以杂交中籼丰两优1号组合为材料，设置不同的播期和收获期，分析稻米主要品质指标(直链淀粉、总蛋白含量、RVA特征值等)和米饭食味品质，并用二硫苏糖醇 (DTT)或蛋白酶(Trypsin)分别打破样品蛋白质二硫键或酶解蛋白质后，观察RVA特征谱和膨胀势的变化，旨在明确蛋白质对不同食味品质样品RVA的影响，进而探索蛋白质影响米饭食味品质的机理。结果表明，第3播期(6月13日)稻米品质主要指标（直链淀粉、总蛋白、膨胀势、RVA特征值）与第4播期（6月23日）样品差异不显著，但食味品质明显好于后者；分别经蛋白酶处理后，第3和第4播期样品RVA上升段斜率差异不显著，但前者后段冷却后回升斜率明显小于第4播期。由于影响RVA特征谱后段凝胶刚性的主要因素是淀粉与水之比，刚性随淀粉凝胶中含水量减少而提高，食味品质较好的第3播期米粉经蛋白酶处理后，凝胶刚性小且减弱程度大，这可能是蛋白质酶解后形成蛋白质碎片的持水能力弱，即淀粉与水之比低，由此推测蛋白质影响米饭食味品质可能在米饭蒸煮后阶段，即可能与蛋白质水合后持水能力差异有关。
With Fengliangyou 1 sowed or harvested at different dates, the effects of sowing and harvest dates on rice amylose content, swelling power(SP), protein content, RVA viscosities and eating quality were analyzed, respectively, as well as changes of RVA viscosity and swelling power after protein removal or disulphide bond disruption, and the factors related to rice eating quality. Preincubation of all flours with dithiothreitol (DTT) or a protease increased SP. The amylose content, protein content, SP and RVA viscosity values were similar between sowing Ⅲ（13th June） and sowing Ⅳ(23th June), but the eating quality of rice for sowing Ⅲ was better. When treated with trypsin, the slope of the linear region of each curve for both samples was similar, but the liftoff from hot viscosity to the cool viscosity part varied and the hot viscosity and cool viscosity of sowing Ⅲ were significantly lower than those of sowing Ⅳ. The latter part of the RVA paste rigidity was affected by the proportion of the quantity starch to water. Paste rigidity decreased greatly and resulted low values, suggesting that the difference of water holding capacity of protein after protein hydration may play a major role in determining the eating quality of cooked rice.
\[1\]黄发松, 孙宗修, 胡培松, 等. 食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望. 中国水稻科学, 1998, 12(3): 172176.
\[2\]陈能, 罗玉坤, 谢黎虹, 等. 我国水稻品种的蛋白质含量及与米质的相关性研究. 作物学报, 2006, 32（8）: 11931196.
\[3\]Hamker B R, Griffin V K. Changing the viscoelastic properties of cooked rice through protein disruption. J Cereal Chem, 1990, 67(3): 261264.
\[4\]Derycke V, Veraverbeke W S, Vandeputte G E, et al. Impact of proteins on pasting and cooking properties of nonparboiled and parboiled rice. J Cereal Chem, 2005, 82(4): 468474.
\[5\]Martin M, Fitzgerald M A. Proteins in rice influence cooking properties. J Cereal Sci, 2002, 36: 285294.
\[6\]谢黎虹, 陈能, 段彬伍, 等. 稻米中蛋白质对淀粉RVA特征谱的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(5): 524528.
\[7\]陈能, 谢黎虹, 段彬伍. 稻米中含二硫键蛋白对其米饭质地的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(1): 167170.
\[8\]田纪春. 谷物品质测试理论与方法. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006, 9697.
\[9\]Vandeputte G E, Derycke V, Geeroms J, et al. Rice starches: Ⅱ. Structural aspects provide insight into swelling and pasting properties. J Cereal Sci, 2003, 38: 5359.
\[10\]American Association of Cereal Chemist (AACC). Approved methods of analysis. 11th ed. Methods 6102. 01. Determination of the pasting properties of rice with the Rapid Visco Analyser. The Association: St. Paul, MN, 1999.
\[11\]谢黎虹, 杨仕华, 陈能, 等. 不同生态条件下籼稻米饭质地和淀粉RVA谱特性. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 14791484.
\[12\]中华人民共和国国家标准. GB/T 156821995 稻米蒸煮试验品质评定. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996.
\[13\]舒庆尧, 吴殿星, 夏英武, 等．稻米淀粉RVA谱特征与食用品质的关系．中国农业科学, 1998, 31(3): 2529.
\[14\]Matasue Y, Odahara K, Hiramatsum et al. Difference in amylose content amylographic characteristics and storage proteins of grain on primary and secondary rice branches in rice. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1995, 64(3): 601606.
\[15\]Xie L H, Chen N, Duan B W, et al. Impact of proteins on pasting and cooking properties of waxy and nonwaxy rice. J Cereal Sci, 2008, 47: 372379.
