

Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 375-385.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.241111
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Zifang1, ZHOU Zeyuan1, QIAN Jialu1, MA Xiaowei1, LI Jintao1, CAO Yuxian2,*(
), HOU Jun1,*(
)
Received:2024-11-18
Revised:2024-12-22
Online:2026-05-10
Published:2026-05-13
Contact:
CAO Yuxian, HOU Jun
陈子方1, 周泽源1, 钱嘉潞1, 马孝卫1, 李锦涛1, 曹玉贤2,*(
), 侯俊1,*(
)
通讯作者:
曹玉贤,侯俊
基金资助:CHEN Zifang, ZHOU Zeyuan, QIAN Jialu, MA Xiaowei, LI Jintao, CAO Yuxian, HOU Jun. Effect of Foliar Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Timing on Yield and Quality of Ratoon Rice Under Mechanical Harvesting of the Main Crop[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(3): 375-385.
陈子方, 周泽源, 钱嘉潞, 马孝卫, 李锦涛, 曹玉贤, 侯俊. 头季机收后叶面氮肥施用时间对再生季稻米产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(3): 375-385.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.241111
| 试验地Site | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment | 喷施处理Spray- treatment | 有效穗数 Productive panicle No.(No./m2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 千粒重 Thousand grain weight(g) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 产量 Yield(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 190.67±12.70 c | 71.14±0.28 a | 20.81±0.36 a | 77.90±0.21 b | 2200.32±177.30 c★ |
| HF | D1 | 308.00±22.00 a★ | 71.28±0.61 a | 21.58±0.06 a | 81.27±0.07 a | 3848.63±236.61 a★ | |
| D3 | 271.33±12.70 b★ | 72.11±0.04 a | 20.85±0.15 a | 80.16±1.13 a | 3269.09±113.61 b | ||
| D7 | 278.67±12.70 b | 71.48±0.42 a | 20.91±0.17 a | 81.66±2.12 a | 3399.63±140.98 b | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 264.00±22.00 b | 78.76±2.02 a | 20.93±0.31 a★ | 80.39±0.58 b★ | 3498.33±318.07 b | |
| D1 | 344.67±12.70 a | 77.95±0.66 a | 20.94±0.58 a | 85.03±0.28 a★ | 4781.92±136.80 a★ | ||
| D3 | 337.33±12.70 a | 77.43±1.36 a | 20.79±0.26 a★ | 83.80±0.61 a | 4551.64±207.29 a★ | ||
| D7 | 337.33±12.70 a | 78.15±1.12 a | 20.98±0.60 a | 84.32±0.81 a★ | 4665.78±301.58 a★ | ||
| 低施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 176.00±22.00 b | 71.49±1.05 a | 20.84±0.47 a | 73.30±0.82 b | 1923.33±253.19 b |
| LF | D1 | 286.00±22.00 a | 71.86±0.39 a | 21.25±0.37 a | 80.59±0.67 a | 3516.57±198.65 a | |
| D3 | 249.33±33.61 a | 71.58±1.84 a | 21.17±0.38 a | 78.64±0.93 a | 2971.90±423.05 a | ||
| D7 | 264.00±22.00 a | 72.16±1.17 a | 21.38±0.32 a | 79.01±1.55 a | 3214.14±221.34 a | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 220.00±22.00 b | 77.33±0.53 a | 20.94±0.18 a | 76.47±0.74 b | 2725.88±301.72 b | |
| D1 | 271.33±12.70 a | 77.48±1.69 a | 21.14±0.29 a | 81.16±0.17 a | 3605.52±128.74 a | ||
| D3 | 264.00±22.00 ab | 78.04±0.72 a | 21.07±0.30 a | 81.24±0.82 a | 3527.02±303.59 a | ||
| D7 | 256.67±33.61 ab | 78.15±0.66 a | 21.05±0.35 a | 81.05±0.61 a | 3423.97±476.96 a | ||
| F值 | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment(RT) | 32.595*** | 412.067*** | 1.396ns | 99.024*** | 109.713*** | |
| F value | 试验地 Site(S) | 52.595*** | 0.007ns | 1.674ns | 120.291*** | 74.588*** | |
| 喷施处理 Spray treatmet(ST) | 43.96*** | 0.246ns | 2.178ns | 75.071*** | 59.375*** | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地 RT×S | 17.357*** | 0.916ns | 0.006ns | 3.935ns | 25.838*** | ||
| 碾压处理×喷施处理 RT×ST | 2.944* | 0.324ns | 0.950ns | 0.698ns | 2.316ns | ||
| 试验地×喷施处理 S×ST | 0.595ns | 0.361ns | 0.771ns | 3.596* | 0.424ns | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地×喷施处理 RT×S×ST | 0.405ns | 1.013ns | 0.892ns | 2.339ns | 0.580ns |
Table 1. Effects of foliar fertilizer application timing on ratoon rice yield and its components
| 试验地Site | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment | 喷施处理Spray- treatment | 有效穗数 Productive panicle No.(No./m2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 千粒重 Thousand grain weight(g) | 结实率 Seed setting rate (%) | 产量 Yield(kg/hm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 190.67±12.70 c | 71.14±0.28 a | 20.81±0.36 a | 77.90±0.21 b | 2200.32±177.30 c★ |
| HF | D1 | 308.00±22.00 a★ | 71.28±0.61 a | 21.58±0.06 a | 81.27±0.07 a | 3848.63±236.61 a★ | |
| D3 | 271.33±12.70 b★ | 72.11±0.04 a | 20.85±0.15 a | 80.16±1.13 a | 3269.09±113.61 b | ||
| D7 | 278.67±12.70 b | 71.48±0.42 a | 20.91±0.17 a | 81.66±2.12 a | 3399.63±140.98 b | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 264.00±22.00 b | 78.76±2.02 a | 20.93±0.31 a★ | 80.39±0.58 b★ | 3498.33±318.07 b | |
| D1 | 344.67±12.70 a | 77.95±0.66 a | 20.94±0.58 a | 85.03±0.28 a★ | 4781.92±136.80 a★ | ||
| D3 | 337.33±12.70 a | 77.43±1.36 a | 20.79±0.26 a★ | 83.80±0.61 a | 4551.64±207.29 a★ | ||
| D7 | 337.33±12.70 a | 78.15±1.12 a | 20.98±0.60 a | 84.32±0.81 a★ | 4665.78±301.58 a★ | ||
| 低施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 176.00±22.00 b | 71.49±1.05 a | 20.84±0.47 a | 73.30±0.82 b | 1923.33±253.19 b |
| LF | D1 | 286.00±22.00 a | 71.86±0.39 a | 21.25±0.37 a | 80.59±0.67 a | 3516.57±198.65 a | |
| D3 | 249.33±33.61 a | 71.58±1.84 a | 21.17±0.38 a | 78.64±0.93 a | 2971.90±423.05 a | ||
| D7 | 264.00±22.00 a | 72.16±1.17 a | 21.38±0.32 a | 79.01±1.55 a | 3214.14±221.34 a | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 220.00±22.00 b | 77.33±0.53 a | 20.94±0.18 a | 76.47±0.74 b | 2725.88±301.72 b | |
| D1 | 271.33±12.70 a | 77.48±1.69 a | 21.14±0.29 a | 81.16±0.17 a | 3605.52±128.74 a | ||
| D3 | 264.00±22.00 ab | 78.04±0.72 a | 21.07±0.30 a | 81.24±0.82 a | 3527.02±303.59 a | ||
| D7 | 256.67±33.61 ab | 78.15±0.66 a | 21.05±0.35 a | 81.05±0.61 a | 3423.97±476.96 a | ||
| F值 | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment(RT) | 32.595*** | 412.067*** | 1.396ns | 99.024*** | 109.713*** | |
| F value | 试验地 Site(S) | 52.595*** | 0.007ns | 1.674ns | 120.291*** | 74.588*** | |
| 喷施处理 Spray treatmet(ST) | 43.96*** | 0.246ns | 2.178ns | 75.071*** | 59.375*** | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地 RT×S | 17.357*** | 0.916ns | 0.006ns | 3.935ns | 25.838*** | ||
| 碾压处理×喷施处理 RT×ST | 2.944* | 0.324ns | 0.950ns | 0.698ns | 2.316ns | ||
| 试验地×喷施处理 S×ST | 0.595ns | 0.361ns | 0.771ns | 3.596* | 0.424ns | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地×喷施处理 RT×S×ST | 0.405ns | 1.013ns | 0.892ns | 2.339ns | 0.580ns |
| 试验地Site | 碾压处理 Treatment | 喷施处理Spray- treatment | 精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head milled rice rate (%) | 垩白率 Chalkiness rate (%) | 长宽比 Length-width ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 43.56±1.02 d | 72.67±1.20 c | 26.89±1.26 d | 46.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a |
| HF | D1 | 58.00±1.76 a | 78.11±1.39 a | 44.44±1.26 a | 35.17±0.25 d | 2.60±0.10 a | |
| D3 | 54.67±1.53 b | 72.89±1.17 c | 39.22±1.02 b | 36.80±0.36 c | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 50.67±1.33 c | 75.44±1.50 b✭ | 36.44±0.51 c | 38.73±0.47 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| 非碾压区 Unrolled area | CK | 42.22±1.02 c | 71.33±1.20 b | 26.22±1.26 b | 46.67±1.36 a | 2.63±0.06 a | |
| D1 | 56.33±1.76 a | 74.78±0.69 a | 43.11±1.26 a | 34.97±0.25 c | 2.70±0.10 a | ||
| D3 | 54.56±1.39 ab | 72.22±1.26 ab | 41.56±1.64 a | 36.83±0.35 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 51.89±2.04 b | 71.22±2.14 b | 41.22±1.50 a | 37.43±0.68 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| 低施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 50.33±0.88 b✭ | 79.33±1.20 a | 33.56±1.26 b | 41.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a |
| LF | D1 | 64.00±1.33 a✭ | 80.33±0.67 a✭ | 51.11±1.26 a | 27.67±1.20 b | 2.60±0.10 ab | |
| D3 | 62.11±1.39 a✭ | 80.56±1.17 a✭ | 50.89±1.35 a | 27.80±0.46 b✭ | 2.57±0.06 ab | ||
| D7 | 62.89±1.17 a✭ | 79.78±0.51 a | 51.33±1.67 a | 26.83±0.31 b | 2.53±0.06 b | ||
| 非碾压区 Unrolled area | CK | 45.22±1.07 b | 72.00±1.20 a | 33.56±1.26 b | 41.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a | |
| D1 | 58.11±1.17 a | 78.00±0.33 ab | 51.11±1.26 a | 26.40±0.46 b | 2.60±0.10 a | ||
| D3 | 56.89±0.51 a | 76.89±0.51 b | 51.44±1.35 a | 26.13±0.31 b | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 57.00±0.67 a | 75.78±1.58 c | 50.44±0.84 a | 26.17±0.31 b | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| F值 | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment(RT) | 217.210*** | 151.270*** | 614.838*** | 1339.163*** | 2.133ns | |
| F value | 试验地 Site(S) | 62.710*** | 94.611*** | 2.623ns | 7.863** | 0.533ns | |
| 喷施处理 Spray treatmet(ST) | 262.122*** | 22.171*** | 477.380*** | 721.732*** | 3.956* | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地 RT×S | 44.522*** | 7.916* | 3.406ns | 1.060ns | 0.133ns | ||
| 碾压处理×喷施处理 RT×ST | 7.747*** | 4.457* | 11.602*** | 36.999*** | 1.156ns | ||
| 试验地×喷施处理 S×ST | 0.703ns | 3.061* | 0.677ns | 0.622ns | 0.952ns | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地×喷施处理 RT×S×ST | 0.952ns | 5.396** | 0.005ns | 1.336ns | 0.756ns |
Table 2. Effects of foliar fertilizer application timing on processing and appearance quality of ratoon rice
| 试验地Site | 碾压处理 Treatment | 喷施处理Spray- treatment | 精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head milled rice rate (%) | 垩白率 Chalkiness rate (%) | 长宽比 Length-width ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 43.56±1.02 d | 72.67±1.20 c | 26.89±1.26 d | 46.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a |
| HF | D1 | 58.00±1.76 a | 78.11±1.39 a | 44.44±1.26 a | 35.17±0.25 d | 2.60±0.10 a | |
| D3 | 54.67±1.53 b | 72.89±1.17 c | 39.22±1.02 b | 36.80±0.36 c | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 50.67±1.33 c | 75.44±1.50 b✭ | 36.44±0.51 c | 38.73±0.47 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| 非碾压区 Unrolled area | CK | 42.22±1.02 c | 71.33±1.20 b | 26.22±1.26 b | 46.67±1.36 a | 2.63±0.06 a | |
| D1 | 56.33±1.76 a | 74.78±0.69 a | 43.11±1.26 a | 34.97±0.25 c | 2.70±0.10 a | ||
| D3 | 54.56±1.39 ab | 72.22±1.26 ab | 41.56±1.64 a | 36.83±0.35 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 51.89±2.04 b | 71.22±2.14 b | 41.22±1.50 a | 37.43±0.68 b | 2.63±0.06 a | ||
| 低施肥 | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 50.33±0.88 b✭ | 79.33±1.20 a | 33.56±1.26 b | 41.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a |
| LF | D1 | 64.00±1.33 a✭ | 80.33±0.67 a✭ | 51.11±1.26 a | 27.67±1.20 b | 2.60±0.10 ab | |
| D3 | 62.11±1.39 a✭ | 80.56±1.17 a✭ | 50.89±1.35 a | 27.80±0.46 b✭ | 2.57±0.06 ab | ||
| D7 | 62.89±1.17 a✭ | 79.78±0.51 a | 51.33±1.67 a | 26.83±0.31 b | 2.53±0.06 b | ||
| 非碾压区 Unrolled area | CK | 45.22±1.07 b | 72.00±1.20 a | 33.56±1.26 b | 41.87±1.36 a | 2.70±0.10 a | |
| D1 | 58.11±1.17 a | 78.00±0.33 ab | 51.11±1.26 a | 26.40±0.46 b | 2.60±0.10 a | ||
| D3 | 56.89±0.51 a | 76.89±0.51 b | 51.44±1.35 a | 26.13±0.31 b | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 57.00±0.67 a | 75.78±1.58 c | 50.44±0.84 a | 26.17±0.31 b | 2.57±0.06 a | ||
| F值 | 碾压处理 Rolling treatment(RT) | 217.210*** | 151.270*** | 614.838*** | 1339.163*** | 2.133ns | |
| F value | 试验地 Site(S) | 62.710*** | 94.611*** | 2.623ns | 7.863** | 0.533ns | |
| 喷施处理 Spray treatmet(ST) | 262.122*** | 22.171*** | 477.380*** | 721.732*** | 3.956* | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地 RT×S | 44.522*** | 7.916* | 3.406ns | 1.060ns | 0.133ns | ||
| 碾压处理×喷施处理 RT×ST | 7.747*** | 4.457* | 11.602*** | 36.999*** | 1.156ns | ||
| 试验地×喷施处理 S×ST | 0.703ns | 3.061* | 0.677ns | 0.622ns | 0.952ns | ||
| 碾压处理×试验地×喷施处理 RT×S×ST | 0.952ns | 5.396** | 0.005ns | 1.336ns | 0.756ns |
Fig. 1. Effects of foliar fertilizer application timing on SPAD value of ratoon rice leaves HF represents the high-fertility experimental field, and LF represents the low-fertility experimental field. Under the same rolling treatment, different lowerase letters indicate significant difference among the spraying treatment(P<0.05).
