Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 373-382.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.210207
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Cailin WANG, Yadong ZHANG, Tao CHEN, Zhen ZHU, Qingyong ZHAO, Chunfang ZHAO, Shu YAO, Lihui ZHOU, Ling ZHAO, Xiaodong Wei, Kai LU, Wenhua LIANG
Received:
2021-02-21
Revised:
2021-03-18
Online:
2021-07-10
Published:
2021-07-10
王才林, 张亚东, 陈涛, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 赵春芳, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 魏晓东, 路凯, 梁文化
基金资助:
Cailin WANG, Yadong ZHANG, Tao CHEN, Zhen ZHU, Qingyong ZHAO, Chunfang ZHAO, Shu YAO, Lihui ZHOU, Ling ZHAO, Xiaodong Wei, Kai LU, Wenhua LIANG. Effect of Location and Sowing Date on Eating Quality of Semi-waxy japonica Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(4): 373-382.
王才林, 张亚东, 陈涛, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 赵春芳, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 魏晓东, 路凯, 梁文化. 地点和播期对半糯粳稻食味品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(4): 373-382.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.210207
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 1 | 0.54 * | 0.11 | 1.65* | 3 498 | 18 150 | 32 603 |
品种Variety | 39 | 0.53** | 84.63** | 2.52** | 194 056** | 99 962** | 102 064** |
误差Error | 39 | 0.13 | 17.49 | 0.34 | 81 436 | 28 507 | 32 810 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
重复Repetition | 1 | 0.02 | 37 584 | 57 459 | 2 101 * | 0.15 * | 24.24** |
品种Variety | 39 | 0.08** | 89 320** | 96 568** | 3 359** | 0.35** | 84.49** |
误差Error | 39 | 0.02 | 30 918 | 25 947 | 485 | 0.03 | 7.61 |
Table 1 Analysis of variance on ECQs for semi-waxy japonica rice lines tested.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 1 | 0.54 * | 0.11 | 1.65* | 3 498 | 18 150 | 32 603 |
品种Variety | 39 | 0.53** | 84.63** | 2.52** | 194 056** | 99 962** | 102 064** |
误差Error | 39 | 0.13 | 17.49 | 0.34 | 81 436 | 28 507 | 32 810 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
重复Repetition | 1 | 0.02 | 37 584 | 57 459 | 2 101 * | 0.15 * | 24.24** |
品种Variety | 39 | 0.08** | 89 320** | 96 568** | 3 359** | 0.35** | 84.49** |
误差Error | 39 | 0.02 | 30 918 | 25 947 | 485 | 0.03 | 7.61 |
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均Average | 8.9 | 83.7 | 72.6 | 2823 | 1507 | 2043 |
变异系数CV/% | 5.8 | 7.8 | 1.5 | 11.0 | 14.8 | 11.1 |
最小值Min. | 8.0 | 60.3 | 69.2 | 2128 | 1088 | 1628 |
最大值Max. | 9.9 | 94.3 | 74.4 | 3366 | 1993 | 2584 |
中熟中粳平均Average for MMR | 8.8 | 87.1 | 71.9 | 2607 | 1436 | 2031 |
迟熟中粳平均Average for LMR | 8.7 | 78.9 | 73.7 | 2907 | 1471 | 1988 |
晚粳平均Average for LR | 9.0 | 84.5 | 72.3 | 2889 | 1560 | 2077 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
平均Average | 6.0 | 1316 | -779 | 537 | 1.9 | 76.2 |
变异系数CV/% | 3.4 | 16.1 | -28.2 | 7.6 | 22.7 | 4.6 |
最小值Min. | 5.6 | 917 | -1400 | 482 | 1.1 | 65.6 |
最大值Max. | 6.5 | 1910 | -384 | 636 | 3.0 | 82.5 |
中熟中粳平均Average for MMR | 6.1 | 1171 | -575 | 596 | 1.8 | 73.6 |
迟熟中粳平均Average for LMR | 5.9 | 1436 | -920 | 517 | 2.2 | 76.3 |
晚粳平均Average for LR | 6.1 | 1329 | -811 | 517 | 1.7 | 77.4 |
Table 2 Statistic parameters of ECQs of semi-waxy japonica lines tested.
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均Average | 8.9 | 83.7 | 72.6 | 2823 | 1507 | 2043 |
变异系数CV/% | 5.8 | 7.8 | 1.5 | 11.0 | 14.8 | 11.1 |
最小值Min. | 8.0 | 60.3 | 69.2 | 2128 | 1088 | 1628 |
最大值Max. | 9.9 | 94.3 | 74.4 | 3366 | 1993 | 2584 |
中熟中粳平均Average for MMR | 8.8 | 87.1 | 71.9 | 2607 | 1436 | 2031 |
迟熟中粳平均Average for LMR | 8.7 | 78.9 | 73.7 | 2907 | 1471 | 1988 |
晚粳平均Average for LR | 9.0 | 84.5 | 72.3 | 2889 | 1560 | 2077 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
平均Average | 6.0 | 1316 | -779 | 537 | 1.9 | 76.2 |
变异系数CV/% | 3.4 | 16.1 | -28.2 | 7.6 | 22.7 | 4.6 |
最小值Min. | 5.6 | 917 | -1400 | 482 | 1.1 | 65.6 |
最大值Max. | 6.5 | 1910 | -384 | 636 | 3.0 | 82.5 |
中熟中粳平均Average for MMR | 6.1 | 1171 | -575 | 596 | 1.8 | 73.6 |
迟熟中粳平均Average for LMR | 5.9 | 1436 | -920 | 517 | 2.2 | 76.3 |
晚粳平均Average for LR | 6.1 | 1329 | -811 | 517 | 1.7 | 77.4 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度 GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点内重复 Repetition within site | 2 | 0.30 | 35.82 | 9.71 | 11 941 | 57 189 | 83 235* |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 20.07** | 216.15** | 41.04** | 157 088 | 741 318** | 1431 660** |
品种Variety(V) | 19 | 0.61** | 65.96** | 7.81 | 294 668** | 191 793** | 183 126** |
地点×品种S×V | 19 | 0.55** | 129.05** | 6.51 | 59 091 | 25 723 | 28 060 |
误差Error | 38 | 0.13 | 17.03 | 4.62 | 54 061 | 17 915 | 20 589 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.04 | 19 517 | 36 483 | 2 639** | 0.11 * | 83.63** |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 1.27** | 215 904** | 640 283** | 112 575** | 3.98** | 1233.76** |
品种Variety(V) | 19 | 0.10 | 84 041** | 107 778** | 4 305** | 0.25** | 19.99 * |
地点×品种S×V | 19 | 0.04 * | 59 783** | 59 186** | 2 250** | 0.16** | 17.26 * |
误差Error | 38 | 0.02 | 23 958 | 20 198 | 379 | 0.02 | 9.95 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance on ECQs of semi-waxy japonica lines at two locations.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度 GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点内重复 Repetition within site | 2 | 0.30 | 35.82 | 9.71 | 11 941 | 57 189 | 83 235* |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 20.07** | 216.15** | 41.04** | 157 088 | 741 318** | 1431 660** |
品种Variety(V) | 19 | 0.61** | 65.96** | 7.81 | 294 668** | 191 793** | 183 126** |
地点×品种S×V | 19 | 0.55** | 129.05** | 6.51 | 59 091 | 25 723 | 28 060 |
误差Error | 38 | 0.13 | 17.03 | 4.62 | 54 061 | 17 915 | 20 589 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.04 | 19 517 | 36 483 | 2 639** | 0.11 * | 83.63** |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 1.27** | 215 904** | 640 283** | 112 575** | 3.98** | 1233.76** |
品种Variety(V) | 19 | 0.10 | 84 041** | 107 778** | 4 305** | 0.25** | 19.99 * |
地点×品种S×V | 19 | 0.04 * | 59 783** | 59 186** | 2 250** | 0.16** | 17.26 * |
误差Error | 38 | 0.02 | 23 958 | 20 198 | 379 | 0.02 | 9.95 |
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均Mean | 9.2 | 81.4 | 72.3 | 2820 | 1562 | 2154 |
变异系数CV/% | 4.2 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 9.6 | 14.0 | 9.9 |
最小值Min. | 8.3 | 71.6 | 71.6 | 2315 | 1189 | 1766 |
最大值Max. | 10.2 | 89.5 | 73.2 | 3313 | 1996 | 2611 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
平均Mean | 6.1 | 1258 | -666 | 592 | 1.8 | 78.8 |
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 11.5 | -24.6 | 5.5 | 14.1 | 2.8 |
最小值Min. | 5.9 | 1033 | -1024 | 535 | 1.5 | 73.6 |
最大值Max. | 6.5 | 1572 | -417 | 654 | 2.4 | 82.2 |
Table 4 Statistic parameters of ECQs for semi-waxy japonica lines at two locations.
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均Mean | 9.2 | 81.4 | 72.3 | 2820 | 1562 | 2154 |
变异系数CV/% | 4.2 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 9.6 | 14.0 | 9.9 |
最小值Min. | 8.3 | 71.6 | 71.6 | 2315 | 1189 | 1766 |
最大值Max. | 10.2 | 89.5 | 73.2 | 3313 | 1996 | 2611 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
平均Mean | 6.1 | 1258 | -666 | 592 | 1.8 | 78.8 |
变异系数CV/% | 2.5 | 11.5 | -24.6 | 5.5 | 14.1 | 2.8 |
最小值Min. | 5.9 | 1033 | -1024 | 535 | 1.5 | 73.6 |
最大值Max. | 6.5 | 1572 | -417 | 654 | 2.4 | 82.2 |
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南京Nanjing | 8.7 | 83.0 | 72.8 | 2 757 | 1 454 | 2 010 |
泗洪Sihong | 9.7 | 79.7 | 71.8 | 2 865 | 1 659 | 2 288 |
地点差异Difference between two sites | 1.0** | -3.2** | -1.0** | 107.7 | 205.2** | 278.4** |
地点变异Variation between sites/% | 42.1 | 4.7 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 13.1 | 22.4 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
南京Nanjing | 6.0 | 1 304 | -748 | 556 | 2.0 | 75.0 |
泗洪Sihong | 6.3 | 1 206 | -577 | 629 | 1.6 | 82.8 |
地点差异Difference between two sites | 0.3** | -97.6** | 170.7** | 73.2** | -0.4** | 7.8** |
地点变异Variation between sites/% | 26.3 | 5.5 | 13.8 | 43.8 | 30.7 | 49.6 |
Table 5 Differences in ECQs between two locations for 20 semi-waxy japonica lines.
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南京Nanjing | 8.7 | 83.0 | 72.8 | 2 757 | 1 454 | 2 010 |
泗洪Sihong | 9.7 | 79.7 | 71.8 | 2 865 | 1 659 | 2 288 |
地点差异Difference between two sites | 1.0** | -3.2** | -1.0** | 107.7 | 205.2** | 278.4** |
地点变异Variation between sites/% | 42.1 | 4.7 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 13.1 | 22.4 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
南京Nanjing | 6.0 | 1 304 | -748 | 556 | 2.0 | 75.0 |
泗洪Sihong | 6.3 | 1 206 | -577 | 629 | 1.6 | 82.8 |
地点差异Difference between two sites | 0.3** | -97.6** | 170.7** | 73.2** | -0.4** | 7.8** |
地点变异Variation between sites/% | 26.3 | 5.5 | 13.8 | 43.8 | 30.7 | 49.6 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度 GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.01 | 21.18 | 0.11 | 28 905 | 31 726 | 47 271* |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 3.42** | 1644.81** | 0.55 | 159 391** | 247 433** | 382 789** |
品种Variety(V) | 9 | 0.35* | 38.05** | 0.20 | 277 309** | 212 142** | 211 831** |
地点×品种 S×V | 9 | 0.09 | 18.51* | 0.29 | 24 301* | 25 619* | 27 465* |
误差Error | 18 | 0.12 | 7.26 | 0.13 | 9 307 | 9 826 | 10 454 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.01 | 127 | 2 284 | 1 551 | 0.02 | 78.91** |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 0.41** | 9 641 | 48 164 | 14 707** | 0.13** | 191.41** |
品种Variety(V) | 9 | 0.10** | 51 813** | 49 337** | 2 537** | 0.08** | 27.53** |
地点×品种 S×V | 9 | 0.04 | 37 854* | 35 277* | 578 | 0.00 | 21.67** |
误差Error | 18 | 0.02 | 13 833 | 12 742 | 321 | 0.01 | 4.32 |
Table 6 Analysis of variance on ECQs for two sowing dates of semi-waxy japonica lines.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 直链淀粉含量AC | 胶稠度 GC | 糊化温度 GT | 峰值黏度PKV | 热浆黏度HPV | 冷浆黏度 CPV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.01 | 21.18 | 0.11 | 28 905 | 31 726 | 47 271* |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 3.42** | 1644.81** | 0.55 | 159 391** | 247 433** | 382 789** |
品种Variety(V) | 9 | 0.35* | 38.05** | 0.20 | 277 309** | 212 142** | 211 831** |
地点×品种 S×V | 9 | 0.09 | 18.51* | 0.29 | 24 301* | 25 619* | 27 465* |
误差Error | 18 | 0.12 | 7.26 | 0.13 | 9 307 | 9 826 | 10 454 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值时间 PeT | 崩解值 BDV | 消减值 SBV | 回复值 CSV | 外观品质 AQ | 食味值 TV |
地点内重复Repetition within site | 2 | 0.01 | 127 | 2 284 | 1 551 | 0.02 | 78.91** |
地点Site(S) | 1 | 0.41** | 9 641 | 48 164 | 14 707** | 0.13** | 191.41** |
品种Variety(V) | 9 | 0.10** | 51 813** | 49 337** | 2 537** | 0.08** | 27.53** |
地点×品种 S×V | 9 | 0.04 | 37 854* | 35 277* | 578 | 0.00 | 21.67** |
误差Error | 18 | 0.02 | 13 833 | 12 742 | 321 | 0.01 | 4.32 |
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常播种平均Average for normal sowing | 8.8 | 87.1 | 71.9 | 2607 | 1436 | 2031 |
迟播平均Average for late sowing | 9.3 | 74.2 | 72.1 | 2733 | 1593 | 2227 |
播期差异Difference between sowing dates | 0.6** | -12.8** | 0.2 | 126** | 157** | 195** |
播期变异Variation between sowing dates/% | 35.8 | 70.7 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 9.4 | 13.6 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
正常播种平均Average for normal sowing | 6.1 | 1171 | -575 | 596 | 1.8 | 73.6 |
迟播平均Average for late sowing | 6.3 | 1140 | -506 | 634 | 1.7 | 78.0 |
播期差异Difference between sowing dates | 0.2** | -31.1 | 69.4 | 38.4** | -0.1** | 4.4** |
播期变异Variation between sowing dates/% | 21.2 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 28.5 | 11.6 | 22.0 |
Table 7 Differences of ECQs between two sowing dates for semi-waxy japonica lines.
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常播种平均Average for normal sowing | 8.8 | 87.1 | 71.9 | 2607 | 1436 | 2031 |
迟播平均Average for late sowing | 9.3 | 74.2 | 72.1 | 2733 | 1593 | 2227 |
播期差异Difference between sowing dates | 0.6** | -12.8** | 0.2 | 126** | 157** | 195** |
播期变异Variation between sowing dates/% | 35.8 | 70.7 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 9.4 | 13.6 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
正常播种平均Average for normal sowing | 6.1 | 1171 | -575 | 596 | 1.8 | 73.6 |
迟播平均Average for late sowing | 6.3 | 1140 | -506 | 634 | 1.7 | 78.0 |
播期差异Difference between sowing dates | 0.2** | -31.1 | 69.4 | 38.4** | -0.1** | 4.4** |
播期变异Variation between sowing dates/% | 21.2 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 28.5 | 11.6 | 22.0 |
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南京迟播平均Average for late sowing in Nanjing | 9.3 | 74.2 | 72.1 | 2733 | 1593 | 2227 |
泗洪平均Average in Sihong | 9.7 | 76.0 | 71.8 | 2804 | 1634 | 2270 |
差异Difference | -0.3** | -1.8 | 0.3* | -70.8* | -40.8 | -42.9 |
变异Variation between Nanjing and Sihong/% | 16.4 | 2.8 | 9.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
南京迟播平均Average for late sowing in Nanjing | 6.3 | 1140 | -506 | 634 | 1.7 | 78.0 |
泗洪平均Average in Sihong | 6.3 | 1170 | -534 | 636 | 1.6 | 82.3 |
差异Difference | 0.0 | -30.0 | 27.9 | -2.1 | 0.1** | -4.3** |
变异Variation between Nanjing and Sihong/% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 7.0 | 35.1 |
Table 8 Differences in ECQs between Sihong and Nanjing late sowing for semi-waxy japonica lines.
项目Item | 直链淀粉含量AC/% | 胶稠度GC/mm | 糊化温度GT/℃ | 峰值黏度PKV/cP | 热浆黏度HPV/cP | 冷浆黏度CPV/cP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南京迟播平均Average for late sowing in Nanjing | 9.3 | 74.2 | 72.1 | 2733 | 1593 | 2227 |
泗洪平均Average in Sihong | 9.7 | 76.0 | 71.8 | 2804 | 1634 | 2270 |
差异Difference | -0.3** | -1.8 | 0.3* | -70.8* | -40.8 | -42.9 |
变异Variation between Nanjing and Sihong/% | 16.4 | 2.8 | 9.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
项目Item | 峰值时间PeT/min | 崩解值BDV/cP | 消减值SBV/cP | 回复值CSV/cP | 外观品质` AQ | 食味值 TV |
南京迟播平均Average for late sowing in Nanjing | 6.3 | 1140 | -506 | 634 | 1.7 | 78.0 |
泗洪平均Average in Sihong | 6.3 | 1170 | -534 | 636 | 1.6 | 82.3 |
差异Difference | 0.0 | -30.0 | 27.9 | -2.1 | 0.1** | -4.3** |
变异Variation between Nanjing and Sihong/% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 7.0 | 35.1 |
[1] | 赵春芳, 岳红亮, 黄双杰, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 张亚东, 陈涛, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 姚姝, 梁文化, 路凯, 王才林. 南粳系列水稻品种的食味品质与稻米理化特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 909-920. |
Zhao C F, Yue H L, Huang S J, Zhou L H, Zhao L, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Yao S, Liang W H, Lu K, Wang C L.Study on eating quality and physicochemical properties in Nanjing rice varieties.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(5): 909-920. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[2] | 王才林, 陈涛, 张亚东, 朱镇, 赵凌, 林静. 通过分子标记辅助选择培育优良食味水稻新品种[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(1): 25-30. |
Wang C L, Chen T, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Lin J.Breeding of a new rice variety with good eating quality by marker assisted selection.Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23(1): 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[3] | 王才林, 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 赵凌, 周丽慧, 姚姝. 优良食味粳稻新品种南粳5055的选育及利用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2012(2): 84-87. |
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhao L, Zhou L H, Yao S, Breeding and application of new good eating quality rice variety Nanjing 5055. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012(2): 84-87. (in Chinese). | |
[4] | 王才林, 张亚东, 朱镇, 姚姝, 赵庆勇,、陈涛,、周丽慧,、赵凌. 优良食味粳稻新品种南粳9108的选育与利用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(9): 86-88. |
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Yao S, Zhao Q Y, Chen T, Zhou L H, Zhao L.Breeding and application of new good eating quality rice variety Nanjing 9108.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(9): 86-88. (in Chinese). | |
[5] | 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 冯凯华, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 赵春芳, 梁文化, 路凯, 王才林. 优良食味粳稻南粳5718的选育及主要特征特性[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(4): 100-102. |
Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Feng K H, Yao S, Zhou L H, Zhao L, Zhao C F, Liang W H, Lu K, Wang C L.Breeding and characteristics of a newjaponica rice variety Nangeng 5718 with good eating quality. China Rice, 2020, 26(4): 100-102. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[6] | 于新, 赵庆勇, 赵春芳, 张亚东, 朱镇, 赵凌, 陈涛, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 王才林. 携带Wx-mq基因的不同类型水稻新品种(系)直链淀粉含量分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2012, 28(6): 1218-1222. |
Yu X, Zhao Q Y, Zhao C F, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Chen T, Zhou L H, Yao S, Wang C L.Analysis of Amylose content in different types of new rice varieties (lines) carringWx-mq gene. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 28(6): 1218-1222. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 姚姝, 张亚东, 刘燕清, 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 朱镇, Pillay B, 王才林. 水稻Wxmp背景下SSIIa和SSIIIa等位变异及其互作对蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1690-1702. |
Yao S, Zhang Y D, Liu Y Q, Zhao C F, Zhou L H, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhu Z, Pillay B, Wang C L.Effects ofSSⅡa and SSⅢa alleles and their interaction on eating and cooking quality under Wxmp background of rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(11): 1690-1702. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[8] | 赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 于新, 赵凌, 王才林. 播期和地点对不同生态类型粳稻稻米品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 297-304. |
Zhao Q Y, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Yao S, Zhou L H, Yu X, Zhao L, Wang C L.Effects of sowing date and site on grain quality of rice cultivars planted in different ecological types.Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(3): 297-304. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[9] | 赵庆勇, 张亚东, 朱镇, 陈涛, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 于新, 王才林. 播期与地点对不同生态类型粳稻淀粉RVA谱特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2014, 30(1): 1-8. |
Zhao Q Y, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Yao S, Zhou L H, Yu X, Zhao L, Wang C L.Effects of sowing dates and sites on starch RVA profile characteristics of different ecological types of rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica). Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 30(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[10] | 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 于新, 王才林. 播期和种植地点对南粳46稻米品质及RVA谱的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(5): 921-927. |
Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Yao S, Zhou L H, Yu X, Wang C L.Effects of sowing date and planting site on grain quality and RVA profiles of Nanjing 46, a popular cultivar in japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 29(5): 921-927. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[11] | 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 于新, 王才林. 播期和地点对南粳44稻米品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2013, 26(5): 1747-1752. |
Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Yao S, Zhou L H, Yu X, Wang C L.Effect of Different Sowing Date and Site on Grain Quality of Nanjing 44.Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 26(5): 1747-1752. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[12] | 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 张亚东, 陈涛, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 赵春芳, 梁文化, 路凯, 王才林. 不同地点南粳9108稻米直链淀粉含量及RVA谱特征值分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(24): 213-216. |
Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Yao S, Zhou L H, Zhao L, Zhao C F, Liang W H, Lu K, Wang C L.Analysis of amylose content and RVA profile characteristics of Nanjing 9108 rice from different locations.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(24): 213-216. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 姚姝, 于新, 周丽慧, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东, 赵春芳, 赵凌, 王才林. 氮肥用量和播期对优良食味粳稻直链淀粉含量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(5): 535-549. |
Yao S, Yu X, Zhou L H, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, Zhao C F, Zhao L, Wang C L.Effects of nitrogen and sowing date on amylose content in good eating quality rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica). Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(5): 535-549. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[14] | 程方民, 丁元树, 朱碧岩. 稻米直链淀粉含量的形成及其与灌浆结实期温度的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(4): 646-652. |
Chen F M, Ding Y S, Zhu B Y.The formation of amylose content in rice grain and its relation with field temperature.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(4): 646-652. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 程方民, 张嵩午, 吴永常, 王长发. 稻米胶稠度与结实期温度间的关系[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 1996(5): 27-31. |
Chen F M, Ding Y S, Wu Y C, Wang Z F.Relationship between gel consistency in rice grain and temperature during grain-filling stage. Acta Universitatis Agriculturalis Boreali-occidentalis, 1996(5): 27-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋. 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2): 482-491. |
Gong J L, Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Wang Y, Xing Z P, Huo Z Y.Effects of air temperature during rice grain-filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(2): 482-491. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 段斌, 方玲, 何世界, 李慧龙, 宋晓华. 播期及灌浆期温度对豫南粳稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1): 65-69. |
Duan B, Fang L, He S J, Li H L, Song X H.Effects of sowing date and filling stage temperature on quality of rice in the Southern of Henan Province.China Rice, 2019, 25(1): 65-69. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[18] | Hu Y J, Li L, Tian J Y, Zhang C X, Wang J, Yu E W, Xing Z P, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Huo Z Y, Zhang H C.Effects of dynamic low temperature during the grain filling stage on starch morphological structure, physicochemical properties, and eating quality of soft japonica rice[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2020, 97(2): 540-550. |
[19] | 陈涛, 骆名瑞, 张亚东, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 赵凌, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 王才林. 利用四引物扩增受阻突变体系PCR技术检测水稻低直链淀粉含量基因Wx-mp[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(5): 529-534. |
Chen T, Luo M R, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Zhao L, Zhou L H, Yao S, Wang C L.Detection ofWx-mp gene for low amylose content by tatre-amplification refractory mutation system PCR in rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(5): 529-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 标准米质测定方法 NY147-88[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1988. |
Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Standard Rice Quality Measurement Method of NY147-88. Beijing: China Standards Press, 1988. (in Chinese). | |
[21] | 中华人民共和国国家粮食局. 粮油检验大米胶稠度的测定 GB/T 22294-2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
State Administration of Grain, the People’s Republic of China. Inspection of the Grain and Oil-determination of Rice Adhesive Strength, GB/T 22294-2008[S]. Beijing: Standard Press of China, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 莫惠栋. 农业试验统计[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1992: 151-166. |
Mo H D. Agricultural Experiment Statistics.Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1992: 151-166. (in Chinese) |
[1] | YONG Mingling, YE Miao, ZHANG Yu, TAO Yu, NI Chuan, KANG Yuying, ZHANG Zujian. Rice Starch Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Good Taste japonica Rice Varieties and Their Regulations by Nitrogen [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 57-71. |
[2] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[3] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[4] | YAO Shu, ZHAO Chunfang, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Ling, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Qingyong, LIANG Wenhua, HE Lei, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Nutritional Quality and Cooking and Eating Quality Characteristics of Low Glutelin Semi-glutinous japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(2): 178-188. |
[5] | CHEN Tao, ZHAO Qingyong, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Ling, YAO Shu, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Chunfang, ZHANG Yadong, WANG Cailin. Development of New Low Glutelin Content japonica Rice Lines with Good Eating Quality and Fragrance by Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 55-65. |
[6] | REN Weichen, CHANG Qingxia, ZHANG Yajun, ZHU Kuanyu, WANG Zhiqin, YANG Jianchang. Characteristics and Physiological Mechanism of Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation of japonica Rice Varieties Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[7] | SHI Yuliang, YANG Yong, LI Xuefei, LI Qianfeng, HUANG Lichun, ZHANG Changquan, SONG Xuetang, LIU Qiaoquan. Comparison of Grain Quality Profiles of japonica Soft Rice Varieties with Different Amylose Contents [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 601-610. |
[8] | LU Dandan, YONG Mingling, TAO Yu, YE Miao, ZHANG Zujian. Characteristics of Grain Protein Accumulation and Its Response to Nitrogen Level in Good Taste Rice Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. |
[9] | WU Longlong, YU Yijun, TIAN Cang, ZHANG Lu, HUANG Jing, ZHU Lianfeng, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Regimes on Translocation of Rice Photosynthetic Products and Nitrogen Under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 295-307. |
[10] | Cailin WANG, Yadong ZHANG, Tao CHEN, Zhen ZHU, Qingyong ZHAO, Shu YAO, Ling ZHAO, Chunfang ZHAO, Lihui ZHOU, Xiaodong Wei, Kai LU, Wenhua LIANG. Rapid Breeding of New Semi-glutinous japonica Rice Varieties with Good Eating Quality by Crossing Between Sister Lines [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 455-465. |
[11] | Feng SHEN, Hongbo JIANG, Bo LIU, Xiuru ZHANG, Jun LIU, Wenxiao XIE, Jipan YAO, Liang MA. Difference of Metabolites in Brown Rice Between Liaojing 433 and Koshihikari with Good Eating Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(4): 359-367. |
[12] | Lü SHI, Xinyue ZHANG, Huiyan SUN, Xianmei CAO, Jian LIU, Zujian ZHANG. Relationship of Grain Protein Content with Cooking and Eating Quality as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer at Late Growth Stage for Different Types of Rice Varieties [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. |
[13] | Haiyue WANG, Qiao ZHANG, Yunxia WU, Fengjun YAN, Changchun GUO, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Zhiyuan YANG, Jun MA. Effects of Reduced Urea Application on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mechanically-transplanted Rice Under Different Planting Spaces [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(5): 447-456. |
[14] | Yajie HU, Pei WU, Ming ZHU, Zhipeng XING, Qigen DAI, Zhongyang HUO, Ke XU, Haiyan WEI, Baowei GUO, Hongcheng ZHANG. Characteristics of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization of Mechanically-transplanted Pot-tray-nursed Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 257-264. |
[15] | Mingyu FAN, Xiaojing WANG, Xuhong WANG, Liang TANG, Quan XU, Zhengjin XU. Research Advances of Amylopectin Structure in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(2): 124-132. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||