Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 91-98.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230608
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Qian1, LONG Liping1, WU Feng2, CHENG Xuejiang2, WU Biqiu1, LI Cheng1, HUANG Suosheng1, HUANG Fengkuan1, LING Yan1,*()
Received:
2023-06-29
Revised:
2023-10-18
Online:
2024-01-10
Published:
2024-01-16
Contact:
* email:
黄芊1, 龙丽萍1, 吴锋2, 程学江2, 吴碧球1, 李成1, 黄所生1, 黄凤宽1, 凌炎1,*()
通讯作者:
* email: 基金资助:
HUANG Qian, LONG Liping, WU Feng, CHENG Xuejiang, WU Biqiu, LI Cheng, HUANG Suosheng, HUANG Fengkuan, LING Yan. Study on the Species and Spatial Distribution Patterns of Overwintering Rice Stem Borers in Guangxi Zhuang Automomous Region, China[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 91-98.
黄芊, 龙丽萍, 吴锋, 程学江, 吴碧球, 李成, 黄所生, 黄凤宽, 凌炎. 广西越冬稻螟种类及其空间分布型研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 91-98.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230608
样地号 Field No. | 调查地点 Investigation site | 调查虫数 No. of insects | 大螟 Sesamia inferens | 二化螟 Chilo suppressalis | 三化螟 Scirpophaga incertulas | 台湾稻螟 Chilo auricilius | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | |||||||
桂东北 Northeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
1 | 桂林市永福县广福乡龙溪村下坪屯 | 222 | 8 | 3.60 | 214 | 96.40 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
2 | 柳州市柳南区流山镇肯巴村 | 22 | 3 | 13.64 | 19 | 86.36 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
3 | 柳州市柳江区白朋镇 | 90 | 6 | 6.67 | 84 | 93.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
4 | 梧州市滕县滕州镇 | 74 | 3 | 4.05 | 64 | 86.49 | 7 | 9.46 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
5 | 桂林市全州镇绕山村 | 190 | 52 | 27.37 | 138 | 72.63 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
6 | 贺州市八步区信都会灵村 | 47 | 9 | 19.15 | 38 | 80.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
桂西北 Northeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
7 | 百色市田阳区白育镇 | 42 | 16 | 38.10 | 26 | 61.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
8 | 河池市宜州区洛西镇和平村 | 319 | 9 | 2.82 | 25 | 7.84 | 285 | 89.34 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
9 | 靖西市新清镇鹅泉村 | 31 | 4 | 12.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.23 | 26 | 83.87 | ||||
10 | 百色市乐业县同乐镇 | 70 | 15 | 21.43 | 30 | 42.86 | 0 | 0.00 | 25 | 35.71 | ||||
桂东南 Southeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
11 | 玉林市博白县亚山镇盘古岭民新村 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
12 | 贵港市港南区木格镇良坡村 | 15 | 2 | 13.33 | 13 | 86.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
13 | 来宾市武宣县思灵镇双林村 | 13 | 0 | 0.00 | 13 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
14 | 贵港市桂平市金桂田园综合体 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | 10 | 83.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
15 | 来宾市兴宾区寺山镇贺山村 | 33 | 1 | 3.03 | 32 | 96.97 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
16 | 玉林市博白县龙潭镇东岸村 | 135 | 39 | 28.89 | 87 | 64.44 | 0 | 0.00 | 9 | 6.67 | ||||
17 | 玉林市陆川县马坡镇良厚村 | 55 | 7 | 12.73 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 48 | 87.27 | ||||
18 | 贵港市港北区庆丰镇鄱岭村 | 99 | 6 | 6.06 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 93 | 93.94 | ||||
19 | 来宾市兴宾区三五镇碑口村 | 327 | 13 | 3.98 | 284 | 86.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 30 | 9.17 | ||||
桂西南Southeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
20 | 南宁市西乡塘区广西农业科学院 | 43 | 24 | 55.81 | 19 | 44.19 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
21 | 崇左市江州镇板麦村 | 178 | 32 | 17.98 | 146 | 82.02 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
广西沿海地区 Coastal area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
22 | 北流市民安镇才旺村 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
23 | 钦州市钦南区 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
24 | 钦州市浦北县 | 12 | 11 | 91.67 | 1 | 8.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
25 | 北海市合浦县星岛湖镇下洋村 | 47 | 0 | 0.00 | 47 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
26 | 钦州市钦南区大番坡沙坡村 | 8 | 8 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
27 | 防城港市防城区滩营乡滩营村 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 100.00 |
Table 1. Investigation on the species of rice stem borers in paddy fields in Guangxi.
样地号 Field No. | 调查地点 Investigation site | 调查虫数 No. of insects | 大螟 Sesamia inferens | 二化螟 Chilo suppressalis | 三化螟 Scirpophaga incertulas | 台湾稻螟 Chilo auricilius | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | 虫数 Number | 比例 Ratio/% | |||||||
桂东北 Northeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
1 | 桂林市永福县广福乡龙溪村下坪屯 | 222 | 8 | 3.60 | 214 | 96.40 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
2 | 柳州市柳南区流山镇肯巴村 | 22 | 3 | 13.64 | 19 | 86.36 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
3 | 柳州市柳江区白朋镇 | 90 | 6 | 6.67 | 84 | 93.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
4 | 梧州市滕县滕州镇 | 74 | 3 | 4.05 | 64 | 86.49 | 7 | 9.46 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
5 | 桂林市全州镇绕山村 | 190 | 52 | 27.37 | 138 | 72.63 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
6 | 贺州市八步区信都会灵村 | 47 | 9 | 19.15 | 38 | 80.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
桂西北 Northeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
7 | 百色市田阳区白育镇 | 42 | 16 | 38.10 | 26 | 61.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
8 | 河池市宜州区洛西镇和平村 | 319 | 9 | 2.82 | 25 | 7.84 | 285 | 89.34 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
9 | 靖西市新清镇鹅泉村 | 31 | 4 | 12.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 3.23 | 26 | 83.87 | ||||
10 | 百色市乐业县同乐镇 | 70 | 15 | 21.43 | 30 | 42.86 | 0 | 0.00 | 25 | 35.71 | ||||
桂东南 Southeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
11 | 玉林市博白县亚山镇盘古岭民新村 | 13 | 13 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
12 | 贵港市港南区木格镇良坡村 | 15 | 2 | 13.33 | 13 | 86.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
13 | 来宾市武宣县思灵镇双林村 | 13 | 0 | 0.00 | 13 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
14 | 贵港市桂平市金桂田园综合体 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | 10 | 83.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
15 | 来宾市兴宾区寺山镇贺山村 | 33 | 1 | 3.03 | 32 | 96.97 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
16 | 玉林市博白县龙潭镇东岸村 | 135 | 39 | 28.89 | 87 | 64.44 | 0 | 0.00 | 9 | 6.67 | ||||
17 | 玉林市陆川县马坡镇良厚村 | 55 | 7 | 12.73 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 48 | 87.27 | ||||
18 | 贵港市港北区庆丰镇鄱岭村 | 99 | 6 | 6.06 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 93 | 93.94 | ||||
19 | 来宾市兴宾区三五镇碑口村 | 327 | 13 | 3.98 | 284 | 86.85 | 0 | 0.00 | 30 | 9.17 | ||||
桂西南Southeast area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
20 | 南宁市西乡塘区广西农业科学院 | 43 | 24 | 55.81 | 19 | 44.19 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
21 | 崇左市江州镇板麦村 | 178 | 32 | 17.98 | 146 | 82.02 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
广西沿海地区 Coastal area of Guangxi | ||||||||||||||
22 | 北流市民安镇才旺村 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
23 | 钦州市钦南区 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
24 | 钦州市浦北县 | 12 | 11 | 91.67 | 1 | 8.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
25 | 北海市合浦县星岛湖镇下洋村 | 47 | 0 | 0.00 | 47 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
26 | 钦州市钦南区大番坡沙坡村 | 8 | 8 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
27 | 防城港市防城区滩营乡滩营村 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 100.00 |
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance(S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded Degree(M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating (M*/m) index | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 0.29 | 3.47 | 0.42 |
2 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 1.36 | 10.47 | 2.23 | 0.11 | 9.47 | 1.23 |
3 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.70 | 7.00 | 1.60 | 0.17 | 6.00 | 0.60 |
5 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 2.05 | 41.00 | 3.00 | 0.03 | 40.00 | 2.00 |
6 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 2.00 | 20.00 | 2.90 | 0.05 | 19.00 | 1.90 |