| 试验地 Site | 碾压处理 Treatment | 喷施处理 Spray-treatment | 剑叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 剑叶宽 Flag leaf width (cm) | 平均叶长 Mean leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Mean leaf width (cm) | LAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥HF | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 20.17±0.96 b | 0.91±0.05 b | 24.43±0.79 b | 1.10±0.12 a | 1.78±0.14 b |
| D1 | 23.22±0.42 a | 1.04±0.05 a | 27.11±0.72 a | 0.96±0.02 b | 1.99±0.09 a | ||
| D3 | 21.21±0.45 b | 0.91±0.05 b | 28.10±0.75 a | 0.88±0.08 b | 1.75±0.09 b | ||
| D7 | 20.23±0.50 b | 0.92±0.08 b | 18.69±1.43c | 0.92±0.02 b | 1.42±0.06 c | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 18.20±0.37 b | 0.97±0.00 a | 19.78±1.08 c | 0.90±0.09 a | 1.98±0.20 a | |
| D1 | 20.79±0.88 a | 1.02±0.08 a | 20.32±0.35 c | 0.96±0.08 a | 1.87±0.03 a | ||
| D3 | 20.53±1.42 a | 0.96±0.10 a | 26.96±0.69 a | 0.89±0.10 a | 2.00±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 19.23±0.58 ab | 0.99±0.08 a | 23.97±1.79 b | 1.02±0.02 a | 1.90±0.05 a | ||
| 低施肥LF | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 20.62±1.05 b | 1.06±0.07 a | 25.21±0.87 a | 1.12±0.12 a | 1.40±0.07 b |
| D1 | 24.72±0.96 a | 0.92±0.05 b | 25.84±0.62 a | 0.94±0.02 b | 1.61±0.07 a | ||
| D3 | 23.76±0.60 a | 1.04±0.02 a | 26.51±0.73 a | 0.97±0.06 b | 1.73±0.09 b | ||
| D7 | 24.49±0.99 a | 0.96±0.08 ab | 26.06±0.27 a | 0.94±0.02 b | 1.72±0.08 c | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 19.46±0.44 b | 1.01±0.04 a | 21.68±1.15 b | 0.91±0.07 a | 1.57±0.07 b | |
| D1 | 20.86±0.57 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 23.68±0.36 a | 0.99±0.11 a | 1.69±0.03 a | ||
| D3 | 20.46±0.07 a | 0.87±0.09 a | 23.41±0.47 a | 1.01±0.04 a | 1.63±0.05 ab | ||
| D7 | 20.79±0.62 a | 0.90±0.09 a | 23.69±0.37 a | 0.99±0.11 a | 1.66±0.03 a |
Table 3. Effects of foliar fertilizer application timing on leaf traits and leaf area index of ratoon rice
| 试验地 Site | 碾压处理 Treatment | 喷施处理 Spray-treatment | 剑叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 剑叶宽 Flag leaf width (cm) | 平均叶长 Mean leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Mean leaf width (cm) | LAI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 高施肥HF | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 20.17±0.96 b | 0.91±0.05 b | 24.43±0.79 b | 1.10±0.12 a | 1.78±0.14 b |
| D1 | 23.22±0.42 a | 1.04±0.05 a | 27.11±0.72 a | 0.96±0.02 b | 1.99±0.09 a | ||
| D3 | 21.21±0.45 b | 0.91±0.05 b | 28.10±0.75 a | 0.88±0.08 b | 1.75±0.09 b | ||
| D7 | 20.23±0.50 b | 0.92±0.08 b | 18.69±1.43c | 0.92±0.02 b | 1.42±0.06 c | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 18.20±0.37 b | 0.97±0.00 a | 19.78±1.08 c | 0.90±0.09 a | 1.98±0.20 a | |
| D1 | 20.79±0.88 a | 1.02±0.08 a | 20.32±0.35 c | 0.96±0.08 a | 1.87±0.03 a | ||
| D3 | 20.53±1.42 a | 0.96±0.10 a | 26.96±0.69 a | 0.89±0.10 a | 2.00±0.06 a | ||
| D7 | 19.23±0.58 ab | 0.99±0.08 a | 23.97±1.79 b | 1.02±0.02 a | 1.90±0.05 a | ||
| 低施肥LF | 碾压区 Rolled area | CK | 20.62±1.05 b | 1.06±0.07 a | 25.21±0.87 a | 1.12±0.12 a | 1.40±0.07 b |
| D1 | 24.72±0.96 a | 0.92±0.05 b | 25.84±0.62 a | 0.94±0.02 b | 1.61±0.07 a | ||
| D3 | 23.76±0.60 a | 1.04±0.02 a | 26.51±0.73 a | 0.97±0.06 b | 1.73±0.09 b | ||
| D7 | 24.49±0.99 a | 0.96±0.08 ab | 26.06±0.27 a | 0.94±0.02 b | 1.72±0.08 c | ||
| 非碾压区 Non-rolled area | CK | 19.46±0.44 b | 1.01±0.04 a | 21.68±1.15 b | 0.91±0.07 a | 1.57±0.07 b | |
| D1 | 20.86±0.57 a | 0.92±0.07 a | 23.68±0.36 a | 0.99±0.11 a | 1.69±0.03 a | ||
| D3 | 20.46±0.07 a | 0.87±0.09 a | 23.41±0.47 a | 1.01±0.04 a | 1.63±0.05 ab | ||
| D7 | 20.79±0.62 a | 0.90±0.09 a | 23.69±0.37 a | 0.99±0.11 a | 1.66±0.03 a |
Fig. 5. Under various foliar fertilizer application timing on correlation analysis among various factors in ratoon rice GPP, Grains per panicle; TGW, Thousand grain weight; FR, Filled grain rate; NRS, Number of regenerated shoots; EP, Effective panicles; LSL, Length of flag leaf; WSL, Width of flag leaf; SPAD, SPAD value at booting stage; LAI, Leaf area index; SW, Stem weight; LW, Leaf weight; PW, Panicle weight; MRR, Milled rice ratio; BRR, Brown rice ratio; HRY, Head rice yield; CR, Chalkiness rate; AR, Aspect ratio; ST, Spray timing; RT, Rolling treatment. * indicates P≤0.05, ** indicates P≤0.01, and *** indicates P≤0.001.
| [1] | Liu B, Yuan S, Peng S. A synthesis analysis of the relationship between main and ratoon crop grain yields in ratoon rice[J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(9): 2170. |
| [2] | Xu F, Zhang L, Zhou X, Guo X, Zhu Y, Liu M, Xiong H, Jiang P. The ratoon rice system with high yield and high efficiency in China: Progress, trend of theory and technology[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, 272: 108282. |
| [3] | 宋美芳, 刘莉, 冉娇, 邹家龙, 李继福, 吴启侠, 朱建强. 南方再生稻高产理论与技术发展趋势[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(22): 26-27, 37. |
| Song M F, Liu L, Ran J, Zou J L, Li J F, Wu Q X, Zhu J Q. High-yielding theory and technology development trend of southern ratoon rice[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(22): 26-27, 37. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 汪浩, 张强, 张文地, 李思宇, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 腋芽萌发能力对再生稻产量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 205-216. |
| Wang H, Zhang Q, Zhang W D, Li S Y, Huang J, Zhu A, Liu L J. Advances in the effects of the ability of axillary bud germination on grain yield in ratoon rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(3): 205-216. (in Chinese) | |
| [5] | 陈斌. 再生稻全程机械化高产栽培技术[J]. 杂交水稻, 2019, 34(3): 44-46. |
| Chen B. High-yielding cultivation techniques of ratoon rice with whole process mechanization operation[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2019, 34(3): 44-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [6] | Ding Z, Li J, Hu R, Xiao D, Huang F, Peng S, Huang J, Li C, Hou J, Tian Y, Zhou J, Cao B. Root-zone fertilization of controlled-release urea reduces nitrous oxide emissions and ammonia volatilization under two irrigation practices in a ratoon rice field[J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 287: 108673. |
| [7] | Ding Z, Li J, Huang F, Hu R, Peng S, Huang J, Hou J, Zhou J, Li C, Su B, Xu M. One-time root-zone fertilization of controlled-release urea increases nitrogen use efficiency while reducing nitrogen loss risk in a ratoon rice field under two irrigation practices[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2024, 128(1): 13-33. |
| [8] | 陈晨, 陈雪琼, 陈月珍, 冯顾城, 束胜, 王俐翔, 陶建平, 谭国飞, 陈姝妍, 刘佩卓, 王雅慧, 熊爱生. 叶面施氮对芹菜叶绿素含量及代谢有关基因表达的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2023, 59(8): 1533-1542. |
| Chen C, Chen X Q, Chen Y Z, Feng G C, Shu S, Wang L X, Tao J P, Tan G F, Chen S Y, Liu P Z, Wang Y H, Xiong A S. Effects of foliar application of nitrogen fertilizer on chlorophyll content and expression of metabolism-related genes in celery[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2023, 59(8): 1533-1542. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | Zhang Q, Brown P H. The mechanism of foliar zinc absorption in pistachio and walnut[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1999, 124(3): 312-317. |
| [10] | Amanullah, Yasir M, Khalil S K, Jan M T, Khan A Z. Phenology, growth, and grain yield of maize as influenced by foliar applied urea at different growth stages[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2009, 33(1): 71-79. |
| [11] | Yadav K, Singh S P, Yadav D K, Yadav K G, Singh K, Yadav M. Influence of phosphorous and foliar nitrogen on the growth, quality and yield of kasuri methi (Trigonella corniculatal)[J]. Legume Research, 2024, 47(8): 1306-1312. |
| [12] | 张钧浩. 后期叶面追氮对小麦产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2022. |
| Zhang J H. Effects of late foliar N application on yield, quality and N uptake and utilization of wheat[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [13] | 蔡可为, 陈兴良. 水稻抽穗灌浆后喷施尿素对茎叶及籽粒氮素吸收的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2019, 49(5): 33-34. |
| Cai K W, Chen X L. Effect of nitrogen absorption on stems, leaves and seeds when spraying urea after rice tassel and grout[J]. North Rice, 2019, 49(5): 33-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [14] | Delfim J, Dameto L S, Moraes L A C, Moreira A. Nitrogen and nickel foliar application on grain yield, yield components, and quality of soybean[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2022, 53(10): 1226-1234. |
| [15] | 孙钰林. 不同施氮量和留桩高度对再生稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2020. |
| Sun Y L. Effects of different nitrogen application rates and piling height on ratooning rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [16] | Garde-Cerdan T, Gutiérrez-Gamboa G, Pérez-Álvarez E P, Rubio-Bretón P. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate to Graciano and Tempranillo vines: Effects on grape amino acid content during two consecutive vintages[J]. OENO One, 2019, 53(1): 1-9. |
| [17] | Ishfaq M, Kiran A, ur Rehman H, Farooq M, Ijaz N H, Nadeem F, Azeem I, Li X, Wakeel A. Foliar nutrition: Potential and challenges under multifaceted agriculture[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2022, 200: 104909. |
| [18] | Lončarić Z, Ivezić V, Kerovec D, Rebekić A. Foliar zinc-selenium and nitrogen fertilization affects content of Zn, Fe, Se, P, and Cd in wheat grain[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(8): 1549. |
| [19] | Rodrigues V A, Crusciol C A C, Bossolani J W, Portugal J R, Moretti L G, Bernart L, Vilela R G, Galeriani T, Lollato R P. Foliar nitrogen as stimulant fertilization alters carbon metabolism, reactive oxygen species scavenging, and enhances grain yield in a soybean-maize rotation[J]. Crop Science, 2021, 61(5): 3687-3701. |
| [20] | 朱启东, 聂军, 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 李东晖, 高雅洁, 谢雪. 翻压紫云英对早稻产量、干物质积累及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(6): 158-166. |
| Zhu Q D, Nie J, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Li D H, Gao Y J, Xie X. Effect of pulverized milk vetch on yield, dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic characteristics of early rice[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2022(6): 158-166. (in Chinese) | |
| [21] | Jiang S, Du B, Wu Q, Zhang H, Zhu J. Increasing pit-planting density of rice varieties with different panicle types to improves sink characteristics and rice yield under alternate wetting and drying irrigation[J]. Food and Energy Security, 2023, 12(1): e335. |
| [22] | El-Sanatawy A M, Ash-Shormillesy S M A I, Abou El-Yazied A, El-Gawad H G A, Azab E, Gobouri A A, Sitohy M, Osman A. Enhancing grain yield and nitrogen accumulation in wheat plants grown under a Mediterranean arid environment by foliar spray with papain-released whey peptides[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(10): 1913. |
| [23] | Fan X, Zhao W, Li J. Dynamic responses of physiological indexes in maize leaves to different spraying fertilizers at varying concentrations[J]. Irrigation Science, 2023, 41(2): 309-320. |
| [24] | Danso O P, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Niu S, Wang Y, Wu G, Wang X, Zheng L, Dai J, Yin X, Zhu R. Effects of foliar selenium, biochar, and pig manure on cadmium accumulation in rice grains and assessment of health risk[J]. Environmental Research, 2024, 256: 119160. |
| [25] | Jarecki W. The reaction of winter oilseed rape to different foliar fertilization with macro- and micronutrients[J]. Agriculture, 2021, 11(6): 515. |
| [26] | Hirooka Y, Homma K, Kodo T, Shiraiwa T, Soben K, Chann M, Tsujimoto K, Tamagawa K, Koike T. Evaluation of cultivation environment and management based on LAI measurement in farmers’ paddy fields in Pursat Province, Cambodia[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 199: 150-155. |
