食味品质和淀粉理化特性的作用效应研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022. |
| Yang B. Effects of nitrogen reduction on eating quality and starch physicochemical properties of rice[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 金书秦, 张惠, 付饶, 刘静. 化肥零增长行动实施状况中期评估[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(2): 39-43. |
| Jin S, Zhang H, Fu R, Liu J. Mid-term evaluation on the implementation of zero growth action of chemical fertilizers[J]. Environmental Protection, 2019, 47(2): 39-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 张舒, 赵华, 吕亮, 常向前, 杨小林, 杨利, 卢殿友, 陈明学. 不同化肥农药减施组合对水稻主要病虫害发生及产量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(6): 1-7. |
| Zhang S, Zhao H, Lü L, Chang X Q, Yang X L, Yang L, Lu D Y, Chen M X. Effects of reduction combinations of fertilizer and pesticide on incidence of main pests and diseases and yield in rice[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020, 39(6): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | 李伟. 我国人口负增长趋势及应对策略[J]. 中国发展观察, 2024(S1): 6-9. |
| Li W. Trends of negative population growth in China and countermeasures[J]. China Development Observation, 2024(S1): 6-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | 娄尚易, 薛新宇, 顾伟, 崔龙飞, 周晴晴, 王昕. 农用植保无人机的研究现状及趋势[J]. 农机化研究, 2017, 39(12): 1-6, 31. |
| Lou S Y, Xue X Y, Gu W, Cui L F, Zhou Q Q, Wang X. Current status and trends of agricultural plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2017, 39(12): 1-6, 31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [12] | 童纪氚, 戎雪利, 任萍, 褚光, 王丹英. 水稻无人机直播产量、效益分析及技术要点[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(1): 98-100, 107. |
| Tong J C, Rong X L, Ren P, Chu G, Wang D Y. Yield and benefit analysis of rice drone direct seeding and its technical points[J]. China Rice, 2024, 30(1): 98-100, 107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 彭志清, 柏超, 宁国云. 基于农药减量下植保无人机施药对水稻病虫害防效的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(2): 106-107, 110. |
| Peng Z Q, Bai C, Ning G Y. Effects of applying plant protection UAV on rice pests and diseases based on pesticide reduction[J]. China Rice, 2019, 25(2): 106-107, 110. [ | |
| [14] | 朱赞彬, 黄钰琪, 龚守富. 无人机作业参数对小麦喷雾效果的分析及试验[J]. 农机化研究, 2023, 45(5): 186-190. |
| Zhu Z B, Huang Y Q, Gong S F. Analysis and experiment on the effect of UAV operating parameters on wheat spraying[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2023, 45(5): 186-190. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 臧禹, 谷秀艳, 林树青, 资乐, 李长龙, 陈其龙, 臧英. 植保无人机作业方式对玉米螟防治的雾滴沉积和防治效果影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2024, 43(6): 325-332. |
| Zang Y, Gu X Y, Lin S Q, Zi L, Li C L, Chen Q L, Zang Y. Effects of mode of operating agricultural unmanned aerial vehicles on deposition of droplet and prevention and control of corn borer[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2024, 43(6): 325-332. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 陈盛德, 兰玉彬, 李继宇, 周志艳, 金济, 刘爱民. 小型无人直升机喷雾参数对杂交水稻冠层雾滴沉积分布的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(17): 40-46. |
| Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Jin J, Liu A M. Effect of spray parameters of small unmanned helicopter on distribution regularity of droplet deposition in hybrid rice canopy[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(17): 40-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 周圆, 沈云鹏, 段志平, 李月帅, 张卫峰. 肥料物理性质对无人机撒肥均匀性的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(12): 57-71. |
| Zhou Y, Shen Y P, Duan Z P, Li Y S, Zhang W F. Effects of physical properties of fertilizer on the uniformity of UAV fertilization[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2024, 29(12): 57-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [18] | 方铁飞, 姚晓明, 周宇杰. 植保无人机不同喷液量对抗性二化螟防治效果的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(7): 1663-1666. |
| Fang T F, Yao X M, Zhou Y J. Effect of different spray amounts of plant protection drones on the control effect of the Chilo suppressalis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 65(7): 1663-1666. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [19] | 杨行洲, 乐秀虎. 植保无人机喷洒技术在不同作物中的适应性与优化策略[J]. 中国农机装备, 2024, 42(12): 77-79. |
| Yang X Z, Le X H. Adaptability and optimization strategy for spray application of UAV in different crops[J]. China Agricultural Machinery Equipment, 2024, 42(12): 77-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 姚熔薇. 不同杀菌剂对水稻纹枯病防效筛选试验[J]. 现代化农业, 2022(5): 18-19. |
| Yao R W. Screening test of control effect of different fungicides on rice sheath blight[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2022(5): 18-19. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | 唐春生, 高家樟, 曹国平, 黄守行, 刘二明, 刘承龙. 稻曲病病情分级标准的研究和应用[J]. 植物保护, 2001, 27(1): 18-21. |
| Tang C S, Gao J Z, Cao G P, Huang S X, Liu E M, Liu C L. Studies on the grading standard of rice false smut disease[J]. Plant Protection, 2001, 27(1): 18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 杨永刚, 袁晓娟, 曹云, 陈雪芳, 尹慧来, 王志强, 文艳芳, 杨志远, 孙园园, 贾现文, 马均, 孙永健. 品种和播种量互作对机械旱直播水稻与杂草养分竞争的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 185-197. |
| Yang Y G, Yuan X J, Cao Y, Chen X F, Yin H L, Wang Z Q, Wen Y F, Yang Z Y, Sun Y Y, Jia X W, Ma J, Sun Y J. Effects of variety and seeding rate interaction on nutrient competition between mechanized dry direct seeded rice and weeds[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 185-197. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | 刘风, 石爱龙, 祝海竣, 段玉婷, 关常铮, 罗龙欣, 彭涛, 王学华. 施氮量与肥料配比对水稻群体生长和产量的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2024, 39(3): 117-126. |
| Liu F, Shi A L, Zhu H J, Duan Y T, Guan C Z, Luo L X, Peng T, Wang X H. Effects of nitrogen application rate and fertilizer ratio on population growth and yield of rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2024, 39(3): 117-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [24] | Cheng Q Y, Li L Y, Liao Q, Fu H, Nie J X, Luo Y H, Wang Z L, Yin H L, Shu C H, Chen Z K, Sun Y J, Ma J, Li N, Yang Z Y. Is scale production more advantageous than smallholders for Chinese rice production?[J]. Energy, 2023, 283: 128753-128765. |
| [25] | 朱岳梅. 种子包衣对淹水直播杂交稻产量、能量利用和经济效益的影响[D]. 温江: 四川农业大学, 2023. |
| ZHU Y M. Effects of seed coating on yield, energy useand economic benefits of flooded direct seeding hybrid rice[D]. Wenjiang: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [26] | Ozkan B. Energy input-output analysis in tiurksh agriculture[J]. Energy, 2017, 32(2): 145-155. |
| [27] | 董洋阳, 贾晴晴, 朱新春, 刘章生, 王雅凤. 施氮量对机穴播水稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(3): 105-107. |
| Dong Y Y, Jia Q Q, Zhu X C, Liu Z S, Wang Y F. Effects of nitrogen application rate on yield and yield components of mechanical-dibbling rice[J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(3): 105-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 顾汉柱, 王琛, 吴昊, 张瑛, 肖治林, 景文疆, 张耗. 减氮方式对不同穗型粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2023, 37(5): 448-460. |
| Gu H Z, Wang C, Wu H, Zhang Y, Xiao Z L, Jing W J, Zhang H. Effects of nitrogen reduction on yield and quality of Japonica rice with different panicle type[J]. Crop Research, 2023, 37(5): 448-460. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 徐文波. 减量施氮对优质杂交籼稻产量形成及品质的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2021. |
| Xu W B. Effect of reduced nitrogen application on yield formation and quality of high-quality indica hybrid rice[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 胡明明, 李志欣, 丁峰, 陈凯瑞, 廖琴, 吴子牛, 熊莹, 付浩, 罗永恒, 陈宗奎, 杨志远, 孙永健, 马均. 不同水旱轮作模式下秸秆还田与精量减氮对水稻产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤氮含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(8): 1500-1514. |
| Hu M M, Li Z X, Ding F, Chen K R, Liao Q, Wu Z N, Xiong Y, Fu H, Luo Y H, Chen Z K, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Ma J. Effects of straw returning and precise N reduction on rice yield, N uptake and utilization and soil N content under different paddy-upland rotation patterns[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2024, 30(8): 1500-1514. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 宋灿灿, 王国宾, 韩金钢, 兰玉彬, 王会征, 赵静. 农用无人机播撒装置与技术研究综述[J]. 农业机械学报, 2025, 56(1): 110-122. |
| Song C C, Wang G B, Han J G, Lan Y B, Wang H Z, Zhao J. Review of research progress on agricultural UAV spreading devices and technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2025, 56(1): 110-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 任万军, 吴振元, 李蒙良, 雷小龙, 朱世林, 陈勇. 水稻无人机撒肥系统设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(3): 88-98. |
| Ren W J, Wu Z Y, Li M L, Lei X L, Zhu S L, Chen Y. Design and experiment of UAV fertilization spreader system for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(3): 88-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] | 吴振元. 无人机施肥装置的设计及在水稻穗肥上的应用与评价[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2020. |
| Wu Z Y. Design of UAV fertilization device and its application and evaluation on rice panicle fertilizer[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [34] | 黄世文, 王玲, 陈惠哲, 王全永, 朱德锋. 氮肥施用量和施用方法对超级杂交稻纹枯病发生的影响[J]. 植物病理学报, 2009, 39(1): 104-109. |
| Huang S W, Wang L, Chen H Z, Wang Q Y, Zhu D F. Effect of nitrogen dosage and fertilization approach on the occurrence of sheath blight disease in super hybrid rice(SHR)[J]. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 2009, 39(1): 104-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [35] | 任家琼. 2种助剂对水稻二化螟防治的减施增效作用[J]. 植物医学, 2022, 1(4): 60-65. |
| Ren J Q. Effects of two additives on reducing pesticide and increasing efficiency for control of rice stem borer[J]. Plant Health and Medicine, 2022, 1(4): 60-65. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [36] | 陈秋玉, 黄影华, 张华杰, 周丽燕, 赵丽君, 张善炫, 夏丽莎, 洪瑞霞, 李艳大, 陈青春. 不同生育期水稻叶片SPAD值与氮素指标相关关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(17): 19-24, 27. |
| Chen Q Y, Huang Y H, Zhang H J, Zhou L Y, Zhao L J, Zhang S X, Xia L S, Hong R X, Li Y D, Chen Q C. Correlation between SPAD value and nitrogen indicators in rice leaves at different growth stages[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 59(17): 19-24, 27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [37] | 刘磊, 宋娜娜, 齐晓丽, 崔克辉. 水稻根系特征与氮吸收利用效率关系的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(1): 11-19. |
| Liu L, Song N N, Qi X L, Cui K H. Research advances on the relationship between root characteristics and nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in rice[J]. Crops, 2022(1): 11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [38] | 王坤庭, 陶钰, 邢志鹏, 冯源, 郭力, 赵欣怡, 缪孙静, 陈慧敏, 胡雅杰. 穗肥施氮量和结实期遮光对水稻产量和干物质积累特征的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(8): 105-110. |
| Wang K T, Tao Y, Xing Z P, Feng Y, Guo L, Zhao X Y, Miao S J, Chen H M, Hu Y J. Effects of panicle nitrogen fertilizer amount and shading during grain filling period on yield and dry matter accumulation characteristics of rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(8): 105-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [39] | 王颖姮, 陈丽娟, 崔丽丽, 詹生威, 宋煜, 陈世安, 解振兴, 姜照伟, 吴方喜, 卓传营, 蔡秋华, 谢华安, 张建福. 施氮量对优质稻“福香占”光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(1): 89-101. |
| Wang Y H, Chen L J, Cui L L, Zhan S W, Song Y, Chen S A, Xie Z X, Jiang Z W, Wu F X, Zhuo C Y, Cai Q H, Xie H A, Zhang J F. Effects of nitrogen rate on photosynthesis, yield and grain quality of superior quality rice “Fuxiangzhan”[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 89-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [40] | 霍中洋, 杨雄, 张洪程, 葛梦婕, 马群, 李敏, 戴其根, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李国业, 朱聪聪, 王亚江, 颜希亭. 不同氮肥群体最高生产力水稻品种各器官的干物质和氮素的积累与转运[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(5): 1035-1045. |
| Huo Z Y, Yang X, Zhang H C, Ge M J, Ma Q, Li M, Dai Q G, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li G Y, Zhu C C, Wang Y J, Yan X T. Accumulation and translocation of dry matter and nitrogen nutrition in organs of rice cultivars with different productivity levels[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(5): 1035-1045. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [41] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, 李应洪, 严奉君, 徐徽, 王海月, 马均. 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24): 4745-4756. |
| Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Jiang M J, Li Y H, Yan F J, Xu H, Wang H Y, Ma J. Effects of fertilizer levels on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(24): 4745-4756. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [42] | 马巍, 齐春艳, 刘亮, 刘晓亮, 郭晞明, 隋鹏举, 付胜, 侯立刚. 氮肥减量后移对超级稻吉粳88氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(1): 23-27. |
| Ma W, Qi C Y, Liu L, Liu X L, Guo X M, Sui P J, Fu S, Hou L G. Effects of postponing and decreasing nitrogen application on nitrogen use efficiency and yield of super rice “Jijing 88”[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 41(1): 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [43] | 刘洪涛, 陈同斌, 郑国砥, 高定, 雷梅. 有机肥与化肥的生产能耗、投入成本和环境效益比较分析: 以污泥堆肥生产有机肥为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(4): 1000-1003. |
