Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 443-456.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0307
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yan JIA1, Liang YANG2, Detang ZOU1, Zhaojun QU1, Jingguo WANG1, Hualong LIU1, Jin WANG3, Hongwei ZHAO1,*()
Received:
2020-03-18
Revised:
2020-05-09
Online:
2020-09-10
Published:
2020-09-10
Contact:
Hongwei ZHAO
About author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
贾琰1, 杨亮2, 邹德堂1, 瞿炤珺1, 王敬国1, 刘化龙1, 王晋3, 赵宏伟1,*()
通讯作者:
赵宏伟
作者简介:
#共同第一作者;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yan JIA, Liang YANG, Detang ZOU, Zhaojun QU, Jingguo WANG, Hualong LIU, Jin WANG, Hongwei ZHAO. Effects of Exogenous Materials on Nitrogen Photosynthetic Efficiency and Yield Formation of japonica Rice in Cold Region Under Cold Water Stress at Booting Stage[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(5): 443-456.
贾琰, 杨亮, 邹德堂, 瞿炤珺, 王敬国, 刘化龙, 王晋, 赵宏伟. 孕穗期冷水胁迫下施用外源物质对寒地粳稻氮光合效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 443-456.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0307
年份 Year | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 缓效钾 Slowly available K/(mg·kg-1) /(mg·kg-1) | 速效氮 Available N /(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | pH值 Value of pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 22.5 | 1.26 | 0.43 | 707 | 130 | 18.9 | 99.3 | 6.85 |
2015 | 22.4 | 1.25 | 0.42 | 706 | 127 | 18.1 | 98.3 | 6.67 |
2016 | 22.3 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 705 | 126 | 17.9 | 98.1 | 6.61 |
2017 | 22.1 | 1.20 | 0.39 | 705 | 125 | 18.0 | 97.6 | 6.56 |
Table 1 Soil properties of composite topsoil samples (0-20 cm) from the main experimental plots (2014-2017).
年份 Year | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 缓效钾 Slowly available K/(mg·kg-1) /(mg·kg-1) | 速效氮 Available N /(mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | pH值 Value of pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 22.5 | 1.26 | 0.43 | 707 | 130 | 18.9 | 99.3 | 6.85 |
2015 | 22.4 | 1.25 | 0.42 | 706 | 127 | 18.1 | 98.3 | 6.67 |
2016 | 22.3 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 705 | 126 | 17.9 | 98.1 | 6.61 |
2017 | 22.1 | 1.20 | 0.39 | 705 | 125 | 18.0 | 97.6 | 6.56 |
外源物质 Exogenous substance | 浓度 Concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
γ-氨基丁酸GABA/(mmol·L-1) | 0(T1) | 1.25(G1) | 2.50(G2) | 3.75(G3) | 5.00(G4) |
谷氨酸Glu/(mg·mL-1) | 0(T1) | 0.75(Glu1) | 1.50(Glu2) | 2.25(Glu3) | 3.00(Glu4) |
氯化钙CaCl2/(mmmol·L-1) | 0(T1) | 1.00(C1) | 2.00(C2) | 3.00(C3) | 4.00(C4) |
Table 2 Exogenous substance concentrations under cold-water stress during booting stage.
外源物质 Exogenous substance | 浓度 Concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
γ-氨基丁酸GABA/(mmol·L-1) | 0(T1) | 1.25(G1) | 2.50(G2) | 3.75(G3) | 5.00(G4) |
谷氨酸Glu/(mg·mL-1) | 0(T1) | 0.75(Glu1) | 1.50(Glu2) | 2.25(Glu3) | 3.00(Glu4) |
氯化钙CaCl2/(mmmol·L-1) | 0(T1) | 1.00(C1) | 2.00(C2) | 3.00(C3) | 4.00(C4) |
试验因素 Factor | 步距 Step size | 编码值 Coded value (r=1.682) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-r | -1 | 0 | 1 | r | ||
γ-氨基丁酸 GABA/(mmol·L-1) | 1.00 | 2.82 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 6.18 |
谷氨酸Glu/(mg·mL-1) | 1.00 | 0.92 | 1.60 | 2.60 | 3.60 | 4.28 |
氯化钙CaCl2/(mol·L-1) | 1.00 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.68 |
Table 3 Factor code and actual level.
试验因素 Factor | 步距 Step size | 编码值 Coded value (r=1.682) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-r | -1 | 0 | 1 | r | ||
γ-氨基丁酸 GABA/(mmol·L-1) | 1.00 | 2.82 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 6.18 |
谷氨酸Glu/(mg·mL-1) | 1.00 | 0.92 | 1.60 | 2.60 | 3.60 | 4.28 |
氯化钙CaCl2/(mol·L-1) | 1.00 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.68 |
序号 Order | 因子编码水平 Coded level of factors | 序号 Order | 因子编码水平 Coded level of factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glu | CaCl2 | GABA | Glu | CaCl2 | GABA | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 14 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 15 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 |
6 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 16 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
7 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 |
Table 4 Central composite design code of factors.
序号 Order | 因子编码水平 Coded level of factors | 序号 Order | 因子编码水平 Coded level of factors | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glu | CaCl2 | GABA | Glu | CaCl2 | GABA | ||
1 | 0 | 0 | -1.682 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 14 | 1.682 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 15 | 0 | 1.682 | 0 |
6 | 0 | -1.682 | 0 | 16 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
7 | -1.682 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1.682 |
年份 Year | 试验处理 Treatment | 水温 Tw/℃ | 空气温度 Ta/℃ | 热量 Rd/(MJ·m-2 d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 对照 Control | 24.2±1.9 | 25.4±1.5 | 16.3±6.3 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.1±0.7 | 24.2±1.9 | 16.2±6.5 | |
2015 | 对照 Control | 24.2±1.8 | 23.8±1.1 | 16.1±7.1 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.1±0.6 | 23.6±1.8 | 16.2±6.9 | |
2016 | 对照 Control | 23.4±1.5 | 24.2±1.2 | 16.7±8.6 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.0±0.5 | 24.0±1.4 | 16.6±8.7 | |
2017 | 对照 Control | 23.0±1.9 | 23.8±1.6 | 15.9±8.4 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.0±0.7 | 23.5±1.1 | 15.8±8.2 |
Table 5 Survey of testing site conditions during cold-water irrigation at booting stage.
年份 Year | 试验处理 Treatment | 水温 Tw/℃ | 空气温度 Ta/℃ | 热量 Rd/(MJ·m-2 d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 对照 Control | 24.2±1.9 | 25.4±1.5 | 16.3±6.3 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.1±0.7 | 24.2±1.9 | 16.2±6.5 | |
2015 | 对照 Control | 24.2±1.8 | 23.8±1.1 | 16.1±7.1 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.1±0.6 | 23.6±1.8 | 16.2±6.9 | |
2016 | 对照 Control | 23.4±1.5 | 24.2±1.2 | 16.7±8.6 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.0±0.5 | 24.0±1.4 | 16.6±8.7 | |
2017 | 对照 Control | 23.0±1.9 | 23.8±1.6 | 15.9±8.4 |
冷水灌溉 Cold-water irrigation | 17.0±0.7 | 23.5±1.1 | 15.8±8.2 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 总颖花数 Spikelets per panicle | 总枝梗数 No. of rachises and branches per panicle | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农428 Dongnong 428 | T0 | 93.5 a | 148.2 a | 31.4 a | 330.9 a | 115.1 a | 92.5 a | 25.5 a | 8984.9 a |
T1 | 89.0 fg | 132.7 i | 30.5 de | 326.4 b | 111.9 bc | 88.1 g | 23.1 i | 7417.9 f | |
T1+G1 | 88.8 c | 134.6 h | 30.8 bc | 327.6 b | 112.1 bc | 89.5 def | 23.5 fg | 7717.6 cde | |
T1+G2 | 90.3 cd | 140.6 cd | 30.9 b | 328.1 ab | 112.5 bc | 90.3 bcd | 23.9 c | 7959.0 bc | |
T1+G3 | 91.1 bc | 142.1 b | 30.8 bc | 328.9 ab | 111.9 b | 90.6 bc | 23.5 fg | 7826.1 bcd | |
T1+G4 | 90.9 bc | 141.6 bc | 30.7 bcd | 327.4 b | 112.0 bc | 90.1 cde | 23.6 efg | 7779.8 cd | |
T1+Glu1 | 89.3 ef | 135.2 gh | 30.3 e | 326.9 b | 112.1 bc | 89.4 ef | 23.2 hi | 7584.4 def | |
T1+Glu2 | 90.4 bcd | 139.3 ef | 30.7 bcd | 327.7 b | 112.9 b | 90.4 bc | 23.7 cde | 7920.0 bc | |
T1+Glu3 | 91.2 b | 141.6 bc | 30.6 cd | 328.1 ab | 112.4 bc | 90.5 b | 23.4 gh | 7812.4 bcd | |
T1+Glu4 | 89.6 def | 140.1 de | 30.5 de | 327.3 b | 111.8 c | 90.2 cde | 23.2 hi | 7670.1 cdef | |
T1+C1 | 89.1 efg | 133.3 i | 30.6 cd | 327.1 b | 110.8 d | 88.9 f | 23.2 hi | 7476.0 ef | |
T1+C2 | 89.9 de | 136.3 g | 31.2 a | 327.4 b | 112.6 bc | 90.5 bc | 23.8 cd | 7941.5 bc | |
T1+C3 | 90.8 bc | 140.7 cd | 30.8 bc | 328.1 ab | 112.3 bc | 91.1 b | 24.1 b | 8090.6 b | |
T1+C4 | 88.4 g | 138.4 f | 30.7 bcd | 327.2 b | 112.1 bc | 90.1 cde | 23.5 fg | 7767.3 cd | |
松粳10 Songjing 10 | T0 | 93.0 a | 142.6 a | 29.8 a | 325.4 a | 105.2 bc | 91.5 a | 25.2 a | 7884.3 a |
T1 | 85.0 e | 117.7 f | 27.5 ef | 318.9 b | 100.1 i | 83.4 defg | 21.1 g | 5607.0 f | |
T1+G1 | 85.0 e | 121.6 e | 27.9 bc | 319.2 b | 100.2 i | 82.9 g | 21.3 f | 5637.6 f | |
T1+G2 | 85.7 cde | 125.9 b | 27.1 g | 318.9 b | 101.3 fg | 83.5 defg | 21.6 e | 5821.8 ef | |
T1+G3 | 86.6 b | 125.7 bc | 27.8 cd | 319.1 b | 105.6 ab | 84.5 c | 22.6 b | 6424.1 b | |
T1+G4 | 86.0 bcd | 124.9 bc | 27.6 def | 319.2 b | 106.4 a | 84.1 cd | 21.9 d | 6241.2 bc | |
T1+Glu1 | 85.2 e | 122.0 e | 27.6 def | 319.3 b | 100.3 hi | 83.1 fg | 21.2 fg | 5640.1 f | |
T1+Glu2 | 85.8 cde | 124.7 c | 28.1 b | 319.6 b | 105.3 bc | 84.1 cd | 21.4 ef | 6046.3 cd | |
T1+Glu3 | 86.2 bcd | 125.5 bc | 27.7 cde | 319.4 b | 103.6 d | 83.9 cde | 22.2 c | 6158.5 c | |
T1+Glu4 | 85.1 e | 123.4 d | 27.5 ef | 319.2 b | 102.9 de | 83.6 defg | 21.4 ef | 5882.5 de | |
T1+C1 | 85.0 e | 121.5 e | 27.4 f | 318.5 b | 101.1 d | 83.5 defg | 21.3 f | 5717.0 ef | |
T1+C2 | 85.5 de | 123.5 d | 27.9 bc | 319.7 b | 103.4 gh | 85.2 b | 22.1 c | 6230.8 bc | |
T1+C3 | 86.3 bc | 124.8 bc | 27.6 def | 320.1 b | 104.6 c | 83.8 cdef | 21.6 e | 6055.8 cd | |
T1+C4 | 85.1 e | 123.6 d | 27.1 g | 319.4 b | 102.1 ef | 83.2 efg | 21.4 ef | 5804.3 ef | |
F值 F value | 品种 Variety(V) | 2.95* | 2.14* | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 1.21 | 3.62** | 1.34 |
处理Treatment(T) | 12.23** | 8.14** | 2.81* | 2.74* | 0.52 | 8.12** | 16.48** | 6.23** | |
品种×处理 V×T | 9.929** | 29.53** | 19.02** | 0.57 | 21.49** | 19.77** | 42.97** | 6.17** |
Table 6 Effects of exogenous CaCl2, Glu and GABA on yield related indexes of cold-region japonica rice under cold water stress at booting stage.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 总颖花数 Spikelets per panicle | 总枝梗数 No. of rachises and branches per panicle | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农428 Dongnong 428 | T0 | 93.5 a | 148.2 a | 31.4 a | 330.9 a | 115.1 a | 92.5 a | 25.5 a | 8984.9 a |
T1 | 89.0 fg | 132.7 i | 30.5 de | 326.4 b | 111.9 bc | 88.1 g | 23.1 i | 7417.9 f | |
T1+G1 | 88.8 c | 134.6 h | 30.8 bc | 327.6 b | 112.1 bc | 89.5 def | 23.5 fg | 7717.6 cde | |
T1+G2 | 90.3 cd | 140.6 cd | 30.9 b | 328.1 ab | 112.5 bc | 90.3 bcd | 23.9 c | 7959.0 bc | |
T1+G3 | 91.1 bc | 142.1 b | 30.8 bc | 328.9 ab | 111.9 b | 90.6 bc | 23.5 fg | 7826.1 bcd | |
T1+G4 | 90.9 bc | 141.6 bc | 30.7 bcd | 327.4 b | 112.0 bc | 90.1 cde | 23.6 efg | 7779.8 cd | |
T1+Glu1 | 89.3 ef | 135.2 gh | 30.3 e | 326.9 b | 112.1 bc | 89.4 ef | 23.2 hi | 7584.4 def | |
T1+Glu2 | 90.4 bcd | 139.3 ef | 30.7 bcd | 327.7 b | 112.9 b | 90.4 bc | 23.7 cde | 7920.0 bc | |
T1+Glu3 | 91.2 b | 141.6 bc | 30.6 cd | 328.1 ab | 112.4 bc | 90.5 b | 23.4 gh | 7812.4 bcd | |
T1+Glu4 | 89.6 def | 140.1 de | 30.5 de | 327.3 b | 111.8 c | 90.2 cde | 23.2 hi | 7670.1 cdef | |
T1+C1 | 89.1 efg | 133.3 i | 30.6 cd | 327.1 b | 110.8 d | 88.9 f | 23.2 hi | 7476.0 ef | |
T1+C2 | 89.9 de | 136.3 g | 31.2 a | 327.4 b | 112.6 bc | 90.5 bc | 23.8 cd | 7941.5 bc | |
T1+C3 | 90.8 bc | 140.7 cd | 30.8 bc | 328.1 ab | 112.3 bc | 91.1 b | 24.1 b | 8090.6 b | |
T1+C4 | 88.4 g | 138.4 f | 30.7 bcd | 327.2 b | 112.1 bc | 90.1 cde | 23.5 fg | 7767.3 cd | |
松粳10 Songjing 10 | T0 | 93.0 a | 142.6 a | 29.8 a | 325.4 a | 105.2 bc | 91.5 a | 25.2 a | 7884.3 a |
T1 | 85.0 e | 117.7 f | 27.5 ef | 318.9 b | 100.1 i | 83.4 defg | 21.1 g | 5607.0 f | |
T1+G1 | 85.0 e | 121.6 e | 27.9 bc | 319.2 b | 100.2 i | 82.9 g | 21.3 f | 5637.6 f | |
T1+G2 | 85.7 cde | 125.9 b | 27.1 g | 318.9 b | 101.3 fg | 83.5 defg | 21.6 e | 5821.8 ef | |
T1+G3 | 86.6 b | 125.7 bc | 27.8 cd | 319.1 b | 105.6 ab | 84.5 c | 22.6 b | 6424.1 b | |
T1+G4 | 86.0 bcd | 124.9 bc | 27.6 def | 319.2 b | 106.4 a | 84.1 cd | 21.9 d | 6241.2 bc | |
T1+Glu1 | 85.2 e | 122.0 e | 27.6 def | 319.3 b | 100.3 hi | 83.1 fg | 21.2 fg | 5640.1 f | |
T1+Glu2 | 85.8 cde | 124.7 c | 28.1 b | 319.6 b | 105.3 bc | 84.1 cd | 21.4 ef | 6046.3 cd | |
T1+Glu3 | 86.2 bcd | 125.5 bc | 27.7 cde | 319.4 b | 103.6 d | 83.9 cde | 22.2 c | 6158.5 c | |
T1+Glu4 | 85.1 e | 123.4 d | 27.5 ef | 319.2 b | 102.9 de | 83.6 defg | 21.4 ef | 5882.5 de | |
T1+C1 | 85.0 e | 121.5 e | 27.4 f | 318.5 b | 101.1 d | 83.5 defg | 21.3 f | 5717.0 ef | |
T1+C2 | 85.5 de | 123.5 d | 27.9 bc | 319.7 b | 103.4 gh | 85.2 b | 22.1 c | 6230.8 bc | |
T1+C3 | 86.3 bc | 124.8 bc | 27.6 def | 320.1 b | 104.6 c | 83.8 cdef | 21.6 e | 6055.8 cd | |
T1+C4 | 85.1 e | 123.6 d | 27.1 g | 319.4 b | 102.1 ef | 83.2 efg | 21.4 ef | 5804.3 ef | |
F值 F value | 品种 Variety(V) | 2.95* | 2.14* | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.40 | 1.21 | 3.62** | 1.34 |
处理Treatment(T) | 12.23** | 8.14** | 2.81* | 2.74* | 0.52 | 8.12** | 16.48** | 6.23** | |
品种×处理 V×T | 9.929** | 29.53** | 19.02** | 0.57 | 21.49** | 19.77** | 42.97** | 6.17** |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate | 总颖花数 Spikelet per panicle | 总枝梗数 No. of rachises and branches per panicle | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Yield | 隶属函数平均值 ASFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农428 Dongnong 428 | T0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
T1 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | |
T1+G1 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.24 | |
T1+G2 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.42 | |
T1+G3 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.42 | |
T1+G4 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.35 | |
T1+Glu1 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.15 | |
T1+Glu2 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.38 | |
T1+Glu3 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.38 | |
T1+Glu4 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.25 | |
T1+C1 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.11 | |
T1+C2 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.39 | |
T1+C3 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.46 | |
T1+C4 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.26 | |
松粳10 Songjing 10 | T0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
T1 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | |
T1+G1 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | |
T1+G2 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | |
T1+G3 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 0.14 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.31 | |
T1+G4 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
T1+Glu1 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |
T1+Glu2 | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 1.02 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.27 | |
T1+Glu3 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
T1+Glu4 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.14 | |
T1+C1 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |
T1+C2 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.27 | |
T1+C3 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.27 | |
T1+C4 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
Table 7 Comprehensive effects of exogenous CaCl2, Glu and GABA on cold tolerance of cold-region japonica rice under cold water stress at booting stage.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate | 总颖花数 Spikelet per panicle | 总枝梗数 No. of rachises and branches per panicle | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Yield | 隶属函数平均值 ASFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东农428 Dongnong 428 | T0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
T1 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | |
T1+G1 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.24 | |
T1+G2 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.42 | |
T1+G3 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.42 | |
T1+G4 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.35 | |
T1+Glu1 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.15 | |
T1+Glu2 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.38 | |
T1+Glu3 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.38 | |
T1+Glu4 | 0.24 | 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.25 | |
T1+C1 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.11 | |
T1+C2 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.39 | |
T1+C3 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.46 | |
T1+C4 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.26 | |
松粳10 Songjing 10 | T0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
T1 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | |
T1+G1 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 | |
T1+G2 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.17 | |
T1+G3 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.66 | 0.14 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.31 | |
T1+G4 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
T1+Glu1 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 | |
T1+Glu2 | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 1.02 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.27 | |
T1+Glu3 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.24 | |
T1+Glu4 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.14 | |
T1+C1 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |
T1+C2 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.27 | |
T1+C3 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.27 | |
T1+C4 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
Fig. 1. Relationship between exogenous substances concentration and ASFV of cold-region japonica rice under cold water stress. *represents significant correlation at P < 0.05, **represents significant correlation at P < 0.01.
编码 Code | 实际值 Actual value | 预测值 Predictive value | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABA | CaCl2 | Glu | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | ASFV | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | ASFV |
1 | -1 | 1 | 94.84 | 93.45 | 25.06 | 8956.1 | 0.71 | 78.30 | 76.34 | 20.68 | 8023.01 | 0.23 |
-1 | -1 | 1 | 90.13 | 88.72 | 23.72 | 8426.3 | 0.22 | 78.50 | 76.80 | 20.20 | 7995.03 | 0.22 |
0 | 1.682 | 0 | 95.98 | 94.75 | 24.87 | 8923.8 | 0.75 | 76.17 | 73.98 | 20.01 | 7851.64 | 0.15 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 98.06 | 95.86 | 24.67 | 9000.5 | 0.84 | 83.95 | 81.88 | 22.72 | 8603.76 | 0.45 |
-1.682 | 0 | 0 | 89.85 | 87.85 | 22.49 | 8236.1 | 0.05 | 88.14 | 85.94 | 24.74 | 9041.59 | 0.63 |
-1 | 1 | 1 | 96.97 | 97.28 | 24.51 | 9106.4 | 0.87 | 77.22 | 74.75 | 20.76 | 8023.94 | 0.20 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 95.43 | 94.12 | 25.61 | 9020.3 | 0.80 | 81.64 | 79.91 | 21.56 | 8315.40 | 0.35 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 97.37 | 95.69 | 25.91 | 9112.1 | 0.94 | 78.30 | 76.17 | 20.78 | 8077.84 | 0.23 |
1.682 | 0 | 0 | 97.01 | 95.45 | 25.53 | 9015.8 | 0.87 | 75.14 | 73.53 | 19.32 | 7657.39 | 0.10 |
-1 | -1 | -1 | 92.34 | 90.37 | 23.58 | 8485.6 | 0.33 | 72.49 | 70.77 | 18.25 | 7434.11 | 0.00 |
1 | -1 | -1 | 98.13 | 96.07 | 24.90 | 9006.2 | 0.87 | 88.69 | 86.30 | 24.66 | 9051.84 | 0.64 |
1 | 1 | -1 | 97.88 | 96.34 | 24.42 | 9018.5 | 0.84 | 87.81 | 85.50 | 24.11 | 8953.07 | 0.60 |
0 | 0 | -1.682 | 88.47 | 87.22 | 23.09 | 8369.2 | 0.08 | 79.55 | 77.44 | 21.26 | 8231.43 | 0.29 |
0 | 0 | 1.682 | 96.14 | 94.69 | 24.96 | 9005.2 | 0.78 | 83.07 | 80.71 | 23.04 | 8645.71 | 0.44 |
-1 | 1 | -1 | 88.65 | 87.29 | 22.87 | 8256.9 | 0.04 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 92.10 | 89.89 | 22.92 | 8453.1 | 0.25 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | -1.682 | 0 | 98.11 | 96.31 | 24.28 | 9015.2 | 0.83 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 95.88 | 94.05 | 23.33 | 8789.2 | 0.58 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 90.63 | 89.64 | 23.89 | 8536.8 | 0.30 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 90.43 | 88.87 | 23.58 | 8429.7 | 0.23 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
Table 8 Effects of different concentrations of CGG on cold-water stress at the booting stage.
编码 Code | 实际值 Actual value | 预测值 Predictive value | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABA | CaCl2 | Glu | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | ASFV | 可育花粉率 Fertile pollen rate/% | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | ASFV |
1 | -1 | 1 | 94.84 | 93.45 | 25.06 | 8956.1 | 0.71 | 78.30 | 76.34 | 20.68 | 8023.01 | 0.23 |
-1 | -1 | 1 | 90.13 | 88.72 | 23.72 | 8426.3 | 0.22 | 78.50 | 76.80 | 20.20 | 7995.03 | 0.22 |
0 | 1.682 | 0 | 95.98 | 94.75 | 24.87 | 8923.8 | 0.75 | 76.17 | 73.98 | 20.01 | 7851.64 | 0.15 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 98.06 | 95.86 | 24.67 | 9000.5 | 0.84 | 83.95 | 81.88 | 22.72 | 8603.76 | 0.45 |
-1.682 | 0 | 0 | 89.85 | 87.85 | 22.49 | 8236.1 | 0.05 | 88.14 | 85.94 | 24.74 | 9041.59 | 0.63 |
-1 | 1 | 1 | 96.97 | 97.28 | 24.51 | 9106.4 | 0.87 | 77.22 | 74.75 | 20.76 | 8023.94 | 0.20 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 95.43 | 94.12 | 25.61 | 9020.3 | 0.80 | 81.64 | 79.91 | 21.56 | 8315.40 | 0.35 |
1 | 1 | 1 | 97.37 | 95.69 | 25.91 | 9112.1 | 0.94 | 78.30 | 76.17 | 20.78 | 8077.84 | 0.23 |
1.682 | 0 | 0 | 97.01 | 95.45 | 25.53 | 9015.8 | 0.87 | 75.14 | 73.53 | 19.32 | 7657.39 | 0.10 |
-1 | -1 | -1 | 92.34 | 90.37 | 23.58 | 8485.6 | 0.33 | 72.49 | 70.77 | 18.25 | 7434.11 | 0.00 |
1 | -1 | -1 | 98.13 | 96.07 | 24.90 | 9006.2 | 0.87 | 88.69 | 86.30 | 24.66 | 9051.84 | 0.64 |
1 | 1 | -1 | 97.88 | 96.34 | 24.42 | 9018.5 | 0.84 | 87.81 | 85.50 | 24.11 | 8953.07 | 0.60 |
0 | 0 | -1.682 | 88.47 | 87.22 | 23.09 | 8369.2 | 0.08 | 79.55 | 77.44 | 21.26 | 8231.43 | 0.29 |
0 | 0 | 1.682 | 96.14 | 94.69 | 24.96 | 9005.2 | 0.78 | 83.07 | 80.71 | 23.04 | 8645.71 | 0.44 |
-1 | 1 | -1 | 88.65 | 87.29 | 22.87 | 8256.9 | 0.04 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 92.10 | 89.89 | 22.92 | 8453.1 | 0.25 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | -1.682 | 0 | 98.11 | 96.31 | 24.28 | 9015.2 | 0.83 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 95.88 | 94.05 | 23.33 | 8789.2 | 0.58 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 90.63 | 89.64 | 23.89 | 8536.8 | 0.30 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 90.43 | 88.87 | 23.58 | 8429.7 | 0.23 | 95.07 | 92.59 | 27.40 | 9769.73 | 0.91 |
来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方根 Mean square | 方差值 F-value | 显著性P值 P value | 备注 Note | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 2 | 9 | 0.22 | 42.58 | < 0.0001 | 显著Significant | |
X1(GABA) | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 2.55 | 0.1417 | ||
X2(CaCl2) | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.5458 | ||
X3(Glu) | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 5.65 | 0.0388 | ||
X1X2 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 9.42 | 0.0118 | ||
X1X3 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.09 | 17.05 | 0.0020 | ||
X2X3 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 3.88 | 0.0771 | ||
X12 | 1.36 | 1 | 1.36 | 260.98 | < 0.0001 | ||
X22 | 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 29.44 | 0.0003 | ||
X32 | 0.54 | 1 | 0.54 | 103.10 | < 0.0001 | ||
残差Residual | 0.05 | 10 | 0.01 | ||||
失拟Lack of fit | 0.04 | 5 | 0.01 | 2.09 | 0.2195 | 不显著Not significant | |
纯误Pure error | 0.02 | 5 | 0.00 | ||||
总变异Total variation | 2.05 | 19 | |||||
R2=0. 9746 | R2adj=0.9517 | Adeq precision=28.049 |
Table 9 Response surface model ANOVA of ASFV.
来源 Source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方根 Mean square | 方差值 F-value | 显著性P值 P value | 备注 Note | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型Model | 2 | 9 | 0.22 | 42.58 | < 0.0001 | 显著Significant | |
X1(GABA) | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 2.55 | 0.1417 | ||
X2(CaCl2) | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 0.5458 | ||
X3(Glu) | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 5.65 | 0.0388 | ||
X1X2 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.05 | 9.42 | 0.0118 | ||
X1X3 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.09 | 17.05 | 0.0020 | ||
X2X3 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.02 | 3.88 | 0.0771 | ||
X12 | 1.36 | 1 | 1.36 | 260.98 | < 0.0001 | ||
X22 | 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 29.44 | 0.0003 | ||
X32 | 0.54 | 1 | 0.54 | 103.10 | < 0.0001 | ||
残差Residual | 0.05 | 10 | 0.01 | ||||
失拟Lack of fit | 0.04 | 5 | 0.01 | 2.09 | 0.2195 | 不显著Not significant | |
纯误Pure error | 0.02 | 5 | 0.00 | ||||
总变异Total variation | 2.05 | 19 | |||||
R2=0. 9746 | R2adj=0.9517 | Adeq precision=28.049 |
Fig. 2. Effect of application of exogenous substances on ASFV of yield-related indexes of cold-region japonica rice under cold water stress at booting stage. CaCl2, Glu and GABA concentrations in a, b and c are 2.00 mmol/L, 2.60 mg/mL and 4.50 mmol/L, respectively.
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 单位面积叶 片干物质量 Leaf dry weight/(g·m-2) | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 叶片氮素浓度 Leaf nitrogen concentration /(g·kg-1) | 单位叶面积 干物质量 Leaf dry weight/(g·m-2) | 单位面积 含氮量 Nitrogen content /(g·m-2) | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 氮光合效率 Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency /(μmol·g-1 s-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 154.32 a | 7.29 a | 22.58 a | 21.18 b | 0.48 a | 21.07 a | 44.03 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 148.48 b | 6.43 c | 20.13 c | 23.10 a | 0.47 ab | 19.87 b | 42.70 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 149.71 b | 6.86 b | 21.07 b | 21.83 b | 0.46 b | 20.14 ab | 43.75 ab | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 155.48 a | 7.23 a | 22.10 a | 21.51 b | 0.48 a | 21.25 a | 44.66 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 142.52 b | 6.38 b | 20.02 b | 22.35 a | 0.45 b | 19.07 b | 42.59 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water+CGG | 146.61 b | 6.59 b | 20.86 b | 22.26 a | 0.46 ab | 20.14 ab | 43.35 ab | ||||
2017 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 159.35 a | 7.09 a | 22.70 a | 22.48 a | 0.51 a | 22.64 a | 44.34 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 147.59 b | 6.43 c | 21.30 b | 22.98 a | 0.49 b | 20.17 b | 41.19 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 150.71 b | 6.69 b | 21.36 b | 22.54 a | 0.48 b | 21.17 ab | 43.94 a | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 151.05 a | 6.99 a | 21.77 a | 21.62 c | 0.47 b | 21.38 a | 45.40 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 145.42 b | 6.31 b | 21.09 a | 23.05 a | 0.49 a | 18.87 b | 38.80 c | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 148.71 ab | 6.53 b | 21.48 a | 22.79 b | 0.49 a | 19.83 ab | 40.49 b | ||||
平均值 Mean | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 156.84 a | 7.19 a | 22.64 a | 21.83 b | 0.50 a | 21.86 a | 44.19 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 148.04 b | 6.43 c | 20.71 b | 23.04 a | 0.48 ab | 20.02 b | 41.95 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water+CGG | 150.21 b | 6.77 b | 21.22 b | 22.19 b | 0.47 b | 20.65 ab | 43.85 a | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 153.27 a | 7.11 a | 21.94 a | 21.57 b | 0.47 a | 21.31 a | 45.03 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water | 143.97 c | 6.34 c | 20.56 b | 22.70 a | 0.47 a | 18.97 b | 40.69 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 147.66 b | 6.56 b | 21.17 b | 22.52 a | 0.48 a | 19.98 b | 41.92 b | ||||
F值 F value | 品种 Variety(V) | 4.28* | 1.17 | 1.04 | 0.18 | 1.91 | 2.92 | 1.18 | |||
处理 Treatment(T) | 20.24** | 74.72** | 26.14** | 25.27** | 1.46 | 11.65** | 11.09** | ||||
年份 Year (Y) | 0.30 | 1.10 | 2.86 | 7.98** | 22.38** | 0.86 | 2.72 | ||||
年份×品种 Y×T | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 1.57 | 1.39 | ||||
年份×处理 Y×V | 0.09 | 1.29 | 5.41* | 1.74 | 1.69 | 0.42 | 3.33 | ||||
品种×处理 V×T | 0.17 | 0.87 | 1.22 | 2.73 | 1.76 | 0.19 | 2.40 | ||||
年份×品种×处理 Y×V×T | 4.00* | 0.41 | 0.61 | 739.06** | 6.00** | 0.18 | 1.49 |
Table 10. Effects of application of the optimal ratio CGG under cold water stress at booting stage on nitrogen photosynthetic efficiency of cold-region japonica rice at full heading stage.
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 单位面积叶 片干物质量 Leaf dry weight/(g·m-2) | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 叶片氮素浓度 Leaf nitrogen concentration /(g·kg-1) | 单位叶面积 干物质量 Leaf dry weight/(g·m-2) | 单位面积 含氮量 Nitrogen content /(g·m-2) | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 氮光合效率 Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency /(μmol·g-1 s-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 154.32 a | 7.29 a | 22.58 a | 21.18 b | 0.48 a | 21.07 a | 44.03 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 148.48 b | 6.43 c | 20.13 c | 23.10 a | 0.47 ab | 19.87 b | 42.70 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 149.71 b | 6.86 b | 21.07 b | 21.83 b | 0.46 b | 20.14 ab | 43.75 ab | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 155.48 a | 7.23 a | 22.10 a | 21.51 b | 0.48 a | 21.25 a | 44.66 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 142.52 b | 6.38 b | 20.02 b | 22.35 a | 0.45 b | 19.07 b | 42.59 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water+CGG | 146.61 b | 6.59 b | 20.86 b | 22.26 a | 0.46 ab | 20.14 ab | 43.35 ab | ||||
2017 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 159.35 a | 7.09 a | 22.70 a | 22.48 a | 0.51 a | 22.64 a | 44.34 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 147.59 b | 6.43 c | 21.30 b | 22.98 a | 0.49 b | 20.17 b | 41.19 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 150.71 b | 6.69 b | 21.36 b | 22.54 a | 0.48 b | 21.17 ab | 43.94 a | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 151.05 a | 6.99 a | 21.77 a | 21.62 c | 0.47 b | 21.38 a | 45.40 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 145.42 b | 6.31 b | 21.09 a | 23.05 a | 0.49 a | 18.87 b | 38.80 c | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 148.71 ab | 6.53 b | 21.48 a | 22.79 b | 0.49 a | 19.83 ab | 40.49 b | ||||
平均值 Mean | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 156.84 a | 7.19 a | 22.64 a | 21.83 b | 0.50 a | 21.86 a | 44.19 a | ||
低温胁迫 Cold water stress | 148.04 b | 6.43 c | 20.71 b | 23.04 a | 0.48 ab | 20.02 b | 41.95 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water+CGG | 150.21 b | 6.77 b | 21.22 b | 22.19 b | 0.47 b | 20.65 ab | 43.85 a | ||||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 153.27 a | 7.11 a | 21.94 a | 21.57 b | 0.47 a | 21.31 a | 45.03 a | |||
低温胁迫 Cold water | 143.97 c | 6.34 c | 20.56 b | 22.70 a | 0.47 a | 18.97 b | 40.69 b | ||||
低温+CGG Cold water +CGG | 147.66 b | 6.56 b | 21.17 b | 22.52 a | 0.48 a | 19.98 b | 41.92 b | ||||
F值 F value | 品种 Variety(V) | 4.28* | 1.17 | 1.04 | 0.18 | 1.91 | 2.92 | 1.18 | |||
处理 Treatment(T) | 20.24** | 74.72** | 26.14** | 25.27** | 1.46 | 11.65** | 11.09** | ||||
年份 Year (Y) | 0.30 | 1.10 | 2.86 | 7.98** | 22.38** | 0.86 | 2.72 | ||||
年份×品种 Y×T | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 1.57 | 1.39 | ||||
年份×处理 Y×V | 0.09 | 1.29 | 5.41* | 1.74 | 1.69 | 0.42 | 3.33 | ||||
品种×处理 V×T | 0.17 | 0.87 | 1.22 | 2.73 | 1.76 | 0.19 | 2.40 | ||||
年份×品种×处理 Y×V×T | 4.00* | 0.41 | 0.61 | 739.06** | 6.00** | 0.18 | 1.49 |
F值 F value | 积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 群体生长速率 Crop growth rate/(g·m-2 d -1) | 温度生产效率 Temperature production efficiency/(g·m-2 ℃-1) |
---|---|---|---|
品种Variety(V) | 1.737 | 1.832 | 20.01** |
处理Treatment(T) | 66.743** | 46.954** | 16.71** |
年份Year (Y) | 0.037 | 0.250 | 0.65 |
年份×品种Y×T | 0.329 | 0.368 | 0.14 |
年份×处理Y×V | 0.648 | 0.125 | 0.22 |
品种×处理V×T | 34.384** | 23.246** | 24.24** |
年份×品种×处理Y×V×T | 29.578** | 2.665 | 3.91* |
Table 11. Effect of optimal concentration of CGG during cold-water stress at booting stage on variance of dry matter production of cold-region japonica rice after heading stage.
F值 F value | 积累量 Dry matter accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | 群体生长速率 Crop growth rate/(g·m-2 d -1) | 温度生产效率 Temperature production efficiency/(g·m-2 ℃-1) |
---|---|---|---|
品种Variety(V) | 1.737 | 1.832 | 20.01** |
处理Treatment(T) | 66.743** | 46.954** | 16.71** |
年份Year (Y) | 0.037 | 0.250 | 0.65 |
年份×品种Y×T | 0.329 | 0.368 | 0.14 |
年份×处理Y×V | 0.648 | 0.125 | 0.22 |
品种×处理V×T | 34.384** | 23.246** | 24.24** |
年份×品种×处理Y×V×T | 29.578** | 2.665 | 3.91* |
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(No.·m-2) | 每穂粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量Yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
理论产量 /(kg·hm-2) | 理论产量冷水反应指数/% | |||||||
2016 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 331.3 a | 115.1 a | 93.1 a | 25.5 a | 9051.5 a | 100.0 a |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 325.9 b | 111.5 b | 88.1 c | 23.4 c | 7491.0 c | 82.8 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 329.6 ab | 114.9 a | 89.9 b | 24.3 b | 8272.2 b | 91.4 b | ||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 328.9 a | 104.8 a | 92.1 a | 25.4 a | 8062.2 a | 100.0 a | |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 316.6 c | 100.5 b | 84.1 c | 21.1 c | 5645.8 c | 70.0 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 322.0 b | 103.9 a | 89.7 b | 23.1 b | 6931.9 b | 86.0 b | ||
2017 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 353.22 a | 112.6 a | 94.2 a | 25.3 a | 9286.7 a | 100.0 a |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 347.33 b | 108.4 b | 88.2 c | 22.6 c | 7529.6 c | 79.2 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 348.96 ab | 110.5 a | 90.3 b | 24.2 b | 8408.8 b | 88.7 b | ||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 345.89 a | 104.2 a | 90.5 a | 24.7 a | 8356.7 a | 100.0 a | |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 338.65 c | 98.6 b | 81.0 c | 20.2 c | 5752.3 c | 67.9 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 342.16b | 102.9 a | 88.7 b | 23.3 b | 7254.8 b | 90.1 b | ||
F值 F value | 品种Variety(V) | 3.60 | 146.32** | 7.25** | 4.00* | 22.23** | 1.64 | |
处理Treatment(T) | 1.38 | 2.29 | 36.24** | 49.24** | 21.24* | 122.99** | ||
年份Year (Y) | 138.17** | 1.57 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.09 | 0.04 | ||
年份×品种Y×T | 0.21 | 2.37 | 1.25 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.13 | ||
年份×处理Y×V | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.80 | 0.13 | 0.67 | ||
品种×处理V×T | 0.10 | 0.55 | 19.41** | 26.94** | 15.00** | 60.21** | ||
年份×品种×处理Y×V×T | 3.19 | 3.39 | 3.31 | 10.65** | 3.35 | 3.02 |
Table 12. Effect of optimal concentration of CGG during cold-water stress at booting stage on yield and yield components of cold-region japonica rice.
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(No.·m-2) | 每穂粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Spikelet fertility/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 产量Yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
理论产量 /(kg·hm-2) | 理论产量冷水反应指数/% | |||||||
2016 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 331.3 a | 115.1 a | 93.1 a | 25.5 a | 9051.5 a | 100.0 a |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 325.9 b | 111.5 b | 88.1 c | 23.4 c | 7491.0 c | 82.8 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 329.6 ab | 114.9 a | 89.9 b | 24.3 b | 8272.2 b | 91.4 b | ||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 328.9 a | 104.8 a | 92.1 a | 25.4 a | 8062.2 a | 100.0 a | |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 316.6 c | 100.5 b | 84.1 c | 21.1 c | 5645.8 c | 70.0 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 322.0 b | 103.9 a | 89.7 b | 23.1 b | 6931.9 b | 86.0 b | ||
2017 | 东农428 Dongnong 428 | 正常灌溉Control | 353.22 a | 112.6 a | 94.2 a | 25.3 a | 9286.7 a | 100.0 a |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 347.33 b | 108.4 b | 88.2 c | 22.6 c | 7529.6 c | 79.2 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 348.96 ab | 110.5 a | 90.3 b | 24.2 b | 8408.8 b | 88.7 b | ||
松粳10 Songjing 10 | 正常灌溉Control | 345.89 a | 104.2 a | 90.5 a | 24.7 a | 8356.7 a | 100.0 a | |
冷水胁迫Cold water stress | 338.65 c | 98.6 b | 81.0 c | 20.2 c | 5752.3 c | 67.9 c | ||
冷水+CGG Cold water stress+CGG | 342.16b | 102.9 a | 88.7 b | 23.3 b | 7254.8 b | 90.1 b | ||
F值 F value | 品种Variety(V) | 3.60 | 146.32** | 7.25** | 4.00* | 22.23** | 1.64 | |
处理Treatment(T) | 1.38 | 2.29 | 36.24** | 49.24** | 21.24* | 122.99** | ||
年份Year (Y) | 138.17** | 1.57 | 0.32 | 0.64 | 0.09 | 0.04 | ||
年份×品种Y×T | 0.21 | 2.37 | 1.25 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.13 | ||
年份×处理Y×V | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.80 | 0.13 | 0.67 | ||
品种×处理V×T | 0.10 | 0.55 | 19.41** | 26.94** | 15.00** | 60.21** | ||
年份×品种×处理Y×V×T | 3.19 | 3.39 | 3.31 | 10.65** | 3.35 | 3.02 |
Fig. 3. Effect of optimal concentration of CGG during cold-water stress at booting stage on dry matter production of cold-region japonica rice after heading stage.
Fig. 4. Effect of optimal concentration of CGG during cold-water stress at booting stage on temperature production efficiency of cold-region japonica rice.
[1] | 贾琰,沈阳,邹德堂,沙汉景,王敬国,刘化龙,赵振东,夏楠,赵宏伟. 孕穗期冷水灌溉对寒地粳稻籽粒灌浆及其氮素积累的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29: 259-272. |
Jia Y, Shen Y, Zou D, Sha H, Wang J, Liu H, Zhao Z, Xia N, Zhao H.Effect of cold-water irrigation at booting stage on grain filling and nitrogen accumulation of grain in cold-regionrice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29: 259-272. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Jia Y, Wang J, Qu Z, Zou D, Sha H, Liu H, Sun J, Zheng H, Yang L, Zhao H.Effects of low water temperature during reproductive growth on photosynthetic production and nitrogen accumulation in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 242: 107587. |
[3] | 梁书民. 中国农业种植结构及演化的空间分布和原因分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2006, 27(2): 29-34. |
Liang S.Pace distribution and reason analysis of the changes in agriculture planting structure of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2006, 27(2): 29-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Wang H, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Han J, Shi D.Effects of salt stress on ion balance and nitrogen metabolism in rice[J]. Plant Soil Environment, 2012, 58(2): 62-67. |
[5] | Jia Y, Zou D,Wang J, Liu H, Inayat M, Sha H, Zheng H, Sun J, Zhao H.Effect of low water temperature at reproductive stage on yield and glutamate metabolism of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 175: 16-25. |
[6] | Bown A W, Shelp B J.Plant GABA: Not just a metabolite[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2016, 21(10): 811-813. |
[7] | Fait A, Fromm H, Walter D, Galili G, Fernie A.Highway or byway: The metabolic role of the GABA shunt in plants[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2008, 13(1): 14-19. |
[8] | Song H, Xu X, Wang H, Wang H, Tao Y.Exogenous γ‐aminobutyric acid alleviates oxidative damage caused by aluminium and proton stresses on barley seedlings[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 90(9): 1410-1416. |
[9] | 付蓉. γ-氨基丁酸对作物幼苗生长发育的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2010. |
Fu R.Effects ofγ-aminobutyric acid on the growth and development of crop seedlings[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Malekzadeh P, Khara J, Heidari R.Effect of exogenous Gama-aminobutyric acid on physiological tolerance of wheat seedlings exposed to chilling stress[J]. Iran Journal of Plant Physiology, 2012, 3(1): 611-617. |
[11] | 罗黄颖,高洪波,夏庆平,宫彬彬,吴晓蕾. γ-氨基丁酸对盐胁迫下番茄活性氧代谢及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 4(4): 753-761. |
Luo H Y, Gao H B, Xia Q P, Gong B B, Wu X X.Effects of Exogenous GABA on reactive oxygen species metabolism and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in tomato under NaCl stres[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 4(4): 753-761. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | Aurisano N, Bertani A, Reggiani R.Involvement of calcium and calmodulin in protein and amino acid metabolism in rice roots under anoxia[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 1995, 36(8): 1525-1529. |
[13] | Ma R, Zhang M, Li B, Du G, Wang J, Chen J.The effects of exogenous Ca2+ on endogenous polyamine levels and drought-resistant traits of spring wheat grown under arid conditions[J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 2005, 63(1): 177-190. |
[14] | Gao H, Jia Y, Guo S, Lv G, Wang T, Li J.Exogenous calcium affects nitrogen metabolism in root-zone hypoxia-stressed muskmelon roots and enhances short-term hypoxia tolerance[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2011, 168(11): 1217-1225. |
[15] | Cheng T S, Hung M J, Cheng Y I, Cheng L.Calcium-induced proline accumulation contributes to amelioration of NaCl injury and expression of glutamine synthetase in greater duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza L.)[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2013, 144: 265-274. |
[16] | Yin Y, Yang R, Guo Q, Gu Z. NaCl stress and supplemental CaCl2 regulating GABA metabolism pathways in germinating soybean[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2014, 238(5): 781-788. |
[17] | Yu G H, Zou J, Feng J, Peng X,Wu J,Wu Y, Palanivelu R, Sun M.Exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) affects pollen tube growth via modulating putative Ca2+-permeable membrane channels and is coupled to negative regulation on glutamate decarboxylase[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(12): 3235-3248. |
[18] | Mazzucotelli E, Tartari A, Cattivelli L, Forlani G. Metabolism of gamma-aminobutyric acid during cold acclimation and freezing and its relationship to frost tolerance in barley and wheat[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(14): 3755-3766. |
[19] | Wang Y, Luo Z, Huang X, Yang K, Gao S, Du R.Effect of exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) treatment on chilling injury and antioxidant capacity in banana peel[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 168: 132-137. |
[20] | Jia Y, Zou D, Wang J, Sha H, Liu H, Inayat M, Sun J, Zheng H, Xia N, Zhao H.Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, and calcium chloride on rice (Oryza sativa L.) under cold stress during the early vegetative stage[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 36(1): 240-253. |
[21] | Bagdi D L, Shaw B P.Analysis of proline metabolic enzymes in Oryza sativa under NaCl stress[J]. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2013, 34(4): 677. |
[22] | Xue J, Wang S, You X, Dong J, Han L, Liu F.Multi-residue determination of plant growth regulators in apples and tomatoes by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2011, 25(21): 3289-3297. |
[23] | 李勇. 氮素营养对水稻光合作用与光合氮素利用率的影响机制研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011. |
Li Y.Studies on mechanisms of the effects of different nitrogen supplies on photosynthesis and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of rice plants[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王熹, 阙瑞芬. 籼稻大粒型品种花粉发育的生理分析[J]. 作物学报, 1981, 7(3): 171-178. |
Wang X, Que R.Physiological study on the pollen development of large-grain type of indica rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1981, 7(3): 171-178. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 刘利,雷小龙,王丽,邓飞,刘代银,任万军. 种植方式对杂交稻枝梗和颖花分化及退化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(8): 1434-1444. |
Liu L, Lei X, Wang L, Deng F, Liu D, Ren W.Effect of planting methods on differentiation and retrogression of branches and spikelets of hybrid rice cultivar[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(8): 1434-1444. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 闫艳红,杨文钰,张新全,陈小林,陈忠群. 施氮量对套作大豆花后光合特性、干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011(3): 236-241. |
Yan Y, Yang W, Zhang X, Chen X, Chen Z. Effects of different nitrogen levels on photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield of relay strip intercropping Glycine max after blooming[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011(3): 236-241. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 朱启林,向蕊,汤利,龙光强. 间作对氮调控玉米光合速率和光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 672-680. |
Zhu Q, Xiang R, Tang L, Long Q.Effects of intercropping on photosynthetic rate and net photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiencyof maize under nitrogen addition[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(6): 672-680. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Deng N, Ling X, Sun Y, Zhang C, Fahad S, Peng S, Cui K, Nie L, Huang J.Influence of temperature and solar radiation on grain yield and quality in irrigated rice system[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 64: 37-46. |
[29] | 王洪章,刘鹏,董树亭,张吉旺,赵斌,任佰朝. 夏玉米产量与光温生产效率差异分析——以山东省为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(8): 66-78. |
Wang H, Liu P, Dong S, Zhang J, Zhao B, Ren B.Analysis of gap between yield and radiation production efficiency and temperature production efficiency in summer maize: Taking Shandong Province as an example[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 66-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | Zhang W, Zhu K, Wang Z, Zhang H, Gu J, Liu L, Yang J, Zhang J.Brassinosteroids function in spikelet differentiation and degeneration in rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2019, 61(8): 943-963. |
[31] | Zhu X, Liao J, Xia X, Fei X, Li Y,., Shen J, Wen B, Ma Y, Wang Y, Fang W. Physiological and iTRAQ-based proteomic analyses reveal the function of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in improving tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) tolerance at cold temperature[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 43. |
[32] | Çekiç F Ö.Exogenous GABA stimulates endogenous GABA and phenolic acid contents in tomato plants under salt stress[J]. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2018, 14(1): 61-64. |
[33] | Bhattacharjee P, Chakraborti S, Chakraborty S.Metabolic Adaptations in Plants During Abiotic Stress. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2018: 261-270. |
[34] | Eprintsev A T, Selivanova N V, Igamberdiev A U. Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants. New York: Springer Press, 2020: 71-78. |
[35] | Li Y, Fan Y, Ma Y, Zhang Z, Yue H, Wang L, Li J, Jiao Y.Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on photosynthesis and antioxidant system in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings under low light stress[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 36(2): 436-449. |
[36] | Hohmannmarriott M F, Blankenship R E.Evolution of photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 154(2): 434-438. |
[37] | Monneveux P, Zaidi P H, Sanchez C.Population density and low nitrogen affects yield-associated traits in tropical maize[J]. Crop Science, 2005, 45(2): 535. |
[38] | Liu T, Ren T, White P J, Cong R, Lu J.Storage nitrogen coordinates leaf expansion and photosynthetic capacity in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2018, 69:2995-3007. |
[39] | Kratsch H A, Wise R R.The ultrastructure of chilling stress[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2000, 23(4): 337-350. |
[40] | Lei P, Xu Z, Liang J, Luo X, Xu H.Poly (γ-glutamic acid) enhanced tolerance to salt stress by promoting proline accumulation in Brassica napus L[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2016, 78(2): 233-241. |
[41] | Shimono H, Hasegawa T, Iwama K.Response of growth and grain yield in paddy rice to cool water at different growth stages[J]. Field Crops Research, 2002, 73(2): 67-79. |
[42] | Ramankutty N, Foley J A, Norman J, Mcsweeney K.The global distribution of cultivable lands: Current patterns and sensitivity to possible climate change[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2002, 11(5): 377-392. |
[43] | Normile D.Agricultural research: Reinventing rice to feed the world[J]. Science, 2008, 321(5887): 330-333. |
[44] | Liu Z, Yang X, Lin X, Hubbard K, Lv S, Wang J.Maize yield gaps caused by non-controllable, agronomic, and socioeconomic factors in a changing climate of Northeast China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 541: 756-764. |
[45] | Li W, Liu J, Ashraf U, Li G, Li Y, Lu W, Gao L, Han F, Hu J.Exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) application improved early growth, net photosynthesis, and associated physio-biochemical events in maize[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 919. |
[46] | Li M, Guo S, Yang X, Meng Q, Wei X.Exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid increases salt tolerance of wheat by improving photosynthesis and enhancing activities of antioxidant enzymes[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2016, 60(1): 123-131. |
[47] | Kant S, Bi Y M, Rothstein S J.Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(4): 1499-1509. |
[48] | Poorter H, Evans J R.Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area[J]. Oecologia, 1998, 116(1-2): 26-37. |
[49] | Doherty C J, van Buskirk H A, Myers S J, Michael F. T. Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA transcription factors in cold-regulated gene expression and freezing tolerance[J]. Plant Cell, 2009, 21(3): 972-984. |
[50] | 张洪程,吴桂成,吴文革,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,高辉,魏海燕,黄幸福,龚金龙. 水稻“精苗稳前、控蘖优中、大穗强后”超高产定量化栽培模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(13): 2645-2660. |
Zhang H, Wu G, Wu W, Dai Q, Huo Z, Xu K, Gao H, Wei H, Huang X, Gong J.The SOI model of quantitative cultivation of super-high yielding rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(13): 2645-2660. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[51] | 张洪程,吴桂成,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,高辉,魏海燕,吕修涛,万靓军,黄银忠. 水稻氮肥精确后移及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(10): 1837-1851. |
Zhang H, Wu G, Dai Q, Huo Z, Xu K, Wei H, Lv X, Wan L, Huang Y.Precise postponing nitrogen application and its mechanism in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(10): 1837-1851. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[52] | 张洪程,赵品恒,孙菊英,吴桂成,徐军,端木银熙,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕. 机插杂交粳稻超高产形成群体特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(2): 39-44. |
Zhang H, Zhao P, Sun J, Wu G, Xu J, Duan M, Dai Q, Huo Z, Xu K, Wei H.Population characteristics of super high yield formation of mechanical transplanted japonica hybrid rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(2): 39-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[53] | Takai T, Matsuura S, Nishio T, Ohsumi A. Shiraiwa T, Horie T.Rice yield potential is closely related to crop growth rate during late reproductive period[J]. Field Crops Research, 2006, 96(2-3): 328-335. |
[54] | 龚金龙,邢志鹏,胡雅杰,张洪程,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,高辉. 籼、粳超级稻光合物质生产与转运特征的差异[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(3): 497-510. |
Gong J, Xing Z, HU Y, Zhang H, Dai Q, Huo Z, Xu K, Wei H, Gao H.Difference of characteristics of photosynthesis, matter production and translocation between indica and japonica super rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(3): 497-510.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[55] | 程建峰, 沈允钢. 作物高光效之管见[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8): 1235-1247. |
Cheng J, Shen Y.My humble opinions on high photosynthetic efficiency of crop[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(8): 1235-1247. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[2] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[3] | Changchun GUO, Zhibai SUN, Yongjian SUN, Yaozhu YIN, Yunxia WU, Yuan TANG, Zhiyuan YANG, Kaihong XIANG, Jun MA. Study on Yield Formation and Population Quality of indica Hybrid Rice with Good Quality and High Yield Under Mechanical Direct Seeding [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(5): 462-474. |
[4] | Jun-feng PAN, Bo WANG, Ke-hui CUI, Jian-liang HUANG, Li-xiao NIE. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Accumulation and Translocation of Non-structural Carbohydrates in Internodes and Sheaths of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(3): 273-282. |
[5] | Nan XIA, Hong-wei ZHAO, Yan-chao LV, Zhen-dong ZHAO, De-tang ZOU, Hua-long LIU, Jing-guo WANG, Yan JIA. Effect of Cold-water Stress at Grain-filling Stage on Starch Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in Grains of japonica Rice in Cold-region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 62-74. |
[6] | Peng-gang PEI, Jun-hua ZHANG, Lian-feng ZHU, Zhi-hua HU, Qian-yu JIN. Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with N Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 282-290. |
[7] | Yan JIA, Yang SHEN, De-tang ZOU, Han-jing SHA, Jing-guo WANG, Hua-long LIU, Zhen-dong ZHAO, Nan XIA, Hong-wei ZHAO. Effect of Cold-Water Irrigation at Booting Stage on Grain Filling and Nitrogen Accumulation of Rice in Cold-Region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 259-272. |
[8] | YANG Jun, CHEN Xiaorong, ZHU Changlan, PENG Xiaosong, HE Xiaopeng, FU Junru, OUYANG Linjuan, BIAN Jianmin, HU Lifang, HE Haohua*. Effects of Nitrogen Level and High Temperature at Late Booting Stage on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Two Early Rice Cultivars [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(5): 523-533. |
[9] | LI Jianling1,3, HUO Zhiguo2, WU Liji1, ZHU Qinghua1, HU Fei1,*. Effects of Low Temperature on Grain Yield of Rice and Its Physiological Mechanism at the Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(3): 277-288. |
[10] | ZHANG Weixing#, SUN Chengxiao#, MIN Jie, DUAN Binwu, ZHU Zhiwei*. Effect of Exogenous Phytic Acid Application on Rice Grain Yield and Quality During Mid and Late Growth Stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(6): 603-609. |
[11] | XIE Yongwu1,2,3 , YANG Shuming1,*, ZENG Yawen1,*, YANG Tao1, PU Xiaoying1, DU Juan1, ZHAO Chunyan2, ZHANG Mingxi4. QTL Analysis of Cold Tolerance in Japonica Rice Using Recombinant Inbred Lines from 02428×02428c at Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(6): 681-684. |
[12] | SHAO Cai-hong ,XIE Jin-shui ,HUANG Yong-lan ,QIU Cai-fei,ZHANG Zhen-miao,LIN Wen-xiong. Developmental Proteomics Analysis of Different Functional Leaves in Rice (Oryza sativa) at the Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23(5): 456-462 . |
[13] | ZENG Ya-wen ,LI Shen-chong ,PU Xiao-ying ,DU Juan ,YANG Shu-ming ,LIU Kun ,GUI Min ,ZHANG Hao. Ecological Difference and Correlation Among Cold Tolerance Traits at the Booting Stage for Core Collection of Rice Landrace in Yunnan, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(3): 265-271 . |
[14] | SHEN Shi-quan ,ZENG Ya-wen ,LI Shen-chong ,WEN Guo-song ,PU Xiao-ying . Mapping Cold Tolerance Gene by Near-Isogenic Lines at Booting Stage in japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2005, 19(3): 217-222 . |
[15] | LI Shen-chong ,ZENG Ya-wen*,SHEN Shi-quan,LI Ben-xun,ZHANG Zhong-sheng,QI Liu-hua,PU Xiao-ying. Cold Tolerance of Core Collection at Booting Stage in Association with Ecogeographic Distribution in Yunnan Rice Landrace (Oryza sativa), China [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2004, 18(5): 401-406 . |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||