| [27] | Lin F F, Qiu L F, Deng J S, Shi Y Y, Chen L S, Wang K. Investigation of SPAD meter-based indices for estimating rice nitrogen status[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 71: S60-S65. |
| [28] | 陈嘉军, 林祥, 谷淑波, 王威雁, 张保军, 朱俊科, 王东. 花后叶面喷施尿素对冬小麦氮素吸收利用和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 277-285. |
| Chen J J, Lin X, Gu S B, Wang W Y, Zhang B J, Zhu J K, Wang D. Effects of foliar spraying of urea post anthesis on nitrogen uptake and utilization and yield in winter wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(1): 277-285. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [29] | 叶淑娟, 张宁, 成芳, 张成龙, 隋鲁鹏, 吴碧波, 巩养仓, 贺云新, 魏尚职, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 周仲华. 不同叶面肥喷施处理对棉花生长及产量品质的影响[J/OL]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(22): 90-96. |
| Ye S J, Zhang N, Cheng F, Zhang C L, Sui L P, WU B B, Gong Y C, He Y X, Wei S Z, Tu X J, Liu A Y, Zhou Z H. Effects of different foliar fertilizer spraying treatments on cotton growth, yield and quality[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(22): 90-96. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [30] | Pannico A, Modarelli G C, Stazi S R, Giaccone M, Romano R, Rouphael Y, Cirillo C. Foliar nutrition influences yield, nut quality and kernel composition in hazelnut cv mortarella[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(11): 2219. |
| [31] | 董洪瑞, 朱杰, 周勇, 李皓轩, 杨伟, 蒋梦蝶, 朱波, 聂江文, 刘章勇. 穗肥施钾量和叶面肥对稻虾共作水稻生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2024, 53(5): 30-39. |
| Dong H R, Zhu J, Zhou Y, Li H X, Yang W, Jiang M D, Zhu B, Nie J W, Liu Z Y. Effects of panicle potassium fertilizer rates and foliar fertilizer on rice physiological characteristics, yield and quality under crayfish-rice integrated system[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 53(5): 30-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [32] | 宋聪. 叶面喷施氨基酸对香稻产量、品质和香气的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2022. |
| Song C. Effects of foliar spraying of amino acids on yield, quality and aroma of fragrant rice[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [33] | 闫政东, 郭平毅, 原向阳, 肖晓璐, 王东明. 叶面喷施氮肥对张杂谷10号光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 38(2): 37-41. |
| Yan Z D, Guo P Y, Yuan X Y, Xiao X L, Wang D M. Effect of foliar application of nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of foxtail millet cultivar Zhangzagu 10 Setaria italic(L.) Beauv[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University: Natural Science Edition, 2018, 38(2): 37-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [34] | 王春晓, 郑永美, 矫岩林, 陈静, 李文金, 赵玉成, 华伟, 解晓梅, 孙学武, 于天一, 沈浦, 吴正锋, 王才斌. 以15N示踪技术分析叶面施氮对花生氮素吸收、分配及利用率的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46(4): 881-888. |
| Wang C X, Zheng Y M, Jiao Y L, Chen J, Li W J, Zhao Y C, Hua W, Xie X M, Sun X W, Yu T Y, Shen P, Wu Z F, Wang C B. Effects of foliar topdressing of labeled urea(15N) on nitrogen absorption, distribution and utilization of peanut[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2024, 46(4): 881-888. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | LIAO Ping, LIU Ruotong, MENG Yi, WENG Wenan, DU Hanmeng, LI Jun, GAO Hui, ZHANG Hongcheng. Effects of One-time Basal Application of Controlled-release Blended Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Lodging-related Traits [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(4): 469-475. |
| [2] | ZHONG Xiaoyuan, WANG Zhong, CHEN Lei, ZHANG Xiaoli, HUANG Yan, ZHU Defeng, WANG Yaliang, QIN Yong, GAO Guoqing, ZHANG Longkui, TANG Maoyan, LIANG Tianfeng. Effects of Precision Drill Sowing on Transplanting Quality, Dry Matter Production, and Yield of Machine-transplanted Rice in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(4): 487-501. |
| [3] | MA Yihu, ZHOU Cui, ZHU Lianfeng, YU Shanhong. Effects of Key Cultivation Measures on Grain Yield Formation, Quality and Growth Characteristics of High-quality Super Rice Huazheyou 261 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(4): 502-518. |
| [4] | ZHAO Chunfang, LUO Lei, ZHAO Qingyong, ZHUANG Lihua, GUAN Ju, CHEN Tao, ZHU Zhen, ZHANG Yadong, WANG Cailin. Effects of Water-saving Irrigation on Yield Formation and Root Morphology of High-quality japonica Cultivars [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(4): 519-530. |
| [5] | ZHENG Linna, LING Xiaoxia, YANG Xianke, PENG Shaobing, HUANG Jianliang, XIONG Dongliang. Research on Comprehensive Benefit of Spring Maize-late Rice Rotation System: Current Status, Challenges and Prospects [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(3): 281-291. |
| [6] | SHEN Zhida, MA Shihao, HUANG Siyuan, ZHANG Yangyang, LIAO Shipeng, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Planting Methods and Fertilization on Root Morphology Lodging Resistance and Yield in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(2): 253-263. |
| [7] | LI Xingyi, CHEN Ling, SHAO Jiantao, XIAO Suqin, LI Jinlu, FU Huixian, YIN Fuyou, ZHANG Jianhong, CHENG Zaiquan, LIU Li. Progress in Molecular Genetic Research on Co-regulation of Grain Yield and Starch Quality in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(1): 1-17. |
| [8] | WANG Yixin, LIN Shen, MA Liuyang, CHEN Long, FENG Baohua, NI Shen, WEI Xiangjin, HE Jiwai, CHEN Tianxiao. Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake and Yield in Rice by the Alanine Aminotransferase Gene OsAlaAT4 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(1): 51-60. |
| [9] | XIAO Wuwei, ZHANG Yuqing, ZHU Chenguang, TIAN Guisheng, CAI Yuehong, WANG Fei, XIONG Dongliang, HUANG Jianliang, PENG Shaobing, CUI Kehui. Effects of Application Time and Rate of Bud-promoting Fertilizer on Main Crop Quality and Annual Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(1): 118-130. |
| [10] | CHEN Ling, LIN Wenying, LIANG Limei, OUYANG Younan, YE Shenghai, JI Zhijuan. Flowering Habits of Rice and Its Application in Breeding japonica Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 731-743. |
| [11] | ZHANG Lanlan, LIU Dilin, MA Xiaozhi, HUO Xing, KONG Le, LI Jinhua, FU Chongyun, LIAO Yilong, ZHU Manshan, ZENG Xueqin, LIU Wuge, WANG Feng. Quality Traits Affecting Eating Quality in indica Rice Under Different Nitrogen Application Levels in Early and Late Seasons in South China [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 832-846. |
| [12] | BIAN Jinlong, REN Gaolei, QIU Shi, XU Fangfu, HU Zhonglei, ZHANG Hongcheng, WEI Haiyan. Effect of Application Methods of Mixed Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Good Taste Quality japonica Rice Under Different Mechanical Transplanting Methods in the Huaibei Region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 847-862. |
| [13] | LI Xing, ZHANG Ruichun, CHEN Ge, XIE Jiaxin, XIAO Zhengwu, CAO Fangbo, CHEN Jiana, HUANG Min. Yield Formation and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Machine-transplanted Late-season Rice with Short Growth Duration [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 863-872. |
| [14] | LUO Zizi, ZHANG Dejun, CHEN Dongdong, BI Miao, ZHU Yuhan, HAN Xu, WU Qiang, LI Yuechen. Characteristics of Spatiotemporal Evolution of Thermal Resources in Ratoon Rice at Heading and Grain-filling Stages in Sichuan Basin in 1981−2022 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 873-886. |
| [15] | LU Tingting, YAN Wenhui, SU Xinquan, ZENG Luohua, HUA Liqin, CHEN Jianghua, FENG Baohua, WANG Yuexing, HU Jiang, FU Guanfu. Research Progress on Physiological and Ecological Mechanisms and Regulation Pathways of Yield, Quality and Stress Resistance Response in Perennial Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(5): 586-600. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||