
转Pi9抗稻瘟病基因水稻株系的比较转录组分析
收稿日期: 2019-11-23
修回日期: 2020-03-11
网络出版日期: 2020-05-10
基金资助
国家自然科学基金面上项目(31272016);浙江省农业科学院省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地开放基金资助项目(2010DS700124-ZZ1906);浙江省农业科学院扶持学科建设2018年B类项目
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Transgenic Rice Line Carrying the Rice Blast Resistance Gene Pi9
Received date: 2019-11-23
Revised date: 2020-03-11
Online published: 2020-05-10
【目的】在转录水平上解析Pi9基因介导的稻瘟病抗性调控机理,为培育抗病水稻品种提供理论依据。【方法】向水稻品种日本晴(NPB)及其转Pi9抗稻瘟病基因株系(NPB/Pi9)接种稻瘟菌。分别于接种后0 h、12 h、24 h、36 h提取叶组织样品,选取12 503个水稻基因定制基因芯片,进行水稻基因转录组分析,并通过qRT-PCR对部分差异表达基因进行验证。【结果】NPB/Pi9在接种后12 h、24 h和36 h的基因表达量分别与其接种0 h表达量比较,共检测到7 754个差异表达基因;相应地,感病水稻NPB在以上时间点共检测到7 385个差异表达基因;在接种后36 h,NPB/Pi9的差异表达基因数目显著多于NPB。比较NPB/Pi9和NPB相同时间点的基因表达量,共获得4 065个差异表达基因,其中接种后36 h的差异表达基因显著多于接种后0 h、12 h或24 h。因此,NPB/Pi9的稻瘟病防御反应更强烈。对NPB/Pi9与NPB相同时间点的差异表达基因进行GO和KEGG分析,细胞外区域、植物对刺激应答、转录调控、氧化还原、离子结合、次生代谢和植物激素相关的GO分类在接种后呈显著富集,苯丙氨酸代谢、类黄酮生物合成和植物激素信号途径的KEGG通路在接种后显著富集。与效应分子触发的免疫反应(ETI)相关的水杨酸信号途径、几丁质酶,以及与病原相关分子模式触发的免疫反应(PTI)相关的胞外区域、对刺激的应答、木质素合成等,均在抗感水稻之间差异表达。而且PTI/ETI共有的WRKY转录因子、MAPK激酶、茉莉酸和乙烯信号途径等发生差异表达。综上所述,NPB/Pi9和NPB的差异表达模式与ETI和PTI相关,两者相互联系并在Pi9介导的稻瘟病抗性中发挥作用。【结论】与日本晴比较,抗病基因型NPB/Pi9对稻瘟病防御反应更强烈。转录因子、激酶、NBS-LRR基因、几丁质酶、水杨酸、茉莉酸和乙烯信号途径,以及植物次生代谢在Pi9介导的稻瘟病抗病反应中发挥重要作用。
许赵蒙, 李利华, 高晓庆, 袁正杰, 李莘, 田旭丹, 王岚岚, 瞿绍洪 . 转Pi9抗稻瘟病基因水稻株系的比较转录组分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020 , 34(3) : 245 -255 . DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.9126
【Objective】The purpose of the study is to analyze the mechanism behind Pi9 gene-mediated rice blast resistance at the transcriptional level, and to lay a theoretical basis for breeding disease-resistant rice cultivars. 【Method】Rice cultivar Nipponbare (NPB) and NPB-transgenic line carrying the Pi9 rice blast resistance gene (NPB/Pi9) were inoculated with Magnaporthe oryzae. Leaf tissues were sampled at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h after inoculation, respectively. Gene-chip transcriptome analysis of 12503 rice genes was performed using the rice samples, and the microarray data were verified by qRT-PCR of a set of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). 【Result】7754 DEGs were identified by comparing the gene expression levels in the resistant NPB/Pi9 line at 12 h, 24 h and 36 h after inoculation, respectively, to that at 0 h after inoculation. Accordingly, 7385 DEGs were identified in the susceptible rice NPB at the same time points. At 36 h after inoculation, the DEG number of NPB/Pi9 was significantly higher than that of NPB. 4065 DEGs were identified by comparing the gene expression levels in NPB/Pi9 and NPB at the same time points; there were significantly more DEGs at 36 h after inoculation than at 0 h, 12 h or 24 h after inoculation. Therefore, NPB/Pi9 exhibited more intensive defense responses to Magnaporthe oryzae. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG analyses were carried out on the DEGs between NPB/Pi9 and NPB at the same time points. The GO terms classifications related to extracellular regions, plant response to stimuli, transcriptional regulation, redox activity, ion binding activity, secondary metabolism and plant hormones were significantly enriched for the time points post inoculation. The KEGG pathways of phenylalanine metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and plant hormone signaling were enriched significantly at the time points post inoculation. Distinctive gene expression patterns were observed between NPB/Pi9 and NPB at the same time points for the genes of the effector-triggered immunity (ETI) related salicylic acid signaling pathway and chitinase, and the PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) related extracellular regions, response to stimuli, and lignin biosynthesis. Moreover, distinctive gene expression patterns were observed between NPB/Pi9 and NPB at the same time points for the genes of WRKY transcription factors, MAPK kinases, jasmonate and ethylene signaling pathways that were utilized by both PTI and ETI. Based on all the results, the differential expression patterns between NPB/Pi9 and NPB are related to ETI and PTI, which are involved with each other and play important roles in the Pi9-mediated rice blast rice resistance. 【Conclusion】 Compared with NPB, the resistant genotype NPB/Pi9 showed more intensive defense responses against Magnaporthe oryzae. Transcription factors, kinases, NBS-LRR genes, chitinases, salicylic acid-, jasmonic acid-, and ethylene-signaling pathways, and plant secondary metabolism play important roles in Pi9 gene-mediated rice blast resistance.
Key words: rice blast; transcriptome; resistance genes; plant hormones; secondary metabolism
| [1] | Deng Y, Zhai K, Xie Z, Yang D, Zhu X, Liu J, Wang X, Qin P, Yang Y, Zhang G, Li Q, Zhang J, Wu S, Milazzo J, Mao B, Wang E, Xie H, Tharreau D, He Z.Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6328): 962-965. |
| [2] | Jain P, Singh P K, Kapoor R, Khanna A, Solanke A U, Krishnan S G, Singh A K, Sharma V, Sharma T R.Understanding host-pathogen interactions with expression profiling of NILs carrying rice-blast resistance Pi9 gene[J]. Frontiers of Plant Sciences, 2017, (8): 93-93. |
| [3] | Liu J, Hu Y, Ning Y, Jiang N, Wu J, Jeon J, Xiao Y, Liu X, Dai N, Wang G.Genetic variation and evolution of the Pi9 blast resistance locus in the AA genome Oryza species[J]. Journal of Plant Biology, 2011, 54(5): 294-302. |
| [4] | Wu J, Kou Y, Bao J, Li Y, Tang M, Zhu X, Ponaya A, Xiao G, Li J, Li C, Song M Y, Cumagun C J, Deng Q, Lu G, Jeon J S, Naqvi N I, Zhou B.Comparative genomics identifies the Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence effector AvrPi9 that triggers Pi9-mediated blast resistance in rice[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 206(4): 1463-1475. |
| [5] | Jones J D, Dang I J L. The plant immune system[J]. Nature, 2006, 444(7117): 323-329. |
| [6] | Liu W, Liu J, Triplett L, Leach J E, Wang G L.Novel insights into rice innate immunity against bacterial and fungal pathogens[J]. Phytopathology, 2014, 52(11): 213-241. |
| [7] | Kou Y, Wang S.Broad-spectrum and durability: Understanding of quantitative disease resistance[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010, 13: 181-185. |
| [8] | Wei T, Ou B, Li J, Zhao Y, Guo D, Zhu Y, Chen Z, Gu H, Li C, Qin G, Qu L J.Transcriptional profiling of rice early response to Magnaporthe oryzae identified OsWRKYs as important regulators in rice blast resistance[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3): e59720. |
| [9] | Zhang Y, Zhao J, Li Y, Yuan Z, He H, Yang H, Qu H, Ma C, Qu S.Transcriptome analysis highlights defense and signaling pathways mediated by rice pi21 gene with partial resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Frontiers of Plant Sciences, 2016, 7: 1834. |
| [10] | Li W, Liu Y, Wang J, He M, Zhou X, Yang C, Yuan C, Wang J, Chern M, Yin J, Chen W, Ma B, Wang Y, Qin P, Li S, Ronald P, Chen X.The durably resistant rice cultivar Digu activates defence gene expression before the full maturation of Magnaporthe oryzae appressorium[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2015, 16: 973-986. |
| [11] | Kitony J K.水稻CO39品种及其5个近等基因系对稻瘟病感染应答的转录组分析[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2016. |
| [11] | Kitony J K.Transcriptome analysis of rice cultivar CO39 and its five Near-Isogenic Lines in response to blast fungus infection[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian University of Agriculture and Forestry, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [12] | 王玉, 杨雪, 杨蕊菁, 王玉霞, 杨飞霞, 夏鹏飞, 赵磊. 调控苯丙烷类生物合成的MYB类转录因子研究进展[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2019, 46(5): 859-864. |
| [12] | Wang Y, Yang X, Yang R Q, Wang Y X, Yang F X, Xia P F, Zhao L.Advances in research of MYB transcription factors in regulating phenylpropane biosynthesis[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2019, 46(5): 859-864. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [13] | 崔慧萍, 周薇, 郭长虹. 植物过氧化物酶体在活性氧信号网络中的作用[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2017, 33(3): 220-226. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [13] | Cui H P, Zhou W, Guo C H.The role of plant peroxisomes in ROS signaling network[J]. Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2017, 33(3): 220-226. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | 杜欣谊. 苯丙氨酸解氨酶的研究进展[J]. 现代化农业, 2016(7): 24-26. |
| [14] | Du X Y.Research advances on phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2016(7): 24-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | 李魏, 谭晓风, 陈鸿鹏. 植物肉桂酰辅酶A还原酶基因的结构功能及应用潜力[J]. 经济林研究, 2009, 27(1): 7-12. |
| [15] | Li W, Tan X F, Chen H P.Structural function and application potential of cinnamoyl-CoA reductase gene in plant[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2009, 27(1): 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Kasprzewska A.Plant chitinases-regulation and function[J]. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 2003, 8(3): 809-824. |
| [17] | 许明辉, 李成云, 李进斌, 谭学林, 田颖川, 陈正华, 唐祚舜, 田文忠. 转几丁质酶-葡聚糖酶基因水稻稻瘟病抗谱分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(4): 307-310. |
| [17] | Xu M H, Li C Y, Li J B, Tan X L, Tian Y C, Chen Z H, Tang Z S, Tian W Z.Analysis on resistant spectrum to rice blast in transgenic rice lines with chitinase gene and β-1, 3-glucanase gene[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2003, 17(4): 307-310. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [18] | Qu S, Liu G, Zhou B, Bellizzi M, Zeng L, Dai L, Han B, Wang G L.The broad-spectrum blast resistance gene Pi9 encodes a nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat protein and is a member of a multigene family in rice[J]. Genetics, 2006, 172(3): 1901-1914. |
| [19] | Liu W, Liu J, Ning Y, Ding B, Wang X, Wang Z, Wang G.Recent progress in understanding PAMP- and effector-triggered immunity against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Molecular Plant, 2013, 6(3): 605-620. |
| [20] | Zipfel C.Pattern-recognition receptors in plant innate immunity[J]. Current Opinion Immunology, 2008, 20(1): 10-16. |
| [21] | Ramamoorthy R, Jiang S Y, Kumar N, Venkatesh P N, Ramachandran S.A comprehensive transcriptional profiling of the WRKY gene family in rice under various abiotic and phytohormone treatment[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 2008, 49(6): 865-879. |
| [22] | Peng X, Hu Y, Tang X, Zhou P, Deng X, Wang H, Guo Z.Constitutive expression of rice WRKY30 gene increases the endogenous jasmonic acid accumulation, PR gene expression and resistance to fungal pathogens in rice[J]. Planta, 2012, 236(5): 1485-1498. |
| [23] | Pitzschke A, Schikora A, Hirt H.MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2009, 12(4): 421-426. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |