研究报告

稻瘟病菌诱导的感病和抗病水稻品种根系离子吸收变化研究

展开
  • 1北京农业信息技术研究中心, 北京 100097;2北京林业大学 生物科学与技术学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期: 2013-11-01

  修回日期: 2014-04-11

  网络出版日期: 2014-11-10

基金资助

国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项(2011YQ080052);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203026);北京市农林科学院科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX201104010)。

Research on Magnaporthe oryzae Induced Alternations of Ion Absorption in Roots of Susceptible and Resistant Rice Varieties

Expand
  • 1Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097,  China;2College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083,  China;

Received date: 2013-11-01

  Revised date: 2014-04-11

  Online published: 2014-11-10

摘要

利用动态离子流检测技术分析稻瘟病菌侵染条件下感病和抗病水稻品种根系离子吸收规律,以探讨稻瘟病菌对水稻营养吸收的影响。研究发现感病水稻品种病症较明显,根系对K+吸收减少,H+由外流转为内流,Ca2+吸收减少且呈现不稳定吸收特征;抗病水稻品种病症较轻,根系对K+、H+、Ca2+吸收仅表现小幅下降。结果表明,在稻瘟病菌侵染后,抗病水稻品种仍保持较强的离子吸收能力,而感病水稻品种的离子吸收能力明显减弱,甚至出现离子流失。这可能是导致感病水稻品种根系营养吸收障碍的重要原因。

本文引用格式

侯佩臣1,王成1,* ,王晓冬1 ,王美娟2 ,朱大洲1,高权1 . 稻瘟病菌诱导的感病和抗病水稻品种根系离子吸收变化研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014 , 28(6) : 659 -664 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.06.012

Abstract

The dynamic ion flux test technique was employed to analyze ion absorption by roots in susceptible and resistant rice varieties subjected to Magnaporthe oryzae infection,aiming to determine the effect of Magnaporthe oryzae infection on nutrient absorption in rice plants. The results showed that Magnaporthe oryzae infection caused more obvious disease symptom in susceptible variety and reduced K+ absorption, led to H+ transition from efflux to influx, and reduced Ca2+ absorption with larger unstability  in root. In contrast, the resistant rice variety showed moderate disease severity and was characterized by only a slight decrease in absorption of K+, H+, and Ca2+ ions by the roots. These results indicated that subjected to Magnaporthe oryzae infection, resistant rice variety showed stronger ion absorption capacity, while the susceptible rice variety exhibited weaker capacity, which could be an important reason leading to the barrier of nutrients absorption in the roots of susceptible rice variety.

参考文献

\[1\]Ou S H. International Mycological Institute. Rice diseases. 2nd ed. Slough: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, 1985.

\[2\]张建福,凌忠专,王国英,等. 籼型恢复系云恢290稻瘟病抗性遗传学分析. 分子植物育种, 2006, 4(4): 540544.

\[3\]王久林,凌忠专,雷财林,等. 籼稻品种浙辐802抗稻瘟病基因的鉴定与分离. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(5): 670674.

\[4\]董海涛,何祖华,吴玉良,等. 水稻抗稻瘟病近等基因系mRNA差别显示分析. 农业生物技术学报, 1998(3): 223228.

\[5\]张骥诚,张向明,王春台,等. 稻瘟病新抗性基因Pita2候选基因的表达载体构建. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(10): 21332135.

\[6\]饶志明,董海涛,庄杰云,等. 水稻稻瘟病菌胁迫应答cDNA片段的表达及定位. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(2): 105108.

\[7\]张江涛,段光明,于泽英. 苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)与水稻抗稻瘟病的关系. 植物生理学通讯, 1987, 6:3437.

\[8\]孙万春,薛高峰,张杰,等. 硅对水稻防御性关键酶活性的影响及其与抗稻瘟病的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(5): 10231028.

\[9\]李海青,张玲,杨国涛,等. 稻瘟菌粗毒素对冈优725离体叶片生理生化的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2011, 39(1): 3840.

\[10\]牟少亮,蔡金森,严艳,等. 水稻Pita启动子的克隆及其功能分析.核农学报, 2013,27(12):18031808.

\[11\]杨秀娟,朱春雨,杜宜新,等. 氮、钾、硅肥对水稻苗生长和抗瘟性的影响. 福建农业学报, 2008, 23(1): 15.

\[12\]周建业. 滨海地区稻瘟病发生与氯离子的关系.植物病理学报, 1987, 17(2): 125126.

\[13\]唐旭,郑毅,汤利,等. 不同品种间作条件下的氮硅营养对水稻稻瘟病发生的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(6): 663666.

\[14\]Newman I A. Ion transport in roots: Measurement of fluxes using ionselective microelectrodes to characterize transporter function. Plant Cell Environ, 2001, 24(1): 114.

\[15\]娄兴亮,侯佩臣,高述民,等.水稻白化突变体根部离子动态吸收规律的研究. 安徽农学通报, 2012, 18(6): 1720, 81.

\[16\]Walsh A. The application of atomic absorption spectra to chemical analysis. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecul Spect, 1989, 45(S10): 221230.

\[17\]Ramos A C, Lima P T, Dias P N, et al. A pH signaling mechanism involved in the spatial distribution of calcium and anion fluxes in ectomycorrhizal roots. New Phytol, 2009, 181(2): 448462.

\[18\]Li J, Bao S, Zhang Y, et al. Paxillus involutus strains MAJ and NAU mediate K+/Na+ homeostasis in ectomycorrhizal populus x canescens under sodium chloride stress. Plant Physiol, 2012, 159(4): 17711786.

\[19\]张国珍,马秋娟,彭友良. 水稻稻瘟病菌有性世代形成条件的优化. 植物病理学报, 2002, 32(2): 121126.

\[20\]Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H, et al. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 2nd ed. Manila,   Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute,1972: 5763.

\[21\]王宝山,赵可夫. 小麦叶片中Na+、K+提取方法的比较. 植物生理学通讯, 1995, 31(1):  5052.

\[22\]Sun J, Chen S, Dai S, et al. NaClinduced alternations of cellular and tissue ion fluxes in roots of saltresistant and saltsensitive poplar species. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149(2): 11411153.

\[23\]Sze H, Li X, Palmgren M G. Energization of plant cell membranes by H+pumping ATPases. Regulation and biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 1999, 11(4): 677690.

\[24\]Palmgren M G. Plant plasma membrane H+ATPases: Powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 52: 817845.

\[25\]鲁黎明. 农作物钾离子通道蛋白及其进化关系分析. 作物杂志, 2009(6): 3134.

\[26\]Shabala L, Ross T, Mcmeekin T, et al. Noninvasive microelectrode ion flux measurements to study adaptive responses of microorganisms to the environment. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2006, 30(3): 472486.

\[27\]Shabala S, Babourina O, Rengel Z, et al. Noninvasive microelectrode potassium flux measurements as a potential tool for early recognition of virushost compatibility in plants. Planta, 2010, 232(4): 807815.

\[28\]Dodd A N, Kudla J, Sanders D. The language of calcium signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010, 61: 593620.

\[29\]Scheel D. Resistance response physiology and signal transduction. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 1998, 1(4): 305310.

\[30\]Kuta D D, Gaivaronskaya L M. Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species are involved in the defense responses of rice callus culture to rice blast disease. Afric J Biotechnol, 2004, 3(1): 7681.
 
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: