为了明确稻瘟病菌不同拼接版本基因组序列的差异，促进合理利用不同拼接版本基因组序列，比较了不同版本稻瘟病菌基因组数据库微卫星序列的分布情况，功能基因的位置及长度差异，SSR引物的位置差异等。结果表明，不同基因组数据库在序列长度上差异明显，功能基因的位置、SSR引物位置和SSR核苷酸重复类型数量也差异明显。无毒基因AvrPizt连锁标记比较分析表明AvrPizt基因定位在不同数据库中差别明显。不同稻瘟病菌数据库中，第7染色体的序列与其上的BAC序列之间差异显著，虽然这不影响功能基因的分析，但影响无毒基因图位克隆的定位区间的判断。因此，稻瘟病菌研究者应根据实际情况选择相应的数据库。
To promote the scientific utilization of M. oryzae databases, the location and length of functional genes, the distribution and number of SSR loci, SSR primer’s location, and other characteristics in four M. oryzae databases and Chr7 BAC sequence database were compared. The results suggest that the length and annotated gene numbers, location of functional genes, SSR numbers of nucleotide repeats and SSR primer location in the four M. oryzae databases and Chr7 BAC sequence database differ. AvrPizt linked marker location assay shows that genome sequences in different databases have significant differences. Our results also indicate significant differences among the four M. oryzae databases and Chr7 BAC sequence database. Though the difference among different databases exerting not effect on the gene homolog clone, it affects the map based cloning of avirulence gene. In a word, researchers need to choose which database can be used in their studies according to the purpose.
\[1\]Zhu H, Blackmon B P, Sasinowski M, et al. Physical map and organization of chromosome 7 in the rice blast fungus. Magnaporthe grisea. Genome Res, 1999, 9(8): 739750.
\[2\]Thon M R, Martin S L,Goff S, et al. BAC end sequences and a physical map reveal transposable element content and clustering patterns in the genome of Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet Biol, 2004, 41(7): 657666.
\[3\]Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 1999, 27(2): 573580.
\[4\]GurArie R, Cohen C, Eitan Y,et al. Simple Sequence Repeats in Escherichia coli: Abundance, distribution, composition, and polymorphism. Genome Res, 2000, 10: 6271.
\[5\]Li C Y, Liu L, Yang J, et al. Genomewide analysis of microsatellite sequence in seven filamentous fungi.Interdiscip Sci, 2009, 1(2): 141150.
\[6\]王艳丽, Claudia K, Amandine B, et al. 稻瘟病菌株CH63和TH16杂交组合的遗传图谱构建及无毒基因定位. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(2): 160166.
\[7\]Zheng Y, Zhang G, Lin F, et al. Development of microsatellite markers and construction of genetic map in rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Fungal Genet Biol, 2008, 45(10): 13401347.
\[8\]Li W, Wang B, Wu J, et al. The Magnaporthe oryzae avirulence gene AvrPizt encodes a predicted secreted protein that triggers the immunity in rice mediated by the blast resistance gene Pizt. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2009, 22(4): 411420.
\[9\]Yoshida K, Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, et al. Association genetics reveals three novel avirulence genes from the rice blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Cell, 2009, 21(5): 15731591.
\[10\]Couch B C, Kohn L M. A multilocus gene genealogy concordant with host preference indicates segregation of a new species,Magnaporthe oryzae, from Mgrisea. Mycologia, 2002, 94(4): 683693.
\[11\]DeZwaan T M, Carroll A M, Valent B,et al. Magnaporthe grisea Pth11p is a novel plasma membrane protein that mediates appressorium differentiation in response to inductive substrate cues. Plant Cell, 1999, 11(10): 20132030.
\[12\]Dean R A. Signal pathways and appressorium morphogenesis.Ann Rev Phytopathol, 1997, 35: 211234.
\[13\]Xu J R, Hamer J E. MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea.Genes Dev, 1996, 10(21): 26962706.
\[14\]Liu X H, Lu J P, Zhang L, et al. Involvement of a Magnaporthe grisea serine/threonine kinase gene, MgATG1, in appressorium turgor and pathogenesis.Eukaryot Cell, 2007, 6(6): 9971005.
\[15\]Mitchell T K, Dean R A. The cAMPdependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for appressorium formation and pathogenesis by the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea.Plant Cell, 1995, 7(11): 18691878.
\[16\]Zheng W, Chen J, Liu W, et al. A Rho3 homolog is essential for appressorium development and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe grisea.Eukaryot Cell, 2007, 6(12): 22402250.
\[17\]Xu J R, Staiger C J, Hamer J E. Inactivation of the mitogenactivated protein kinase Mps1 from the rice blast fungus prevents penetration of host cells but allows activation of plant defense responses.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95(21): 1271312718.
\[18\]Kang S C, Sweigard J A, Valent B. The PWL host specificity gene family in the blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol PlantMicrobe Interac, 1995, 8(6): 939948.
\[19\]Sweigard J A, Carroll A M, Kang S, et al. Identification, cloning, and characterization of PWL2, a gene for host species specificity in the rice blast fungus. Plant Cell, 1995, 7(8): 12211233.
\[20\]Orbach M J, Farrall L, Sweigard J A, et al. A telomeric avirulence gene determines efficacy for the rice blast resistance gene Pita. Plant Cell, 2000, 12(11): 20192032.
\[21\]Jia Y, McAdams S A, Bryan G T, et al. Direct interaction of resistance gene and avirulence gene products confers rice blast resistance. EMBO J, 2000, 19(15): 40044014.
\[22\]Bohnert H U, Fudal I, Dioh W, et al. A putative polyketide synthase/peptide synthetase from Magnaporthe grisea signals pathogen attack to resistant rice. Plant Cell, 2004, 16(9): 24992513.
