<FONT face="Verdana">温室条件下抗除草剂转基因水稻与杂草稻杂交和回交后代的适合度分析</FONT>

左娇,强胜,宋小玲

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.06.008

中国水稻科学 >

2010 , Vol. 24 >Issue 6: 608 - 616

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.06.008

研究报告

温室条件下抗除草剂转基因水稻与杂草稻杂交和回交后代的适合度分析

展开

南京农业大学杂草研究室, 江苏南京 210095; *通讯联系人, E-mail: sxl@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2010-11-10

收起

Fitness of Progenies Between Transgenic Rice and Weedy Rice under Greenhouse Conditions

Expand

Weed Research Laboratory, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: sxl@njau.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2010-11-10

Fold

摘要

在温室条件下，将抗除草剂转基因水稻Y0003和991与马来西亚杂草稻和国内安徽塘稻人工授粉获得的携带抗性基因的F1、F2与相应杂草稻回交，统计回交结实率和携带抗性基因的比例，并对携带抗性基因的杂交/回交代的适合度进行了测定，综合判断抗性基因漂移的风险。研究表明，在人工授粉的条件下，携带抗性基因的杂交代都能与相应的杂草稻回交并结实，结实率为15%~60%。F1的种子绝大多数都对草丁膦表现出了良好的抗性，F2和回交代分别表现为3∶1和1∶1的抗性分离比例，符合孟德尔遗传规律。适合度研究表明，杂交代、回交代与相应的杂草稻相比没有明显差异，大多数的杂交种的适合度和回交代相差不大，个别杂交代的适合度没有回交代高。以上研究结果表明在无除草剂选择压下，携带转基因水稻Y0003和991的抗性基因的2种杂草稻的杂交和回交后代有在适宜环境条件下生存定植的可能性。

关键词： 抗除草剂转基因水稻; 杂草稻; 后代; 环境安全性; 适合度

本文引用格式

左娇,强胜,宋小玲 . 温室条件下抗除草剂转基因水稻与杂草稻杂交和回交后代的适合度分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(6) : 608 -616 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.06.008

Abstract

In greenhouse, the F1 and F2 hybrids derived from glufosinateresistant transgenic rice (Y0003 and 991) and Malaysian weedy rice or Anhui weedy rice were backcrossed with corresponding weedy rice to obtain backcross generations. And the seed setting rates of the backcross were counted. The proportions of plants carrying the glufosinateresistance gene in F1 or F2 hybrids and the backcross generation were calculated. In order to comprehensively assess the risk of gene flow from glufosinateresistant rice to weedy rice, the fitness of hybrid and backcross generations were observed. The results showed that the hybrid generations were able to backcross with corresponding weedy rice with seed setting rates from 15% to 60%. The seeds from reciprocal hybrid F1 generation showed favorable glufosinateresistance, but F2 and backcross generations showed a normal 3∶1 and 1∶1 Mendelian segregation with glufosinate selection. The fitness of hybrid and backcross generations didn′t differ obviously from that of their corresponding weedy rice. Most hybrid generations displayed similar fitness with backcross generations, but some hybrid generations were lower than backcross generations in fitness. All above results indicate that hybrids and backcross generations of two weedy rice carrying glufosinateresistance genes of Y0003 and 991 could survive under benign conditions without herbicide selection.

Key words： herbicideresistant transgenic rice; weedy rice; progeny; environmental biosafety; fitness

参考文献

[1]Chevre A M, Eber F, Baranger A, et al. Gene flow from transgenic crops. Nature, 1997, 389: 924.

[2]Madsen K H, Valverde B E, Jensen J E. Risk assessment of herbicide-resistant crops: A Latin American perspective using rice (Oryza sativa) as a model. Weed Technol, 2002, 16: 215-223.

[3]Chapman M A, Burke J M. Letting the gene out of the bottle: The population genetics of genetically modified crops. New Phytol, 2006, 170: 429-443.

[4]Oka H I, Chang W T. Hybrid swarms between wild and cultivated rice species Oryza perennis and O. sativa. Evolution, 1961, 15: 418-430.

[5]Langevin S A, Clay K, Grace J. The incidence and effects of hybridization between cultivated rice and its related weed red rice (Oryza sativa L.). Evolution, 1990, 44: 1000-1008.

[6]Noldin J A, Yokoyama S, Antunes P, et al. Outcrossing potential of glufosinate-resistant rice to red rice. Planta Daninha, 2002, 20(2): 243-251.

[7]Zhang N Y, Linscombe S, Oard J. Out-crossing frequency and genetic analysis of hybrids between transgenic glufosinate herbicide-resistant rice and the weed, red rice. Euphytica, 2003, 130(1): 35-45.

[8]Zhang W Q, Linscombe S D, Webster E, et al. Risk assessment of the transfer of imazethapyr herbicide tolerance from Clearfield rice to red rice (Oryza sativa). Euphytica, 2006, 152: 75-86.

[9]Shivrain V K, Burgos N R, Anders M M, et al. Gene flow between ClearfieldTM rice and red rice.Mol Breeding, 2007, 26: 349-356.

[10]Messeguer J, Marfa V, Catala M M, et al. A field study of pollen-mediated gene flow from Mediterranean GM rice to conventional rice and the red rice weed. Mol Breeding, 2004, 13: 103-112.

[11]Chen L J, Lee D S, Song Z P, et al. Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives. Ann Bot, 2004, 93: 67-73.

[12]Mercer K L, Andow D A, Wyse D L, et al. Stress and domestication traits increase the relative fitness of crop wild hybrids in sunflower. Ecol Lett, 2007, 10: 383-393.

[13]Endler J A. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.

[14]Gueritaine G, Sester M, Eber F, et al. Fitness of backcross six of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Mol Ecol, 2002, 11: 1419-1426.

[15]Lu B R, Snow A A. Gene flow from genetically modified rice and its environmental consequences. BioScience, 2005, 55(8): 669-678.

[16]Oard J, Cohn M A, Linscombe S, et al. Field evaluation of seed prodution, shattering, and dormancy in hybrid populations of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) and the weed, red rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Sci, 2000, 157(1): 13-22.

[17]Shivrain V K, Burgos N R, Gealy D R, et al. Gene flow from weedy red rice (Oryza sativa L.) to cultivated rice and fitness of hybrids. Pest Manag Sci, 2009, 65: 1124-1129.

[18]Cao Q J, Xia H, Yang X, et al. Performance of hybrids between weedy rice and insect-resistant transgenic rice under field experiments: Implication for environmental biosafety assessment. J Int Plant Biol, 2009, 51: 1138-1148.

[19]刘琳莉. 以种间亲和性评价抗除草剂转基因作物安全性的技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2004.

[20]Park S H, Pinson S R M, Smith R H. T-DNA integration into genomic DNA of rice following Agrobacterium inoculation of isolated shoot apices. Plant Mol Biol, 1996, 32: 1135-1148.

[21]Escorial M C, Sixto H, García-Baudín J M, et al. A rapid method to determine cereal plant response to glyphisate. Weed Technol, 2001, 15: 697-702.

[22]陈游, 程世军, 王江, 等. 检测转基因水稻中PPT抗性表达的快速简便方法. 植物生理学通讯, 2000, 36(1): 50-52.

[23]Song Z P, Lu B R, Wang B, et al. Fitness estimation through performance comparison of F1 hybrids with their parental species Oryza rufipogon and O. sativa. Ann Bot, 2004, 93: 311-316.

[24]Rice W R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 1989, 43: 223-225.

[25]Jenczewski E, Ronfort J, Chévre A M. Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes. Environ Biosafety Res, 2003, 2: 9-24.

[26]Sankula S, Braverman M P, Orrd J H. Genetic analysis of glufosinate resistance in crosses between transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol, 1998, 12: 209-214.

[27]Jiang J, Linscombe S D, Wang J L, et al. High efficiency transformation of U.S. rice lines from mature seed derived calli and segregation of glufosinate resistance under field conditions. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1729-1741.

[28]Arriola P E, Ellstrand N C. Fitness of interspecific hybrids in the genus Sorghum: Persistence of crop genes in wild populations. Ecol Appl, 1997, 7: 512-518.

[29]Baker H G. The evolution of weeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1974, 5: 1-24.

[30]强胜. 杂草学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 2.

[31]Waser N M, Price M V. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregate, seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution, 1989, 43: 1097-1109.

[32]Byers D L. Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am J Bot, 1998, 85(5): 644-653.

[33]Emms S K, Arnold M L. The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: Transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution, 1997, 51: 1112-1119.

[34]Vacher C, Weis A E, Hermann D. Impact of ecological factors on the initial invasion of Bt transgenes into wild populations of birdseed rape (Brassica rapa). Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 806-814.

[35]Brock M T, Galen C. Drought tolerance in the alpine dandelion, Taraxacum ceratophorum (Asteraceae), its exotic congener T. officinale, and interspecific hybrids under natural and experimental conditions. Am J Bot, 2005, 92: 1311-1321.

[36]Campbell L G, Snow A A. Competition alters life history and increase the relative fecundity of crop wild radish hybrids (Raphanus spp.). New Phytol, 2007, 173: 648-660.

[37]Campbell D R, Waser N M. Genotype by environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution, 2001, 55: 669-676.

[38]Johnston J A, Grise D J, Donovan L A, et al. Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I. fulva (Iridaceae), and hybrids. Am J Bot, 2001, 88: 933-938.

[39]Pertl M, Hauser T P, Damgaard C, et al. Male fitness of oilseed rape (Brassica napus), weedy B. rapa and their F1 hybrids when pollinating B. rapa seeds. Heredity, 2002, 89: 212-218.

[40]Johannessen M M, Andersen B A, Jφrgensen R B. Competition affects gene flow from oilseed rape (♀) to Brassica rapa (♂). Heredity, 2006, 96: 360-367.

[41]Whitney K D, Randell R A, Rieseberg L H. Adaptive introgression of herbivore resistance traits in weedy sunflower Helianthus annuus. Am Nat, 2006, 167: 794-807.

[42]蒋荷, 吴竞仑, 王根来, 等. 连云港穞稻研究. 作物品种资源，1985(2): 4-7.

[43]许聪, 吴万春. 海南岛杂草稻的生态考查和鉴定. 中国水稻科学, 1996, 10(4): 247-249.

[44]许聪, 吴万春. 杂草稻的分类地位和利用途径探讨. 海南大学学报: 自然科学版, 1996, 14(2): 146-151.

[45]马殿荣, 陈温福, 徐正进, 等. 辽宁杂草稻的发生及其控制措施. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(8): 358-360, 365.

[46]郭勋斌, 顾克礼, 袁秦. 越冬杂草稻的发生与防治研究. 安徽农业科学, 2005, 33(7): 1180-1181.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献