研究简报

水稻品种(组合)对褐飞虱抗性的田间表现

展开
  • 1浙江省金华市植物保护站, 浙江 金华 321017; 2浙江省农业科学院 植物保护与微生物研究所, 浙江 杭州 310021;*通讯联系人, E-mail:luzxmh2004@yahoo.com.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

  修回日期: 1900-01-01

  网络出版日期: 2010-09-10

Resistance Performance of Rice Varieties (Combinations) to Brown Planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens, in Paddy Field

Expand
  • 1Jinhua Plant Protection Station of Zhejiang Province, Jinhua 321017, China; 2Institute of Plant Protection & Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China; *Corresponding author, Email: luzxmh2004@yahoo.com.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

  Revised date: 1900-01-01

  Online published: 2010-09-10

摘要

在褐飞虱大发生的2007年单季稻期间,以TN1作为感虫对照,在浙江省金华市评价了48份水稻品种(组合)的田间成株期抗性表现。结果表明,16个品种(组合)表现为田间成株期感虫,其他32个品种(组合)具有中抗以上水平,其中丙04123、Ⅱ优845、宜香845、中组14、嘉兴优041和IR36等品种(组合)达高抗水平。在持久抗性方面,除高抗品种外,秀水09、新嘉优99、嘉优225、秀优0969、宁0481、丙04103、丙0408、丙04123、R4101、丙04132、丙05129、丙05227、浙粳23和浙粳22等品种(组合)具持抗性。试验表明,成株期田间褐飞虱抗性评价对生产实践具有更重要的意义。

本文引用格式

盛仙俏,张发成,徐红星,郑许松,陈桂华,吕仲贤, . 水稻品种(组合)对褐飞虱抗性的田间表现 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(5) : 535 -538 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.016

Abstract

Resistance performance of 48 rice varieties (combinations) to brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens Stl, was evaluated in single season rice field during BPH population outbreak of year 2007. Results showed that 16 varieties(combinations) were susceptible while the other 32 varieties (combinations) were highly or moderately resistant to BPH. Bing 04123, Ⅱ you 845, Yixiang 845, Zhongzu 14, Jiaxingyou 041 and IR36 showed high resistance. Besides the 5 varieties with high resistance, other varieties including Xiushui 09, Xinjiayou 99, Jiayou 225, Xiuyou 0969, Ning 0481, Bing 04103, Bing 0408, Bing 04123, R4101, Bing 04132, Bing 05129, Bing 05227, Zhejing 23 and Zhejing 22 also had long durable resistance characteristics. The results imply that rating resistance of rice varieties to BPH in paddy field at the adult stage of rice was much more importance in screening and evaluating resistance resources for optimizing the layout and application of newbred resistant varieties as one of key strategies of integrated pest management.

参考文献


[1]李汝铎,丁锦华, 胡国文, 等. 褐飞虱及其种群管理. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 1996.
[2]Sogawa K. Windborn displacements of the rice planthoppers related to the seasonal weather patterns in Kyushu district. Bull Kyushu Natl Agric Exp Stn, 1995, 28 (4): 219-278.
[3]Medrano F G, Heinrichs E A. Response of resistant rice to brown planthopper collected in Mindanao, Philippines. IRRN, 1985, 10: 14-15.
[4]吕仲贤, 俞晓平, 陶林勇, 等. 水稻新品种(系)对褐飞虱抗性的评价. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(2): 225-229.
[5]Singh J, Dhaliwal G S. Insect resistance in rice: Progress and perspectives//Dhaliwal G S, Singh R. Host Plant Resistance to Insect. New Delhi: Panima Publishing Corporation, 2004.
[6]IRRI. Standard Evaluation System for Rice. 4th ed. Manila: IRRI, 2002: 56.
[7]陈峰, 傅强, 罗举, 等. 苗期抗性不同的水稻品种成株期对褐飞虱的抗性. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(2): 201-206.
[8]陶林勇, 俞晓平, 吕仲贤, 等. 水稻新品种(系)对褐飞虱持抗性的鉴定. 浙江农业学报, 1999, 11(6): 315-320.
[9]刘光杰, 付志红, 沈君辉, 等. 水稻品种对稻飞虱抗性鉴定方法的比较研究. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16(1): 52-56.
[10]唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[11]陶林勇, 俞晓平, 巫国瑞. 我国褐飞虱生物型监测初报. 中国农业科学, 1992, 25(3): 9-13
[12]Juan N F, Fornoni J, Valvrde P L. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2007, 38: 541-566.
[13]程家安, 朱金良, 祝增荣, 等. 稻田飞虱灾变与环境调控. 环境昆虫学报, 2008, 30(2): 167-182.
[14]Settle W H, Ariawan H, Astuti E T, et al. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology, 1996, 77(7): 1975-1988.
[15]Heong K L. Are planthopper problems caused by a breakdown in ecosystem services//Heong K L, Hardy B. Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia. Manila: IRRI, 2009: 221-232.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: