Resistance Performance of Rice Varieties (Combinations) to Brown Planthopper，Nilaparvata lugens, in Paddy Field

SHENG Xian-qiao,ZHANG Fa-cheng,XU Hong-xing,ZHENG Xu-song,CHEN Gui-hua,LU Zhong-xian

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.016

Chinese Journal OF Rice Science >

2010 , Vol. 24 >Issue 5: 535 - 538

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.016

研究简报

Resistance Performance of Rice Varieties (Combinations) to Brown Planthopper，Nilaparvata lugens, in Paddy Field

Expand

¹Jinhua Plant Protection Station of Zhejiang Province, Jinhua 321017, China; ²Institute of Plant Protection & Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China; ^*Corresponding author, Email: luzxmh2004@yahoo.com.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2010-09-10

Fold

Abstract

Resistance performance of 48 rice varieties (combinations) to brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens Stl, was evaluated in single season rice field during BPH population outbreak of year 2007. Results showed that 16 varieties(combinations) were susceptible while the other 32 varieties (combinations) were highly or moderately resistant to BPH. Bing 04123, Ⅱ you 845, Yixiang 845, Zhongzu 14， Jiaxingyou 041 and IR36 showed high resistance. Besides the 5 varieties with high resistance, other varieties including Xiushui 09, Xinjiayou 99, Jiayou 225, Xiuyou 0969, Ning 0481, Bing 04103, Bing 0408, Bing 04123, R4101, Bing 04132, Bing 05129, Bing 05227, Zhejing 23 and Zhejing 22 also had long durable resistance characteristics. The results imply that rating resistance of rice varieties to BPH in paddy field at the adult stage of rice was much more importance in screening and evaluating resistance resources for optimizing the layout and application of newbred resistant varieties as one of key strategies of integrated pest management.

Key words： rice variety; Nilaparvata lugens; resistance evaluation in field; durable resistance

Cite this article

SHENG Xian-qiao,ZHANG Fa-cheng,XU Hong-xing,ZHENG Xu-song,CHEN Gui-hua,LU Zhong-xian .

Resistance Performance of Rice Varieties (Combinations) to Brown Planthopper，Nilaparvata lugens, in Paddy Field

[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2010 , 24(5) : 535 -538 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.016

References

[1]李汝铎,丁锦华, 胡国文, 等. 褐飞虱及其种群管理. 上海: 复旦大学出版社， 1996.

[2]Sogawa K. Windborn displacements of the rice planthoppers related to the seasonal weather patterns in Kyushu district. Bull Kyushu Natl Agric Exp Stn, 1995, 28 (4): 219-278.

[3]Medrano F G, Heinrichs E A. Response of resistant rice to brown planthopper collected in Mindanao, Philippines. IRRN, 1985, 10: 14-15.

[4]吕仲贤，俞晓平，陶林勇，等. 水稻新品种（系）对褐飞虱抗性的评价. 中国农业科学， 2002， 35（2）： 225-229.

[5]Singh J, Dhaliwal G S. Insect resistance in rice: Progress and perspectives//Dhaliwal G S, Singh R. Host Plant Resistance to Insect. New Delhi: Panima Publishing Corporation, 2004.

[6]IRRI. Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 4th ed. Manila： IRRI, 2002: 56.

[7]陈峰, 傅强, 罗举, 等. 苗期抗性不同的水稻品种成株期对褐飞虱的抗性. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(2): 201-206.

[8]陶林勇, 俞晓平，吕仲贤，等. 水稻新品种(系)对褐飞虱持抗性的鉴定. 浙江农业学报， 1999， 11（6）： 315-320.

[9]刘光杰, 付志红, 沈君辉, 等. 水稻品种对稻飞虱抗性鉴定方法的比较研究. 中国水稻科学， 2002， 16（1）： 52-56.

[10]唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.

[11]陶林勇，俞晓平，巫国瑞. 我国褐飞虱生物型监测初报. 中国农业科学， 1992， 25（3）： 9-13

[12]Juan N F, Fornoni J, Valvrde P L. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2007, 38: 541-566.

[13]程家安，朱金良，祝增荣，等. 稻田飞虱灾变与环境调控. 环境昆虫学报， 2008， 30（2）： 167-182.

[14]Settle W H, Ariawan H, Astuti E T, et al. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology, 1996, 77(7): 1975-1988.

[15]Heong K L. Are planthopper problems caused by a breakdown in ecosystem services//Heong K L, Hardy B. Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia. Manila: IRRI, 2009: 221-232.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References