<FONT face="Verdana">两种籽粒镉含量不同水稻的镉吸收转运及其生理效应差异初探<BR></FONT>

李 鹏,  ,葛 滢,吴龙华,沈丽波,谭维娜,骆永明

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.010

中国水稻科学 >

2011 , Vol. 25 >Issue 3: 291 - 296

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.010

研究报告

两种籽粒镉含量不同水稻的镉吸收转运及其生理效应差异初探

展开

¹南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院，江苏南京 210095； ² 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤环境与污染修复重点实验室，江苏南京 210008; *通讯联系人, E-mail: lhwu@issas.ac.cn; yingge711@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2011-05-10

收起

Uptake and Translocation of Cadmium and Its Physiological Effects in Two Rice Cultivars Differed in Grain Cadmium Concentration

Expand

¹College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; ²Key Laboratory of Soil
Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; *Corresponding authors, E-mail: lhwu@issas.ac.cn; yingge711@njau.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2011-05-10

Fold

摘要

以籽粒镉(Cd)含量不同的两个水稻品种为材料，采用水培和盆栽试验，研究了水稻不同生育期Cd吸收转运、生理效应对籽粒Cd浓度的影响。盆栽试验结果表明，在Cd含量为1.57 mg/kg的土壤中，中香1号（A16，低Cd品种）和IR656103824263（A54，高Cd品种）糙米中Cd含量分别为0.88和0.31 mg/kg。水培和土培试验均显示品种A16对Cd的吸收转运在苗期强于A54，但在苗期之后，A54吸收转运Cd的强度高于A16。比较不同生育期两个品种单株Cd累积量，发现苗期至拔节期的增幅最大。水稻非蛋白巯基（NPT）含量不仅与Cd胁迫程度密切相关，也在一定程度上制约着Cd从根部向地上部的转运，从而对水稻籽粒Cd含量产生影响。从各生育期A16和A54地上部和根中的Cd和NPT含量可以推断，水稻籽粒Cd含量的差异很大程度上受到根部吸收和向地上部转运的制约。水稻苗期和其他生育期Cd吸收转运特点不同的原因可能包括根系Cd滞留能力及根际土壤性状的差异。

关键词： 水稻; 镉; 吸收; 转运; 丙二醛; 非蛋白巯基

本文引用格式

李鹏, ,葛滢,吴龙华,沈丽波,谭维娜,骆永明 . 两种籽粒镉含量不同水稻的镉吸收转运及其生理效应差异初探
[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011 , 25(3) : 291 -296 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.010

Abstract

A hydroponic experiment and a pot experiment were conducted to investigate Cd uptake and translocation in rice and their physiological effects at several growth stages by using two rice cultivars with different grain Cd concentrations. In the pot experiment, the grain Cd contents of low Cd rice cultivar(A16) and high Cd cultivar(A54) were 0.31 mg/kg and 0.88 mg/kg, respectively at a total soil Cd concentration of 1.57 mg/kg. Both hydroponic and pot experiments showed that A16 absorbed and translocated more Cd than A54 at the seedling stage. However, after the seedling stage, the amounts of Cd uptake and translocation by A54 were higher than those of A16. By comparing Cd accumulation in two rice cultivars at various growth stages, the highest increase in Cd accumulation was observed at seedlingelongation stage. The amount of nonprotein thiol(NPT) was not only closely related to Cd stress, but also partly controlled Cd translocation from roots to shoots, thus affecting the Cd concentration in rice grain. According to Cd and NPT contents in shoots and roots of the two rice cultivars at each growth stage, it may be speculated that the variation of grain Cd concentration was largely controlled by root uptake and translocation to shoot. Root Cd sequestration and rhizosphere soil properties may result in the differences in rice Cd absorption and translocation between the seedling stage and other stages.

Key words： rice; Cd; uptake; translocation; malonaldehyde; non-protein thiol

参考文献

[1]史静, 李正文, 龚伟群，等. 2种常规水稻Cd、Zn吸收与器官分配的生育期变化: 品种、土壤和Cd处理的影响. 生态毒理学报, 2007, 2(1): 32-40.
[2]Clemens S, Palmgren M G, Kramer U. A long way ahead: Understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends Plant Sci, 2002, 7: 309-315.
[3]Cataldo D A, Garland T R, Wildung R E. Cadmium uptake kinetics in intact soybean plants. Plant Physiol, 1983, 73: 844-848.
[4]Homma Y, Hirata H. Kinetics of cadmium and zinc absorption by rice seedling roots. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 1984, 30: 527-532.
[5]Costa G, Morel J L. Cadmium uptake by Lupinus albus (L.): Cadmium excretion, a possible mechanism of cadmium tolerance. J Plant Nutr，1993, 16: 1921-1929.
[6]Zhao F J, Hamon R E, Lombi E. Characteristics of cadmium uptake in two contrasting ecotypes of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. J Exp Bot, 2002, 53: 535-543.
[7]Hart J J, Welch R M, Norvell W A. Characterization of cadmium binding, uptake, and translocation in intact seedlings of bread and durum wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol, 1998, 116: 1413-1420.
[8]Uraguchi S, Mori S, Kuramata M. Root-to-shoot Cd translocation via the xylem is the major process determining shoot and grain cadmium accumulation in rice. J Exp Bot, 2009, 60(9): 2677-2688.
[9]丁园, 宗良纲, 徐晓炎，等. 镉污染对水稻不同生育期生长和品质的影响. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(1): 183-186.
[10]王芳，丁杉，张春华，等. 不同镉耐性水稻非蛋白巯基及镉的亚细胞和分子分布. 农业环境科学学报， 2010, 29(4): 625-629.
[11]Wang Z, Zhang S, Shan X. Effects of low-molecular-weight organic acids on uptake of lanthanum by wheat roots. Plant Soil, 2004, 261: 163-170.
[12]Heath R L, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplast, kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophy, 1968, 25: 189-198.
[13]Rama D S, Prasad M N V. Copper toxicity in Ceratophyllum demersum L. (Coontail), a free floating macrophyte: Response of antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants. Plant Sci, 1998, 138:157-165.
[14]王凯荣, 龚惠群. 不同生育期镉胁迫对两种水稻的生长、镉吸收及糙米镉含量的影响. 生态环境, 2006, 15(6): 1197-1203.
[15]白晓娟，刘丽娟，张春华等. H2O2预处理对不同水稻品种Cd耐性的影响. 中国水稻科学， 2010， 24(4)： 391-397.
[16]李正文. 镉处理下不同水稻品种对两种土壤中铅、镉的吸收及其生育期动态[D]. 南京：南京农业大学, 2003: 13-18.
[17]安志装, 王校常, 严蔚东, 等. 镉硫交互处理对水稻吸收累积镉及其蛋白巯基含量的影响. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(5): 728-734.
[18]Zenk M H. Heavy metal detoxification in higher plants: A review. Gene, 1996, 179: 21-30.
[19]Strasdeit H, Duhme A K, Kneer R, et al. Evidence for discrete Cd (SCys )4 units in cadmium phytochelatin complexes from EXAFS spectroscopy. J Chem Soc Chem Commun, 1991, 16: 1129-1130.
[20]Tommasini R, Vogt E, Fromenteau M, et al. An ABC-transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana has both glutathione-conjugate and chlorophyll catabolite transport activity. Plant J， 1998, 13: 773-780.
[21]Rea P. MRP subfamily ABC transports from plants and yeast. J Exp Bot， 1999, 50: 895-913.
[22]孙琴, 袁信芳, 王晓蓉. 环境因子对小麦体内镉的生物毒性和植物络合素合成的影响. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(7): 1360-1365.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献