研究报告

灌浆乳熟期土壤水势对苏打盐渍土水稻产量及生理性状的影响

展开
  • 吉林农业大学, 吉林 长春 130118;

收稿日期: 2013-11-19

  修回日期: 2013-12-17

  网络出版日期: 2014-09-10

基金资助

吉林省科技支撑计划重大科技攻关专项(20130204036NY);国家科技支撑计划重点资助项目(2009BADB3B03);吉林省现代农业产业技术体系资助项目; 吉林省农业综合开发科技示范资助项目; 吉林省产业技术创新战略联盟项目(20130305035NY)。

Effects of   Soil Water Potential at Grain FillingMilky Stage on Rice Yield and Physiological Traits in Salinealkali Soil

Expand
  • Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; 

Received date: 2013-11-19

  Revised date: 2013-12-17

  Online published: 2014-09-10

摘要

为明确在苏打盐渍土水稻灌浆乳熟期不同土壤水势对其产量构成因素和生理性状的影响,设置4个土壤水势,即WP0(土壤水势0 kPa)、WP-15(土壤水势-15 kPa)、WP-30(土壤水势-30 kPa)以及CK(淹水并保持水层),研究了苏打盐渍土水稻灌浆乳熟期不同土壤水势对产量构成、干物质积累、叶片生理特性以及叶面积的影响。结果表明,水稻灌浆乳熟期进行土壤水势调控,WP0产量最高,比CK、WP-15、WP-30分别增产4.03%、19.90%和26.05%,千粒重和结实率的提高是实现高产的主要原因;根部干物质积累量WP0显著高于对照;复水后15 d,WP0处理地上部分干物质量和根干物质量显著高于CK和其他两个处理;随土壤水势降低叶片相对含水量和叶面积指数下降,但CK与WP0差异不显著;各处理电导率和游离脯氨酸含量均高于CK,含量随土壤水势的降低而增加;而叶绿素含量WP0高于CK,WP-15和WP-30均低于CK,CK与WP0之间差异不显著。苏打盐碱地水稻在灌浆乳熟期不必持续淹水灌溉,湿润灌溉可增加水稻结实率、千粒重、根系活力、地上部分干物质积累量以及叶片叶绿素含量,从而提高水稻产量并节约了水资源。

本文引用格式

耿艳秋,金峰,朱明霞,高显颖,王帅,华霜,邵玺文*,张连学* . 灌浆乳熟期土壤水势对苏打盐渍土水稻产量及生理性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014 , 28(5) : 534 -540 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.05.011

Abstract

To explore the effects of soil water potential at grain fillingmilky stage on rice yield and physiological traits in salinealkali soil, we measured grain yield, dry matter production, leaf physiological traits and leaf area under soil water potentials of 0kPa(WP0), -15 kPa(WP-15),-30 kPa(WP-30) and CK (continuously flooded).The results showed that yield of rice differed significantly under different soil water potentials, being the highest under WP0, while being the lowest under WP-30.Compared with the CK, WP-15 and WP-30, rice grain yield under WP0 increased by 403%, 19.90 % and 26.05 %, respectively and the increased 1000grain weight and seed setting percentage may contribute to its higher grain yield. The root dry matter production under WP0 was significantly higher than that under CK at grain fillingmilky  stage. The dry matter accumulation of root and abroveground part under WP0 were significantly higher than those under CK , WP-15 and WP-30 after 15 days of  rewatering. With the decreasing soil water potential, the leaf relative water content  and leaf area index  decreased with insignificant difference. The content of proline and electrical conductivity under CK were significantly lower than those under WP0, WP-15 and , WP-30. The chlorophyll contents showed a trend of WP0>CK> WP-15> WP-30. The 1000grain weight, seed setting percentage, root activity, dry matter production and chlorophyll contents of rice in soda alkalisaline soil increased under moist irrigation at the grain fillingmilky stage, so in soda alkalisaline soil continuously flooded irrigation is not necessary. Moist irrigation method could improve not only rice yield ,but also water resourceuse efficiency. 

参考文献

\[1\]Belder P, Bouman B A M, Cabangon R, et al. Effect of watersaving  irrigationon rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manag, 2004, 65: 193210.

\[2\]Belder P, Spiertz J H J, Bouman B A M, et al. Nitrogen economy and water productivity of lowland rice under watersaving irrigation. Field Crops Res, 2005, 93: 169185.

\[3\]Borrell A, Garside A, Fukai S. Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semiarid tropical environment. Field Crops Res, 1997, 52: 231248.

\[4\]邵玺文, 马景勇, 童淑媛, 等. 灌浆乳熟期不同水分处理对水稻产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2006, 25(3): 4143.

\[5\]Boonjung H, Fukai S. Effects of soil water deficit at different growth stages on rice growth and yield under upland conditions:I.Growth during drought. Field Crops Res, 1996, 48(1): 3745.

\[6\]Kato Y, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, et al. Growth of rice(Oryza sativa L. ) cultivars under upland conditions with different levels of water supply. Plant Prod Sci, 2007, 10(1): 313.

\[7\]彭世彰,徐俊增,黄乾,等.控制灌溉水稻叶片水平的水分利用效率试验研究.农业工程学报,2006,22(11): 4752.

\[8\]王志琴, 杨建昌, 朱庆森. 土壤水分对水稻光合速率和物质运转的影响. 中国水稻科学, 1996, 10(4): 235240.

\[9\]胡继超, 姜东, 曹卫星, 等. 短期干旱对水稻叶水势、光合作用及干物质分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(1): 6367.

\[10\]Kumar R, Sarawgi A K, Ramos C, et al. Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res, 2006,98(1): 111.

\[11\]Cater G A, Cibula W G, Miller R L. Narrowband reflectance imagery compared with thermal imagery for early detection of plant stress. Plant Physiol, 1996, 148(5): 515522.

\[12\]Belder P, Bouman B A M, Cabangon R, et al. Effect of watersaving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manag, 2004, 65(3): 193210.

\[13\]黄新宇, 徐阳春, 沈其荣, 等. 不同地表覆盖旱作水稻和水作水稻水分利用效率的研究. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(3): 140143.

\[14\]Bouman B A M, Tuong T P. Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agric Water Manag, 2001, 49(1): 1130.

\[15\]Vories E D, Helms R S. Production of waterseeded rice on a clay soil. Res Series, 1996, 453: 271274.

\[16\]Borrell A, Garside A, Fukai S. Improving efficiency of water use for irrigated rice in a semiarid tropical environment. Field Crops Res, 1997, 52(3): 231248.

\[17\]陈贵, 周毅, 郭世伟, 等. 水分胁迫条件下不同形态氮素营养对水稻叶片光合效率的调控机理研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(10): 21622168.

\[18\]周毅, 郭世伟, 宋娜, 等. 水分胁迫和供氮形态耦合作用下分蘖期水稻的光合速率、水分与氮素利用. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(3): 313318.

\[19\]邹桂花, 梅捍卫, 余新桥, 等. 不同灌水量对水、旱稻营养生长和光合特性及其产量的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(8): 11791183.

\[20\]O’ Toole J C, Cruz R T. Response of leaf water potential,stomatal resistance,and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiol, 1980, 65(3):428432.

\[21\]杨建昌, 朱庆森, 王志琴, 等. 土壤水分对水稻产量与生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 1995, 21(1): 110114.

\[22\]林贤青, 周伟军, 朱德峰, 等. 稻田水分管理方式对水稻光合速率和水分利用效率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18(4): 333338.

\[23\]程建平, 曹凑贵, 蔡明历, 等. 不同灌溉方式对水稻生物学特性与水分利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10): 18591865.

\[24\]Lu J, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T. The effects of irrigation regimes on the water use,dry matter production and physiological responses of paddy rice. Plant & Soil, 2000, 223(1/2): 209218.

\[25\]秦江涛, 胡锋, 李辉信, 等. 覆草旱作对水稻主要农艺性状的影响及节水效应. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(2): 171176.

\[26\]邵玺文, 刘红丹, 杜震宇, 等. 不同时期水分处理对水稻生长及产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1): 193196.

\[27\]Yang J, Zhang H, Zhang J. Root morphology and physiology in relation tothe yield formation of rice. J Integr Agric, 2012, 11: 920926.

\[28\]Ramasamy S, Berge, H F M, Purushothaman S. Yield formation in rice inresponse to drainage and nitrogen application. Field Crops Res,1997, 51: 6582.

\[29\]张荣萍, 马均, 王贺正, 等. 不同灌水方式对水稻生育特性及水分利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(9): 144150.

\[30\]程建平, 曹凑贵, 潘圣刚, 等.不同灌溉方式下水稻产量性状相关性及通径分析. 灌溉排水学报, 2008, 27(1): 9699.

\[31\]曾翔, 李阳生, 谢小立, 等. 不同灌溉模式对杂交水稻生育后期根系生理特性和剑叶光合特性的影响.中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(4): 6670.

\[32\]陈国林.水稻节水灌溉的生理生态效应.江西农业大学学报, 1996, 18(2): 160166.

\[33\]徐芬芬, 曾晓春, 石庆华, 等. 不同灌溉方式对水稻生长与产量的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2005, 27(5): 653658.

\[34\]黄占斌. 干湿变化与作物补偿效应规律研究. 生态农业研究, 2000, 8(1): 3033.

\[35\]Steward C R. Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980: 173189.

\[36\]梁永超, 胡锋, 杨茂成, 等. 水稻覆膜旱种高产节水机理研究.中国农业科学, 1999, 32(1): 26~32.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: