<FONT face="Verdana">水稻不同粒位籽粒淀粉与蛋白质累积动态差异</FONT>

董明辉,谢裕林,乔中英 ,刘晓斌,吴翔宙,赵步洪,杨建昌,

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.011

中国水稻科学 >

2011 , Vol. 25 >Issue 3: 297 - 306

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.011

研究报告

水稻不同粒位籽粒淀粉与蛋白质累积动态差异

展开

¹扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室, 江苏扬州 225009; ²苏州市农业科学院，江苏苏州 215155; ³江苏省里下河地区农业科学研究所, 江苏扬州 225007; *通讯联系人, E-mail: jcyang@yzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2011-05-10

收起

Variation in Carbohydrate and Protein Accumulation Between Spikelets at Different Positions Within a Rice Panicle During Grain Filling

Expand

¹National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; ² Suzhou City Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Suzhou 215155, China; 3Lixiahe Region Agricultural Research Institute of Jiangsu, Yangzhou 225007, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: jcyang@yzu.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2011-05-10

Fold

摘要

以中熟籼稻（扬稻6号）和中熟粳稻（扬粳9538）为材料，研究了穗上不同粒位籽粒灌浆过程中粒重、淀粉、可溶性糖和粗蛋白质含量等动态变化，以期通过分析灌浆物质累积动态差异探讨不同粒位间籽粒品质差异形成的生理原因。穗上不同粒位籽粒灌浆物质累积动态存在显著差异，同一穗上早开花籽粒起步灌浆早，初期灌浆速率快；灌浆前、中期籽粒中淀粉和直链淀粉累积速率、累积量与籽粒开花顺序较为一致，即早开花籽粒大于迟开花籽粒，而不同粒位籽粒间的可溶性糖含量变化则与之相反。灌浆在粒位间的差异扬粳9538大于扬稻6号。成熟期籽粒直链淀粉含量则与开花顺序无必然联系。粗蛋白质含量随灌浆进程呈倒“S”型趋势，即灌浆前期下降较快，至最低点后略有回升，前期下降速率迟开花籽粒大于早开花籽粒，但蛋白质含量在整个灌浆阶段则以迟开花籽粒大于早开花籽粒，二次枝梗大于一次枝梗籽粒，穗下部籽粒高于其他部位籽粒。灌浆前、中期同枝梗上较早开花籽粒含水量下降幅度大于迟开花的籽粒，一次枝梗上第1粒尤为明显。以上结果说明，可溶性碳水化合物的供给可能不是弱势粒发育不良的限制因子，弱势粒灌浆充实不良可能与其较低的生理活性有关。

关键词： 粒位; 淀粉; 蛋白质; 累积动态; 差异; 水稻

本文引用格式

董明辉,谢裕林,乔中英 ,刘晓斌,吴翔宙,赵步洪,杨建昌, . 水稻不同粒位籽粒淀粉与蛋白质累积动态差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011 , 25(3) : 297 -306 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.011

Abstract

he accumulation dynamic of filling matter for spikelets at different positions within a rice panicle was investigated during grain filling to understand the physiological reasons for the variations of grain quality. Two rice cultivars, Yangdao 6 (indica) and Yangjing 9538(japonica), were fieldgrown, and the grain filling character and the contents of starch, soluble sugar, and protein of the spikelets at different positions were studied. There were significant differences in matter accumulation between spikelets at different positions during grain filling. The earlierflowered spikelets presented dominance over the laterflowered spikelets in initial filling rate and filling intensity. The contents and rates of starch and amylose accumulation in spikelets were consistent with the flowering sequence at the initial and medium filling stages, i.e., the earlierflowered spikelets had greater contents and rates of starch and amylose accumulation than laterflowered spikelets, but the soluble sugar content (SSC) exhibited an opposite result. The difference in SSC between the spikelets of Yangjing 9538 was greater than that of Yangdao 6, but the amylase content in spikelets at maturity was not very identical with the flowering sequence of spikelets. The change in crude protein content (CPC) showed an Sshaped curve. The CPC of earlierflowered spikelets decreased more rapidly than that of those laterflowered ones at the initial filling stage, and CPC in the spikelets on the secondary rachis branch was more than that on the primary rachis branch, but CPC in laterflowered spikelets was higher than that in earlierflowered spikelets in the whole filling period. Grain water content (GWC) of earlierflowered spikelets decreased more rapidly than that of laterflowered spikelets in the same branch at the initial and medium filling stages, especially for the first grain among the spikelets on a primary rachis branch. The results suggested that the low biological activity of laterflowered inferior spikelets may be attributed to their poor grain filling rather than carbohydrate supply.

Key words： spikelet position; starch; protein; accumulation dynamic; variation; rice

参考文献

[1]刘芸, 唐延林, 黄敬峰, 等.利用高光谱数据估测水稻米粉中粗蛋白粗淀粉和直链淀粉含量. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2617-2623.

[2]Cheng Y L, Mei L T, Kuo H T. Effect of amylose content on the rheological property of rice starch. Cereal Chem, 1996, 73(4): 415-420.

[3]Umemoto T, Ishikura N, Nakamura Y. Activity of starch synthase and the amylose content in rice endosperm. Pak J Nutr, 1995 , 40(6): 1613-1616.

[4]Dipti S S, Bari M N, Kabir K A. Grain quality characteristics of some Beruin rice varieties of Bangladesh. Pak J Nutr, 2003, 2(4): 242-245.

[5]Zhou K， Robards K， Helliwell S. Aging of stored rice： Changes in chemical and physical attributes. J Cereal Sci, 2002, 35: 65-78.

[6]蔡一霞, 徐大勇, 朱庆森. 稻米品质形成的生理基础研究进展.植物学通报, 2004, 21(4): 419-428.

[7]Masahiko T, Morie E, Toru T. Physico-ecological studied on quality formation of rice kernel: Ⅱ. Changes in quality of rice kernel during grain development. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1989, 58(4): 659-663.

[8]陆艳婷, 张小明, 叶胜海, 等. 密穗型和散穗型粳稻穗部不同部位直链淀粉含量的差异分析. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(4): 391-395.

[9]王余龙, 蔡建中, 徐永林, 等. 水稻籽粒受容活性及其控制途径: Ⅰ. 籽粒含水量与受容活性的关系. 江苏农学院学报, 1990, 11(3): 15-29.

[10]谢光辉, 杨建昌, 王志琴, 等. 水稻籽粒灌浆特性及其与籽粒生理活性的关系. 作物学报, 2001, 27(5): 557-566.

[11]王丰, 程方民. 从籽粒灌浆过程上讨论水稻粒间品质差异形成的生理机制. 种子， 2004， 23（1）： 31-35.

[12]Dong M H, Sang D Z, Wang P, et al. Changes in cooking and nutrition quality of grains at different positions in a rice panicle under different nitrogen levels. Rice Sci, 2007, 14(2): 141-148.

[13]董明辉, 赵步洪, 吴翔宙, 等. 水稻结实期不同粒位籽粒相关内源激素含量和关键酶活性的差异及其与品质的关系.中国农业科学， 2008, 41(2): 370-380.

[14]金峰, 陈书强, 徐正进, 等. 直立与弯曲穗型水稻穗上不同部位籽粒碾磨品质的比较. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(2): 167-174.

[15]Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, et al. Post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in rice in relation to abscisic acid and ethylene. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57: 149-160.

[16]中华人民共和国农业部. 米质测定方法NY147-88. 北京：中华人民共和国农业部, 1988.

[17]上海植物生理学会. 植物生理学实验手册. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 1985.

[18]蔡武城, 袁厚积. 生物物质常用化学分析法. 北京: 科学出版社, 1982: 15-16.

[19]Mohapatra P K, Patel R, Sahu S K. Time of flowering affects grain quality and spikelet partitioning within the rice panicle. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1993, 20: 231-242.

[20]杨建昌, 苏宝林, 王志琴, 等. 亚种间杂交稻籽粒灌浆特性及其生理的研究. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31(1): 7-14.

[21]Asaoka M, Okuno K, Sugimoto Y. Development changes in the structure of endosperm starch of rice. Agric Biol Chem, 1985, 49: 1973-1978.

[22]钟连进, 程方民. 水稻籽粒灌浆过程直链淀粉的积累及其相关酶的品种类型间差异. 作物学报, 2003, 29(3): 452-456.

[23]Kouichi M, Koji K, Yuji A. Starch branching enzymes from immature rice seeds. J Biochem, 1992, 112: 643-651.

[24]Smith A M, Denyer K, Martin C. What controls the amount and structure of starch in store organ? Plant Physiol, 1995, 107: 673-677.

[25] 杨建昌, 刘立军, 王志琴, 等. 稻穗颖花开花时间对胚乳发育的影响及其生理机制. 中国农业科学, 1999, 32(3): 34-51.

[26]Yang J, Zhang W, Wang Z, et al. Source-sink characteristics and the translocation of assimilates in new plant type and intersubspecific hybrid rice. Agric Sci China, 2002, 1(2): 155-162.

[27]Zhang H, Tan G, Yang L, et al. Hormones in the grains and roots in relation to post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47: 195-204.

[28] 黄升谋, 邹应斌, 李淑清. 两优培九稻穗枝梗维管束特征及生理特性. 湖南农业大学学报, 2004, 30(1): 1-3 .

[29] 黄升谋, 邹应斌, 刘春林. 杂交水稻两优培九强、弱势粒结实生理研究.作物学报, 2005, 31(1): 102-107.

[30] 李木英, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 两系杂交稻穗部解剖特征及其与结实关系的研究.江西农业大学学报, 2000, 22(2): 147-151.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献