<FONT face="Verdana">氮高效水稻品种苗期耐低磷种质的筛选与鉴定</FONT>

宋爱梅,黄新朋,孙淑斌,张亚丽,徐国华

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.006

中国水稻科学 >

2010 , Vol. 24 >Issue 5: 479 - 486

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.006

研究报告

氮高效水稻品种苗期耐低磷种质的筛选与鉴定

展开

南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院，江苏南京 210095; *通讯联系人， E-mail: ghxu@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2010-09-10

收起

Screening and Identification of Rice Cultivars with Relatively High Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Tolerance to Phosphorus Deficiency at Seedling Stage

Expand

College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; *Corresponding author,
E-mail: ghxu@njau.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2010-09-10

Fold

摘要

以先前通过田间试验筛选出来的36个氮高效水稻品种为供试材料，在苗期进行了耐低磷筛选，并对获得的3个耐低磷和2个低磷敏感品种响应磷素胁迫的生理机制进行了初步研究。结果表明：1)正常供磷和低磷条件下，所有调查性状的相对值(低磷/正常供磷)中，相对根系干质量、相对地上部干质量、相对根冠比和相对分蘖数均具有较大的品种间变异(变异系数分别为16.9%、10.9%、11.4%、16.3%)。相关分析表明，它们呈显著或极显著正相关。因此，这4个性状可以作为水稻苗期耐低磷筛选的评价指标。2) 在低磷条件下，筛选出的3个耐低磷品种比2个低磷敏感品种的根系生长旺盛且活力强，P吸收动力学参数中Km、Cmin小，而Vmax大，酸性磷酸酶(APase)活性升幅大，磷效率在两者之间也存在显著差异。同时，不同耐低磷品种适应低磷胁迫的调节机制也有所不同。表明筛选氮磷双高效的水稻品种是可行的，同时也为后续基因定位和遗传机制的研究提供了材料和生理学依据。

关键词： 水稻; 苗期; 耐低磷; 筛选; 鉴定

本文引用格式

宋爱梅,黄新朋,孙淑斌,张亚丽,徐国华 . 氮高效水稻品种苗期耐低磷种质的筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(5) : 479 -486 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.05.006

Abstract

A hydroponic experiment was carried out to study the responses of 36 rice cultivars with relatively high nitrogen use efficiency to lowphosphorus at the seedling stage and to explore the differences in physiological mechanism between the lowphosphorus tolerant rice cultivars and the lowphosphorus sensitive ones. Great variation existed in the relative values of root dry weight, shoot dry weight, ratio of root to shoot dry weight and tiller number (coefficient of variation: 16.9%,10.9%,114%,16.3%) in different rice cultivars. In addition, correlation analysis showed their relativity was significant or highly significant. Therefore, these four indexes were employed to evaluate the tolerance to phosphorus deficiency comprehensively. Based on these indexes, three rice cultivars were preliminarily screened out as lowphosphorus tolerant and two rice cultivars as lowphosphorus sensitive, respectively. Comparing with the lowphosphorus sensitive cultivars, the lowphosphorus tolerant ones were characterized by more extensive root system coupled with its higher activity, lower Km and Cmin, but higher Vmax and APase activity. However, the lowphosphorus tolerant cultivars differed in physiological mechanism. The research proved the feasibility for screening double efficient rice cultivars of both nitrogen and phosphorus uses. The screened rice cultivars could be used for identifying genes involved in phosphorus efficiency.

Key words： rice; seedling stage; tolerance to phosphorus deficiency; screening; identification

参考文献

[1]吴平. 植物营养分子生理学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 103-108.

[2]刘建中, 李振声, 李继云. 利用植物自身潜力提高土壤中磷的生物有效性. 农业生态研究, 1994, 2(1): 16-23.

[3]李继云, 刘秀娣, 周伟. 有效利用土壤营养元素的作物育种新技术研究. 中国科学: B 辑, 1995, 25(1): 41-48.

[4]Fairhust T, Lefroy R, Mutert E, et al. The importance, distribution and causes of phosphorus deficiency as a constraint crop production in the tropics. Agrofor Forum, 1999, 9: 2-8.

[5]Hinsinger P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes. Plant & Soil, 2001, 237: 173-195.

[6]李生秀. 植物营养与肥料学科的现状与展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(3): 193-205.

[7]李庆逵, 蒋柏藩, 鲁如坤.中国磷矿的农业应用. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1992: 1-142.

[8]高方远，陆贤军，康海岐，等. 水稻耐低磷种质的苗期筛选与鉴定.作物学报， 2006, 32(8): 1151-1155.

[9]严小龙, 张福锁.植物营养遗传学. 北京: 中国农业出版社，1997: 44-51，106-118.

[10]李莉梅, 郭荣发, 郭智娟. 不同基因型水稻磷营养的差异性研究. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 35(11): 75-79.

[11]明凤, 米国华，张福锁, 等. 水稻对低磷反应的基因型差异及其生理适应机制的初步研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 2000, 6(2): 138-141.

[12]李永夫, 罗安程, 王为木, 等. 耐低磷水稻基因型筛选指标的研究.应用生态学报, 2005, 16(1): 119-124.

[13]郭玉春, 林文雄, 石秋梅, 等.水稻苗期磷高效基因型筛选研究. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12): 1587-1591.

[14]张亚丽, 樊剑波, 段英华, 等.不同基因型水稻氮利用效率的差异及评价.土壤学报, 2008, 45(2): 267-273.

[15]Elliott G C, Lauchli A. Phosphorus efficiency and phosphate-iron interactions in maize.Agron J, 1985, 77: 399-403.

[16]Siddiqi M Y, Glass A D. Utilization index: A modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. J Plant Nutr, 1981, 4: 289-302.

[17]Claassen N, Barber S A. A method for characterizing the relation between nutrient concentration and flux into roots of intact plants. Plant Physiol, 1974, 54: 564-568.

[18]蒋廷慧, 郑绍建, 石锦芹.植物吸收养分动力学中的几个问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1995, 1(2): 11-17.

[19]上海师范大学生理教研室. 水稻栽培生理. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978: 241-245.

[20]黄学林. 种子生理实验手册. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990: 107-109.

[21]熊又升, 袁家富, 郝福新, 等. 小麦营养高效基因型筛选的研究进展.湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(9): 1084-1087.

[22]Morris R A, Garrity D P. Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: Non-nitrogen nutrients.Field Crops Res, 1993, 34: 319-334.

[23]Duncan R R. Genetic manipulation/Wilkinson R E. Plant-environment Interactions. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1994: 1-38.

[24]林文雄, 石秋梅, 郭玉春, 等.水稻磷效率差异的生理生化特性. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(6): 578-583.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献