Research Papers

Cloning and Characterization of Ty3/gypsy Retrotransposon in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Expand
  • 1 College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;

Received date: 2014-02-14

  Revised date: 2014-03-19

  Online published: 2014-05-10

Abstract

Transposable elements constitute a substantial fraction of host genomes. Ty3/gypsy retrotransposon, one group of LTR retrotransposons, is widespread in different species. By inversePCR and genome walking, a novel member of Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons was cloned from Chilo suppressalis. This new member of Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons was named CsuTy3 (GenBank accession No. KJ191261). The sequence is 4 934 bp in length and integrated into the “AACGT” target site duplications (TSDs) of the genome. There is a pair of noncompletely identical long terminal repeats (LTRs) in the CsuTy3 retrotransposon. The 5′LTR is 161 bp in length and the 3′LTR is 168 bp, sharing 935% similarities. A polypurine tract (PPT), 15 bp in length, is adjacent to the 3′LTR. There are three independent open reading frames (ORFs) in CsuTy3. The first ORF encodes a protein which is related to viral structural protein, termed GAG. The second encodes aspartic protease (AP). The third encodes a polyprotein including a reverse transcriptase (RT) which produces a cDNA copy of the transposon′s RNA, an RNase H (RH) which splits the DNARNA hybrid and an integrase (IN) which inserts the cDNA into the host′s genome. The southern hybridization indicated that there were many CsuTy3 copies in different C. suppressalis populations. Flanking PCR results showed that the CsuTy3 copy was inserted at the same locus in different populations. At this locus, all the individuals have the CsuTy3 copy insertion except some individuals from Deyang and Jiangjin populations. The CsuTy3 insertion ratio varied with field populations.

Cite this article

LI Xiaohuan1, 2, #, LUO Guanghua2, #, ZHANG Zhichun2, LIU Baosheng2, FANG Jichao1, 2,* . Cloning and Characterization of Ty3/gypsy Retrotransposon in Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2014 , 28(3) : 314 -321 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.03.011

References

\[1\]Doolittle W F, Sapienza C. Selfish gene, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature, 1980, 284: 601603.

\[2\]Kidwell M G, Lisch D R. Transposable elements and host genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol, 2000, 15(3): 9599.

\[3\]Kazazian H H Jr. Mobile elements: Drivers of genome evolution. Science, 2004, 303(5664): 16261632.

\[4\]Kidwell M G. Transposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes. Genetica, 2002, 115: 4963.

\[5\]Ding S, Wu X H, Li G, et al. Efficient transposition of the piggybac (PB) transposon in mammalian cell and mice. Cell, 2005, 122(3): 473483.

\[6\]Woltjen K, Michael I P, Mohseni P, et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature, 2009, 458: 766770.

\[7\]Miyao A, Tanaka K, Murata K, et al. Target site specificity of the Tos17 retrotransposon shows a preference for insertion within genes and against insertion in retrotransposonrich regions of the genome. Plant Cell, 2003, 15(8): 17711780.

\[8\]Finnegan D J. Transposable elements: How nonLTR retrotransposons do it. Curr Biol, 1997, 7(4): R245R248.

\[9\]Finnegan D J. Transposable elements. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 1992, 2(6): 861867.

\[10\] Bennetzen J L. The contributions of retroelements to plant genome organization, function and evolution. Trends Microbiol, 1996, 4(9): 347353.

\[11\]Muszewska A, HoffmanSommer M, Grynberg M. LTR retrotransposons in fungi. Plos One, 2011, 6(12): e29425. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029425.

\[12\]Casacuberta J M, Santiago N. Plant LTRretrotransposons and MITEs: Control of transposition and impact on the evolution of plant genes and genomes. Gene, 2003, 311: 111.

\[13\]Meng X F, Shi M, Chen X X, et al. Population genetic structure of Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae): Strong subdivision in China inferred from microsatellite markers and mtDNA gene sequences. Mol Ecol, 2008, 17(12): 28802897.

\[14\]Ishiguro N, Yoshida K, Tsuchida K. Genetic differences between rice and wateroat feeders in the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 2006, 41(4): 585593.

\[15\]Tao N G, Wei J, Liu Y Z, et al. Copialike retrotransposons in a precocious mutant of trifoliate orange \[Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf\]. J Horticul Sci Biotech, 2006, 81(6): 10381042.

\[16\]Kapitonov V V, Jurka J. Molecular paleontology of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100(11): 65696574.

\[17\]Baucom R S, Estill J C, Chaparro C, et al. Exceptional diversity, nonrandom distribution, and rapid evolution of retroelements in the B73 maize genome. PLoS Genet, 2009, 5(11): e1000732.

\[18\]Schnable P S, Ware D, Fulton R S, et al. The B73 maize genome: Complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science, 2009, 326(5956): 11121115.

\[19\]Lander E S, Linton L M, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 2001, 409: 860921.

\[20\]Fontanillas P, Hartl D L, Reuter M. Genome organization and gene expression shape the transposable element distribution in the Drosophila melanogaster Euchromatin. PloS Genet, 2007, 3(11): e210.

\[21\]Long M, Betran E, Thornton K, et al. The origin of new genes: Glimpses from the young and old. Nat Rev Genet, 2003, 4: 865875.

\[22\]Koen J T, Venken, Bellen H J. Emerging technologies for gene manipulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Rev Genet, 2005, 6: 167178.

\[23\]Havecker E R, Gao X, Voytas D F. The diversity of LTR retrotransposons. Genome Biol, 2004, 5: 255260.

\[24\]Bui Q T, Delauriere L, Casse N, et al. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic position of a new marinerlike element in the coastal crab, Pachygrapsus marmoratus. Gene, 2007, 396(2): 248256.

\[25\]Luo G H, Wu M, Wang X F, et al. A new active piggyBaclike element in Aphis gossypii. Insect Sci, 2011, 18(6): 652662.

\[26\]罗光华, 吴敏, 韩召军, 等. 二化螟piggyBac类转座子的克隆与分析. 昆虫学报, 2012, 55(7): 763771.

\[27\]Mizrokhi L J, Mazo A M. Cloning and analysis of the mobile element gypsy from D. virilis. Nucl Acids Res, 1991, 19(4): 913916.

\[28\]Petrov D A, Sangster T A, Johnston J S, et al. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science, 2000, 287(5455): 10601062.

\[29\]Capy P. Is bigger better in Cricket? Science, 2000, 287(5455): 985986.

\[30\]卢欣, 孙之荣, 李衍达. 基因组复杂度进化的仿真研究. 生物物理学报, 2001, 17(2): 318328.

\[31\]Kalendar R, Flavell A J, Ellis T H N, et al . Analysis of plant diversity with retrotransposonbased molecular markers Heredity, 2011, 106: 520530.

\[32\]Venturi S, Dondini L, Donini P, et al. Retrotransposon characterisation and fingerprinting of apple clones by SSAP markers. Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112(3): 440444.

\[33\]Sanz A M, Gonzalez S G, Syed N H, et al. Genetic diversity analysis in Vicia species using retrotransposonbased SSAP markers. Mol Genet Genom, 2007, 278(4): 433441.

\[34\]Huo H, Conner J A, OziasAkins P. Genetic mapping of the aposporyspecific genomic region in Pennisetum squamulatum using retrotransposonbased molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 119(2): 199212.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.