中国水稻科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 176-185.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.8048
收稿日期:
2018-04-17
修回日期:
2018-05-30
出版日期:
2019-03-10
发布日期:
2019-03-10
通讯作者:
周而勋
基金资助:
Minghai ZHU, Dandan PENG, Canwei SHU, Erxun ZHOU*()
Received:
2018-04-17
Revised:
2018-05-30
Online:
2019-03-10
Published:
2019-03-10
Contact:
Erxun ZHOU
摘要:
【目的】为明确南繁区水稻纹枯病菌(Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA)的遗传分化及遗传多样性与致病力的关系,【方法】采用AFLP分子标记技术和离体叶片接种法对南繁核心区(三亚、乐东、陵水)和非核心区(琼中、屯昌和定安)共60株水稻纹枯病菌的遗传多样性、遗传结构和致病力分化进行了测定,并分析了遗传多样性与致病力之间的关系。【结果】聚类分析结果表明,核心区菌株的遗传多样性相对更高;群体遗传结构分析表明,核心区群体的多态性位点百分率(PPL)、Nei基因多样性指数(H)、Shannon信息指数(I)和基因流(Nm)分别为 82.24%、0.1932、0.3062和2.5627,高于非核心区群体的67.49%、0.1535、0.2447和0.9365;而核心区群体的基因分化系数(Gst)为0.1633,低于非核心区群体的0.3481。【结论】核心区菌株的遗传变异程度比非核心区菌株高;核心区不同群体间存在较多的基因交流,而非核心区菌体间的基因交流较少,但遗传变异均主要来自于群体内;总体而言,核心区菌株的遗传分化程度更高。菌株的致病力及其与菌株遗传多样性的相关性分析表明,核心区菌株以中等致病型为主,而非核心区菌株则以中、强致病型为主,但与菌株的AFLP谱系之间的相关均未达显著水平。
朱名海, 彭丹丹, 舒灿伟, 周而勋. 海南南繁区水稻纹枯病菌的遗传多样性与致病力分化[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 176-185.
Minghai ZHU, Dandan PENG, Canwei SHU, Erxun ZHOU. Genetic Diversity and Pathogenicity Differentiation of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(2): 176-185.
区域 Region | 采集地点 Sampling location | 采集时间 Sampling date | 菌株编号 Isolate No. |
---|---|---|---|
核心区Core region | 三亚Sanya | 2014-05-28 | SY1, SY2, SY3, SY4, SY5, SY6, SY7, SY8, SY9, SY10 |
乐东Ledong | 2014-06-01 | LD1, LD2, LD3, LD4, LD5, LD6, LD7, LD8, LD9, LD10 | |
陵水Lingshui | 2014-03-15, 2014-10-27 | LS1, LS2, LS3, LS4, LS5, LS6, LS7, LS8, LS8, LS10 | |
非核心区Non-core region | 琼中Qiongzhong | 2014-06-02 | QZ1, QZ2, QZ3, QZ4, QZ5, QZ6, QZ7, QZ8, QZ9, QZ10 |
屯昌Tunchang | 2014-06-03 | TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, TC5, TC6, TC7, TC8, TC9, TC10 | |
定安Ding’an | 2014-06-04 | DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4, DA5, DA6, DA7, DA8, DA9, DA10 |
表1 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌
Table 1 Rhizoctonia solani AG-1IA isolates collected from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
区域 Region | 采集地点 Sampling location | 采集时间 Sampling date | 菌株编号 Isolate No. |
---|---|---|---|
核心区Core region | 三亚Sanya | 2014-05-28 | SY1, SY2, SY3, SY4, SY5, SY6, SY7, SY8, SY9, SY10 |
乐东Ledong | 2014-06-01 | LD1, LD2, LD3, LD4, LD5, LD6, LD7, LD8, LD9, LD10 | |
陵水Lingshui | 2014-03-15, 2014-10-27 | LS1, LS2, LS3, LS4, LS5, LS6, LS7, LS8, LS8, LS10 | |
非核心区Non-core region | 琼中Qiongzhong | 2014-06-02 | QZ1, QZ2, QZ3, QZ4, QZ5, QZ6, QZ7, QZ8, QZ9, QZ10 |
屯昌Tunchang | 2014-06-03 | TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, TC5, TC6, TC7, TC8, TC9, TC10 | |
定安Ding’an | 2014-06-04 | DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4, DA5, DA6, DA7, DA8, DA9, DA10 |
序号 Code | 接头或引物 Adapter or primer | 序列 Primer sequence(5′→3′) | 引物用途 Purpose |
---|---|---|---|
Ea | EcoRⅠ接头 EcoRⅠadapter | CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC CATCTGACGCATGGTTAA | 连接 Ligation |
Em | MseⅠ接头 MseⅠadapter | GACGATGAGTCCTGAG TACTCAGGACTCAT | 连接 Ligation |
E0 | EcoRⅠ+0 | GACTGCGTACCAATTC | 预扩增 Pre-amplification |
E1 | EcoRⅠ+AA | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E2 | EcoRⅠ+AT | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E3 | EcoRⅠ+AC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E4 | EcoRⅠ+AG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E5 | EcoRⅠ+TA | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E6 | EcoRⅠ+TT | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E7 | EcoRⅠ+TC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E8 | EcoRⅠ+TG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M0 | MseⅠ+0 | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA | 预扩增 Pre-amplification |
M1 | MseⅠ+CAA | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M2 | MseⅠ+CAT | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M3 | MseⅠ+CAC | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M4 | MseⅠ+CAG | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M5 | MseⅠ+ CTA | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M6 | MseⅠ+CTT | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M7 | MseⅠ+CTC | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M8 | MseⅠ+CTG | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
表2 AFLP所用接头和引物
Table 2 Adapters and primers for AFLP.
序号 Code | 接头或引物 Adapter or primer | 序列 Primer sequence(5′→3′) | 引物用途 Purpose |
---|---|---|---|
Ea | EcoRⅠ接头 EcoRⅠadapter | CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC CATCTGACGCATGGTTAA | 连接 Ligation |
Em | MseⅠ接头 MseⅠadapter | GACGATGAGTCCTGAG TACTCAGGACTCAT | 连接 Ligation |
E0 | EcoRⅠ+0 | GACTGCGTACCAATTC | 预扩增 Pre-amplification |
E1 | EcoRⅠ+AA | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E2 | EcoRⅠ+AT | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E3 | EcoRⅠ+AC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E4 | EcoRⅠ+AG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCAG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E5 | EcoRⅠ+TA | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E6 | EcoRⅠ+TT | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E7 | EcoRⅠ+TC | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
E8 | EcoRⅠ+TG | GACTGCGTACCAATTCTG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M0 | MseⅠ+0 | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA | 预扩增 Pre-amplification |
M1 | MseⅠ+CAA | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M2 | MseⅠ+CAT | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M3 | MseⅠ+CAC | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M4 | MseⅠ+CAG | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACAG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M5 | MseⅠ+ CTA | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTA | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M6 | MseⅠ+CTT | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTT | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M7 | MseⅠ+CTC | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTC | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
M8 | MseⅠ+CTG | GATGAGTCCTGAGTAACTG | 选择性扩增 Selective amplification |
图1 引物组合E3/M2扩增的水稻纹枯病菌AFLP图谱 M–分子标记。
Fig. 1. AFLP amplification results of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA with the primer combination E3/M2. M, DNA ladder marker
引物组合 Primer combination | 扩增条带数 Amplification band number | 多态性条带数 Polymorphic band number | 多态性条带百分率 Percentage of polymorphic bands/% |
---|---|---|---|
E1/M2 | 63 | 60 | 95.24 |
E2/M3 | 39 | 34 | 87.18 |
E2/M7 | 44 | 33 | 75.00 |
E3/M2 | 57 | 48 | 84.21 |
E3/M4 | 38 | 37 | 97.37 |
E6/M3 | 52 | 49 | 94.23 |
E6/M5 | 38 | 37 | 97.37 |
E6/M8 | 35 | 33 | 94.29 |
合计Total | 366 | 331 | 90.44 |
表3 南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌AFLP引物组合的扩增结果
Table 3 Amplification results of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area with AFLP primer combinations.
引物组合 Primer combination | 扩增条带数 Amplification band number | 多态性条带数 Polymorphic band number | 多态性条带百分率 Percentage of polymorphic bands/% |
---|---|---|---|
E1/M2 | 63 | 60 | 95.24 |
E2/M3 | 39 | 34 | 87.18 |
E2/M7 | 44 | 33 | 75.00 |
E3/M2 | 57 | 48 | 84.21 |
E3/M4 | 38 | 37 | 97.37 |
E6/M3 | 52 | 49 | 94.23 |
E6/M5 | 38 | 37 | 97.37 |
E6/M8 | 35 | 33 | 94.29 |
合计Total | 366 | 331 | 90.44 |
图2 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌的聚类分析右侧编号为水稻纹枯病菌菌株编号。
Fig. 2. Clustering dendrogram of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province. The column on the right represent isolates of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1ⅠA.
AFLP谱系 AFLP lineage | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌株来源 Isolate origin | 致病型 Pathotype |
---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | SY1, SY2, SY4, SY6, SY7, SY10, LD1, LD2, LD3, LD6 | 三亚、乐东 Sanya, Ledong | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅱ | LD4, LD5, LD10, LS4, LS5, QZ1, QZ4, QZ7, QZ9, QZ10 | 乐东、陵水、琼中 Ledong, Lingshui, Qiongzhong | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅲ | LD7, LD8, LD9, LS1, LS8, LS10, QZ2, QZ3, QZ5, QZ6, QZ8, DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4, DA5, DA6, DA7, DA8, DA9, DA10 | 乐东、陵水、琼中、定安 Ledong, Lingshui, Qiongzhong, Dingan | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅳ | LS3, TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, TC5, TC7, TC9 | 陵水、屯昌 Lingshui, Tunchang | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅴ | SY3, SY8, TC6, TC8, TC10 | 三亚、屯昌Sanya, Tunchang | 弱、中 Weak, medium |
Ⅵ | SY5, SY9 | 三亚 Sanya | 弱、中 Weak, medium |
Ⅶ | LS9 | 陵水Lingshui | 强 High |
Ⅷ | LS6, LS7 | 陵水 Lingshui | 中、强 Medium, high |
Ⅸ | LS2 | 陵水Lingshui | 弱 Weak |
表4 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌AFLP谱系分析
Table 4 AFLP lineage analyses of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA in the core and non-core regions of South China Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
AFLP谱系 AFLP lineage | 菌株编号 Isolate No. | 菌株来源 Isolate origin | 致病型 Pathotype |
---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | SY1, SY2, SY4, SY6, SY7, SY10, LD1, LD2, LD3, LD6 | 三亚、乐东 Sanya, Ledong | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅱ | LD4, LD5, LD10, LS4, LS5, QZ1, QZ4, QZ7, QZ9, QZ10 | 乐东、陵水、琼中 Ledong, Lingshui, Qiongzhong | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅲ | LD7, LD8, LD9, LS1, LS8, LS10, QZ2, QZ3, QZ5, QZ6, QZ8, DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4, DA5, DA6, DA7, DA8, DA9, DA10 | 乐东、陵水、琼中、定安 Ledong, Lingshui, Qiongzhong, Dingan | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅳ | LS3, TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, TC5, TC7, TC9 | 陵水、屯昌 Lingshui, Tunchang | 弱、中、强 Weak, medium, high |
Ⅴ | SY3, SY8, TC6, TC8, TC10 | 三亚、屯昌Sanya, Tunchang | 弱、中 Weak, medium |
Ⅵ | SY5, SY9 | 三亚 Sanya | 弱、中 Weak, medium |
Ⅶ | LS9 | 陵水Lingshui | 强 High |
Ⅷ | LS6, LS7 | 陵水 Lingshui | 中、强 Medium, high |
Ⅸ | LS2 | 陵水Lingshui | 弱 Weak |
群体 Population | 菌株数 Number of isolates | 总位点数 Total number of loci | 多态性位点数 Number of polymorphic loci | 多态性位点百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci/% | Shannon信息指数 Shannon’s information index(I) | Nei基因多样性指数Nei’s gene diversity Index(H) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三亚 Sanya | 10 | 366 | 160 | 43.72 | 0.2149 | 0.1417 |
乐东 Ledong | 10 | 366 | 148 | 40.44 | 0.2035 | 0.1351 |
陵水 Lingshui | 10 | 366 | 273 | 74.59 | 0.3250 | 0.2082 |
琼中 Qiongzhong | 10 | 366 | 128 | 34.97 | 0.1695 | 0.1112 |
屯昌 Tunchang | 10 | 366 | 166 | 45.36 | 0.2119 | 0.1387 |
定安 Ding’an | 10 | 366 | 60 | 16.39 | 0.0761 | 0.0503 |
核心区 Core region | 30 | 366 | 301 | 82.24 | 0.3062 | 0.1932 |
非核心区 Non-core region | 30 | 366 | 247 | 67.49 | 0.2447 | 0.1535 |
总计 Total | 60 | 366 | 331 | 90.44 | 0.3009 | 0.1869 |
表5 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌不同群体的遗传多样性分析
Table 5 Genetic diversity analyses of different Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA populations from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
群体 Population | 菌株数 Number of isolates | 总位点数 Total number of loci | 多态性位点数 Number of polymorphic loci | 多态性位点百分率 Percentage of polymorphic loci/% | Shannon信息指数 Shannon’s information index(I) | Nei基因多样性指数Nei’s gene diversity Index(H) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三亚 Sanya | 10 | 366 | 160 | 43.72 | 0.2149 | 0.1417 |
乐东 Ledong | 10 | 366 | 148 | 40.44 | 0.2035 | 0.1351 |
陵水 Lingshui | 10 | 366 | 273 | 74.59 | 0.3250 | 0.2082 |
琼中 Qiongzhong | 10 | 366 | 128 | 34.97 | 0.1695 | 0.1112 |
屯昌 Tunchang | 10 | 366 | 166 | 45.36 | 0.2119 | 0.1387 |
定安 Ding’an | 10 | 366 | 60 | 16.39 | 0.0761 | 0.0503 |
核心区 Core region | 30 | 366 | 301 | 82.24 | 0.3062 | 0.1932 |
非核心区 Non-core region | 30 | 366 | 247 | 67.49 | 0.2447 | 0.1535 |
总计 Total | 60 | 366 | 331 | 90.44 | 0.3009 | 0.1869 |
群体 Population | 群体总基因多样性 Total genetic diversity in populations (Ht) | 群体内基因多样性 Genetic diversity within population (Hs) | 基因分化度 Genetic differentiation coefficient (Gst) | 基因流 Gene flow (Nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
核心区 Core region | 0.1932 | 0.1617 | 0.1633 | 2.5627 |
非核心区 Non-core region | 0.1535 | 0.1001 | 0.3481 | 0.9365 |
总计 Total | 0.1869 | 0.1309 | 0.2997 | 1.1682 |
表6 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌群体的遗传分化和基因流
Table 6 Genetic differentiation and gene flow of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA populations from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
群体 Population | 群体总基因多样性 Total genetic diversity in populations (Ht) | 群体内基因多样性 Genetic diversity within population (Hs) | 基因分化度 Genetic differentiation coefficient (Gst) | 基因流 Gene flow (Nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
核心区 Core region | 0.1932 | 0.1617 | 0.1633 | 2.5627 |
非核心区 Non-core region | 0.1535 | 0.1001 | 0.3481 | 0.9365 |
总计 Total | 0.1869 | 0.1309 | 0.2997 | 1.1682 |
群体 Population | 三亚 Sanya | 乐东 Ledong | 陵水 Lingshui | 琼中 Qiongzhong | 屯昌 Tunchang | 定安 Ding’an |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三亚 Sanya | 0.9382 | 0.9433 | 0.9236 | 0.9317 | 0.8862 | |
乐东 Ledong | 0.0638 | 0.9511 | 0.9397 | 0.9343 | 0.8978 | |
陵水 Lingshui | 0.0583 | 0.0502 | 0.9330 | 0.9515 | 0.8948 | |
琼中 Qiongzhong | 0.0795 | 0.0622 | 0.0693 | 0.9225 | 0.9145 | |
屯昌 Tunchang | 0.0708 | 0.0679 | 0.0497 | 0.0807 | 0.8979 | |
定安 Ding’an | 0.1208 | 0.1078 | 0.1111 | 0.0894 | 0.1077 |
表7 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌群体的遗传一致性和遗传距离
Table 7 Genetic identity and genetic distance of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA populations from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
群体 Population | 三亚 Sanya | 乐东 Ledong | 陵水 Lingshui | 琼中 Qiongzhong | 屯昌 Tunchang | 定安 Ding’an |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三亚 Sanya | 0.9382 | 0.9433 | 0.9236 | 0.9317 | 0.8862 | |
乐东 Ledong | 0.0638 | 0.9511 | 0.9397 | 0.9343 | 0.8978 | |
陵水 Lingshui | 0.0583 | 0.0502 | 0.9330 | 0.9515 | 0.8948 | |
琼中 Qiongzhong | 0.0795 | 0.0622 | 0.0693 | 0.9225 | 0.9145 | |
屯昌 Tunchang | 0.0708 | 0.0679 | 0.0497 | 0.0807 | 0.8979 | |
定安 Ding’an | 0.1208 | 0.1078 | 0.1111 | 0.0894 | 0.1077 |
图3 基于Nei遗传一致性的南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌群体聚类分析结果
Fig. 3. Clustering dendrogram of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area based on Nei’s genetic consistency.
菌株编号 Isolate no. | 平均致病力 Average pathogenicity | 致病型a Pathotype a | 5%显著水平b (P=0.05)b | 1%极显著水平b (P=0.01)b |
---|---|---|---|---|
SY1 | 3.83±1.17 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
SY2 | 3.67±1.37 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
SY3 | 2.17±1.47 | 弱Weak | i | FG |
SY4 | 2.83±1.33 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
SY5 | 4.00±1.26 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
SY6 | 3.00±1.67 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
SY7 | 3.17±1.33 | 中Medium | cdefghi | ABCDEF |
SY8 | 4.00±2.00 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
SY9 | 2.83±1.83 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
SY10 | 3.83±0.75 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD1 | 3.00±0.63 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LD2 | 2.17±1.72 | 弱Weak | i | FG |
LD3 | 3.33±0.82 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD4 | 3.67±0.82 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD5 | 3.83±0.75 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD6 | 4.17±0.98 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
LD7 | 3.17±0.41 | 中Medium | cdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD8 | 3.83±1.60 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD9 | 3.50±1.64 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD10 | 4.00±1.10 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
LS1 | 3.67±1.03 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LS2 | 2.50±1.38 | 弱Weak | ghi | DEF |
LS3 | 3.33±1.37 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LS4 | 3.00±0.63 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LS5 | 0.67±0.52 | 弱Weak | j | G |
LS6 | 3.00±1.10 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LS7 | 4.17±0.75 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
LS8 | 4.50±0.84 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
LS9 | 4.33±0.82 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
LS10 | 5.00±0.00 | 强High | a | A |
QZ1 | 3.00±1.41 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
QZ2 | 3.83±0.98 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
QZ3 | 3.33±0.82 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
QZ4 | 4.83±0.41 | 强High | ab | AB |
QZ5 | 4.67±0.52 | 强High | abc | ABC |
QZ6 | 4.33±1.21 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
QZ7 | 4.67±0.82 | 强High | abc | ABC |
QZ8 | 4.00±0.89 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
QZ9 | 4.00±1.26 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
QZ10 | 3.00±1.10 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
TC1 | 4.17±1.33 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
TC2 | 4.33±0.82 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
TC3 | 4.67±0.82 | 强High | abc | ABC |
TC4 | 2.67±1.75 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
TC5 | 4.17±1.17 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
TC6 | 2.67±0.52 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
TC7 | 5.00±0.00 | 强High | a | A |
TC8 | 3.83±0.98 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
TC9 | 3.50±1.64 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
TC10 | 2.83±1.83 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
DA1 | 3.67±1.51 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA2 | 2.33±0.82 | 弱Weak | hi | EFG |
DA3 | 3.33±1.03 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA4 | 3.00±1.67 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
DA5 | 3.00±1.55 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
DA6 | 4.50±0.84 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
DA7 | 4.50±0.55 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
DA8 | 3.33±1.63 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA9 | 3.67±0.82 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA10 | 2.67±0.82 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
表8 海南南繁核心区和非核心区的水稻纹枯病菌致病力
Table 8 Pathogenicity test of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
菌株编号 Isolate no. | 平均致病力 Average pathogenicity | 致病型a Pathotype a | 5%显著水平b (P=0.05)b | 1%极显著水平b (P=0.01)b |
---|---|---|---|---|
SY1 | 3.83±1.17 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
SY2 | 3.67±1.37 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
SY3 | 2.17±1.47 | 弱Weak | i | FG |
SY4 | 2.83±1.33 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
SY5 | 4.00±1.26 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
SY6 | 3.00±1.67 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
SY7 | 3.17±1.33 | 中Medium | cdefghi | ABCDEF |
SY8 | 4.00±2.00 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
SY9 | 2.83±1.83 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
SY10 | 3.83±0.75 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD1 | 3.00±0.63 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LD2 | 2.17±1.72 | 弱Weak | i | FG |
LD3 | 3.33±0.82 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD4 | 3.67±0.82 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD5 | 3.83±0.75 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD6 | 4.17±0.98 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
LD7 | 3.17±0.41 | 中Medium | cdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD8 | 3.83±1.60 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
LD9 | 3.50±1.64 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LD10 | 4.00±1.10 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
LS1 | 3.67±1.03 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LS2 | 2.50±1.38 | 弱Weak | ghi | DEF |
LS3 | 3.33±1.37 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
LS4 | 3.00±0.63 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LS5 | 0.67±0.52 | 弱Weak | j | G |
LS6 | 3.00±1.10 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
LS7 | 4.17±0.75 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
LS8 | 4.50±0.84 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
LS9 | 4.33±0.82 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
LS10 | 5.00±0.00 | 强High | a | A |
QZ1 | 3.00±1.41 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
QZ2 | 3.83±0.98 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
QZ3 | 3.33±0.82 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
QZ4 | 4.83±0.41 | 强High | ab | AB |
QZ5 | 4.67±0.52 | 强High | abc | ABC |
QZ6 | 4.33±1.21 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
QZ7 | 4.67±0.82 | 强High | abc | ABC |
QZ8 | 4.00±0.89 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
QZ9 | 4.00±1.26 | 中Medium | abcdefg | ABCDEF |
QZ10 | 3.00±1.10 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
TC1 | 4.17±1.33 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
TC2 | 4.33±0.82 | 强High | abcde | ABCDE |
TC3 | 4.67±0.82 | 强High | abc | ABC |
TC4 | 2.67±1.75 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
TC5 | 4.17±1.17 | 强High | abcdef | ABCDEF |
TC6 | 2.67±0.52 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
TC7 | 5.00±0.00 | 强High | a | A |
TC8 | 3.83±0.98 | 中Medium | abcdefgh | ABCDEF |
TC9 | 3.50±1.64 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
TC10 | 2.83±1.83 | 弱Weak | efghi | BCDEF |
DA1 | 3.67±1.51 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA2 | 2.33±0.82 | 弱Weak | hi | EFG |
DA3 | 3.33±1.03 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA4 | 3.00±1.67 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
DA5 | 3.00±1.55 | 中Medium | defghi | ABCDEF |
DA6 | 4.50±0.84 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
DA7 | 4.50±0.55 | 强High | abcd | ABCD |
DA8 | 3.33±1.63 | 中Medium | bcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA9 | 3.67±0.82 | 中Medium | abcdefghi | ABCDEF |
DA10 | 2.67±0.82 | 弱Weak | fghi | CDEF |
区域 Region | 市(县) County | 菌株数(所占比例) No. of isolates (Percentage/%) | 合计 Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
强致病型 High | 中致病型 Medium | 弱致病型 Weak | |||
核心区 Core region | 三亚 Sanya | 0(0.00) | 7(70.00) | 3(30.00) | 10 |
乐东 Ledong | 1(10.00) | 8(80.00) | 1(10.00) | 10 | |
陵水 Lingshui | 4(40.00) | 4(40.00) | 2(20.00) | 10 | |
合计 Total | 5(16.70) | 19(63.33) | 6(20.00) | 30 | |
非核心区 Non-core region | 琼中 Qiongzhong | 4(40.00) | 6(60.00) | 0(0.00) | 10 |
屯昌 Tunchang | 5(50.00) | 2(20.00) | 3(30.00) | 10 | |
定安 Ding’ an | 2(20.00) | 6(60.00) | 2(20.00) | 10 | |
合计 Total | 11(36.70) | 14(46.70) | 5(15.70) | 30 |
表9 海南南繁核心区和非核心区水稻纹枯病菌的致病型
Table 9 Pathotypes of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA from the core and non-core regions of South China Crop Breeding Area in Hainan Province.
区域 Region | 市(县) County | 菌株数(所占比例) No. of isolates (Percentage/%) | 合计 Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
强致病型 High | 中致病型 Medium | 弱致病型 Weak | |||
核心区 Core region | 三亚 Sanya | 0(0.00) | 7(70.00) | 3(30.00) | 10 |
乐东 Ledong | 1(10.00) | 8(80.00) | 1(10.00) | 10 | |
陵水 Lingshui | 4(40.00) | 4(40.00) | 2(20.00) | 10 | |
合计 Total | 5(16.70) | 19(63.33) | 6(20.00) | 30 | |
非核心区 Non-core region | 琼中 Qiongzhong | 4(40.00) | 6(60.00) | 0(0.00) | 10 |
屯昌 Tunchang | 5(50.00) | 2(20.00) | 3(30.00) | 10 | |
定安 Ding’ an | 2(20.00) | 6(60.00) | 2(20.00) | 10 | |
合计 Total | 11(36.70) | 14(46.70) | 5(15.70) | 30 |
[1] | 陈冠铭, 李劲松, 曹兵. 发挥南繁资源优势, 促进种业科技创新. 安徽农学通报, 2012, 18(1): 27-29. |
Chen G M, Li J S, Cao B.Make the most of resource advantages of Hainan national multiplication, promoting sci-tech innovations of seed industry.Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 18(1): 27-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Moni Z R, Ali M A, Alam M S, Rahman M A, Bhuiyan M R, Mian M S, Iftekharuddaula K M, Latif M A, IqbalKhan M A. Morphological and genetic variability among Rhizoctonia solani isolates causing sheath blight disease of rice. Rice Sci, 2016, 23(1): 42-50. |
[3] | 中国植物保护学会. 2018年农作物重大病虫害重于往年,累计将发生50亿亩次[EB/OL]. , 2018-01-12. |
Chinese Society of Plant Protection. The major diseases and insect pests of crops are more severe than those in previous years, and a total of 5 billion mu will occur [EB/OL]. : 2018-01-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 舒灿伟, 曹琦琦, 赵美, 江绍锋, 周而勋. 立枯丝核菌不同融合群G蛋白β亚基基因克隆与分子进化分析. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(5): 7-12. |
Shu C W, Cao Q Q, Zhao M, Jiang S F, Zhou E X.Cloning and sequence analysis of G-protein beta-subunit genes in different anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2017, 32(5): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | Feng S J, Shu C W, Wang C J Z, Jiang S F, Zhou E X. Survival of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA, the causal agent of rice sheath blight, under different environmental conditions. J Phytopathol, 2017, 165(1): 44-52. |
[6] | 周而勋, 曹菊香, 杨媚, 朱西儒. 我国南方六省 (区)水稻纹枯病菌遗传多样性的研究. 南京农业大学学报, 2002, 25(3): 36-40. |
Zhou E X, Cao J X, Yang M, Zhu X R.Studies on the genetic diversity of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1-IA from six provinces in the southern China. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2002, 25(3): 36-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Wang L, Liu L M, Wang Z G, Huang S W.Genetic structure and aggressiveness of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA, the cause of sheath blight of rice in southern China. J Phytopathol, 2013, 161(11-12): 753-762. |
[8] | 王玲, 左示敏, 张亚芳, 陈宗祥, 黄世文, 潘学彪. 中国南方八省(自治区)水稻纹枯病菌群体遗传结构的SSR分析. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(13): 2538-2548. |
Wang L, Zuo S M, Zhang Y F, Chen Z X, Huang S W, Pan X B.SSR analysis of population genetic structure of rice sheath blight causing agent Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA collected from eight provinces (Autonomous Region) in southern China. Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(13): 2538-2548. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Shu C W, Zou C J, Chen J L, Tang F, Yi R H, Zhou E X.Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA, the causal agent of rice sheath blight, in south China. Can J Plant Pathol, 2014, 36(2): 179-186. |
[10] | Taheri P, Gnanamanickam S, Höfte M.Characterization, genetic structure, and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with rice sheath diseases in India. Phytopathology, 2007, 97(3): 373-383. |
[11] | 范文艳, 文景芝, 金丽娜, 马建, 陈瑾. 黑龙江省水稻纹枯病菌的致病力分化与 AFLP 分析. 植物保护, 2008, 34(6): 57-61. |
Fan W Y, Wen J Z, Jin L N, Ma J, Chen J.Pathogenic differentiation and AFLP analysis of the rice sheath blight strains from Heilongjiang.Plant Prot, 2008, 34(6): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 朱名海, 皮磊, 舒灿伟, 周而勋. 南繁区稻瘟病菌遗传多样性和群体遗传结构的AFLP分析. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 320-326. |
Zhu M H, Pi L, Shu C W, Zhou E X.AFLP analyses of genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Magnaporthe oryzae from South China Crop Breeding Area. Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(3): 320-326. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 周而勋, 杨媚. 从植物病组织中分离丝核菌的快速、简便技术. 华南农业大学学报, 1998, 19(1): 125-126. |
Zhou E X, Yang M.A rapid and simple technique for the isolation of Rhizoctonia solani from diseased plant tissues. J South China Agric Univ, 1998, 19(1): 125-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 黄江华, 杨媚, 周而勋, 戚佩坤. 丝核菌细胞核染色技术的研究. 仲恺农业技术学院学报, 2001, 14(4): 13-17. |
Huang J H, Yang M, Zhou E X, Qi P K.Studies on the nuclear staining techniques for Rhizoctonia spp. J Zhongkai Agrotechnol Coll, 2001, 14(4): 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 周而勋, 杨媚. 广东省水稻纹枯病菌的致病力和融合群研究. 广东农业科学, 1999, 26(5): 36-38. |
Zhou E X, Yang M.Studies on the pathogenicity and anastomosis group of Rhizoctonia solani in Guangdong province. Guangdong Agric Sci, 1999, 26(5): 36-38. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | Brant J B, Gustavo C A, Peter M G.Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels.Anal Biochem, 1991, 196(1): 80-83. |
[17] | 陈涛, 张震, 柴荣耀, 王教瑜, 毛雪琴, 邱海萍, 杜新法, 姜华, 王立安, 王艳丽, 孙国昌. 浙江省水稻纹枯病菌的遗传分化与致病力研究. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(1): 67-72. |
Chen T, Zhang Z, Chai R Y, Wang J Y, Mao X Q, Qiu H P, Du X F, Jiang H, Wang L A, Wang Y L, Sun G C.Genetic diversity and pathogenicity variation of different Rhizoctonia solani isolates in rice from Zhejiang Province, China. Chin J Rice Sci, 2010, 24(1): 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 黄雯雯, 王玲, 刘连盟, 刘恩勇, 黄世文. 安徽省水稻纹枯病菌致病力分化与遗传多样性. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(1): 111-116. |
Huang W W, Wang L, Liu L M, Liu E Y, Huang S W.Preliminary study on the pathogenic differentiation and genetic diversity of rice sheath blight pathogen strains from Anhui Province.Acta Agric Zhejiang, 2011, 23(1): 111-116. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 吴荷芳, 王晓宇, 罗楚平, 陈志谊. 江苏省水稻纹枯病菌遗传多样性分析与致病力研究. 江苏农业学报, 2013 29(1): 51-59. |
Wu H F, Wang X Y, Luo C P, Chen Z Y.Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani isolates from Jiangsu province. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2013 29(1): 51-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 张优, 魏松红, 王海宁, 李帅, 李思博, 罗文芳. 东北地区水稻纹枯病菌遗传多样性和致病性分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2017, 48(1): 9-14. |
Zhang Y, Wei S H, Wang H N, Li S, Li S B, Luo W F.Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani isolates causing sheath blight disease of rice in northeast region. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2017, 48(1): 9-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 吴玥, 梁铖玮, 赵辰妃, 孙健, 马殿荣. 直播稻田杂草稻灾害发生及生态型的演变特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[2] | 董俊杰, 曾宇翔, 季芝娟, 梁燕, 杨长登. 273份水稻种质资源的遗传多样性、群体结构与连锁不平衡 分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 130-140. |
[3] | 江绍锋, 王陈骄子, 舒灿伟, 周而勋. 水稻纹枯病菌RsPhm基因的克隆及其表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 1(1): 111-118. |
[4] | 朱名海, 皮磊, 舒灿伟, 周而勋. 南繁区稻瘟病菌遗传多样性和群体遗传结构的AFLP分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 320-326. |
[5] | 袁筱萍, 王彩红, 邓宏中, 徐群, 冯跃, 余汉勇, 王一平, 魏兴华. 亚洲栽培稻遗传变异分析最少SSR引物数的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(6): 578-586. |
[6] | 王玲, 左示敏, 张亚芳, 陈宗祥, 潘学彪, 黄世文. 四川省稻瘟病菌群体遗传结构分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3): 327-334. |
[7] | 刘承晨, 赵富伟, 吴晓霞, 张昌泉, 朱孔志, 薛达元, 武建勇, 黄绍文, 徐小颖, 金银根, 刘巧泉. 云南哈尼梯田当前栽培水稻遗传多样性及群体结构分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 28-34. |
[8] | 杨贤莉,王嘉宇*,刘丹,张玲,李晓楠,吕国依 . 沈农系列水稻高产品种及其衍生系的遗传结构分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5): 496-502. |
[9] | 穆慧敏1,2,姜华1 ,王艳丽1 ,孙国昌1,*. 研究稻瘟病菌群体遗传多态性的分子标记方法[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(5): 545-552. |
[10] | 孙建昌1,2,余滕琼3,汤翠凤3,曹桂兰1,徐福荣3,韩龙植1,*. 基于SSR标记的云南地方稻种群体内遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(1): 41-48. |
[11] | 杨媚1,#,杨迎青1, 2,#,郑丽1,李明海1,周而勋1,*. 水稻纹枯病菌细胞壁降解酶组分分析、活性测定及其致病作用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(5): 599-605. |
[12] | 周振玲1,2,王宝祥1,樊继伟1,卢百关1,赵志刚2,江玲2,秦德荣1,万建民2,3 ,徐大勇1,2,*. 江淮稻区不同生态型粳稻品种的籼粳分化度和遗传多样性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4): 431-437. |
[13] | 罗楚平1,3刘永锋1陈志谊1,3,*王晓宇1方先文2陈忠明2刘邮洲1聂亚锋1张荣胜1. 水稻纹枯病菌6磷酸葡萄糖胺合成酶基因的克隆、测序及表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 137-143. |
[14] | 徐建欣,王云月*,姚春,刘云霞,汤淼,陆明兴. 利用SSR分子标记分析云南陆稻品种遗传多样性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 155-164. |
[15] | 刘丹,孙健,马殿荣*,王嘉宇,唐亮,苗微,陈温福*. 利用SRAP分子标记分析47份杂草稻样品遗传多样性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 70-76. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||