| Liu H T, Chen T B, Zheng G D, Gao D, Lei M. Comparative analysis of organic and chemical fertilizer production energy consumption, input cost and environmental benefit: Sewage sludge composting as example[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(4): 1000-1003. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [44] | Pishgar-KomLeh S H, Sefeedpari P, Rafiee S. Energy and economic analysis of rice production under different farm levels in Guilan Province of Iran[J]. Energy, 2011, 36(10): 5824-5831. |
| [45] | AghaAlikhani M, Kazemi-Poshtmasari H, Habibzadeh F. Energy use pattern in rice production: A case study from Mazandaran Province, Iran[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 69: 157-162. |
| [46] | Yang Z Y, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Li Y D, Wang H Y, Ma J, Sun Y J, Fu H, Shu C H, Yin H L, Chen Z K, Li N. Comparison of energy use between fully mechanized and semi-mechanized rice production in Southwest China[J]. Energy, 2022, 24(5): 123270. |
| [47] | Yang Z Y, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Li Y D, Wang H Y, Ma J, Sun Y J, Fu H, Shu C H, Yin H L, Chen Z K, Li N. Unmanned aerial vehicle direct seeding or integrated mechanical transplanting, which will be the next step for mechanized rice production in China? : A comparison based on energy use efficiency and economic benefits[J]. Energy, 2023, 27(3): 127223. |
| [48] | Qi P, Wang Z Q, Wang C, Zhang J, Li Y D, Ma J, Sun Y J, Fu H, Shu C H, Yin H L, Chen Z K, Li N. Development of multifunctional unmanned aerial vehicles versus ground seeding and outplanting: What is more effective for improving the growth and quality of rice culture[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 953753. |
| [49] | 李艳大, 叶春, 曹中盛, 孙滨峰, 舒时富, 陈立才. 无人机与人工喷施雾滴在水稻冠层内沉积特征及效益比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 513-518. |
| Li Y D, Ye C, Cao Z S, Sun B F, Shu S F, Chen L C. Comparison of droplet deposition characteristics in rice canopy and benefit between unmanned aerial vehicle spray and artificial spray[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 513-518. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 陈春晓, 付琳丽, 张微, 卜庆云, 田晓杰. 水稻MAPK家族基因功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 425-435. |
| [2] | 付瑶, 李娜, 徐静茹, 覃奕琰, 程笑然, 孙浩峰, 张琪, 崔志波, 杨新宇, 赵明辉. OsST2调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 436-446. |
| [3] | 邱一洁, 齐飞扬, 杜何为, 黄敏, 李曼菲. 水稻叶脉基因OsLVD1的鉴定及功能分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 447-459. |
| [4] | 朱骏, 杨延铭, 杨仲南. 水稻光温敏核不育系的诱变创制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 460-468. |
| [5] | 廖萍, 刘若彤, 孟轶, 翁文安, 都晗萌, 李骏, 高辉, 张洪程 . 一次性基施控释掺混肥对水稻产量和倒伏性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 469-475. |
| [6] | 陈川燕, 宋志文, 李玉祥, 郝全有, 朱岚. Fe-Mg纳米颗粒引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 476-486. |
| [7] | 钟晓媛, 王众, 陈雷, 张晓丽, 黄严, 朱德峰, 王亚梁, 覃勇, 高国庆, 张隆葵, 唐茂艳 梁天锋. 精准条播育秧对广西机插水稻栽插质量、干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 487-501. |
| [8] | 赵春芳, 罗磊, 赵庆勇, 庄丽华, 管菊, 陈涛, 朱镇, 张亚东, 王才林. 节水灌溉对优良食味粳稻产量形成及根系形态的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 519-530. |
| [9] | 王超瑞 , 张男, 汝艳, 严语, 孟庆好, 温雅, 张瑛, 肖治林, 张耗. 干湿交替灌溉与秸秆还田方式对水稻产量及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 531-547. |
| [10] | 梁晋雄, 冯严艺, 肖茂华, 王法安, 沈成, 胥文翔, 孟为国, . 面向田间路径控制的轮式拖拉机辅助转向系统设计与验证[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 548-559. |
| [11] | 刘庆, 顾清, 朱怡航, 娄卫东, 黄福灯, 朱英, 张小斌. 基于稻穗检测与机器学习的水稻始穗期预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 560-568. |
| [12] | 刘地斌, 陈雄飞, 方鹏, 余佳佳, 肖丽萍, 刘木华, 曾博涵, 陈晨晨. 粉状有机物料同步覆盖水稻直播机设计与试验[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 414-424. |
| [13] | 贾梅杰, 陈浩田, 钟笑涵, 王伟露, 张伟杨. 植物根鞘的建成机制与功能及其在水稻生产中的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 292-301. |
| [14] | 易浩昆, 罗堰木, 黄敏, 杜何为, 李曼菲. 水稻侧根发育突变体lrp1鉴定及表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 302-311. |
| [15] | 王洋洋, 杨传铭, 张喜娟, 杨贤莉, 王立志, 崔士泽, 许鑫凯, 李红宇, 姜树坤. 水稻苗期耐冷性Meta-QTL分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 312-326. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||