<FONT face="Verdana">不同致害性褐飞虱种群刺吸电位图（EPG）的比较<BR></FONT>

潘建红,陈峰,何佳春,赖风香,傅强

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.013

中国水稻科学 >

2011 , Vol. 25 >Issue 1: 86 - 90

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.013

研究报告

不同致害性褐飞虱种群刺吸电位图（EPG）的比较

展开

中国水稻研究所水稻生物学国家重点实验室，浙江杭州310006； *通讯联系人， E-mail：<A href=

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2011-01-10

收起

Comparison on Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) of Two Populations of Nilaparvata lugens with Different Virulence

Expand

State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: qiangfu1@yahoo.com.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2011-01-10

Fold

摘要

利用刺吸电位图(EPG)比较分析了两个致害性不同的褐飞虱种群（TN1种群、Mudgo种群）在感虫品种TN1和抗性品种Mudgo（含Bph1抗虫基因）上的取食行为。结果表明，种群类型、水稻品种对I波的影响最明显，A波次之，S波再次之；试虫性别对各参数均无显著影响。TN1种群在TN1上及Mudgo种群在TN1、Mudgo上这3种能致害处理下的S波、A波均短于TN1试虫在Mudgo上（不能致害），其中A波的差异达显著水平；而能致害的3种处理的I波持续时间则显著长于不能致害处理。若以3 h内I波持续时间75 min为分界线，高于该值为能致害，低于该值为不能致害，对TN1种群、Mudgo种群致害性的判别准确率分别为82.6%和100%。提出该参数可用于进一步开发褐飞虱个体致害性检测新技术。

关键词： 褐飞虱; 致害性; 刺探电位图; 水稻

本文引用格式

潘建红,陈峰,何佳春,赖风香,傅强 . 不同致害性褐飞虱种群刺吸电位图（EPG）的比较
[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011 , 25(1) : 86 -90 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.013

Abstract

The electrical penetration graph (EPG) of two populations of Nilaparvata lugens with different virulence（TN1 population, Mudgo population） on susceptible rice variety TN1 and resistant rice variety Mudgo (with resistance gene Bph1) were studied. The results showed that duration of I waveform significantly affected by population of N. lugens and rice variety, followed by A waveform, then S waveform. The sex of N. lugens did not affect the three types of waveform. Three virulent treatments (TN1 population on TN1, Mudgo population on TN1 and Mudgo) showed shorter S and A waveforms compared with nonvirulent treatment (TN1 population on Mudgo). And a significant difference in A waveform between virulent treatments and nonvirulent one was found. The I waveform under the three virulent treatments was significantly shorter than that under nonvirulent treatment. The accuracies to distinguish the virulence of TN1 population and Mudgo population were 82.6% and 100%, respectively with 75 min of I waveform in a 3h record period as a criterion(i.e., I waveform more than 75 min represented virulent, less than 75 min represented nonvirulent). It is suggested that the duration of I waveform is a possible alternative for monitoring the virulence of N. lugens individual.

Key words： Nilaparvata lugens; virulence; electrical penetration graph; rice

参考文献

[1]程遐年, 吴进才, 马飞. 褐飞虱研究与防治. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 1.

[2]Saxena R, Barrion A. Biotypes of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) and strategies in deployment of host plant resistance. Insect Sci Appl, 1985, 6: 271-289.

[3]巫国瑞, 陶林勇, 俞晓平, 等. 褐飞虱生物型的发生与现状. 昆虫知识, 1990, 27（1）: 47-51.

[4]张志涛, 陈伟, 姜人春, 等. 稻褐飞虱致害性的转化（同翅目: 飞虱科）. 昆虫学报, 1997, 40（增）： 110-115.

[5]刘芳, 傅强, 赖凤香, 等. 稻褐飞虱致害性遗传与性别的关联性研究. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48（6）: 892-897.

[6]孙佳音, 傅强, 赖凤香, 等. 不同褐飞虱寄主种群类酵母共生菌形态和数量的比较, 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23（5）: 546-550.

[7] Cohen M, Medina E. Brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens, resistance in rice cultivar IR64: Mechanism and role in successful N. lugens management in Central Luzon, Philippines. Entomol Exp Appl， 1997, 85: 221-229.

[8]Sogawa K. The rice brown planthopper: Feeding physiology and host plant interactions. Annu Rev Entomol， 1982, 27: 49-73.

[9] McLean D L, Kingey M G. A technique for electronically recording of aphis feeding and salivation. Nature， 1964, 202:1358-1359.

[10]Backus E A, Serrano M S, Ranger C M. Mechanisms of hopperburn: An overview of insect taxonomy, behavior, and physiology. Annu Rev Entomol， 2005, 50: 125-151.

[11]Walker G P, Backus E A. Principles and applications of electronic monitoring and other techniques in the study of homopteran feeding behavior//Thomas Say Publications in Entomology. Lanham, MD： Entomological Society of America, 2000.

[12]Khan Z R, Saxena R C．Electronically recorded waveforms associated with the feeding behavior of Sogatella furcifera (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on susceptible and resistant rice varieties. J Econ Entomol， 1984, 77: 1479-1482.

[13]Velusamy R, Heinriches E A. Electronic monitoring of feeding behavior of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on resistant and susceptible rice cultivars. Environ Entomol， 1986, 15: 678-682.

[14]Khan Z R, Saxena R C. Probing behavior of three biotypes of Nilaparvata lugens (Stl) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on different resistant and susceptible rice varieties. J Econ Entomol， 1988, 81: 1338-1345.

[15]Kimmins F M. Electrical penetration graphs from Nilaparvata lugehs (Stl) on resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Entomol Exp Appl， 1989, 50: 69-79.

[16]Hattori M. Probing behavior of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stl)(Homoptera: Delphacidae) on a non-host barnyard grass, and resistant and susceptible varieties of rice. Appl Entomol Zool， 2001, 36(1): 83-89.

[17]Hattori M, Sogawa K. Oviposition behaviour of the rice plant-hopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stl), and its electronic monitoring. J Insect Behav， 2002, 15(3): 283-292.

[18]Hattori M. Electronic monitoring of feeding and oviposition behaviour of rice planthopper and its application in plant resistance study. Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(Suppl): 31-36.

[19]服部诚.电子记录稻飞虱取食和产卵行为及其在植物抗虫性研究中的应用.中国水稻科学, 2003, 17（增）: 31-36.

[20]沈君辉, 刘光杰, 陈爱辉, 等. 电子记录白背飞虱的取食和产卵行为.中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(1): 73-76.

[21]沈君辉, 李平, 刘光杰. 运用电子记录技术检测白背飞虱田间种群致害性.应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1090-1094.

[22]陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 电子取食监测仪在植物抗虫性研究中的应用.昆虫知识, 2005, 42(5): 485- 490.

[23]Seo B Y, Kwon Y H, Jung J K, et al. Electrical penetration graphic waveforms in relation to the actual positions of the stylet tips of Nilaparvata lugens in rice tissue. J Asia-Pacific Entomol， 2009, 12: 89-95.

[24]Hao P, Liu C, Wang Y, et al. Herbivore-induced callose deposition on the sieve plates of rice: An important mechanism for host resistance. Plant Physiol, 2008, 146: 1810-1820.

[25]唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京：科学出版社, 2007: 85-168.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献