7 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.82 | 6.33 | 1.69 | 0.19 | 5.33 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.87 | 2.29 | 2.50 | 2.88 | 2.63 | 0.53 | 1.88 | 1.63 |
9 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 1.12 | 4.16 | 1.85 | 0.32 | 3.16 | 0.85 |
10 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.22 | 5.55 | 2.00 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1.00 |
11 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 1.15 | 7.67 | 2.00 | 0.15 | 6.67 | 1.00 |
12 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 1.08 | 4.93 | 1.86 | 0.25 | 3.93 | 0.86 |
13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.98 | −2.22 | −0.45 | −0.02 |
14 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 1.50 | 21.41 | 2.43 | 0.05 | 20.41 | 1.43 |
15 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.70 | 7.00 | 1.60 | 0.17 | 6.00 | 0.60 |
16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | − | − | 0.00 |
17 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 1.10 | 2.75 | 1.70 | 0.57 | 1.75 | 0.70 |
19 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.68 | 4.56 | 1.53 | 0.28 | 3.56 | 0.53 |
20 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.98 | −2.22 | −0.45 | −0.02 |
22 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.97 | −1.47 | −0.68 | −0.03 |
23 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 4.00 | 1.00 |
24 | 0.53 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 3.63 | 2.40 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 1.40 |
25 | 0.65 | 1.38 | 1.77 | 2.73 | 2.12 | 0.58 | 1.73 | 1.12 |
26 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.57 | 3.16 | 1.39 | 0.46 | 2.16 | 0.39 |
Table 2. Spatial distribution pattern of the S. inferens overwintering on rice stubbles.
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance(S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded Degree(M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating (M*/m) index | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 0.29 | 3.47 | 0.42 |
2 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 1.36 | 10.47 | 2.23 | 0.11 | 9.47 | 1.23 |
3 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.70 | 7.00 | 1.60 | 0.17 | 6.00 | 0.60 |
5 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 2.05 | 41.00 | 3.00 | 0.03 | 40.00 | 2.00 |
6 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 2.00 | 20.00 | 2.90 | 0.05 | 19.00 | 1.90 |
7 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.82 | 6.33 | 1.69 | 0.19 | 5.33 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.87 | 2.29 | 2.50 | 2.88 | 2.63 | 0.53 | 1.88 | 1.63 |
9 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 1.12 | 4.16 | 1.85 | 0.32 | 3.16 | 0.85 |
10 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.22 | 5.55 | 2.00 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1.00 |
11 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 1.15 | 7.67 | 2.00 | 0.15 | 6.67 | 1.00 |
12 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 1.08 | 4.93 | 1.86 | 0.25 | 3.93 | 0.86 |
13 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.98 | −2.22 | −0.45 | −0.02 |
14 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 1.50 | 21.41 | 2.43 | 0.05 | 20.41 | 1.43 |
15 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.70 | 7.00 | 1.60 | 0.17 | 6.00 | 0.60 |
16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | − | − | 0.00 |
17 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 1.10 | 2.75 | 1.70 | 0.57 | 1.75 | 0.70 |
19 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.68 | 4.56 | 1.53 | 0.28 | 3.56 | 0.53 |
20 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.98 | −2.22 | −0.45 | −0.02 |
22 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.97 | −1.47 | −0.68 | −0.03 |
23 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 4.00 | 1.00 |
24 | 0.53 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 3.63 | 2.40 | 0.38 | 2.63 | 1.40 |
25 | 0.65 | 1.38 | 1.77 | 2.73 | 2.12 | 0.58 | 1.73 | 1.12 |
26 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.57 | 3.16 | 1.39 | 0.46 | 2.16 | 0.39 |
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance(S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree(M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 3.57 | 10.62 | 5.54 | 1.55 | 2.97 | 1.81 | 0.55 | 1.97 |
4 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.60 | 5.00 | 2.28 | 0.25 | 4.00 | 1.28 |
5 | 0.78 | 2.88 | 3.47 | 4.45 | 3.69 | 0.29 | 3.45 | 2.69 |
6 | 1.40 | 4.35 | 3.51 | 2.51 | 3.11 | 0.66 | 1.51 | 2.11 |
8 | 2.30 | 6.38 | 4.07 | 1.77 | 2.77 | 1.30 | 0.77 | 1.77 |
9 | 0.43 | 1.06 | 1.90 | 4.41 | 2.47 | 0.29 | 3.41 | 1.47 |
10 | 4.73 | 12.10 | 6.29 | 1.33 | 2.56 | 3.04 | 0.33 | 1.56 |
11 | 0.42 | 1.06 | 1.94 | 4.63 | 2.52 | 0.28 | 3.63 | 1.52 |
13 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.22 | 5.55 | 2.00 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1.00 |
16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
17 | 0.32 | 0.80 | 1.82 | 5.69 | 2.5 | 0.21 | 4.69 | 1.50 |
18 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 4.31 | 1.73 | 0.30 | 3.31 | 0.73 |
19 | 0.63 | 2.30 | 3.28 | 5.21 | 3.65 | 0.24 | 4.21 | 2.65 |
20 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.99 | 5.84 | 1.82 | 0.21 | 4.84 | 0.82 |
21 | 0.53 | 1.30 | 1.98 | 3.74 | 2.45 | 0.36 | 2.74 | 1.45 |
22 | 1.07 | 3.55 | 3.39 | 3.17 | 3.32 | 0.46 | 2.17 | 2.32 |
23 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 1.90 | 3.80 | 2.40 | 0.36 | 2.80 | 1.40 |
24 | 2.43 | 7.23 | 4.41 | 1.81 | 2.98 | 1.23 | 0.81 | 1.98 |
25 | 1.45 | 5.40 | 4.17 | 2.88 | 3.72 | 0.53 | 1.88 | 2.72 |
26 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
Table 3. Spatial distribution pattern of the C. suppressalis overwintering on rice stubbles.
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance(S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree(M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 3.57 | 10.62 | 5.54 | 1.55 | 2.97 | 1.81 | 0.55 | 1.97 |
4 | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.60 | 5.00 | 2.28 | 0.25 | 4.00 | 1.28 |
5 | 0.78 | 2.88 | 3.47 | 4.45 | 3.69 | 0.29 | 3.45 | 2.69 |
6 | 1.40 | 4.35 | 3.51 | 2.51 | 3.11 | 0.66 | 1.51 | 2.11 |
8 | 2.30 | 6.38 | 4.07 | 1.77 | 2.77 | 1.30 | 0.77 | 1.77 |
9 | 0.43 | 1.06 | 1.90 | 4.41 | 2.47 | 0.29 | 3.41 | 1.47 |
10 | 4.73 | 12.10 | 6.29 | 1.33 | 2.56 | 3.04 | 0.33 | 1.56 |
11 | 0.42 | 1.06 | 1.94 | 4.63 | 2.52 | 0.28 | 3.63 | 1.52 |
13 | 0.22 | 0.44 | 1.22 | 5.55 | 2.00 | 0.22 | 4.55 | 1.00 |
16 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
17 | 0.32 | 0.80 | 1.82 | 5.69 | 2.5 | 0.21 | 4.69 | 1.50 |
18 | 0.22 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 4.31 | 1.73 | 0.30 | 3.31 | 0.73 |
19 | 0.63 | 2.30 | 3.28 | 5.21 | 3.65 | 0.24 | 4.21 | 2.65 |
20 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.99 | 5.84 | 1.82 | 0.21 | 4.84 | 0.82 |
21 | 0.53 | 1.30 | 1.98 | 3.74 | 2.45 | 0.36 | 2.74 | 1.45 |
22 | 1.07 | 3.55 | 3.39 | 3.17 | 3.32 | 0.46 | 2.17 | 2.32 |
23 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 1.90 | 3.80 | 2.40 | 0.36 | 2.80 | 1.40 |
24 | 2.43 | 7.23 | 4.41 | 1.81 | 2.98 | 1.23 | 0.81 | 1.98 |
25 | 1.45 | 5.40 | 4.17 | 2.88 | 3.72 | 0.53 | 1.88 | 2.72 |
26 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance (S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree (M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 0.29 | 3.47 | 0.42 |
8 | 4.75 | 9.41 | 5.73 | 1.21 | 1.98 | 4.84 | 0.21 | 0.98 |
9 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
Table 4. Spatial distribution pattern of the S. incertulas overwintering on rice stubbles.
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance (S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree (M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 4.47 | 1.42 | 0.29 | 3.47 | 0.42 |
8 | 4.75 | 9.41 | 5.73 | 1.21 | 1.98 | 4.84 | 0.21 | 0.98 |
9 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance (S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree (M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.80 | 2.87 | 3.39 | 4.23 | 3.59 | 0.31 | 3.23 | 2.59 |
3 | 1.55 | 4.49 | 3.45 | 2.22 | 2.90 | 0.82 | 1.22 | 1.90 |
10 | 0.50 | 1.03 | 1.56 | 3.12 | 2.06 | 0.47 | 2.12 | 1.06 |
14 | 0.48 | 1.17 | 1.92 | 3.99 | 2.44 | 0.33 | 2.99 | 1.44 |
23 | 0.42 | 1.26 | 2.42 | 5.76 | 3.00 | 0.21 | 4.76 | 2.00 |
25 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 1.35 | 9.00 | 2.20 | 0.13 | 8.00 | 1.20 |
27 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
Table 5. Spatial distribution pattern of the C. auricilia overwintering on rice stubbles.
样地号 Field No. | 虫口密度 Population density(m) /(No. quadrat−1) | 方差 Variance (S2) | 平均拥挤度 Mean crowded degree (M*) | 聚集度指数 Aggregating index (M*/m) | 扩散系数 Diffusion coefficient(C) | 负二项分布指数 Negative binomial distribution index(K) | 久野指数 Kuno index(CA) | 从生指数 Clumping index(I) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.80 | 2.87 | 3.39 | 4.23 | 3.59 | 0.31 | 3.23 | 2.59 |
3 | 1.55 | 4.49 | 3.45 | 2.22 | 2.90 | 0.82 | 1.22 | 1.90 |
10 | 0.50 | 1.03 | 1.56 | 3.12 | 2.06 | 0.47 | 2.12 | 1.06 |
14 | 0.48 | 1.17 | 1.92 | 3.99 | 2.44 | 0.33 | 2.99 | 1.44 |
23 | 0.42 | 1.26 | 2.42 | 5.76 | 3.00 | 0.21 | 4.76 | 2.00 |
25 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 1.35 | 9.00 | 2.20 | 0.13 | 8.00 | 1.20 |
27 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.00 |
[1] | 于文娟, 田幸, 徐志, 韩喜, 姬红丽, 彭云良. 川渝稻区水稻螟虫种类组成及大螟不同地理种群遗传多态性的差异分析[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2022, 59(5): 1085-1095. |
Yu W J, Tian X, Xu Z, Han X, Ji H L, Peng Y L. Genetic diversity of different geographical populations of rice stem borers, Sesamia inferens, in the Sichuan-Chongqing rice region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2022, 59(5): 1085-1095. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 广西壮族自治区统计局. 2018年广西统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022. |
Statistics Bureau of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Guangxi statistical yearbook 2018[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2022. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 王华生, 廖皓年. 广西水稻钻蛀性螟虫发生现状及防治对策[J]. 广西农学报, 2002(5): 22-24. |
Wang H S, Liao H N. The present occurrence situation of rice boring snout moth's larva and the corresponding control measures[J]. Journal of Guangxi Agriculture, 2002(5): 22-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 廖永林, 张扬, 张振飞, 肖汉祥, 李燕芳, 李怡峰. 广州稻区稻螟幼虫种的构成及其空间分布研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(4): 501-506. |
Liao Y L, Zhang Y, Zhang Z F, Xiao H X, Li Y F, Li Y F,. Determine on the species and spatial pattern of rice borer in paddy field in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2014, 36(4): 501-506. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 武德功, 杜军利, 段海明, 尹金刚, 刁慧娟, 杜玉洁. 大螟越冬幼虫空间分布型调查[J]. 生态科学, 2015, 34(4): 114-117. |
Wu D G, Du J L, Duan H M, Yin J G, Diao H J, Du Y J. Research on the spatialdistribution pattern of overwintering larvae of Sesamia inferens in the rice field[J]. Ecological Science, 2015, 34(4): 114-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 黄寿山, 胡慧建, 梁广文. 二化螟越冬幼虫空间分布图式的地理统计学分析[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(2): 108-111. |
Huang S S, Hu H J, Liang G W. The spatial pattern of dipausing larva of triped rice borer, Chilo supperssalis Walker, with geostatistics[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(2): 108-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王建强, 夏冰, 刘宇. 水稻二化螟测报调查规范: GB/T15798-2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
Wang J Q, Xia B, Liu Y. Specification for survey and forecast of Chilo suppressalis: GB/T15798-2009[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 王助引, 于永浩. 广西主栽作物主要害虫[M]. 南宁: 广西科学技术出版社, 2016. |
Wang Z Y, Yu Y H. Main Pests of Main Crops in Guangxi[M]. Nanning: Guangxi Science and Technology Publishing House, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 张孝羲. 昆虫生态及预测预报: 第3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002: 59-68. |
Zhang X X. Insect Ecology and Prediction: 3rd edn[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2002: 59-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Iwao S. A new regression method for analyzing the aggregation pattern of animal populations[J]. Researches on Populaion Ecology, 1968, 10(1): 1-20. |
[11] | Taylor L R. Aggregation, variance and mean[J]. Nature, 1961, 189(4766): 732-735. |
[12] | 向玉勇, 张帆, 夏必文, 郭荣. 我国水稻螟虫的发生现状及防治对策[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2011, 31(11): 20-23. |
Xiang Y Y, Zhang F, Xia B W, Guo R. Occurrence status and control countermeasures of rice borer in China[J]. China Plant Protection, 2011, 31(11): 20-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Li Y H, Hallerman E M, Wu K M, Peng Y F. Insect-resistant genetically engineered crops in China: Development, application, and prospects for use[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2020, 65: 273-292. |
[14] | 刘杰, 曾娟, 杨清坡, 卞悦, 张熠玚, 黄冲. 2023年农作物重大病虫害发生趋势预报[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2023, 43(1): 32-35. |
Liu J, Zeng J, Yang Q P, Bian Y, Zhang Y X, Huang C. Forecast of occurrence trend of major crop diseases and pests in 2023[J]. China Plant Protection, 2023, 43(1): 32-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 林作晓, 龙梦玲, 唐洁瑜, 辛德育, 黄成宇. 广西2020年农作物主要病虫害发生实况[J]. 广西植保, 2021, 34(3): 25-32. |
Lin Z X, Long M L, Tang J Y, Xin D Y, Huang C Y. Occurrence of major crop diseases and pests in Guangxi in 2020[J]. Guangxi Plant Protection, 2021, 34(3): 25-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 林作晓, 龙梦玲, 唐洁瑜, 谢义灵, 黄成宇, 辛德育. 2021年广西农作物主要病虫害发生实况[J]. 广西植保, 2022, 35(3): 17-26. |
Lin Z X, Long M L, Tang J Y, Xie Y L, Huang C Y, Xin D Y. Occurrence of major crop diseases and pests in Guangxi in 2021[J]. Guangxi Plant Protection, 2022, 35(3): 17-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LUO Guanghua1 , ZHANG Zhichun1 , HAN Guangjie1 , HAN Zhaojun2 , FANG Jichao1, *. Characteristics of Overwintering Populations of Rice Stem Borers and Mutation Frequencies of Resistance to Triazophos [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(4): 481-486. |
[2] | ZHAO Zheng-wu ,LI Shi-gui ,LEI Shu-fan. Genetic Variation of Main Agronomic Traits in a New Germplasm Resource of Perennial Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(5): 481-486 . |
[3] | LUO Ju ,ZHANG Xiao-xi ,ZHAI Bao-ping ,GUO Yu-ren. Resistance and Mechanism of Four Selected Rice Varieties to Rice Stem Borers (Chilo suppressalis and Scirpophaga incertulas) in Shanghai Area, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(1): 97-101 . |
[4] | JIANG Wei-hua ,HAN Zhao-jun ,HAO Ming-li. Primary Study on Resistance of Rice Stem Borer (Chilo suppressalis) to Fipronil [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2005, 19(6): 577-579 . |
[5] | SU Jian-wei,XUAN Wei-jian,SHENG Cheng-fa,GE Feng *. The Sex Pheromone of Rice Stem Borer, Chilo suppressalis in Paddy Fields: Suppressing Effect of Mass Trapping with Synthetic Sex Pheromone [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2003, 17(2): 171-174 . |
[6] | SU Jian-wei,ZHANG Gui-fen,FAN Wei-ming,XUAN Wei-jian,SHENG Cheng-fa . The Sex Pheromone of the Rice Stem Borer, Chilo suppressalis in Paddy Fields: Sticky Trap and Lure Storage Time and Lure Dosage [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(3): 197-200 . |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||