
中国水稻科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 476-486.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.250610
陈川燕1, 宋志文1, 李玉祥1, 郝全有2,*(
), 朱岚1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-17
修回日期:2025-10-05
出版日期:2026-07-10
发布日期:2026-07-15
通讯作者:
*email: haoqy@live.cn;基金资助:
CHEN Chuanyan1, SONG Zhiwen1, LI Yuxiang1, HAO Quanyou2,*(
), ZHU Lan1,*(
)
Received:2025-06-17
Revised:2025-10-05
Online:2026-07-10
Published:2026-07-15
摘要:
【目的】探究纳米引发技术对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发的影响,为盐碱地水稻种植提供技术参考。【方法】以宁粳47号水稻为供试材料,设置盐胁迫处理(0、150 mmol/L NaCl),并在150 mmol/L NaCl胁迫下,设置0、50、100、200、400 mg/L 5种浓度的Fe-Mg纳米颗粒处理,研究纳米引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响。【结果】盐胁迫显著抑制了水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长。纳米引发对水稻种子的发芽率和发芽势没有显著影响,但能促进幼苗生长,显著提高超氧化物歧化酶(27.78%~76.39%)、过氧化物酶(14.05%~38.71%)和过氧化氢酶(18.67%~120.00%)活性及维生素C(4.40%~225.79%)、可溶性糖(63.08%~145.96%)、脯氨酸(10.33%~16.88%)、叶绿素(45.38%~105.31%)含量,降低丙二醛含量(16.94%~32.41%),提高钾离子选择交换系数。【结论】200 mg/L Fe-Mg纳米颗粒引发是缓解盐胁迫,促进水稻萌发和幼苗生长的最适浓度。
陈川燕, 宋志文, 李玉祥, 郝全有, 朱岚. Fe-Mg纳米颗粒引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 476-486.
CHEN Chuanyan, SONG Zhiwen, LI Yuxiang, HAO Quanyou, ZHU Lan. Effects of Fe-Mg Nano-priming on Germination of Rice Seeds and Seedling Growth Under Salt Stress[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(4): 476-486.
| NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration(mmol/L) | 发芽势 Germination potential(%) | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 90.83±3.26 a | 97.92±2.08 a | 32.02±1.73 a | 193.09±10.54 a |
| 150 | 66.67±7.14 b | 90.00±3.33 b | 17.45±2.86 b | 48.86±3.65 b |
表1 盐胁迫对水稻种子萌发的影响
Table 1. Effects of salt stress on the germination of rice seeds
| NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration(mmol/L) | 发芽势 Germination potential(%) | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 90.83±3.26 a | 97.92±2.08 a | 32.02±1.73 a | 193.09±10.54 a |
| 150 | 66.67±7.14 b | 90.00±3.33 b | 17.45±2.86 b | 48.86±3.65 b |
| Fe-Mg NPs浓度 Fe-Mg NPs concentration(mg/L) | 发芽势 Germination potential(%) | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 82.78±4.99 a | 93.89±4.95 a | 27.82±3.46 b | 113.23±14.07 b |
| 50 | 83.89±7.55 a | 93.89±4.95 a | 27.04±3.29 b | 122.92±14.96 b |
| 100 | 85.00±4.92 a | 95.56±2.46 a | 30.81±0.92 ab | 135.11±4.03 b |
| 200 | 86.67±3.97 a | 96.11±3.51 a | 34.86±4.54 a | 175.55±22.86 a |
| 400 | 80.56±6.07 a | 93.89±4.35 a | 27.45±3.51 b | 114.51±14.65 b |
表2 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发的影响
Table 2. Effect of Fe-Mg NPs priming on seed germination of rice under salt stress
| Fe-Mg NPs浓度 Fe-Mg NPs concentration(mg/L) | 发芽势 Germination potential(%) | 发芽率 Germination rate(%) | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 82.78±4.99 a | 93.89±4.95 a | 27.82±3.46 b | 113.23±14.07 b |
| 50 | 83.89±7.55 a | 93.89±4.95 a | 27.04±3.29 b | 122.92±14.96 b |
| 100 | 85.00±4.92 a | 95.56±2.46 a | 30.81±0.92 ab | 135.11±4.03 b |
| 200 | 86.67±3.97 a | 96.11±3.51 a | 34.86±4.54 a | 175.55±22.86 a |
| 400 | 80.56±6.07 a | 93.89±4.35 a | 27.45±3.51 b | 114.51±14.65 b |
图3 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗地上部鲜质量和根系鲜质量(A)、总干质量(B)、苗长(C)及根长(D)的影响
Fig. 3. Effects of Fe-Mg NPs on shoot fresh weight and root fresh weight (A), total dry weight (B), shoot length (C), and root length (D) of rice seedlings under salt stress
| Fe-Mg NPs浓度 Fe-Mg NPs concentration(mg/L) | 根数 Root number | 根投影面积 Root projected area(cm2) | 根表面积 Root surface area(cm2) | 根系直径 Root diameter(mm) | 根系体积 Root volume(cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.47±0.37 b | 3.54±0.36 b | 11.11±1.14 b | 0.26±0.01 a | 0.09±0.01 bc |
| 50 | 2.91±0.34 b | 3.89±0.25 ab | 12.23±0.79 ab | 0.27±0.02 a | 0.10±0.01 abc |
| 100 | 3.07±0.23 b | 4.17±0.43 ab | 13.09±1.34 ab | 0.28±0.02 a | 0.12±0.01 ab |
| 200 | 3.84±0.23 a | 4.54±0.92 a | 14.27±2.89 a | 0.28±0.01 a | 0.12±0.03 a |
| 400 | 2.84±0.41 b | 3.49±0.39 b | 10.79±1.00 b | 0.27±0.03 a | 0.08±0.01 c |
表3 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗根系特征的影响
Table 3. Effects of Fe-Mg NP priming on root characteristics of rice seedlings under salt stress
| Fe-Mg NPs浓度 Fe-Mg NPs concentration(mg/L) | 根数 Root number | 根投影面积 Root projected area(cm2) | 根表面积 Root surface area(cm2) | 根系直径 Root diameter(mm) | 根系体积 Root volume(cm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.47±0.37 b | 3.54±0.36 b | 11.11±1.14 b | 0.26±0.01 a | 0.09±0.01 bc |
| 50 | 2.91±0.34 b | 3.89±0.25 ab | 12.23±0.79 ab | 0.27±0.02 a | 0.10±0.01 abc |
| 100 | 3.07±0.23 b | 4.17±0.43 ab | 13.09±1.34 ab | 0.28±0.02 a | 0.12±0.01 ab |
| 200 | 3.84±0.23 a | 4.54±0.92 a | 14.27±2.89 a | 0.28±0.01 a | 0.12±0.03 a |
| 400 | 2.84±0.41 b | 3.49±0.39 b | 10.79±1.00 b | 0.27±0.03 a | 0.08±0.01 c |
图5 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗叶片SOD (A)、POD (B)、CAT (C)活性及MDA (D)含量的影响
Fig. 5. Effects of Fe-Mg NP priming on SOD (A)、POD (B) and CAT (C) activities and MDA content (D) in rice seedling leaves under salt stress
图7 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗叶片可溶性糖含量(A)及脯氨酸含量(B)的影响
Fig. 7. Effects of Fe-Mg NPs priming on soluble sugar content (A) and proline content (B) in rice seedling leaves under salt stress
| 指标 Index | Fe-Mg NP浓度 Fe-Mg NP concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mg/L | 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 200 mg/L | 400 mg/L | |
| 地上部Na+含量SNC(µg/mL) | 36.03±0.15 d | 37.43±0.31 c | 38.47±0.25 b | 34.43±0.06 e | 43.30±0.20 a |
| 根系Na+含量RNC(µg/mL) | 42.27±0.51 e | 50.93±1.15 b | 44.30±0.78 d | 53.53±0.86 a | 44.50±0.50 c |
| 地上部K+含量SKC(µg/mL) | 9.17±0.06 a | 8.97±0.06 b | 8.43±0.06 d | 8.83±0.06 c | 8.43±0.06 e |
| 根系K+含量RKC(µg/mL) | 3.03±0.06 c | 3.17±0.06 b | 3.03±0.06 d | 3.50±0.10 a | 2.97±0.06 e |
| Na+ 地上部/根系 NS/R | 0.85±0.01 c | 0.74±0.02 d | 0.87±0.01 b | 0.64±0.01 e | 0.97±0.01 a |
| 离子选择交换系数 SK/Na | 3.55±0.09 c | 3.85±0.05 b | 3.20±0.05 d | 3.93±0.19 a | 2.92±0.05 e |
表4 Fe-Mg NPs引发对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗中钠钾离子含量的影响
Table 4. Effect of Fe-Mg NPs on sodium and potassium ion content in rice seedlings under salt stress
| 指标 Index | Fe-Mg NP浓度 Fe-Mg NP concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 mg/L | 50 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 200 mg/L | 400 mg/L | |
| 地上部Na+含量SNC(µg/mL) | 36.03±0.15 d | 37.43±0.31 c | 38.47±0.25 b | 34.43±0.06 e | 43.30±0.20 a |
| 根系Na+含量RNC(µg/mL) | 42.27±0.51 e | 50.93±1.15 b | 44.30±0.78 d | 53.53±0.86 a | 44.50±0.50 c |
| 地上部K+含量SKC(µg/mL) | 9.17±0.06 a | 8.97±0.06 b | 8.43±0.06 d | 8.83±0.06 c | 8.43±0.06 e |
| 根系K+含量RKC(µg/mL) | 3.03±0.06 c | 3.17±0.06 b | 3.03±0.06 d | 3.50±0.10 a | 2.97±0.06 e |
| Na+ 地上部/根系 NS/R | 0.85±0.01 c | 0.74±0.02 d | 0.87±0.01 b | 0.64±0.01 e | 0.97±0.01 a |
| 离子选择交换系数 SK/Na | 3.55±0.09 c | 3.85±0.05 b | 3.20±0.05 d | 3.93±0.19 a | 2.92±0.05 e |
图8 水稻幼苗长势与生理指标的相关性分析 GP、Vi表示发芽势和活力指数;SFW、RFW、TDW、SL、RL分别代表地上部鲜质量、根系鲜质量、总干质量、苗长、根长;RN、RPA、RSA、RD、RV分别代表根数、根投影面积、根表面积、根系直径、根系体积;SS、PRO分别表示可溶性糖含量、脯氨酸含量;TChl表示总叶绿素含量。*,**分别表示在0.05,0.01水平上显著相关。
Fig. 8. Correlation analysis of growth status and physiological indicators of rice seedlings GP and Vi represent germination potential and vigor index, respectively; SFW, RFW, TDW, SL, and RL represent shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, total dry weight, shoot length, and root length, respectively; RN, RPA, RSA, RD, and RV denote root number, root projected area, root surface area, root diameter, and root volume, respectively; SS and PRO stand for soluble sugar content and proline content, respectively; TChl stands for total chlorophyll content. *, ** indicate significant correlations at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.
| [1] | 李润枝, 靳晴, 李召虎, 王晔, 彭真, 段留生. 水杨酸提高甘草种子萌发和幼苗生长对盐胁迫耐性的效应[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1810-1816. |
| Li R Z, Jin Q, Li Z H, Wang Y, Peng Z, Duan L S. Salicylic acid improved salinity tolerance of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch during seed germination and seedling growth stages[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1810-1816. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 王洋, 张瑞, 刘永昊, 李荣凯, 葛建飞, 邓仕文, 张徐彬, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根. 水稻对盐胁迫的响应及耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 105-117. |
| Wang Y, Zhang R, Liu Y H, Li R K, Ge J F, Deng S W, Zhang X B, Chen Y L, Wei H H, Dai Q G. Rice response to salt stress and research progress in salt tolerance mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 105-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 程式华. 中国水稻育种百年发展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4): 1-6. |
| Cheng S H. One-hundred years' development and prospect of rice breeding in China[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(4): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 赵玥, 辛霞, 王宗礼, 卢新雄. 种子引发机理研究进展及牧草种子引发研究展望[J]. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(3): 102-108. |
| Zhao Y, Xin X, Wang Z L, Lu X X. Research progress and prospects in the mechanism of seed priming[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2012, 34(3): 102-108. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | 马唯一, 朱济邹, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 刁刘云, 汪璐璐, 孟天瑶, 高平磊, 陈英龙, 戴其根, 韦还和. 盐害和干旱对稻米品质形成的影响及生理机制研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 156-170. |
| Ma W Y, Zhu J Z, Zhu W, Geng X Y, Zhang X, Diao L Y, Wang L L, Meng T Y, Gao P L, Chen Y L, Dai Q G, Wei H H. Research progress in effects of salt and drought stresses on rice quality formation and associated physiological mechanisms[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 156-170. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | Bohnert H J, Shen B. Transformation and compatible solutes[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1998, 78(1/2/3/4): 237-260. |
| [7] | 尤沛, 何学青. 种子纳米引发的研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(8): 1548-1557. |
| You P, He X Q. Recent progress in seed nanopriming research[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(8): 1548-1557. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | Guha T, Ravikumar K V G, Mukherjee A, Mukherjee A, Kundu R. Nanopriming with zero valent iron (nZVI) enhances germination and growth in aromatic rice cultivar (Oryza sativa cv. Gobindabhog L.)[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018, 127: 403-413. |
| [9] | Mahakham W, Sarmah A K, Maensiri S, Theerakulpisut P. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 8263. |
| [10] | 谢不凋. 铁酸锰纳米材料增强水稻抗旱机制的研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2023. |
| Xie B D. The mechanism of Manganese ferrate nanomaterials enhancing drought resistance in rice[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [11] | Hafeez R, Guo J, Ahmed T, Ibrahim E, Ali M A, Rizwan M, Ijaz M, An Q, Wang Y, Wang J, Li B. Integrative transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveals the toxicity and mechanistic insights of bioformulated chitosan nanoparticles against Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 356: 141904. |
| [12] | 方清, 晏士玮, 崔彩云, 周彩玲, 吴凡, 李育键, 叶文玲. 纳米氧化铜对砷胁迫下水稻种子发芽及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2020, 47(5): 826-831. |
| Fang Q, Yan S W, Cui C Y, Zhou C L, Wu F, Li Y J, Ye W L. Effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on germination and growth of rice seeds exposed to arsenic stress[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2020, 47(5): 826-831. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 江海燕, 何平, 焦洪鹏, 冯先翠. 纳米羟基磷灰石系列材料对水稻吸收镉的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2024, 43(10): 2240-2247. |
| Jiang H Y, He P, Jiao H P, Feng X C. Effects of hydroxylapatite-series materials on cadmium adsorption in rice[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2024, 43(10): 2240-2247. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | 刘鹏, 毕江涛, 罗成科, 惠治兵, 李文兵, 肖国举, 王静. 耐盐菌对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(2): 246-256. |
| Liu P, Bi J T, Luo C K, Hui Z B, Li W B, Xiao G J, Wang J. Effects of salt-tolerant bacteria on rice seed germination and seedling growth under salt stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 41(2): 246-256. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [15] | 崔灿, 王梦琦, 赵琬璐, 刘新颖, 鉴晶晶, 严俊鑫. 胺鲜酯浸种对NaCl胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 46-58. |
| Cui C, Wang M Q, Zhao W L, Liu X Y, Jian J J, Yan J X. The effect on seed germination and seedling growth of soaking seeds with diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate in alfalfa under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 46-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | 李艳娟, 庄正, 刘青青, 尚天赦, 黄钦忠, 邹嘉勇, 刘博. 纳米TiO2对杉木种子萌发和幼苗生长及生理的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5): 1259-1264. |
| Li Y J, Zhuang Z, Liu Q Q, Shang T S, Huang Q Z, Zou J Y, Liu B. The effects of nano-TiO2 on seed germination, seedling growth and physiology of Chinese fir[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(5): 1259-1264. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [17] | 王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. |
| Wang X K. The Principle and Technology of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiment[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. (in Chinese) | |
| [18] | 郝建军, 康宗利, 于洋. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007. |
| Hao J J, Kang Z L, Yu Y. Plant Physiology Experimental Techniques[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] | 陈一酉. 大麦耐盐种质筛选及萌发期盐胁迫响应机理研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2024. |
| Chen Y Y. Study on salt-tolerant germplasm selection and mechanism of response to salt stress during germination in barley[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2024. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [20] | 袁泽, 王艳, 闫敏, 周晓凤, 蒲小秋, 闫浩宇, 苑恒州, 吴翠云. 盐碱胁迫对骏枣养分吸收、积累及运转的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(3): 44-52. |
| Yuan Z, Wang Y, Yan M, Zhou X F, Pu X Q, Yan H Y, Yuan H Z, Wu C Y. Effects of saline and alkaline stress on nutrient uptake, accumulation and transportion in ‘Junzao’ Jujube[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2024, 42(3): 44-52. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | 俞施龙, 张明静, 王光华, 赵金标, 陈远杰, 陈宇琪, 黄丽芬. 高温下减氮对水稻化学计量特征和非结构性碳水化合物分配的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2025, 30(3): 71-84. |
| Yu S L, Zhang M J, Wang G H, Zhao J B, Chen Y J, Chen Y Q, Huang L F. Effect of nitrogen reduction under high temperature on the stoichiometric characteristics and non-structural carbohydrate allocation in rice[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2025, 30(3): 71-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [22] | 康召, 赵丽娟. 纳米种子处理技术: 提高作物气候韧性的有效途径[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2024, 32(5): 745-754. |
| Kang Z, Zhao L J. Nano-enabled seed treatment technology: An efficient strategy to enhance climate resilience of crops[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(5): 745-754. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [23] | Kasote D M, Lee J H J, Jayaprakasha G K, Patil B S. Seed priming with iron oxide nanoparticles modulate antioxidant potential and defense-linked hormones in watermelon seedlings[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(5): 5142-5151. |
| [24] | Yan X, Chen S, Pan Z Y, Zhao W C, Rui Y K, Zhao L J. AgNPs-triggered seed metabolic and transcriptional reprogramming enhanced rice salt tolerance and blast resistance[J]. ACS Nano, 2023, 17(1): 492-504. |
| [25] | Naseer M, Zhu Y, Li F M, Yang Y M, Wang S, Xiong Y C. Nano-enabled improvements of growth and colonization rate in wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 295: 118724. |
| [26] | 孙亚莉, 刘红梅, 徐庆国. 镉胁迫对不同水稻品种种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 425-431. |
| Sun Y L, Liu H M, Xu Q G. Effects of cadmium stress on rice seed germination characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(4): 425-431. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [27] | 孙露莹, 宋凤斌, 李向楠, 朱先灿, 刘胜群, 王洋, 齐晓宁. 纳米氧化锌对玉米种子萌发及根系碳代谢的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2020(1): 40-49. |
| Sun L Y, Song F B, Li X N, Zhu X C, Liu S Q, Wang Y, Qi X N. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on seed germination and root carbon metabolism in maize(Zea mays L.)[J]. Soils and Crops, 2020(1): 40-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [28] | 张雅茹, 颉建明, 张婧, 杨旭珍, 吴志国. 叶面喷施纳米铁对菠菜生长及品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(12): 2696-2704. |
| Zhang Y R, Xie J M, Zhang J, Yang X Z, Wu Z G. Effect of foliar spraying of iron nanoparticles on the growth and quality of spinach[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36(12): 2696-2704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 李俊鹏, 孙心慧, 何亚洲, 陈晓峰. 纳米三氧化二铁对黄瓜发芽和叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(7): 101-104, 113. |
| Li J P, Sun X H, He Y Z, Chen X F. The effects of nano-Fe2O3 on the germination of cucumber and the photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber leaves[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 64(7): 101-104, 113. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | 刘涛, 向垒, 余忠雄, 莫测辉, 李彦文, 赵海明, 蔡全英, 李慧. 水稻幼苗对纳米氧化铜的吸收及根系形态生理特征响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486. |
| Liu T, Xiang L, Yu Z X, Mo C H, Li Y W, Zhao H M, Cai Q Y, Li H. Responses of morphological and physiological characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling roots to its uptake of CuO nanoparticles[J]. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [31] | 高梦迪, 盛茂银, 傅籍锋. 纳米材料对植物生长发育的影响[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(7): 172-180. |
| Gao M D, Sheng M Y, Fu J F. Effects of nanomaterials on plant growth and development[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2019, 35(7): 172-180. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | Sharif R, Xie C, Zhang H Q, Arnao M B, Ali M, Ali Q, Muhammad I, Shalmani A, Nawaz M A, Chen P, Li Y. Melatonin and its effects on plant systems[J]. Molecules, 2018, 23(9): 2352. |
| [33] | van Zelm E, Zhang Y, Testerink C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2020, 71: 403-433. |
| [34] | 寇江涛. 外源2, 4-表油菜素内酯诱导紫花苜蓿幼苗耐盐性的生理响应[J]. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(6): 133-140. |
| Kou J T. Physiological response of salt tolerance of Medicago sativa seedlings induced by exogenous 2, 4-epibrassinolide[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(6): 133-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [35] | 赵玲玉. FeNPs对紫花苜蓿生长、固氮及耐盐性的生物学效应研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023. |
| Zhao L Y. Biological effects of FeNPs on growth, nitrogen fixation and salt tolerance of alfalfa[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [36] | Shah T, Latif S, Saeed F, Ali I, Ullah S, Abdullah Alsahli A A, Jan S, Ahmad P. Seed priming with titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhances seed vigor, leaf water status, and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress[J]. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 2021, 33(1): 101207. |
| [37] | Mahakham W, Theerakulpisut P, Maensiri S, Phumying S, Sarmah A K. Environmentally benign synthesis of phytochemicals-capped gold nanoparticles as nanopriming agent for promoting maize seed germination[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2016, 573(15): 1089-1102. |
| [38] | Dong Q Y, Wallrad L, Almutairi B O, Kudla J. Ca2+ signaling in plant responses to abiotic stresses[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2022, 64(2): 287-300. |
| [39] | 穆逸雪. 盐胁迫下不同种子引发处理对直播稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2023. |
| Mu Y X. Effects of different Seed priming techniques on seed germination and seedling growth of direct-seeding rice (Oryza sativa L.) under salt stress[D]. Haikou: Hainan University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [40] | Zheng M, Tao Y, Hussain S, Jiang Q, Peng S, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L. Seed priming in dry direct-seeded rice: Consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under drought stress[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2016, 78(2): 167-178. |
| [41] | 苏小茜, 许宇捷, 魏健, 王光野. 盐胁迫对种子萌发的影响及作用机制研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(22): 57-61. |
| Su X X, Xu Y J, Wei J, Wang G Y. Research progress on effect of salt stress on seed germination and its mechanisms[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024(22): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [42] | Chen K, Arora R. Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2013, 94: 33-45. |
| [43] | Boucelha L, Djebbar R, Abrous-Belbachir O. Vigna unguiculata seed priming is related to redox status of plumule, radicle and cotyledons[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2019, 46(6): 584-594. |
| [1] | 陈春晓, 付琳丽, 张微, 卜庆云, 田晓杰. 水稻MAPK家族基因功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 425-435. |
| [2] | 付瑶, 李娜, 徐静茹, 覃奕琰, 程笑然, 孙浩峰, 张琪, 崔志波, 杨新宇, 赵明辉. OsST2调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 436-446. |
| [3] | 邱一洁, 齐飞扬, 杜何为, 黄敏, 李曼菲. 水稻叶脉基因OsLVD1的鉴定及功能分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 447-459. |
| [4] | 朱骏, 杨延铭, 杨仲南. 水稻光温敏核不育系的诱变创制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 460-468. |
| [5] | 廖萍, 刘若彤, 孟轶, 翁文安, 都晗萌, 李骏, 高辉, 张洪程. 一次性基施控释掺混肥对水稻产量和倒伏性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 469-475. |
| [6] | 钟晓媛, 王众, 陈雷, 张晓丽, 黄严, 朱德峰, 王亚梁, 覃勇, 高国庆, 张隆葵, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 精准条播育秧对广西机插水稻栽插质量、干物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 487-501. |
| [7] | 赵春芳, 罗磊, 赵庆勇, 庄丽华, 管菊, 陈涛, 朱镇, 张亚东, 王才林. 节水灌溉对优良食味粳稻产量形成及根系形态的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 519-530. |
| [8] | 王超瑞, 张男, 汝艳, 严语, 孟庆好, 温雅, 张瑛, 肖治林, 张耗. 干湿交替灌溉与秸秆还田方式对水稻产量及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 531-547. |
| [9] | 梁晋雄, 冯严艺, 肖茂华, 王法安, 沈成, 胥文翔, 孟为国. 面向田间路径控制的轮式拖拉机辅助转向系统设计与验证[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 548-559. |
| [10] | 刘庆, 顾清, 朱怡航, 娄卫东, 黄福灯, 朱英, 张小斌. 基于稻穗检测与机器学习的水稻始穗期预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(4): 560-568. |
| [11] | 刘地斌, 陈雄飞, 方鹏, 余佳佳, 肖丽萍, 刘木华, 曾博涵, 陈晨晨. 粉状有机物料同步覆盖水稻直播机设计与试验[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 414-424. |
| [12] | 贾梅杰, 陈浩田, 钟笑涵, 王伟露, 张伟杨. 植物根鞘的建成机制与功能及其在水稻生产中的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 292-301. |
| [13] | 易浩昆, 罗堰木, 黄敏, 杜何为, 李曼菲. 水稻侧根发育突变体lrp1鉴定及表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 302-311. |
| [14] | 王洋洋, 杨传铭, 张喜娟, 杨贤莉, 王立志, 崔士泽, 许鑫凯, 李红宇, 姜树坤. 水稻苗期耐冷性Meta-QTL分析及候选基因预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 312-326. |
| [15] | 许扬, 王芳权, 李文奇, 陶亚军, 范方军, 陈智慧, 蒋彦婕, 朱建平, 李霞, 杨杰. 水稻黄叶转绿突变体818-6-8的目标基因定位与转录组分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 327-340. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||