Short Communications

Safety Assessment of Bt63, a Genetically Modified Rice in vitro

Expand
  • 1 Zhejiang Academy of Science & Technology for Inspection & Quarantine, Hangzhou 310016, China; 2 Zhejiang International Travel Healthcare Center, Hangzhou 310016, China;

Received date: 2011-10-26

  Revised date: 2012-12-09

  Online published: 2012-09-10

Abstract

To investigate the cytogenotoxicity of Bt63, a genetically modified(GM) rice in human lymphocytes  in vitro,  human lymphocytes were exposed to whole protein of Bt63 at doses of 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5 μg/mL and incubated for 1.5 h, 6 h and 24 h, respectively. The DNA damage, chromosomal aberrations and cytotoxicity induced by whole protein of Bt63 were measured by comet assay, micronucleus test, CCK8 assay and neutral red uptake (NRU) assay. After different incubation periods, the cytogenotoxicity of lymphocytes in positive control group was significant higher than that of lymphocytes in blank control group. Moreover, the exposure timeeffect relationship was observed in positive control group by CCK8 assay and neutral red uptake (NRU) assay. There was no significant difference in cytogenotoxicity between Bt63 group and nonGM rice group. Also, the Bt63 GM rice group did not show higher cytogenotoxicity than that of nonGM rice group, indicating that Bt63 GM rice has similar cytogenotoxicity with nonGM rice, and Bt63 GM rice has no cytogenotoxicity effect on human lymphocytes in vitro.  Compared with traditional toxicological  methods, the experimental system is economic, simple, rapid and reliable. 

Cite this article

CHEN Wujian1, ZHENG Wei2,*, LU Qinfeng2, ZHANG Mingzhe1, WU Zhonghua2, XU Qi2, WU Zhiyi1, LI He2 . Safety Assessment of Bt63, a Genetically Modified Rice in vitro[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2012 , 26(5) : 633 -636 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.05.019

References

\[1\]Cummins J, Ho M W, Ryan A. Hazardous CaMV promoter?  Nat Biotechnol, 2000, 18: 363.

\[2\]Key S, Ma J K, Drake P M. Genetically modified plants and human health.  J R Soc Med, 2008, 101(6): 290298.

\[3\]顾祖维. 转基因食品的安全性及其毒理学评价. 毒理学杂志, 2005, 19(1): 911.

\[4\]焦哲, 李攻科.  转基因食品及其安全性评价. 大学化学, 2007, 22(4): 3137.

\[5\]张文平, 李云云, 王伟刚, 等. 转几丁质酶和β1, 3葡聚糖基因玉米的致突变性检测. 中国药物与临床, 2009, 9(5): 405407.

\[6\]Anldanl E, Gadani F, Heinze P. Analytical methods for detection and determination of genetically modified organisms in agricultural crops and plantderived food products. Eur Food Res Technol, 2002, 214(1): 326.

\[7\]Pereira A. A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Res, 2000, 9(415): 245260.

\[8\]Millstone E, Brunner E, Mayer S. Beyond substantial equivalence. Nature, 1999, 401(7): 525526.

\[9\]Kuiper H A, Noteborn H P, Peijnenbury A A. Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet, 1999, 354: 13151316.

\[10\]Bryan D, James D A, Helen C, et al. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food Chem Toxicol, 2008, (46): 7197.

\[11\]Kristina Hug. Genetically modified organisms: Do the benefits outweigh the risks? Medicina (Kaunas), 2008, 44(2): 8799.

\[12\]刘岭峰, 曹江山, 吴文花, 等. 转基因食品安全性评价及我国管理现状. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(4): 155158.

\[13\]Kuipera H A, Konig A, Kletera G A, et al.  Concluding remarks. Food  Chem Toxicol, 2004, 42: 11951202.

\[14\]Anthony J C, Jeanne M E J. Genetic engineering of crops as potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet.  Mut Res, 1999, 443: 223234.

\[15\]Konig A, Cockburnb A, Crevelc R W R et al.  Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops.  Food Chem Toxicol,  2004, (42): 10471088.

\[16\]Kok E J, Keijer J, Kleter G A, et al.  Comparative safety assessment of plantderived foods.  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2008, 50: 98113.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.