干旱胁迫下杂草稻和栽培稻根系基因表达差异研究

展开
  • 1 黑龙江省农业科学院博士后科研工作站/黑龙江省农业科学院 耕作栽培研究所/中国科学院 北方粳稻分子育种联合研究中心, 哈尔滨 155086
    2沈阳农业大学 水稻研究所, 沈阳110866
    3辽宁省经济作物研究所, 辽宁 辽阳 111000
    4中国水稻研究所, 杭州 310006
*通讯联系人, E-mail: madianrong@163.com; wfchen5512@126.com

收稿日期: 2015-12-09

  修回日期: 2016-01-23

  网络出版日期: 2016-09-10

基金资助

黑龙江省农业科学院博士后工作站;哈尔滨市科技局项目(2014RFQYJ125);黑龙江省农业科学院创新工程项目(2014QN006);黑龙江省农业科学院博士人员科研启动金项目(201507-16);国家水稻产业技术体系项目(CARS-01-43);北方寒地粳稻资源研究与新品种选育项目(2014BAD01B03-02)

Global Genome Expression Analysis of Root Genes under Drought Stress in Weedy Rice and Up-land Rice

Expand
  • 1Postdoctoral Scientific Research Station of HAAS/Cultivation and Farming Research Institute of HASS/ Northern Japonica Rice Molecular Breeding Joint Research Center, Harbin 150086, China
    2Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
    3Institute of Economic Crop of Liaoning, Liaoyang 111000, China
    4China National Rice Research Institute,Hangzhou 310006,China
*Corresponding author, E-mail: madianrong@163.com, wfchen5512@126.com

Received date: 2015-12-09

  Revised date: 2016-01-23

  Online published: 2016-09-10

摘要

利用Affymetrix水稻表达谱芯片(GeneChip Rice Genome Array)研究抗旱杂草稻HEB07-2与巴西陆稻(IAPAR9)在PEG模拟干旱胁迫下根系基因表达变化。结果表明,杂草稻HEB07-2转录组对干旱信号的响应程度与方向均与巴西陆稻存在很大差异,HEB07-2以正向调控为主,而巴西陆稻以负调控为主。干旱胁迫下杂草稻HEB07-2与巴西陆稻分别有6878个和2923个基因表达,其中HEB07-2受干旱胁迫诱导上调的基因有4693个,下调的基因有2185个;而巴西陆稻则分别有983个和1940个。在差异基因表达的倍数上也是HEB07-2高于巴西陆稻。进一步的GO分析表明,在干旱胁迫下,HEB07-2和IAPAR9根系基因响应途径的差异表现为HEB07-2在钾离子转运(GO:0006813)、次生物质代谢(GO:0019748)、细胞生长(GO:0016049)、葡萄糖代谢(GO:0006006)、跨膜离子转运器活性(GO:0015075)、亚铁血红素结合体(GO:0020037)、氧化还原酶活性(GO:0016491)等方面基因显著上调,这与生理数据和表型数据一致。

本文引用格式

丁国华, 孙健, 杨光, 张凤鸣, 白良明, 孙世臣, 姜树坤, 王彤彤, 郑洪亮, 夏天舒, 沈希宏, 马殿荣, 陈温福 . 干旱胁迫下杂草稻和栽培稻根系基因表达差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016 , 30(5) : 458 -468 . DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5180

Abstract

The expression changes of root genes in drought-resistance weedy rice HEB07-2 (Oryza sativa f. spontanea) and up-land rice IAPAR9 (Oryza sativa) were analyzed under polyethylene glycol(PEG)-simulated with drought stress condition with Affymetrix GeneChip rice genome array. The results indicated that the extent and direction of transcriptome response of HEB07-2 and IAPAR9 to drought differed greatly. For HEB07-2, among 6878 expressed genes, 4693 were up-regulated and 2185 were down-regulated under drought condition. For IAPAR9, among 2923 expressed genes,983 were up-regulated and 1940 were down-regulated. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in HEB07-2 and IAPAR9 showed that the weedy rice HEB07-2 had a higher changing fold than the up-land rice IAPAR9. Gene ontology analysis revealed that genes of HEB07-2 in potassium ion transporting(GO: 0006813), secondary metabolite(GO: 0019748), cell growth(GO: 0016049), glucose metabolism(GO:0006006), transmembrane ion transporter activity(GO:0015075), ferroheme coalition(GO:0020037), oxidordeuctase activity(GO:0016491)were significantly up-regulated in comparing with IAPAR9. These were consistent with the physiological and phenotypic data.

参考文献

[1] Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, et al.OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice.Nat Genet, 2010, 42(6): 545-549.
[2] Lafitte H R, Li Z K, Vijayakumar C H M. Improvement of rice drought tolerance through backcross breeding: Evaluation of donors and selection in drought nurseries.Field Crops Res, 2006, 97: 77-86.
[3] Lilley J M, Ludow T J, McCouch S R, et al. Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice.Exp Bot, 1996, 47(302): 1427-1436.
[4] Courtois G M, Shinha P K, Prasad K, et al.Mapping QTLs associated with drought avoidance in up lands rice.Mol Breeding, 2000, 6: 55-66.
[5] 徐吉臣, 李晶昭, 郑先武, 等. 苗期水稻根部性状的QTL定位. 遗传学报, 2001, 28(5): 433-438.
[5] Xu J C, Li J Z, Zheng X W, et al.QTL mapping of the root traits in rice seeding.Acta Genet Sin, 2001, 28(5): 433-438.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Kumar R, Venuprasad R, Atlin G N.Genetic analysis of rainfed lowland rice drought tolerance under naturally-occurring stress in eastern India: Heritability and QTL effects.Field Crops Res, 2007, 103: 42-52.
[7] 赵宝存, 赵芊, 葛荣朝, 等. 利用基因芯片研究小麦耐盐突变体盐胁迫条件下基因的表达图谱. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(10): 2355-2360.
[7] Zhao B C, Zhao Q, Ge R C, et al.Study on the expression profile of salt-tolerance mutant under salt-stress in wheat using gene microarray.Sci Agric Sin, 2007, 40(10): 2355-2360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Jung C, Lyou S H, Yeu S Y, et al.Microarray-based screening of jasmonate responsive genes inArabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep, 2007, 26: 1053-1063.
[9] Degenkolbe T, Do P T, Zuther E, et al.Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress.Plant Mol Biol, 2009, 69: 133-153.
[10] 李永春, 孟凡荣, 王潇, 等. 干旱胁迫条件下“洛旱2号”小麦根系的基因表达谱. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12): 2126-2133.
[10] Li Y C, Meng F R, Wang X, et al.Gene expression profiling in roots of wheat cultivar “Luohan 2” under water stress.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(12): 2126-2133.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Zhang C, Zhang L, Zhang S, et al.Global analysis of gene expression profiles in physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) seedlings exposed to drought stress.BMC Plant Biol, 2015, 15(1): 17.
[12] Wang G J, Miao W, Wang J Y, et al.Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on antioxidant system in weedy and cultivated rice with different chilling sensitivity under chilling stress.J Agron Crop Sci, 2013, 199(3): 200-208.
[13] Tang L, Ma D R, Xu Z J.Utilization of weedy rice for development of japonica hybrid rice(Oryza sativa L.).Plant Sci, 2011, 180: 733-740.
[14] Huang D, Wu W, Abrams S R, et al.The relationship of drought-related gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana to hormonal and environmental factors.J Exp Bot, 2008, 59: 2991-3007.
[15] Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, Tran L S, et al.Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean.Plant Cell Physiol, 2009, 50: 126-127.
[16] Gong P, Zhang J, Li H, et al.Transcriptional profiles of drought-responsive genes in modulating transcription signal transduction, and biochemical pathways into tomato.J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 3563-3575.
[17] Hou X, Xie K, Yao J, et al.A homolog of human ski-interacting protein in rice positively regulates cell viability and stress tolerance.PNAS, 2009, 106(15): 6410-6415.
[18] Zhu X, Xiong L.Putative megaenzyme DWA1 plays essential roles in drought resistance by regulating stress-induced wax deposition in rice.PNAS, 2013, 110(44): 17790-17795.
[19] Moumeni A, Satoh K, Kondoh H, et al.Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles of two pairs of drought-tolerance and susceptible rice near-isogenic lines under different drought stress.BMC Plant Biol, 2011, 11: 174-191.
[20] Wang H G, Zhang H L, Li Z C.Analysis of gene expression profile induced by water stress in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.var.IRAT109) seedlings using subtractive expressed sequence tags library.J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49(10): 1455-1463.
[21] Maathuis F J M, Sanders D. Energization of potassium uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana.Planta, 1993, 191: 302-307.
[22] Walker D J, Leigh R A, Miller A J.Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells.PNAS, 1996, 93: 10510-10514.
[23] Britto D T, Kronzucker H J.Cellular mechanisms of potassium transport in plants.Physiol Plant, 2008, 133: 637-650.
[24] Mahouachi J, Socorro A R, Talon M.Responses of papaya seedlings (Carica papaya L.) to water stress and rehydration: growth, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient imbalance.Plant Soil, 2006, 281: 137-146.
[25] Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, et al.When defense pathways collide: The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress.Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1683-1696.
[26] Degenkolbe T, Do P T, Zuther E, et al.Expression profiling of rice cultivars differing in their tolerance to long-term drought stress.Plant Mol Biol, 2009, l69: 133-153.
[27] Wang N L, Xiao B Z, Xiong L Z.Identification of a cluster of PR4-like genes involved in stress responses in rice.J Plant Physiol, 2011, 168(18): 2212-2224.
[28] Bartels D, Sunkar R.Drought and salt tolerance in plants.Crit Rev Plant Sci, 2005, 24: 23-58.
[29] Liepman A H, Nairn C J, Willats W G, et al.Functional genomic analysis supports conservation of function among cellulose synthase-like a gene family members and suggests diverse roles of mannans in plants.Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 1881-1893.
[30] Cocuron J C, Lerouxel O, Drakakaki G, et al.A gene from the cellulose synthase like C family encodes a beta-1, 4 glucan synthase.PNAS, 2007, 104: 8550-8555.
[31] Burton R A, Jobling S A, Shirley N J, et al.The genetics and transcriptional profiles of the cellulose synthase-like HvCsIF gene family in barley.Plant Physiol, 2008, 146: 1821-1833.
[32] Dolan L, Davies J.Cell expansion in roots.Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2004, 7: 33-39.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: