研究报告

水稻CYP81A6基因干扰对其他基因表达的影响

展开
  • 1浙江大学 农业与生物技术学院 昆虫科学研究所,  杭州 310058; 2浙江大学 农生环测试中心, 杭州 310058;

收稿日期: 2013-05-15

  修回日期: 2013-08-05

  网络出版日期: 2013-09-10

基金资助

浙江省自然科学基金重点资助项目(Z3080241)。

Knockdown of CYP81A6  Gene  Affects  Expression of Other Genes   in Rice

Expand
  • 1 Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;  2 Analysis Center of Agrobiology and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;

Received date: 2013-05-15

  Revised date: 2013-08-05

  Online published: 2013-09-10

摘要

为了明确抑制基因CYP81A6的表达对水稻的自身功能基因表达的影响,对亲本水稻秀水110和转基因水稻4503的mRNA进行深度测序,并将获得的序列信息通过水稻基因数据库和生物信息学手段进行注释和功能基因比较。结果表明,在3529个差异表达的基因中,上调表达基因1018个,下调表达基因2511个;秀水110与4503中共同表达的基因有2533个,仅在4503中表达的基因有363个,仅在秀水110表达的基因有633个。与水稻基因数据库功能已知的296个抗性基因对比,发现4503中差异表达的基因有64个功能已知且与水稻抗性相关,包括2个抗虫相关基因,17个抗病相关基因和45个抗逆相关基因,预示着基因CYP81A6的抑制表达对水稻抗性会产生一定的影响。GO功能和通路显著性富集分析显示,差异表达基因显著富集在38个GO条目和13个通路上,在结合能力(GO: 0020037)和光合作用(KO 00195)通路上富集最为显著。通过对转基因水稻的转录组分析,阐明转基因水稻基因与亲本相比发生的变化,进而分析这些变化对转基因水稻产生的影响,从基因生态学角度为转基因水稻的安全性评价提供科学依据,可作为一种新的方法应用于转基因生物的安全性评价。

本文引用格式

杨阳1,刘金华1,高其康1,2,* . 水稻CYP81A6基因干扰对其他基因表达的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013 , 27(5) : 447 -456 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.05.001

Abstract

To study the effects of knockdown the gene CYP81A6 on gene expression of transgenic rice,   we report the transcriptome profiling analysis of transgenic rice  4503 and normal control rice Xiushui 110. In this study, mRNA of transgenic rice and its parent (control) were deeply sequenced, sequences information obtained and functional genes comparison against the rice gene database were analyzed. Results showed that 3529 genes in  total were significantly differential expressed, among which 1018 genes were upregulated and 2511 genes were downregulated. The differential expressed genes distribution of the two samples showed that there were 2533 genes expressed in both Xiushui 110 and 4503, 633 genes only expressed in Xiushui 110, while 363 genes expressed just in 4503. Comparative analysis with 296 resistance genes in the rice database showed that 64 resistance genes were involved in rice resistance, including two  insectresistant genes, 17 diseaseresistant genes and 45 stressresistant genes, indicating that resistance of transgenic plant 4503 would be affected. Gene enrichment studies and further analysis showed that differential expressed genes were significantly enriched in 38 GO terms and 13 KO terms in 4503, ‘heme binding’ (GO:0020037) and ‘photosynthesis’ (KO 00195) were enriched most dramatically. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the transgenic rice 4503 and Xiushui 110 was conducted to clarify the changes of gene expression level in 4503. Knockdown of gene CYP81A6 may result in extensive and variable change in the transcriptome of 4503. Viewed from the gene evology point,these observations may provide valuable information to address the safety of genetically modified crops, and it could be used as a new method for  the safety evaluation of genetically modified organisms.

参考文献

\[1\]Losey J E, Rayor L S, Carter M E, et al. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 1999, 399(6733): 214214.

\[2\]Novak W K, Haslberger A G. Substantial equivalence of antinutrients and inherent plant toxins in genetically modified novel foods. Food & Chem Toxicol, 2000(38): 473483.

\[3\]Pan G, Zhang X Y, Liu K D, et al. Mapbased cloning of a novel rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP81A6 that confers resistance to two different classes of herbicides. Plant Mol Biol, 2006, 61: 933943.

\[4\]Lee D S, Nioche P, Hamberg M, et al. Structural insights into the evolutionary paths of oxylipin biosynthetic enzymes. Nature, 2008, 455: 363368.

\[5\]Miyoshi K, Ahn B O, Kawakatsu T, et al. PLASTOCHRON1, a timekeeper of leaf initiation in rice, encodes cytochrome P450. PNAS, 2004, 101: 875880.

\[6\]Chaban C, Waller F, Furuya M, et al. Auxin responsiveness of a novel cytochrome p450 in rice coleoptiles. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133: 20002009.

\[7\]Hong Z, UeguchiTanaka M, Umemura K, et al. A rice brassinosteroiddeficient mutant, ebisu dwarf (d2), is caused by a loss of function of a new member of cytochrome P450. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 29002910.

\[8\]Zhu Y Y, Nomura T, Xu Y H, et al. ELONGATED UPPERMOST INTERNODE encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that epoxidizes gibberellins in a novel deactivation reaction in rice. Plant Cell, 2006, 18: 442456.

\[9\]Lin C Y, Fang J, Xu X L, et al. A builtin strategy for containment of transgenic plants: Creation of selectively terminable transgenic rice. PloS One, 2008, 3: e1818.

\[10\]Audic S, Claverie J M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res, 1997, 7: 98695.

\[11\]Zhang L, Lu Q, Chen H G, et al. Identication of a cytochrome P450 hydroxylase,CYP81A6, as the candidate for the bentazon and sulfonylurea herbicide resistance gene, Bel, in rice. Mol Breeding, 2007, 19: 5968.

\[12\]Ito T, Meyerowitz E M. Overexpression of a gene encoding a cytochrome P450, CYP78A9, induces large and seedless fruit in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2000, 12: 15411550.

\[13\]Hofer R, Briesen I, Beck M, et al. The Arabidopsis Cytochrome P450 CYP86A1 encodes a fatty acid ωhydroxylase involved in suberin monomer biosynthesis. J Exp Bot, 2008, 59: 23472360.

\[14\]Qi J F, Zhou G X, Yang L J, et al. The chloroplastlocalized phospholipases D α4 and α5 regulate herbivoreinduced direct and indirect defenses in rice. Plant Physiol, 2011, 157: 19871999.

\[15\]Cheng A X, Xiang C Y, Li J X, et al. The rice (E)βcaryophyllene synthase (OsTPS3) accounts for the major inducible volatile sesquiterpenes. Phytochemistry, 2007, 68(12): 16321641.

\[16\]Zhu S F, Gao F, Cao X S, et al. The rice dwarf virus P2 protein interacts with entkaurene oxidases in vivo, leading to reduced biosynthesis of gibberellins and rice dwarf symptoms. Plant Physiol, 2005, 139(4): 19351945.

\[17\]Iwai T, Miyasaka A, Seo S, et al. Contribution of ethylene biosynthesis for resistance to blast fungus infection in young rice plants. Plant Physiology, 2006, 142: 12021215.

\[18\]Fukuoka S, Saka N, Koga H, et al. Loss of function of a prolinecontaining protein confers durable disease resistance in rice. Science, 2009, 325: 9981001.

\[19\]Haga K, Iino M. Phytochromemediated transcriptional upregulation of allene oxide synthase in rice seedlings. Plant & Cell Physiol, 2004, 45(2): 119128.

\[20\]Mei C S, Qi M, Sheng G Y, et al. Inducible overexpression of a rice allene oxide synthase gene increases the endogenous jasmonic acid level, PR gene expression, and host resistance to fungal infection. Mol PlantMicrobe Int, 2006, 19: 11271137.

\[21\]Antony G, Zhou J H, Huang S, et al. Rice xa13 recessive resistance to bacterial blight is defeated by induction of the disease susceptibility gene Os11N3. Plant Cell, 2010, 22: 38643876.

\[22\]He H J, Su J B, Shu S Y, et al. Two homologous putative protein tyrosine phosphatases, OsPFADSP2 and AtPFADSP4, negatively regulate the pathogen response in transgenic plants. PloS One, 2012, 7: e34995.

\[23\]Umemura K, Satou J, Iwata M, et al. Contribution of salicylic acid glucosyltransferase, OsSGT1, to chemically induced disease resistance in rice plants.  Plant J, 2008, 57: 463472.

\[24\]Cao Y F, Song F M, Goodman R M, et al. Molecular characterization of four rice genes encoding ethyleneresponsive transcriptional factors and their expressions in response to biotic and abiotic stress. J Plant Physiol, 2006, 163(11): 11671178.

\[25\]Liu X Q, Bai X Q, Wang X J, et al. OsWRKY71, a rice transcription factor, is involved in rice defense response. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 969979.

\[26\]Ding X H, Cao Y L, Huang L L, et al. Activation of the indole3acetic acidamido synthetase GH38 suppresses expansin expression and promotes salicylate and jasmonateindependent basal immunity in rice. Plant Cell, 2008, 20: 228240.

\[27\]Yadav S R, Khanday I, Majhi B B, et al. Auxinresponsive OsMGH3, a common downstream target of OsMADS1 and OsMADS6, controls rice floret fertility. Plant & Cell Physiol, 2011, 52(12): 21232135.

\[28\]Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Ma J F. An Alinducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. Plant J, 2011, 68: 10611069.

\[29\]Horie T, Sugawara M, Okada T, et al. Rice sodiuminsensitive potassium transporter, OsHAK5, confers increased salt tolerance in tobacco BY2 cells. J Biosci & Bioengin, 2011, 111(3): 346356.

\[30\]Ogo Y, Itai R N, Nakanishi H, et al. The rice bHLH protein OsIRO2 is an essential regulator of the genes involved in Fe uptake under Fedeficient conditions. Plant J, 2007, 51: 366377.

\[31\]Zhang L, Tian L H, Zhao J F, et al. Identification of an apoplastic protein involved in the initial phase of salt stress response in rice root by twodimensional electrophoresis. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149: 916928.

\[32\]Jiang J F, Li J H, Xu Y Y, et al. RNAi knockdown of Oryza sativa root meander curling gene led to altered root development and coiling which were mediated by jasmonic acid signalling in rice. Plant, Cell & Environ, 2007, 30(6): 690699.

\[33\]Jeong J S, Kim Y S, Baek K H, et al. Rootspecific expression of OsNAC10 improves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice under field drought conditions. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153(1): 185197.

\[34\]Chen J Q, Meng X P, Zhang Y, et al. Overexpression of OsDREB genes lead to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnol Lett, 2008, 30: 21912198.

\[35\]Xiao B Z, Huang Y M, Tang N, et al. Overexpression of a LEA gene in rice improves drought resistance under the field conditions. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 115(1): 3546.

\[36\]Lee Y S, Jeong D H, Lee D Y, et al. OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB.  Plant J, 2010, 63(1): 1830.

\[37\]Wei X J, Xu J F, Guo H N, et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153(4): 17471758.

\[38\]Wang C, Zhang Q, Shou H X. Identification and expression analysis of OsHsfs in rice. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2009, 10: 291300.

\[39\]Diallinas G, Kanellis A K. A phenylalanine ammonialyase gene from melon fruit: cDNA cloning, sequence and expression in response to development and wounding. Plant Mol Biol, 1994, 26: 473479.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: