<FONT face="Verdana">我国西南地区粳稻品种抽穗期的遗传分析</FONT>

周振玲,  ,魏祥进, 江 玲 ,刘 凯,徐大勇,翟虎渠,万建民

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.007

中国水稻科学 >

2011 , Vol. 25 >Issue 3: 267 - 276

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.007

研究报告

我国西南地区粳稻品种抽穗期的遗传分析

展开

¹南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210095； ²江苏徐淮地区连云港农业科学研究所, 江苏连云港 222006； ³中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京 100081； # 共同第一作者； *通讯联系人， E-mail: wanjm@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2011-05-10

收起

Genetic Analysis of Heading Date of Japonica Rice Cultivars in Southwest China

Expand

¹State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; ² Institute of Lianyungang Agricultural Science of Xuhuai Area, Lianyungang 222006, China; ³ Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; # These authors contributed equally to this paper; *Corresponding author, E-mail: wanjm@njau.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2011-05-10

Fold

摘要

设置长日高温、长日低温、短日高温和短日低温4组环境，对我国西南地区26份主栽粳稻品种的感光性、感温性及基本营养生长性进行了分析。西南地区各粳稻品种表现出不同程度的感光性和感温性，基本营养生长性整体表现适中，品种间也存在着一定的差异。回归分析发现，抽穗期长短与品种的感光性呈显著相关，感光性是影响西南地区粳稻品种抽穗期长短的主要因素。以一套抽穗期主基因近等基因系以及2个QTL近等基因系为测验品种分析26份粳稻品种的抽穗期基因型。结果表明，西南地区粳稻品种携带有显性早熟等位基因Ef1或Ef1t，多数品种在E1位点都携带主效显性感光等位基因E1或感光性比E1稍差的E1t；在Se1位点，大部分品种携带非感光等位基因Se1e；另外，有22个品种还携带可部分抑制Se1、E1表达的隐性感光抑制因子hd2。进一步明确了我国西南地区粳稻品种的抽穗期基因型，揭示了该地区粳稻品种具有不同程度感光性、感温性和适中基本营养生长性的遗传基础，为该地区粳稻品种的选育和推广提供了依据。

关键词： 水稻; 抽穗期; 遗传分析; 感光性; 感温性; 基本营养生长性; 西南地区

本文引用格式

周振玲, ,魏祥进, 江玲 ,刘凯,徐大勇,翟虎渠,万建民 . 我国西南地区粳稻品种抽穗期的遗传分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011 , 25(3) : 267 -276 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.03.007

Abstract

Heading dates of 26 japonica rice cultivars native to Southwest China were investigated, and their basic vegetative growth(BVG), photoperiodsensitivities(PS) and temperaturesensitivities(TS) were analyzed under artificially shortday and natural longday conditions in Nanjing of Jiangsu Province, China, as well as artificially high temperature and natural low temperature conditions in winter in Hainan Province, China. The results showed that the PS and TS varied with different cultivars. The BVGs of all the japonica cultivars were well situated, but differed in cultivars. Regression analysis showed a significant correlation between heading date and PS, indicating that PS was the main factor affecting heading date of japonica cultivar in Southwest China. Genetic analyses were conducted on these 26 cultivars using a set of heading date near isogenic lines as tester lines. The results showed that all these japonica cultivars carried the dominant earlyheading gene Ef1 or Ef1t, and most of these cultivars carried the dominant photoperiod sensitivity allele E1 or E1t, the PS of which was slightly weaker than E1. For the Se1 locus, these japonica cultivars mainly carried recessive photoperiod insensitivity gene Se1e. In addition, the recessive allele hd2 could repress or weaken the PS of 22 japonica cultivars by inhibiting the expression of E1 and Se1. These results indicate that the heading date genotypes determined different PS and well situated BVG in japonica rice cultivars of Southwest China. The above results would be useful for breeding and expanding new japonica cultivars with well adaptability in Southwest China.

Key words： rice; heading date; genetic analysis; photoperiod sensitivity; temperature sensitivity; basic vegetative growth; Southwest China

参考文献

[1]Kinoshita T. Report of committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature and linkage groups. Rice Genet Newsl， 1995, 12: 25-25.

[2]Maheswaran M, Mackill D J, Huang N, et al. Identification of RAPD markers linked to Se-3(t)， a gene enhancing the level of photoperiod sensitivity in rice. Rice Genet Newsl， 1995, 12: 219-221.

[3]Ohshima I, Watanabe Y, Asahic C. Genetic analysis of heading time in cross between two indica varieties with two inhibitor genes for photoperiod sensitivity. Jpn J Breed， 1993, 43: 101-106.

[4]Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T, Yamagata H. Heading-time genes of the rice varieties grown in the Tohoku-Hokuriku region in Japan. Jpn J Breed， 1992, 42: 121-135.

[5]Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Trisomic analysis of a strong photoperiod-sensitivity gene E1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica， 1997, 95: 301-307.

[6]Yokoo M, Okuno K. Genetic analysis of earliness mutations induced in the rice cultivar Norin 8. Jpn J Breed， 1993, 43: 1-11.

[7]Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Photoperiod sensitivity gene of Se-1 locus found in photoperiod insensitive rice cultivars of the northern limit region of rice cultivation. Breed Sci， 1997, 47: 145-152.

[8]Okumoto Y, Ichitani K, Inoue H. Photoperiod insensitivity gene essential to the varieties grown in the northern limit region of paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. Euphytica， 1996, 92: 63-66.

[9]Ohshima I, Kikuchi F. Identification of a recessive inhibitor for photoperiod-sensitive gene, Se-1， in photoperiod-insensitive varieties of indica type rice//Proceedings of 7th International Congress of SABRAO. Taipei: SABRAO, 1994: 93-100.

[10]Tsai K H. Gene loci and alleles controlling the duration of basic vegetative growth of rice//Rice Genetics. Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 1986: 339-349.

[11]Inoue I, Nishida H, Okumoto Y, et al. Identification of an early heading time gene found in the Taiwanese rice cultivar Taichung 65. Breed Sci， 1998, 48: 103-108.

[12]Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet， 1997, 95: 1025-1032.

[13]Lin S Y, Sasaki T, Yano M. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet， 1998, 96: 997-1003

[14]Maheswaran M, Huang N, Sreerangasamy S R, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with days to flowering and photoperiod sensitivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed， 2000, 6: 145-155.

[15]Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. Hd1， a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering line gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell， 2000, 12: 2473-2483.

[16]Takahashi Y, Shomura A, Sasaki T, et al. Hd6， a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the α subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA， 2001, 98(14): 7922-7927.

[17]Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y. Hd3a， a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowing downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol， 2002, 43(10): 1096-1105.

[18]Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, et al. Ehd1 a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev， 2004, 118(8): 926-936.

[19] Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet， 2008, 40: 761-767.

[20] Wei X J, Jiang L, Xu J F, et al. Genetic analyses of heading date of japonica rice cultivars from Northeast China. Field Crops Res, 2008, 107: 147-154.

[21]魏祥进, 江玲, 徐俊锋, 等.我国华北地区粳稻品种抽穗期遗传分析.中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6): 595-603.

[22]Wei X J, Jiang L, Xu J F, et al. Genetic analyses of heading date of japonica rice cultivars in the lower region of the Yangtze River valley. J Integr Plant Biol， 2009, 51(10): 922-932.

[23]Xu J F, Jiang L, Wei X J, et al. Genotypes of heading date of middle indica rice in the mid-lower region of the Yangtze River. J Integr Plant Biol， 2007, 49(12): 1772-1781.

[24]蒋志农．云南稻作．昆明：云南科学技术出版社， 1995.

[25]Yamagata H, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Analysis of genes controlling heading time in Japanese rice//Rice Genetics. Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 1986: 351-359.

[26]Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Genetic analyses of low photoperiod sensitivity of rice cultivars from the northern most regions of Japan. Plant Breed， 1998, 117: 543-547.

[27] Lin H X, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, et al. Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of 3 QTLs, Hd-1， Hd-2 and Hd-3， controlling heading date of rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 1021-1028.

[28]Nishida H, Okumoto Y, Nakagawa H, et al. Analysis of tester lines for rice (Oryza sativa L.) heading-time genes using reciprocal photoperiodic transfer treatments. Ann Bot, 2001, 88: 527-536.

[29] Yokoo M, Kikuchi F. Multiple allelism of the locus controlling heading time of rice, detected using the close linkage with the blast-resistance. Jpn J Breed, 1977, 27: 123-130.

[30]罗林广, 徐俊锋, 翟虎渠, 等. 水稻雄性不育恢复系明恢63的感光基因分析. 遗传学报, 2003, 30(9): 804-810.

[31]Vergara B S, Chang T T. The Flowering Response of the Rice Plant to Photoperiod: A review of the literature. 4thed. Manila: International Rice Research Institute, 1985: 61.

[32]Okumoto Y, Yoshimura A, Tanisaka T, et al. Analysis of a rice variety Taichung 65 and its isogenic early-heading lines for late-heading genes E1, E2 and E3. Jpn J Breed, 1992, 42: 415-429.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献