中国水稻科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 141-154.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.0207
王丰*,#(), 廖亦龙#, 柳武革, 刘迪林, 曾学勤, 傅友强, 朱满山, 李金华, 付崇允, 马晓智, 霍兴
收稿日期:
2020-02-24
修回日期:
2020-09-27
出版日期:
2021-03-10
发布日期:
2021-03-10
通讯作者:
王丰
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
Feng WANG*,#(), Yilong LIAO#, Wuge LIU, Diling LIU, Xueqing ZENG, Youqiang FU, Manshan ZHU, Jinhua LI, Chongyun FU, Xiaozhi MA, Xing HUO
Received:
2020-02-24
Revised:
2020-09-27
Online:
2021-03-10
Published:
2021-03-10
Contact:
Feng WANG
About author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
摘要:
【目的】理想株型是水稻高产稳产的前提。本研究拟对不同年代育成的籼型三系杂交稻恢复系动态株型与光能利用效率进行综合评价,探讨恢复系光能高效利用的理想动态株型特征,为提高光能高效利用的高产稳产杂交稻育种效率提供理论依据。【方法】以明恢63、明恢82、蜀恢527、广恢998、广恢122、广恢128、广恢308和桂99等8个大面积应用的籼型杂交稻恢复系为供试材料,在华南生态条件下考查了其分蘖、叶面积指数(LAI)、透光率、叶片大小与开张角、叶色(SPAD值)等性状的动态变化,以及抽穗期光合速率、生育期、产量相关性状和光能利用率(RUE)等指标。【结果】各恢复系之间在株型动态变化、产量和光能利用率(RUE)等方面存在较大差异。良好的动态株型与光能利用率密切相关,最为接近华南生态条件下理想动态株型的广恢998和广恢308,光能利用率最高。根据聚类分析,广恢998、广恢308和明恢82属于光能高效利用的类群Ⅰ。其他恢复系归为类群Ⅱ。最后,根据华南的光温生态特点,提出了水稻光能高效利用的理想动态株型模式及育种选择关键指标:1)移栽后分蘖和叶面积发展快,LAI达到1.0的时间≤27 d;茎蘖数达到峰值所需时间≤38 d,分蘖力中等,最高茎蘖数≤600苗/m2;2)前期窄叶长披,移栽后15 d顶部3片完全叶平均长度为37 cm,平均宽度≤0.9 cm,开张角度≥80°;后期叶片窄直,抽穗后20 d顶部倒3叶平均开张角≤65°,平均长度为43 cm,平均宽度≤1.3 cm,属于中叶型,有利于后期群体通风透光;3)后期叶片转色好,不早衰,SPAD值维持在35~40,抽穗前20 d至抽穗后20 d之间的叶片SPAD值降幅≤13%;普通栽培条件下平均每穗总粒数180粒左右,有效穗数300穗/m2以上,结实率≥85%。【结论】广恢998和广恢308具有较为理想的动态株型和较高RUE,利用其配制的杂交稻天优998、博优998和五优308等连续多年成为我国华南稻区主导品种和国家与省级区试对照品种。说明通过选育光能高效利用的理想动态株型恢复系,是组配选育高产稳产杂交稻行之有效的重要途径。
王丰, 廖亦龙, 柳武革, 刘迪林, 曾学勤, 傅友强, 朱满山, 李金华, 付崇允, 马晓智, 霍兴. 籼型杂交稻恢复系动态株型与光能利用率评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 141-154.
Feng WANG, Yilong LIAO, Wuge LIU, Diling LIU, Xueqing ZENG, Youqiang FU, Manshan ZHU, Jinhua LI, Chongyun FU, Xiaozhi MA, Xing HUO. Evaluation of Dynamic Plant Type and Radiation Use Efficiency of indica Hybrid Rice Restorer Lines[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 141-154.
类型 Type | 恢复系 R line | 育成单位 Developed by | 组配的代表性杂交稻 Derivative hybrid rice combination |
---|---|---|---|
一季中稻恢复系 Restorer lines for single-season hybrid rice | 蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 四川农业大学 Sichuan Agricultural University | D优527、II优527 D you 527, II you 527 |
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 福建省三明市农业科学研究所 Sanming Agricultural Science Research Institute, Fujian Province | 汕优63 Shanyou 63 | |
华南双季杂交稻恢复系 Restorer lines for double- cropping hybrid rice in South China | 明恢82 Minghui 82 | 汕优82 Shanyou 82 | |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences | 博优998、天优998 Boyou 998, Tianyou 998 | |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 优优122、天优122 Youyou 122, Tianyou 122 | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 优优128、II优128 Youyou 128, II you 128 | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 五优308 Wuyou 308 | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 广西区农业科学院水稻研究所 Rice Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences | 汕优桂99、博优桂99 Shanyougui 99, Boyougui 99 |
表1 供试恢复系及其代表性杂交稻组合
Table 1 Restorer lines(R lines) and their representative hybrid rice combinations.
类型 Type | 恢复系 R line | 育成单位 Developed by | 组配的代表性杂交稻 Derivative hybrid rice combination |
---|---|---|---|
一季中稻恢复系 Restorer lines for single-season hybrid rice | 蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 四川农业大学 Sichuan Agricultural University | D优527、II优527 D you 527, II you 527 |
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 福建省三明市农业科学研究所 Sanming Agricultural Science Research Institute, Fujian Province | 汕优63 Shanyou 63 | |
华南双季杂交稻恢复系 Restorer lines for double- cropping hybrid rice in South China | 明恢82 Minghui 82 | 汕优82 Shanyou 82 | |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences | 博优998、天优998 Boyou 998, Tianyou 998 | |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 优优122、天优122 Youyou 122, Tianyou 122 | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 优优128、II优128 Youyou 128, II you 128 | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 五优308 Wuyou 308 | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 广西区农业科学院水稻研究所 Rice Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences | 汕优桂99、博优桂99 Shanyougui 99, Boyougui 99 |
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期Early stage | 中期Middle stage | 后期Late stage | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 DAT | 22 DAT | 27 DAT | 31 DAT | 15 DBH | 54 DAT | 71 DAT | 85 DAT | 20 DAH | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 0.86±0.06 a | 1.31±0.03 | 1.77±0.09 | 2.13±0.10 a | 4.32±0.06 a | 4.93±0.08 a | 5.13±0.72 a | 4.72±0.55 a | 4.72±0.55 a | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 0.40±0.07 bc | 0.64±0.03 | 0.89±0.05 | 1.08±0.10 cd | 2.21±0.07 c | 3.67±0.16 c | 4.61±0.47 ab | 3.56±0.5 bc | 4.21±0.36 ab | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 0.51±0.12 b | 0.80±0.12 | 1.10±0.14 | 1.33±0.16 c | 2.69±0.22 bc | 4.45±0.29 b | 3.83±0.15 c | 3.34±0.80 bc | 3.64±0.24 bc | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 0.28±0.04 c | 0.53±0.05 | 0.78±0.05 | 0.99±0.06 d | 2.60±0.13 bc | 3.83±0.18 c | 3.73±0.62 c | 3.74±0.42 bc | 3.74±0.50 bc | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 0.36±0.10 bc | 0.86±0.07 | 1.35±0.03 | 1.75±0.01 b | 3.02±0.06 b | 4.19±0.11 b | 4.19±0.25 bc | 3.60±0.13 bc | 3.87±0.13 bc | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 0.38±0.12 bc | 0.73±0.06 | 1.07±0.24 | 1.35±0.29 c | 2.27±0.26 c | 4.36±0.31 b | 3.54± 0.58 c | 3.13±0.66 c | 3.45±0.60 c | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 0.23±0.13 c | 0.51±0.11 | 0.78±0.15 | 1.00±0.18 d | 2.54±0.06 c | 4.21±0.12 b | 4.14±0.51 bc | 3.42±0.22 bc | 3.81±0.27 bc | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 0.31 ±0.15 c | 0.67±0.18 | 1.02±0.21 | 1.31±0.23 c | 3.46±0.19 b | 4.40±0.25 b | 4.74±0.75 ab | 3.97±0.90 b | 4.09±0.88 b |
表2 不同时期LAI动态变化
Table 2 Dynamic changes of LAI during different growth stages.
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期Early stage | 中期Middle stage | 后期Late stage | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 DAT | 22 DAT | 27 DAT | 31 DAT | 15 DBH | 54 DAT | 71 DAT | 85 DAT | 20 DAH | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 0.86±0.06 a | 1.31±0.03 | 1.77±0.09 | 2.13±0.10 a | 4.32±0.06 a | 4.93±0.08 a | 5.13±0.72 a | 4.72±0.55 a | 4.72±0.55 a | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 0.40±0.07 bc | 0.64±0.03 | 0.89±0.05 | 1.08±0.10 cd | 2.21±0.07 c | 3.67±0.16 c | 4.61±0.47 ab | 3.56±0.5 bc | 4.21±0.36 ab | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 0.51±0.12 b | 0.80±0.12 | 1.10±0.14 | 1.33±0.16 c | 2.69±0.22 bc | 4.45±0.29 b | 3.83±0.15 c | 3.34±0.80 bc | 3.64±0.24 bc | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 0.28±0.04 c | 0.53±0.05 | 0.78±0.05 | 0.99±0.06 d | 2.60±0.13 bc | 3.83±0.18 c | 3.73±0.62 c | 3.74±0.42 bc | 3.74±0.50 bc | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 0.36±0.10 bc | 0.86±0.07 | 1.35±0.03 | 1.75±0.01 b | 3.02±0.06 b | 4.19±0.11 b | 4.19±0.25 bc | 3.60±0.13 bc | 3.87±0.13 bc | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 0.38±0.12 bc | 0.73±0.06 | 1.07±0.24 | 1.35±0.29 c | 2.27±0.26 c | 4.36±0.31 b | 3.54± 0.58 c | 3.13±0.66 c | 3.45±0.60 c | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 0.23±0.13 c | 0.51±0.11 | 0.78±0.15 | 1.00±0.18 d | 2.54±0.06 c | 4.21±0.12 b | 4.14±0.51 bc | 3.42±0.22 bc | 3.81±0.27 bc | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 0.31 ±0.15 c | 0.67±0.18 | 1.02±0.21 | 1.31±0.23 c | 3.46±0.19 b | 4.40±0.25 b | 4.74±0.75 ab | 3.97±0.90 b | 4.09±0.88 b |
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期Early stage | 中期Middle stage | 后期Late stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 DAT | 15 DBH | 20 DAH | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 61.4±4.0 d | 15.6±8.4 d | 6.3±0.5 d | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 79.9±7.0 ab | 31.7±1.9 a | 6.9±1.0 d | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 70.5±4.8 bc | 25.8±2.5 bc | 10.3±1.3 abc | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 82.5±3.4 bc | 27.3±5.9 ab | 10.1±0.6 abc | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 67.9±6.0 cd | 23.7±2.8 bc | 10.5±1.8 ab | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 71.6±3.3 bc | 26.9±4.5 b | 11.5±0.4 a | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 80.9±6.7 a | 28.0±5.5 ab | 8.7±0.9 c | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 75.2±11.1 abc | 19.0±0.5 d | 8.8±0.2 bc |
表3 不同时期群体透光率变化动态
Table 3 Dynamics of light transmittance of population in different growth stages. %
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期Early stage | 中期Middle stage | 后期Late stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 DAT | 15 DBH | 20 DAH | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 61.4±4.0 d | 15.6±8.4 d | 6.3±0.5 d | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 79.9±7.0 ab | 31.7±1.9 a | 6.9±1.0 d | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 70.5±4.8 bc | 25.8±2.5 bc | 10.3±1.3 abc | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 82.5±3.4 bc | 27.3±5.9 ab | 10.1±0.6 abc | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 67.9±6.0 cd | 23.7±2.8 bc | 10.5±1.8 ab | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 71.6±3.3 bc | 26.9±4.5 b | 11.5±0.4 a | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 80.9±6.7 a | 28.0±5.5 ab | 8.7±0.9 c | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 75.2±11.1 abc | 19.0±0.5 d | 8.8±0.2 bc |
恢复系 R line | 移栽后15 d 3片完全叶 Top 3 complete leaves on 15DAT | 抽穗后20 d顶部3叶 Top 3 leaves on 20DAH | 抽穗后20 d剑叶 Flag leaf on 20 DAH | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均叶长 Mean length/cm | 平均叶宽 Mean width/cm | 平均叶长 Mean length/cm | 平均叶宽 Mean width/cm | 剑叶长 Leaf length/cm | 剑叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 剑叶面积 Leaf area/cm2 | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 39.1 | 1.1 | 44.3 | 1.7 | 37.6 | 2.0 | 56.4 | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 34.2 | 0.9 | 41.7 | 1.5 | 33.8 | 1.8 | 45.6 | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 36.7 | 0.8 | 44.0 | 1.3 | 39.6 | 1.5 | 44.6 | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 36.8 | 0.8 | 45.7 | 1.5 | 38.0 | 1.9 | 54.2 | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 33.5 | 0.9 | 42.6 | 1.4 | 33.3 | 1.7 | 42.5 | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 35.9 | 0.9 | 42.5 | 1.2 | 38.5 | 1.5 | 43.3 | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 39.2 | 1.1 | 45.7 | 1.5 | 36.2 | 1.8 | 48.9 | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 38.6 | 1.1 | 51.0 | 1.5 | 42.1 | 1.8 | 56.8 |
表4 不同生育时期顶部3片完全叶的长宽
Table 4 Length and width of the top 3 leaves at different growth stages.
恢复系 R line | 移栽后15 d 3片完全叶 Top 3 complete leaves on 15DAT | 抽穗后20 d顶部3叶 Top 3 leaves on 20DAH | 抽穗后20 d剑叶 Flag leaf on 20 DAH | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均叶长 Mean length/cm | 平均叶宽 Mean width/cm | 平均叶长 Mean length/cm | 平均叶宽 Mean width/cm | 剑叶长 Leaf length/cm | 剑叶宽 Leaf width/cm | 剑叶面积 Leaf area/cm2 | |||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 39.1 | 1.1 | 44.3 | 1.7 | 37.6 | 2.0 | 56.4 | ||
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 34.2 | 0.9 | 41.7 | 1.5 | 33.8 | 1.8 | 45.6 | ||
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 36.7 | 0.8 | 44.0 | 1.3 | 39.6 | 1.5 | 44.6 | ||
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 36.8 | 0.8 | 45.7 | 1.5 | 38.0 | 1.9 | 54.2 | ||
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 33.5 | 0.9 | 42.6 | 1.4 | 33.3 | 1.7 | 42.5 | ||
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 35.9 | 0.9 | 42.5 | 1.2 | 38.5 | 1.5 | 43.3 | ||
桂99 Gui 99 | 39.2 | 1.1 | 45.7 | 1.5 | 36.2 | 1.8 | 48.9 | ||
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 38.6 | 1.1 | 51.0 | 1.5 | 42.1 | 1.8 | 56.8 |
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期(移栽后20 d)Early stage(20 DAT) | 抽穗后20 d 20 DAH | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶部第3叶 Top 3rd leaf | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 Top 2nd leaf | 倒3叶 Top 3rd leaf | 平均 Mean | ||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 90.3 | 62.8 | 98.6 | 68.4 | 76.6 | |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 61.5 | 65.8 | 56.8 | 67.9 | 63.5 | |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 85.8 | 64.1 | 72.4 | 66.6 | 67.7 | |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 90.1 | 61.8 | 75.7 | 81.6 | 73.0 | |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 82.2 | 67.8 | 71.3 | 62.7 | 67.3 | |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 52.4 | 31.7 | 36.5 | 33.6 | 33.9 | |
桂99 Gui 99 | 42.5 | 86.3 | 92.4 | 78.3 | 85.7 | |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 65.3 | 89.1 | 86.5 | 79.0 | 84.8 |
表5 前期顶部第3片叶的平均开张角度和抽穗后顶部3叶的开张角度
Table 5 Average opening angle of top 3rd leaf in the early stage and the opening angle of top 3 leaves after heading. °
恢复系 Restorer line | 前期(移栽后20 d)Early stage(20 DAT) | 抽穗后20 d 20 DAH | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶部第3叶 Top 3rd leaf | 剑叶 Flag leaf | 倒2叶 Top 2nd leaf | 倒3叶 Top 3rd leaf | 平均 Mean | ||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 90.3 | 62.8 | 98.6 | 68.4 | 76.6 | |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 61.5 | 65.8 | 56.8 | 67.9 | 63.5 | |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 85.8 | 64.1 | 72.4 | 66.6 | 67.7 | |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 90.1 | 61.8 | 75.7 | 81.6 | 73.0 | |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 82.2 | 67.8 | 71.3 | 62.7 | 67.3 | |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 52.4 | 31.7 | 36.5 | 33.6 | 33.9 | |
桂99 Gui 99 | 42.5 | 86.3 | 92.4 | 78.3 | 85.7 | |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 65.3 | 89.1 | 86.5 | 79.0 | 84.8 |
恢复系 Restorer line | SPAD值(叶绿素含量)SPAD value(chlorophyll content) | 抽穗期光合速率 Leaf photosynthetic rate at heading stage/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
始穗前第20天 20 DBH | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 始穗后第20天 20 DAH | 变幅 Variance/% | ||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 37.2±1.1 e | 38.7±0.6 c | 31.6±4.1 cd | 15.1 | 20.4±0.7 c |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 41.0±0.8 c | 40.8±1.3 abc | 35.5±2.0 bc | 13.4 | 23.2±0.6 ab |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 43.5±0.7 a | 43.2±2.1 a | 38.1±1.6 ab | 12.0 | 23.8±0.1 a |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 41.7±1.0 bc | 40.9±0.6 bc | 34.4±4.6 bc | 17.7 | 22.0±0.6 abc |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 42.6±0.1 ab | 41.3±1.3 bc | 32.8±0.8 bc | 23.0 | 23.2±1.0 ab |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 43.2±0.4 a | 43.9±0.8 a | 40.4±1.9 a | 6.3 | 21.6±0.5 bc |
桂99 Gui 99 | 43.5±0.7 a | 42.6±0.3 ab | 39.6±1.9 ab | 9.0 | 20.7±0.8 cd |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 39.6±0.3 d | 38.8±0.8 d | 30.1±6.2 d | 20.7 | 21.5±0.8 bc |
表6 叶片的SPAD值与光合速率
Table 6 SPAD values and photosynthetic rate of leaves.
恢复系 Restorer line | SPAD值(叶绿素含量)SPAD value(chlorophyll content) | 抽穗期光合速率 Leaf photosynthetic rate at heading stage/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
始穗前第20天 20 DBH | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 始穗后第20天 20 DAH | 变幅 Variance/% | ||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 37.2±1.1 e | 38.7±0.6 c | 31.6±4.1 cd | 15.1 | 20.4±0.7 c |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 41.0±0.8 c | 40.8±1.3 abc | 35.5±2.0 bc | 13.4 | 23.2±0.6 ab |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 43.5±0.7 a | 43.2±2.1 a | 38.1±1.6 ab | 12.0 | 23.8±0.1 a |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 41.7±1.0 bc | 40.9±0.6 bc | 34.4±4.6 bc | 17.7 | 22.0±0.6 abc |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 42.6±0.1 ab | 41.3±1.3 bc | 32.8±0.8 bc | 23.0 | 23.2±1.0 ab |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 43.2±0.4 a | 43.9±0.8 a | 40.4±1.9 a | 6.3 | 21.6±0.5 bc |
桂99 Gui 99 | 43.5±0.7 a | 42.6±0.3 ab | 39.6±1.9 ab | 9.0 | 20.7±0.8 cd |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 39.6±0.3 d | 38.8±0.8 d | 30.1±6.2 d | 20.7 | 21.5±0.8 bc |
恢复系 R line | 抽穗期 HD | 生育期 GD/d | 每穗总粒数 TGN | 结实率 SSR/% | 千粒重 TGW/g | 有效穗数 EPN | 稻谷产量 GY/(kg·m-2) | 光能利用率 RUE/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 06-12 | 135 | 123.0 | 84.7 | 27.2 | 195.0±13.1 bc | 0.60±0.02 ab | 0.411±0.017 bc |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 06-04 | 125 | 187.7 | 81.5 | 20.3 | 176.0±18.3 cd | 0.57±0.03 abc | 0.448±0.026 a |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 06-04 | 125 | 159.2 | 84.8 | 19.9 | 228.0±26.2 a | 0.61±0.02 a | 0.479±0.018 a |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 06-07 | 128 | 147.8 | 83.1 | 22.1 | 188.0±9.6 bc | 0.53±0.00 cd | 0.408±0.034 c |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 06-06 | 127 | 146.1 | 72.4 | 21.1 | 222.0±19.7 ab | 0.52±0.04 cd | 0.405±0.015 c |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 06-01 | 122 | 179.5 | 83.4 | 19.9 | 195.0±28.6 bc | 0.56±0.01 bc | 0.452±0.035 ab |
桂99 Gui 99 | 06-05 | 126 | 164.3 | 80.1 | 24.0 | 162.0±26.2 cd | 0.51±0.02 d | 0.393±0.035 bc |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 06-10 | 132 | 141.5 | 82.7 | 29.7 | 147.0±21.6 d | 0.53±0.04 cd | 0.384±0.012 c |
表7 稻谷产量性状与光能利用率
Table 7 Grain yield related traits and RUE.
恢复系 R line | 抽穗期 HD | 生育期 GD/d | 每穗总粒数 TGN | 结实率 SSR/% | 千粒重 TGW/g | 有效穗数 EPN | 稻谷产量 GY/(kg·m-2) | 光能利用率 RUE/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 06-12 | 135 | 123.0 | 84.7 | 27.2 | 195.0±13.1 bc | 0.60±0.02 ab | 0.411±0.017 bc |
明恢82 Minghui 82 | 06-04 | 125 | 187.7 | 81.5 | 20.3 | 176.0±18.3 cd | 0.57±0.03 abc | 0.448±0.026 a |
广恢998 Guanghui 998 | 06-04 | 125 | 159.2 | 84.8 | 19.9 | 228.0±26.2 a | 0.61±0.02 a | 0.479±0.018 a |
广恢122 Guanghui 122 | 06-07 | 128 | 147.8 | 83.1 | 22.1 | 188.0±9.6 bc | 0.53±0.00 cd | 0.408±0.034 c |
广恢128 Guanghui 128 | 06-06 | 127 | 146.1 | 72.4 | 21.1 | 222.0±19.7 ab | 0.52±0.04 cd | 0.405±0.015 c |
广恢308 Guanghui 308 | 06-01 | 122 | 179.5 | 83.4 | 19.9 | 195.0±28.6 bc | 0.56±0.01 bc | 0.452±0.035 ab |
桂99 Gui 99 | 06-05 | 126 | 164.3 | 80.1 | 24.0 | 162.0±26.2 cd | 0.51±0.02 d | 0.393±0.035 bc |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 06-10 | 132 | 141.5 | 82.7 | 29.7 | 147.0±21.6 d | 0.53±0.04 cd | 0.384±0.012 c |
[1] | 潘瑞炽. 水稻的光能利用[J]. 广东师范学报: 自然科学版, 1976(1): 44-54. |
Pan R C.Light energy utilization of rice[J]. Journal of Guangdong Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 1976(1): 44-54. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 屠曾平. 水稻光合特性研究与高光效育种[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(3): 28-35. |
Tu Z P.Studies on the photosynthetic characteristics of rice and breeding for high use efficiency of solar energy[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1997, 30(3): 28-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 程建峰, 沈允刚. 作物高光效之管见[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8): 1235-1247. |
Cheng J F, Shen Y G.My humble opinions on high photosynthetic efficiency of crop[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(8): 1235-1247. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Khush G S.What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005, 59: 1-6. |
[5] | Peng S, Khush G S, Cassman K G.Evolution of the new plant ideotype for increased yield potential[C] // Breaking the yield barrier: Proceedings of A Workshop on Rice Yield Potential in Favorable Environments. IRRI, 1994: 5-20. |
[6] | 杨守仁. 水稻超高产育种的新动向—理想株型与优势利用相结合[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1987, 18(1): 1-5. |
Yang S R.The new trend of rice super high-yield breeding: Combination of ideal plant type and heterotic utilization[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 1987, 18(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Chen W F, Xu Z J, Zhang W Z, Zhang B L, Yang S R.Creation of new plant type and breeding rice for super high yield[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(5): 665-672. |
[8] | 黄耀祥. 半矮秆、早长根深、超高产、特优质中国超级稻生态育种工程[J]. 广东农业科学, 2001(3): 2-6. |
Huang Y X.The ecological breeding engineering of semi-dwarf, early growing and deep root, super high yield and very high grain quality[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2001(3): 2-6. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 周开达, 马玉清, 刘太清, 沈茂松. 杂交水稻亚种间重穗型组合的选育: 杂交水稻超高产育种的理论与实践[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 1995, 13(4): 403-407. |
Zhou K D, Ma Y Q, Liu T Q, Sheng M S.The Breeding of sub-specific heavy ear hybrid rice: Exploration about super high yield breeding of hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1995, 13(4): 403-407. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 袁隆平. 超级杂交稻育种[J]. 杂交水稻. 1997, 12(6): 1-6. |
Yuan L P.Hybrid rice breeding for super high yield[J]. Hybrid Rice, 1997, 12(6): 1-6. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 广东省农业科学院. 广东水稻矮化育种工作的基本总结[J]. 作物学报, 1966(1): 1-7. |
Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Preliminary summary of the semi-dwarf rice breeding in Guangdong[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1966(1): 1-7. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 薛德榕. 水稻生理生态译丛(1)[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1981. |
Xue D R. Translation of Rice Physiology and Ecology (1) [M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1981. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | Donald C M.The breeding of ideotypes[J]. Euphytica, 1968, 17(3): 385-403. |
[14] | 松岛省三. 稻作的理论与技术[M]. 庞诚, 译. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1981. |
Matsushima S. Theory and Technology of Rice Cultivation [M]. Translated by Pang Cheng. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1981. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 黄耀祥. 水稻丛化育种[J]. 广东农业科学, 1983(1): 1-5. |
Huang Y X.Rice cluster breeding[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 1983(1): 1-5. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 莫永生, 何龙飞, 黄天进, 韦政, 农友业. 高大韧稻育种论[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20: 82-86. |
Mo Y S, He L F, Mo T J, Wei Z, Nong Y Y.A new rice breeding pathway: Higher, thicker and tougher rice breeding[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2004, 20: 82-86. | |
[17] | 程式华, 曹立勇, 陈深广, 朱德峰, 王熹, 闵绍楷, 翟虎渠. 后期功能型超级杂交稻的概念及生物学意义[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(3): 280-284. |
Cheng S H, Cao L Y, Chen S G, Zhu D F, Wang X, Min S K, Zhai H Q.Conception of late-stage vigor super hybrid rice and its biological significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2005, 19(3): 280-284.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 石利娟, 邓启云, 刘国华, 庄文, 陈立云. 水稻理想株型育种研究进展[J]. 杂交水稻, 2006, 21(4): 1-6. |
Shi L J, Deng Q Y, Liu G H, Zhuan W, Chen L Y.Progress in ideal plant type breeding in rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2006, 21(4): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 陈友订, 张旭. 华南水稻动态株型研究[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2011. |
Chen Y D, Zhang X. Research on Dynamic Plant Type in Indica Rice[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 陈友订, 刘传光, 周新桥, 陈达刚, 郭洁, 陈平丽, 万邦惠, 张旭. 华南双季超级籼稻动态株型育种理论研究与应用[J]. 广东农业科学, 2019, 46(9): 8-17. |
Chen Y D, Liu C G, Zhou X Q, Chen D G, Guo J, Chen P L, Wan B H, Zhang X.Studies and applications on dynamic plant type breeding theories in double cropping super Oryza sativa L. subsp. hsien Tingin South China[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 46(9): 8-17. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 康文启, 欧阳由男, 董成琼, 朱练峰, 禹盛苗, 许德海, 金千瑜. 水稻动态株型模式及其指标探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 2007, (1): 1-6. |
Kang W Q, Ouyang Y N, Dong C Q, Zhu L F, Yu S M, Xu D H, Jin Q Y.Investigation on dynamic plant type model and its index in rice[J]. China Rice, 2007, (1): 1-6.(in Chinese) | |
[22] | 苏祖芳, 孙成明, 张亚洁. 高产水稻生育前期株型指标的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(5): 660-664. |
Su Z F, Sun C M, Zhang Y J.Study on index of plant type in early stage of high yield rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002,28(5): 660-664. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 苏祖芳, 许乃霞, 孙成明, 张亚洁. 水稻抽穗后株型指标与产量形成关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(1): 115-120. |
Su Z F, Xu N X, Sun C M, Zhang Y J.Study on the relationship between rice plant type indices after heading stage and yield formation[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2003, 36(1): 115-120. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 孙成明, 苏祖芳, 许乃霞, 周培南. 水稻有效分蘖叶龄期株型特征与产量关系初探[J]. 江苏农业研究, 2000, 21(3): 10-15. |
Sun C M, Su Z F, Xu N X, Zhou P N.Relationship between characters of plant type in critical stage of effective tillering emergence and yield in rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Research, 2000, 21(3): 10-15. | |
[25] | 孙成明, 苏祖芳, 张亚洁, 沙爱红, 桑大志. 水稻拔节期株型特征及其与产量关系研究[J]. 扬州大学学报, 2002, 23(2): 46-49. |
Sun C M, Su Z F, Zhang Y J, Sha A H, Sang D Z.Study on relationship between characters of plant type in elongation stage and yield in rice[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University, 2002, 23(2): 46-49. | |
[26] | 宋宇, 邹小云, 贺浩华, 傅军如, 李海波, 徐亮, 辛晓云. 籼型三系杂交水稻产量及其相关性状的配合力分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004, 26(5): 719-725. |
Song Y, Zou X Y, He H H, Fu J R, Li H B, Xu L, Xin X Y.Analysis on combining ability of yield characters and related characters in three-line indica hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2004, 26(5): 719-725. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 张利华, 王建军, 李旭晨, 王林友. 籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状的配合力分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2003, 15(1): 1-7. |
Zhang L H, Wang J J, Li X C, Wang L Y. Analysis on combining ability of main agronomic characters in three-line indica hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2003, 15(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 涂诗航, 张水金, 董瑞霞, 杨东, 谢鸿光, 郑家团. 籼型三系杂交水稻亲本主要农艺性状配合力及遗传力分析[J]. 福建农林大学学报, 2008, 37(3): 230-234. |
Tu S H, Zhang S J, Dong R X, Yang D G, Xie H G, Zheng J T.Analysis of combining ability and heritability of the major agronomic characters in some parents of three-line Indica hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2008, 37(3): 230-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 齐绍武, 盛孝邦. 籼型两系杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力及遗传力分析[J]. 杂交水稻, 2000, 15(3): 38-41. |
Qi S W, Shen X B.Analysis on combining ability and heritability of major agronomic characters in two line indica hybrid rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2000, 15(3): 38-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 廖伏明, 周坤炉, 盛孝邦, 阳和华, 徐秋生. 籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力研究[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(5): 622-631. |
Liao F M, Zhou K R, Sheng X B, Yang H H, Xu Q S.Studies on combining ability of major agronomic characters in three-line indica hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinca, 1999, 25(5): 622-631. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 邓启云, 石利娟, 庄文, 袁隆平. 杂交水稻叶片形态性状配合力分析[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2007, 38(5): 695-700. |
Deng Q Y, Shi L J, Zhuang W, Yuan L P.Analysis on combining ability of leaf morphological characters in hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2007, 38(5): 695-700. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 丁颖. 中国水稻栽培学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1961. |
Ding Y. Rice Cultivation in China [M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1961. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 徐正进, 董克. 水稻叶片基角、开张角和披垂度的同时测定方法[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1991, 22(2): 185-187. |
Xu Z J, Dong K.Simultaneous determination of base angle, opening angle and drape of rice leaves[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 1991, 22(2): 185-187. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 吉田昌一, 福尔若D A, 科尔J H. 水稻生理学实验手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1975: 65-68. |
Yoshida S, Forno D A, Gock J H. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1975: 65-68. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | Garrigues S, Shabanov N V, Swanson K, Morisette J T, Baret F, Myneni R B.Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of leaf area index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands[J]. Agricultural&Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(8/9): 1193-1209. |
[36] | 黄农荣, 傅友强, 钟旭华, 梁开明, 潘俊峰, 刘彦卓, 胡香玉, 彭碧琳, 陈荣彬, 胡锐. 华南双季稻主栽品种的光能利用效率及聚类分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(11): 1714-1724. |
Huang N R, Fu Y Q, Zhong X H, Ling K M,Pan J F, Liu Y Z, Hu X Y, Peng B L, Chen R B, Hu R.Radiation use efficiency and its classification of main varieties cultivars in double-cropping rice region of South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(11): 1714-1724. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 方志伟, 张荣铣, 朱培仁. 水稻叶片叶绿素含量的变化与光合作用的关系[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1987, 10(4):18-22. |
Fang Z W, Zhang R X, Zhu P R.Change in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate and their relationship in individual leaf from fully expanded stage to senescence[J]. Nanjing Agricultural University, 1987, 10(4): 18-22. | |
[38] | 周炳炎. 水稻理想株型与超高产育种途径的探讨[J]. 湖北农学院学报, 1995, 15(1): 52-60. |
Zhou B Y.Discussion on ideal plant type and super high yield breeding of rice[J]. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College, 1995, 15(1): 52-60. (in Chinese) | |
[39] | Peng S B, Khush G S, Virka P, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B.Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential[J]. Field Crops Research, 2008, 108: 32-38. |
[40] | 高亮之, 金之庆, 张更生, 石春林, 葛道阔. 水稻最佳株型群体受光量与光合量的数值模拟[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2000, 16(1): 1-9. |
Gao L Z, Jin Z Q, Zhang G S, Shi C L, Ge D K.A numerical model to simulate the incident radiation and photosynthate for rice canopies with optimum plant type[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 16(1): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 孙宏伟. 水稻超高产育种的可能途径[J]. 垦殖与稻作, 2006(1): 3-5. |
Sun H W.The possible approaches of super high yield breeding in rice[J]. Reclaiming and Rice Cultivation. 2006(1): 3-5. (in Chinese) | |
[42] | Horie T.Increasing yield potential in irrigated rice: Breaking the yield barrier//Peng S, Hardy B. Rice Research for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation[M]. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, 2001: 3-25 |
[43] | 胡凝, 吕川根, 姚克敏, 邹江石. 卷叶水稻的光分布模拟及适宜叶面卷曲度分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(6): 617-624. |
Hu N, Lu C G, Yao K M, Zou J S.Simulation on photosynthetically active radiation distributing in rice canopy with rolled leaves and its optimum leaf rolling index[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2008, 22(6): 617-624. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[44] | 李绪孟, 王小卉, 郑华斌, 黄璜. 水稻群体冠层光分布及光合作用模型[J]. 生物数学学报, 2014, 29(1): 87-98. |
Li X M, Wang X H, Zheng H B, Huang H.A rice canopy light distribution and photosynthesis model[J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 2014, 29(1): 87-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[45] | 谢华安. 汕优63选育理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 32-61. |
Xie H A. Breeding Theory and Practice of Shanyou 63 [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005: 32-61. (in Chinese) | |
[46] | 王贵学, 黄俊丽, 金良, 郑家奎, 张子龙. 水稻动态株型材料的遗传特性[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2006, 29(7): 108-110. |
Wang G X, Huang J L, Jin L, Zheng J K, Zhang Z L.Heredity of rice transforming leaf morphology[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2006, 29(7): 108-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[47] | 廖亦龙, 王丰, 符福鸿, 柳武革, 李金华, 朱满山, 黄慧君, 刘迪林, 付崇允. 优质抗病恢复系广恢998的选育及其组合的推广应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(2): 87-90. |
Liao Y L, Wang F, Fu F H, Liu W G, Li J H, Zhu M S, Huang H J, Liu D L, Fu C Y.Breeding of restorer line Guanghui 998 with good grain quality and blast resistance and the extension and utilization of its hybrid combinations[J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(2): 87-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[48] | 鄂志国, 程本义, 孙红伟, 汪玉军, 朱练峰, 林海, 王磊, 童汉华, 陈红旗. 近40年我国水稻育成品种分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 523-531. |
E Z G, Cheng B Y, Sun H W, Wang Y J, Zhu L F, Lin H, Wang L, Tong H H,. Chen H Q, Analysis on Chinese improved rice varieties in recent four decades[J]. Chinese Journal Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 523-531. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 张宏根, 仲崇元, 司华, 刘巧泉, 顾铭洪, 汤述翥. 分子标记辅助选择改良C418对红莲型粳稻不育系的恢复力[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(5): 445-452. |
[2] | 姚姝,陈涛,张亚东,朱镇,赵庆勇,周丽慧,赵凌,李余生,王才林*. 分子标记辅助选择改良宁恢8号的条纹叶枯病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1): 85-91. |
[3] | 张建福1 ,曾大力2 ,朱永生1 ,谢鸿光1 ,蔡秋华1 ,连玲1 ,吴方喜1 ,罗曦1 ,王颖姮1 ,郑轶1 ,谢华安1,*. 分子标记辅助选择创制抗白背飞虱水稻恢复系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 329-334. |
[4] | 林建荣,宋昕蔚,吴明国*. 4份籼粳中间型广亲和恢复系的生物学特性及其杂种优势利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6): 656-662. |
[5] | 刘传光1,周汉钦1,冯道基1,周新桥1,陈达刚1,李丽君1,李巨昌1,张桂权2,*,陈友订1,*. 影响华南稻区常规籼稻产量水平的主要农艺性状分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 182-188. |
[6] | 潘晓飚1 黄善军1陈凯2孟丽君2徐建龙2,* . 大田全生育期盐水灌溉胁迫筛选水稻耐盐恢复系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 49-54. |
[7] | 符冠富#,宋健#,廖西元, 章秀福, 熊杰, 王熹乐, 明凯, 陶龙兴*. 中国常用水稻保持系及恢复系开花灌浆期耐热性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 495-500. |
[8] | 柳武革,王丰,肖汉祥,刘振荣,李金华,廖亦龙, 朱满山,黄慧君,黄炳超,张扬. 利用分子标记辅助选择改良水稻恢复系的稻瘿蚊抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(6): 581-586 . |
[9] | 汤述翥,张宏根,孔宪旺,万林生,朱正斌,裔传灯,龚志云,顾铭洪. 不同类型亲本的杂交粳稻产量性状比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(4): 360-366 . |
[10] | 郑文静刘志恒张燕之,刘欣,王昌华,赵家铭. 水稻恢复系C224对条纹叶枯病的抗性遗传模型分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(3): 228-232 . |
[11] | 汤述翥,张宏根,朱正斌,刘超,李鹏,梁国华,严长杰,刘巧泉,于恒秀,顾铭洪. 红莲型不育细胞质在杂交粳稻育种中的应用 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(2): 116-124 . |
[12] | 王昌华张燕之,华泽田,徐正进,郑文静,赵家铭,刘 欣 ,王 辉,周毓珩. 北方杂交粳稻亲本遗传背景分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(5): 489-494 . |
[13] | 郑家团,涂诗航,张建福,郑 轶,赵开军,张水金,谢华安,. 含白叶枯病抗性基因Xa23水稻恢复系的分子标记辅助选育[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(4): 437-439 . |
[14] | 郭媛, 程保山 洪德林,. 粳稻SSR连锁图谱的构建及恢复系卷叶性状QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(3): 245-251 . |
[15] | 周海鹏,占小登, 柴荣耀,程式华曹立勇,. 具抗稻瘟病基因Pi25杂交稻恢复系的分子标记辅助选育[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(6): 590-590~596 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||