研究报告

基于3种遗传统计模型对粳稻米质性状的QTL分析

展开
  • 1 南京农业大学 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210095;2 安徽省农业科学院 作物研究所, 安徽 合肥 230031;

收稿日期: 2011-06-07

  修回日期: 2011-06-14

  网络出版日期: 2012-05-10

基金资助

国家863计划资助项目(2010AA101301);农业部948计划资助项目\[2006G8(4)311\];教育部科技基础条件平台重点资助项目(505005)。

QTL Analysis for Seven Quality Traits of  japonica Rice  Based on Three Genetic Statistical Models

Expand
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2 Institute of Crops, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;

Received date: 2011-06-07

  Revised date: 2011-06-14

  Online published: 2012-05-10

摘要

以粳粳交组合秀水79/C堡衍生的254个重组自交系为材料,利用基于混合线性模型的QTLMapper 2.0软件的复合区间作图法(MCIM)、基于逐步回归线性模型的QTL IciMapping 3.0软件的完备复合区间作图法(ICIM)和基于多元回归分析的Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5软件的多区间作图回归前进选择法(MIMR)等3种定位方法,对整精米的粒长、长宽比、垩白粒率、垩白度、直链淀粉含量、糊化温度和胶稠度等7个米质性状进行了QTL分析。结果表明,3种方法同时检测到的具有加性效应的QTL (AQTL)有5个,2种方法同时检测到的AQTL有2个,仅能在1种方法中检测到的AQTL有23个。MCIM、ICIM和MIMR检测到的AQTL个数分别为5、9和28,单个AQTL贡献率为0.89%~38.07%。MIMR检测到的具有上位性效应的QTL (EQTL)在另2种方法中都未被检测到。MCIM 和ICIM同时检测到的EQTL有14对,仅能在1种方法中检测到的EQTL有142对。MCIM、ICIM和MIMR检测到的EQTL对数分别为25、141和4,单对EQTL贡献率为2.60%~23.78%。在秀堡RIL群体中,粒长和垩白度的变异以上位性效应为主,长宽比则以加性效应为主,而垩白粒率、直链淀粉含量、糊化温度和胶稠度为加性效应和上位性效应同等重要。两种及以上方法同时检测到的QTL可靠性高,可用于改良杂交粳稻米质。

本文引用格式

刘强明1,江建华1,2,牛付安1,赫英俊1,洪德林1,* . 基于3种遗传统计模型对粳稻米质性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012 , 26(3) : 283 -290 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.03.005

Abstract

QTL mapping for seven quality traits was conducted by using 254 recombinant inbred lines derived from a  japonicajaponica  rice (Oryza sativa L.) cross of Xiushui 79/C Bao. The seven  traits were grain length (GL), grain length to width ratio (LWR), percentage of grains with chalkiness (PGWC), degree of endosperm chalkiness (DEC), gelatinization temperature (GT), amylose content (AC) and gel consistency (GC) of headrice. Three mapping methods employed were composite interval mapping in QTLMapper 2.0 software based on mixed linear model (MCIM), the inclusive composite interval mapping in QTL IciMapping 3.0 software based on stepwise regression linear model (ICIM) and the multiple interval mapping with regression forward selection in Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5 based on multiple regression analysis (MIMR). Five QTLs with additive effect (AQTLs) were detected by all the three methods simultaneously, two by two methods simultaneously, and 23 by only one method. Five AQTLs were detected by MCIM, nine by ICIM and 28 by MIMR. The contribution rate of single AQTL ranged from 0.89% to 38.07%. All the QTLs with epistatic effect (EQTLs) detected by MIMR were not detected by the other two methods. Fourteen pairs of EQTLs  were detected by both MCIM and ICIM, and 142 pairs of EQTLs were detected by only one method. Twentyfive  pairs of EQTLs were detected by MCIM, 141 pairs by ICIM and four pairs by MIMR. The contribution rate of a single pair of EQTL was from 2.60% to 23.78%. In the XiuBao RIL population, epistatic effect played a major role in the variation of GL and DEC, and additive effect was the dominant in the variation of LWR, while epistatic effect and additive effect had equal importance in the variation of PGWC, AC, GT and GC. QTLs detected by two or more methods simultaneously were highly reliable, and could be applied to improvement of the quality in  japonica  hybrid rice.

参考文献

\[1\]邓华凤, 何强, 舒服, 等. 中国杂交粳稻研究现状与对策. 杂交水稻, 2006, 21(1): 16.

\[2\]徐建权, 张大友, 张亚, 等. 杂交粳稻育种实践与思考. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(专辑): 8587.

\[3\]Weng J F, Gu S H, Wan X Y, et al.  Isolation and initial characterization of GW5,   a major QTL associated with rice grain width and weight. Cell Res, 2008, 18(12): 11991209.

\[4\]Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, et al. GS3,   a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theor Appl Genet,   2006, 112(6): 11641171.

\[5\]Okagaki R J, Wessler S R. Comparison of nonmutant and mutant waxy genes in rice and maize. Genetics, 1988, 120: 11371143.

\[6\]高振宇, 曾大力, 崔霞, 等. 水稻稻米糊化温度控制基因ALK的图位克隆及其序列分析. 中国科学:C辑, 2003, 33(6):481248.

\[7\]苏成付, 卢为国, 赵团结, 等. 利用目标区段剩余杂合系进行大豆开花期QTL的验证和精细定位. 科学通报, 2010, 55(4/5): 332341.

\[8\]苏成付, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 不同遗传统计模型QTL定位方法应用效果的模拟比较. 作物学报, 2010, 36(7): 11001107.

\[9\]江建华, 郭媛, 陈献功, 等. 粳稻穗角与稻米品质的相关性及稻米品质遗传分析. 遗传, 2007, 29(6): 714724.

\[10\]Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, et al. Mapping QTL with epistatic effects and QTL environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet,   1999, 99: 12551264.

\[11\]Li H H, Ribaut J M, Li Z L, et al. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theor Appl Genet,   2008, 116: 243260.

\[12\]Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm), 2007.

\[13\]郭媛, 程保山, 洪德林. 粳稻SSR连锁图谱的构建及恢复系卷叶性状QTL分析.中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(3): 245251.

\[14\]牛付安. 粳稻穗角性状的遗传分离分析和QTL定位及关联分析\[学位论文\]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2011: 2224.

\[15\]McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice. Rice,   2008, 1: 7284.

\[16\] 高志强, 占小登, 梁永书, 等. 水稻粒形性状的遗传及相关基因定位与克隆研究进展. 遗传, 2011, 33(3): 18.

\[17\]周立军, 刘喜, 江玲, 等. 利用CSSL和BIL群体分析稻米垩白率 QTL 及互作效应.中国农业科学, 2009, 42(4): 11291135.

\[18\]刘家富, 奎丽梅, 朱作峰, 等. 普通野生稻稻米加工品质和外观品质性状QTL定位. 农业生物技术学报, 2007, 15(1): 9096.

\[19\]Bao J S,  Corke H, He P, et al. Analysis of quantitative trait loci for starch properties of rice base on an RIL population. Acta Bot Sin,   2003, 45(8): 986994.

\[20\]雷东阳, 谢放鸣, 徐建龙, 等. 稻米粒形和垩白度的QTL定位和上位性分析. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(3): 255260.

\[21\]江良荣, 王伟, 黄建勋, 等. 水稻粒形性状的上位性和QE互作效应分析. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(4): 690698.

\[22\]黄殿成, 梁奎, 孙程, 等. 杂交粳稻亲本米质性状优异配合力的标记基因型鉴定. 作物学报, 2011, 37(3): 405414.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: