研究报告

不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响

展开
  • 1东北农业大学 资源与环境学院,哈尔滨 150030
    2东北农业大学 寒地粮食作物种质创新与生理生态教育部重点实验室,哈尔滨 150030
    3哈尔滨理工大学 材料科学与化学工程学院,哈尔滨 150040
* email: pxl0508@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-04-17

  修回日期: 2023-06-07

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-14

基金资助

黑土地保护与利用科技创新工程专项(XDA28100302);现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-1-32);寒地粮食作物种质创新与生理生态教育部重点实验室开放课题(CXSTOP2021009)

Effects of Straw Return Rate on Soil Reducing Substances and Rice Growth Under Different Soil Conditions

Expand
  • 1College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    2Key Laboratory of Germplasm Enhancement, Physiology and Ecology of Food Crops in Cold Region, Ministry of Education, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
    3School of Material Science and Chemical Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150040, China

Received date: 2023-04-17

  Revised date: 2023-06-07

  Online published: 2024-03-14

摘要

【目的】在不同土壤上研究水稻秸秆还田后还原性物质的形成及其与水稻生长的关系。【方法】在砂壤土(S1)和粉壤土(S2)上进行2年盆栽试验,模拟低(RL)中(RM)高(RH)产量下秸秆全量还田,以秸秆不还田(R0)为对照,测定土壤还原性物质总量、Eh、亚铁离子、锰离子和铵态氮含量,分析水稻分蘖、根系干质量、根系活力和水稻产量等指标。结果秸秆还田后生育前期土壤Eh显著降低,还原性物质数量增加,S2的还原性物质高于砂壤土。与对照相比,2021年在移栽后56 d之前秸秆还田处理还原性物质总量、铁和锰离子含量分别提高了8.36%~199.64%、1.43%~160.03%和8.43%~57.68%。2022年在移栽后45 d前对应增加了2.95%~163.61%、0.77%~19.74%和3.28%~64.96%。随着秸秆还田量增加,还原性物质总量、铁和锰含量有增加趋势。在移栽后56 d前(2021年)和35 d前(2022年)秸秆还田显著增加了土壤铵态氮含量11.28%~50.67%和10.79%~351.53%。秸秆还田使水稻分蘖期和拔节期的根系干质量降低15.06%~45.80%,秸秆还田显著降低了砂壤土上水稻分蘖期和拔节期的根系活力,在S2土壤上RL和RM增加了拔节期根系活力,RH降低了根系活力。秸秆还田后水稻分蘖数在水稻生育期降低了7.23%~48.44%,干物质积累量降低了3.59%~43.57%。RL和RM处理第二年水稻产量降低不明显,RH处理2年均显著减产。砂壤土中氧化还原电位高于S2,S2还原性物质总量、锰离子含量、铵态氮含量、根系干质量、根系活力、分蘖数、干物质积累量和产量均高于砂壤土。结论在本研究条件下,秸秆还田显著增加还原性物质总量,抑制水稻早期生长。黏重土壤上秸秆全量还田引起减产,砂壤土上中低产量下秸秆全量还田不会造成穗数显著降低,因促进大穗形成不会造成显著减产。采取有效措施减少秸秆还田下还原性物质危害是秸秆还田技术优化的重点。

本文引用格式

彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲 . 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024 , 38(2) : 198 -210 . DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230404

Abstract

【Objective】The study investigates the formation of reductive substances following rice straw incorporation and its impact on rice growth across different soil types.【Method】A two-year pot experiment simulated full straw incorporation at low (RL), medium (RM), and high (RH) rates on sandy loam (S1) and silty loam (S2) soils, with no straw incorporation (R0) as the control. Total soil reducing substances, Eh, ferrous ions, manganese ions, and ammonium nitrogen contents were measured, alongside analyses of rice tillering, root dry weight, root vigor, and rice yield.【Results】Soil Eh decreased significantly, and the concentrations of reducing substances increased after straw incorporation, with S2 exhibiting higher levels than S1. Compared to the control, straw incorporation up to 56 days after transplanting in 2021 increased the levels of total reducing substances, Fe, and Mn by 8.36%−199.64%, 1.43%−160.03%, and 8.43%− 57.68%, respectively. Similar increases occurred before 45 days after transplanting in 2022, ranging from 2.95% to 163.61%, 0.77% to 19.74%, and 3.28% to 64.96%. There was a positive correlation between straw incorporation and the levels of total reducing substances, Fe, and Mn. Straw incorporation significantly elevated soil ammonium N content by 11.28%−50.67% and 10.79%−351.53% before 56 days (2021) and 35 days (2022) after transplanting, respectively. Root dry weight at the tillering and jointing stages decreased by 15.06%−45.80% due to straw incorporation. In S1 soil, RL and RM increased root vigor at the jointing stage, while RH decreased root vigor on S2 soil. The number of rice tillers and dry matter accumulation decreased by 7.23%−48.44% and 3.59%−43.57%, respectively, during the rice reproductive period after straw incorporation. Rice yield was not significantly affected in the second year of RL and RM treatments, whereas RH treatment significantly reduced yield in both years. S1 exhibited higher oxidation-reduction potential than S2, with S2 displaying higher levels of reducing substances, manganese ions, ammonium nitrogen, root dry weight, root activity, tiller number, dry matter accumulation, and yield.【Conclusion】Straw incorporation increases the early-stage content of reducing substances and inhibits rice growth in cold areas. The impact of straw return on rice yield varies with soil type, with significant yield reductions observed on sticky soil following straw incorporation. Medium straw incorporation does not significantly affect the number of tillers but promotes the formation of larger panicle without reducing yield significantly. Optimizing straw incorporation technology requires effective measures to mitigate the negative effects of reducing substances.

参考文献

[1] 韩云哲, 徐伟豪, 柳洪良, 朴雪梅, 白学锋, 杨学智. 水稻秸秆还田与施氮量对水稻生育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022(12): 75-78.
[1] Han Y Z, Xu W H, Liu H L, Piao X M, Bai X F, Yang X Z. Effects of rice straw return and nitrogen application on rice growth, yield and quality[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(12): 75-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 张巩亮, 王宇先, 刘玉涛, 徐莹莹, 杨慧莹, 高盼, 王晨. 秸秆还田和增施氮肥对寒地水稻产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023(1): 8-12.
[2] Zhang G L, Wang Y X, Liu Y T, Xu Y Y, Yang H Y, Gao P, Wang C. Effects of straw returning and additional nitrogen fertilizer application on rice yield in cold regions[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023(1): 8-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] 宋俊鸣. 寒地稻草还田对土壤还原性物质和水稻生长的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2021.
[3] Song J M. Effects of rice straw returning on soil reducing substances and rice growth in cold region[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 王子阳, 陈婉华, 袁伟, 周正萍, 刘世平. 长期秸秆还田与耕作方式对水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(3): 17-20.
[4] Wang Z Y, Chen W H, Yuan W, Zhou Z P, Liu S P. Effects of long-term straw returning and tillage ways on yield and quality of rice[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(3): 17-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Zhai S L, Xu C F, Wu Y C, Liu J, Meng Y L, Yang H S. Long-term ditch-buried straw return alters soil carbon sequestration, nitrogen availability and grain production in a rice-wheat rotation system[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2021, 72(4): 245-254.
[6] 杨思存, 霍琳, 王建成. 秸秆还田的生化他感效应研究初报[J]. 西北农业学报, 2005(1): 52-56.
[6] Yang S C, Huo L, Wang J C. Allelopathic effect of straw returning[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2005(1): 52-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 李学垣, 韩德乾. 绿肥压青后水稻生育期间土壤中还原性物质的动态变化[J]. 土壤学报, 1966(1): 59-64.
[7] Li X Y, Han D Q. The dynamical equilibrium of soil reductive substances after green-manuring for rice culture[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1966(1): 59-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 潘林林. 稻草不同处理方式对盐渍型水稻土铁锰形态和还原性物质的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[8] Pan L L. Effects of different rice straw addition methods on iron and manganese forms and reducing substances in coastal saline paddy soil[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 王红妮, 王学春, 赵长坤, 李军, 秦俭, 龙祖利. 油菜秸秆还田对水稻根系、分蘖和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1243-1252.
[9] Wang H N, Wang X C, Zhao C K, Li J, Qin J, Long Z L. Effects of oilseed rape straw incorporation on root, tiller and grain yield of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(4): 1243-1252. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 韩新忠, 朱利群, 杨敏芳, 俞琦, 卞新民. 不同小麦秸秆还田量对水稻生长、土壤微生物生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(11): 2192-2199.
[10] Han X Z, Zhu L Q, Yang M F, Yu Q, Bian X M. Effects of different amount of wheat straw returning on rice growth, soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(11): 2192-2199. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 金鑫. 秸秆还田对稻田土壤还原性物质和水稻生长的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013.
[11] Jin X. Effects of straw application on rice growth and redox substance in rice fields[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Gao H J, Chen X W, Liang A Z, Peng C, Zhu P, Zhang X Z. Combined effects of straw returning and nitrogen fertilizer application on crop yield and nitrogen utilization in the chernozem of northeast China[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2022, 20(1): 893-903.
[13] 黄晶, 王学春, 郅正鸿, 陶诗顺. 小麦秸秆翻埋还田对水稻秧苗生长及土壤性状的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2016, 34(3): 276-281.
[13] Huang J, Wang X C, Zhi Z H, Tao S Z. Effect of wheat straw residue incorporation on characteristics of rice seedling growth and soil properties[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016, 34(3): 276-281. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 金鑫, 蔡林运, 李刚华, 侯朋福, 王绍华. 小麦秸秆全量还田对水稻生长及稻田氧化还原物质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(5): 80-85.
[14] Jin X, Cai L Y, Li G H, Hou P F, Wang S H. Effects of all wheat crop straw application on rice growth and redox substance in rice fields[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2013(5): 80-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 张赓, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, 汪金平, 熊又升, 吴礼树, 任涛, 张智. 不同措施对冷浸田土壤还原性物质含量及水稻产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(27): 153-157.
[15] Zhang G, Li X K, Lu J W, Wang J P, Xiong Y S, Wu L S, Ren T, Zhang Z. Effects of different measures on the concentration of reducing substances of soil and yield of rice in cold waterlogged paddy field[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(27): 153-157. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang S, Hong Y, Wang Z. Rice and cold stress: Methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci[J]. Rice, 2014, 7(1): 24.
[17] Takakai F, Hirano S, Harakawa Y, Hatakeyama K, Yasuda K, Sato K, Kimura K, Kaneta Y. Fate of fertilizer-derived N applied to enhance rice straw decomposition in a paddy field during the fallow season under cool temperature conditions[J]. Agriculture, 2018, 8(4): 50.
[18] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[18] Lu R K. Methods for Agrochemical Analysis of Soil[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 王伟. 耕作培肥模式对寒地稻田土壤养分及水稻产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019.
[19] Wang W. Effects of tillage and fertilization on soil fertility and rice yield in cold paddy fields[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] 王红妮, 王学春, 陶诗顺, 李军. 秸秆残茬对低温潜沼性稻田土壤还原性物质含量及稻谷产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3): 179-183.
[20] Wang H N, Wang X C, Tao S S, Li J. Effect of straw returning on soil reducing substance and rice grain yield in gleyed paddy field[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3): 179-183. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] 郭腾飞. 稻田秸秆分解的碳氮互作机理[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
[21] Guo T F. The mechanism of carbon and nitrogen interaction during rice straw decomposition[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22] 葛选良, 于洋, 钱春荣. 还田作物秸秆腐解特性及相关影响因素的研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(7): 17-21.
[22] Ge X L, Yu Y, Qian C R. Returning crop straw: A review of decomposing features and influencing factors[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2017, 7(7): 17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 丁昌璞. 水稻土中的还原性物质[J]. 土壤学进展, 1984(2): 1-12.
[23] Ding C P. Reducing substances in paddy soil[J]. Progress in Soil Science, 1984(2): 1-12. (in Chinese)
[24] 叶昌, 黄秀, 褚光, 徐春梅, 陈松, 章秀福, 王丹英. 水稻因土质施肥方法探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(1): 11-15.
[24] Ye C, Huang X, Chu G, Xu C M, Chen S, Zhang X F, Wang D Y. Discussion on fertility characteristics of different texture soils and rice fertilization method[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(1): 11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 张耀尹. 秸秆还田对土壤中氮素转化的作用机制[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2021.
[25] Zhang Y Y. Mechanism of straw returning on nitrogen transformation in soil[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2009, 28(3): 139-163.
[27] Zhang L C, Yuan J, Zhang M Q, Zhang Y, Wang L, Li J. Long term effects of crop rotation and fertilization on crop yield stability in southeast China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 1-10.
[28] Akter U T, Mizanur R M, Moshiul I M. Integrated nutrient management for rice yield, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(1): 138.
[29] Wang R, Li X, Hou L, Liu M, Zheng Y, Yin G. Nitrogen fixation in surface sediments of the East China Sea: Occurrence and environmental implications[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 137: 542-548.
[30] Fauzi A, Skidmore A K, Heitkönig I M A, van Gils H, Schlerf M. Eutrophication of mangroves linked to depletion of foliar and soil base cations[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2014, 186(12): 8487-8498.
[31] Yang S Y, Hao D L, Song Z Z, Yang Z G, Wang L, Su Y H. RNA-Seq analysis of differentially expressed genes in rice under varied nitrogen supplies[J]. Gene, 2015, 555(2): 305-317.
[32] 姚军, 张有山. 土壤质地类型与其基础肥力相关性[J]. 北京农业科学, 1998(4): 34-35.
[32] Yao J, Zhang Y S. Correlation between soil texture type and basic fertility[J]. Beijing Agricultural Sciences, 1998(4): 34-35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Liu H, Luo G Q, Hu H Y, Zhang Q, Yang J K. Emission characteristics of nitrogen- and sulfur-containing odorous compounds during different sewage sludge chemical conditioning processes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 235-236: 289-306.
[34] 徐国伟, 翟志华, 杨久军, 王贺正, 陈明灿. 秸秆还田量对直播稻苗期生长和土壤的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(19): 1-7.
[34] Xu G W, Zhai Z H, Yang J J, Wang H Z, Chen M C. Effects of different amount of wheat-residue application on growth of direct-seeding rice and characteristics of soil[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 42(19): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] Zhen X, Li X, Yu J, Xu F. OsATG8c-mediated increased autophagy regulates the yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(19): 4956.
[36] Yoneyama T, Tanno F, Tatsumi J, Mae T. Whole-plant dynamic system of nitrogen use for vegetative growth and grain filling in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) as revealed through the production of 350 grains from a germinated seed over 150 days: A review and synthesis[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1151.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: