研究报告

基于稻穗检测与机器学习的水稻始穗期预测

  • 刘庆 ,
  • 顾清 ,
  • 朱怡航 ,
  • 娄卫东 ,
  • 黄福灯 ,
  • 朱英 ,
  • 张小斌
展开
  • 1 浙江农林大学 数学与计算机科学学院杭州 311300
    2 浙江省农业科学院 数字农业研究所杭州 310021
    3 浙江省农业科学院 作物与核利用研究所杭州 310021
    4 浙江省农业科学院 病毒学与生物技术研究所杭州 310021

收稿日期: 2025-11-06

  修回日期: 2026-01-08

  网络出版日期: 2026-07-15

基金资助

浙江省“三农九方”科技协作计划项目(2025SNJF012);浙江省农业科学院重大科技任务攻关项目(ZDZX202500)

Prediction of Rice Heading Date Based on Panicle Detection and Machine Learning

  • LIU Qing ,
  • GU Qing ,
  • ZHU Yihang ,
  • LOU Weidong ,
  • HUANG Fudeng ,
  • ZHU Ying ,
  • ZHANG Xiaobin
Expand
  • 1 School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
    2 Institute of Digital Agriculture, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
    3 Institute of Crop and Nuclear Utilization, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China
    4 Institute of Virology and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received date: 2025-11-06

  Revised date: 2026-01-08

  Online published: 2026-07-15

摘要

【目的】针对当前水稻育种过程中人工测量始穗期存在劳动强度大、效率低等问题,本研究提出一种融合无人机图像、YOLOv10b目标检测算法与随机森林回归模型的智能预测方法,实现水稻育种小区始穗期的自动化高效预测。【方法】以水稻育种小区为研究对象,利用无人机在水稻孕穗至成熟阶段获取15个观测期的小区图像,基于YOLOv10b算法训练稻穗检测模型,实现小区图像中稻穗的识别与计数。随后以小区各观测期的稻穗数量为输入变量,始穗期距移栽天数为预测变量,构建多种始穗期预测模型并进行对比分析。在此基础上开展特征重要性分析,进行特征降维,构建精简模型。【结果】YOLOv10b模型在稻穗检测任务中精确率为91.7%,召回率为92.1%,F1值为0.919。在始穗期预测任务中,基于全部15个观测期穗数时序特征所构建的随机森林模型取得了R²为0.84,RMSE为1.57 d,MAE为1.12 d的预测表现;进一步通过特征重要性降维至9个观测期所构建的精简模型,取得了R2为0.83,RMSE为1.65 d,MAE为1.16 d的预测表现,在保证预测精度的同时,显著降低了特征维度,提升了模型的效率与实用性。【结论】该研究提出的方法可有效减少人工测量的工作量,提升水稻始穗期监测效率,实现育种小区始穗期的自动化预测,为智能育种与精准农业管理提供可行的数据支撑与技术路径。

本文引用格式

刘庆 , 顾清 , 朱怡航 , 娄卫东 , 黄福灯 , 朱英 , 张小斌 . 基于稻穗检测与机器学习的水稻始穗期预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026 , 40(4) : 560 -568 . DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.251104

Abstract

【Objective】To address the problems of high labor intensity and low efficiency in manual measurements of heading date in rice breeding, this study proposes an intelligent prediction method that integrates UAV imagery, the YOLOv10b object detection algorithm, and a random forest regression model to achieve automated and efficient prediction of heading date in rice breeding plots.【Methods】Using rice breeding plots as the research subject, UAV imagery was acquired at 15 observation time points from booting to maturity. Based on the YOLOv10b algorithm, a rice panicle detection model was trained to recognize and count panicles in plot images. Subsequently, the numbers of panicles at each observation time point were used as input variables, and the number of days from transplanting to heading was used as the prediction variable to construct and compare multiple heading date prediction models. Based on this, feature importance analysis and dimensionality reduction were performed to develop a simplified model.【Results】Experimental results showed that the YOLOv10b model achieved a precision of 91.7%, a recall of 92.1%, and an F1 score of 0.919 in the panicle detection task. In the heading date prediction task, the random forest model constructed using the sequential features of panicle counts from all 15 observation time points achieved an R² of 0.84, an RMSE of 1.57 days, and an MAE of 1.12 days. Furthermore, after feature dimensionality reduction based on feature importance analysis, a simplified model constructed using 9 observation time points achieved an R² of 0.83, an RMSE of 1.65 days, and an MAE of 1.16 days. This approach effectively reduced feature dimensionality while maintaining prediction accuracy, thereby improving the model's efficiency and practicality.【Conclusion】The proposed method can effectively reduce the workload of manual measurements, improve the efficiency of heading date monitoring, and realize automated prediction of heading date in breeding plots. It provides a feasible data foundation and technical pathway for intelligent breeding and precision agricultural management.

参考文献

[1] 魏逸飞. 基于优化加权集成模型的水稻生长阶段监测研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2023.
  Wei Y F. Research on monitoring rice growth stage based on optimized weighted integrated model[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Bai X, Cao Z, Zhao L, Zhang J, Lv C, Li C, Xie J. Rice heading stage automatic observation by multi-classifier cascade based rice spike detection method[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 259: 260-270.
[3] Hyun S, Kim K S. Estimation of heading date for rice cultivars using ORYZA (v3)[J]. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 19(4): 246-253.
[4] Zhang Z, Song X, Chen Y, Wang P, Wei X, Tao F. Dynamic variability of the heading-flowering stages of single rice in China based on field observations and NDVI estimations[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2015, 59(5): 643-655.
[5] Chen Y C, Lin W S, Chen R K, Chao Y Y, Chin S W, Chen F C, Lee C Y. Establishment of a prediction model for the miRNA-based heading date characteristics of rice in the booting stage[J]. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2015, 14(2): 4381-4390.
[6] Kawakita S, Yamasaki M, Teratani R, Yabe S, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Yoshida H, Fushimi E, Nakagawa H. Dual ensemble approach to predict rice heading date by integrating multiple rice phenology models and machine learning-based genetic parameter regression models[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2024, 344: 109821.
[7] Chen T S, Aoike T, Yamasaki M, Kajiya-Kanegae H, Iwata H. Predicting rice heading date using an integrated approach combining a machine learning method and a crop growth model[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2020, 11: 599510.
[8] Zhang J, Lin X, Jiang C, Hu X, Liu B, Liu L, Xiao L, Zhu Y, Cao W, Tang L. Predicting rice phenology across China by integrating crop phenology model and machine learning[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 951: 175585.
[9] Hong W, Li Z, Feng X, Qin J, Wang A, Jin S, Wang D, Chen S. Estimating key phenological dates of multiple rice accessions using unmanned aerial vehicle-based plant height dynamics for breeding[J]. Rice Science, 2024, 31(5): 617-628.
[10] Taniguchi S, Sakamoto T, Imase R, Nonoue Y, Tsunematsu H, Goto A, Matsushita K, Ohmori S, Maeda H, Takeuchi Y, Ishii T, Yonemaru J I, Ogawa D. Prediction of heading date, culm length, and biomass from canopy-height-related parameters derived from time-series UAV observations of rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 998803.
[11] Lyu M, Lu X, Shen Y, Tan Y, Wan L, Shu Q, He Y, He Y, Cen H. UAV time-series imagery with novel machine learning to estimate heading dates of rice accessions for breeding[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2023, 341: 109646.
[12] 莫佳才, 彭漪, 刘小娟, 王靖. 基于无人机遥感影像的多品种水稻抽穗时间估算[J]. 河南农业科学, 2022, 51(1): 154-161.
  Mo J C, Peng Y, Liu X J, Wang J. Estimation of heading time for rice of different cultivars based on UAV remote sensing images[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 51(1): 154-161. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Ma Y, Jiang Q, Wu X, Zhu R, Gong Y, Peng Y, Duan B, Fang S. Monitoring hybrid rice phenology at initial heading stage based on low-altitude remote sensing data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(1): 86.
[14] 马驿. 基于无人机影像的水稻长势监测和产量估计[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2021.
  Ma Y. Monitoring rice growth parameters and estimating yield based on UAV images[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] He Z, Li S, Wang Y, Dai L, Lin S. Monitoring rice phenology based on backscattering characteristics of multi-temporal RADARSAT-2 datasets[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 340.
[16] 吴水秀. 基于深度学习的稻穗检测及水稻多生育期识别研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2024.
  Wu S X. Deep learning-based rice spike detection and rice multi-growth stage recognition research[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2024. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Bak H J, Sang W G, Chang S, Kwon D, Im W J, Lee J H, Chung N J, Cho J I. Estimation of rice heading date of paddy rice from slanted and top-view images using deep learning classification model[J]. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2023, 25(4): 337-345
[18] Desai S V, Balasubramanian V N, Fukatsu T, Ninomiya S, Guo W. Automatic estimation of heading date of paddy rice using deep learning[J]. Plant Methods, 2019, 15(1): 76.
[19] Tan S, Lu H, Yu J, Lan M, Hu X, Zheng H, Peng Y, Wang Y, Li Z, Qi L, Ma X. In-field rice panicles detection and growth stages recognition based on RiceRes2Net[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2023, 206: 107704.
[20] Zhang Y, Xiao D, Liu Y, Wu H. An algorithm for automatic identification of multiple developmental stages of rice spikes based on improved Faster R-CNN[J]. The Crop Journal, 2022, 10(5): 1323-1333.
[21] Cai W, Lu K, Fan M, Liu C, Huang W, Chen J, Wu Z, Xu C, Ma X, Tan S. Rice growth-stage recognition based on improved YOLOv8 with UAV imagery[J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(12): 2751.
[22] Qin J, Hu T, Yuan J, Liu Q, Wang W, Liu J, Guo L, Song G. Deep-learning-based rice phenological stage recognition[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(11): 2891.
[23] Wang A, Chen H, Liu L. YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection[A]. arXiv, 2024.
[24] Howard A G, Zhu M, Chen B, Kalenichenko D, Wang W, Weyand T, Andreetto M, Adam H. MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications[J]. ArXiv Preprint, ArXiv: 170404861, 2017.
[25] Lin T Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Hays J, Perona P, Ramanan D, Dollár P, Zitnick C L. Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context[C]//Computer Vision - ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer, 2014: 740-755.
[26] Kamilaris A, Prenafeta-Boldú F X. Deep learning in agriculture: A survey[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018, 147: 70-90.
[27] Willmott C J, Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance[J]. Climate Research, 2005, 30(1): 79-82.
[28] Botchkarev A. Performance metrics (error measures) in machine learning regression, forecasting and prognostics: Properties and typology[J]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 2018, 14: 45-76.
[29] Hodson T O. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2022, 15(14): 5481-5487.
[30] 张立才, 张欣, 陈孝玉龙, 刘佳明, 文兴甜, 杨胜贤. 改进伪标签半监督方法的石榴生长阶段检测模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2025, 61(13): 291-299.
  Zhang L C, Zhang X, Chen X, Liu J M, Wen X T, Yang S X. Improved pseudo-labeled semi-supervised method for pomegranate growth stage detection modeling[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2025, 61(13): 291-299. (in Chinese with English abstract)
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: