<FONT face="Verdana">不同锌效率水稻基因型及其杂种一代幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性对Zn<SUP>2+</SUP>活度的反应</FONT>

孟杰,王人民, 万吉丽,付力成

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.03.012

中国水稻科学 >

2010 , Vol. 24 >Issue 3: 289 - 296

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.03.012

研究报告

不同锌效率水稻基因型及其杂种一代幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性对Zn²⁺活度的反应

展开

浙江大学农业与生物技术学院作物科学研究所，浙江杭州310029； *通讯联系人， E-mail: wangrm@zju.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

修回日期: 1900-01-01

网络出版日期: 2010-05-10

收起

Responses of Seedling Growth and Antioxidase Activities of Different Zinc Efficient Rice Genotypes and Their F1 Hybrids to Zn²⁺ Activities

Expand

Institute of Crop Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029， China; ^*Corresponding author, E-mail: wangrm@zju.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

Revised date: 1900-01-01

Online published: 2010-05-10

Fold

摘要

为了解水稻耐低锌能力基因型差异的生理机制及F1杂种的耐低锌能力以提高水稻锌效率，解决水稻锌缺乏问题，选用耐低锌基因型水稻IR8192、IR36，锌敏感基因型水稻Ce64、IR26及杂交后代IR36×IR8192、IR36×IR26和Ce64×IR26为材料，进行低锌(pZn2+ 11.0)和正常锌(pZn2+ 9.7)营养液培养。结果表明：1)亲本和F1幼苗的株高，叶鞘高，地上部和地下部干质量及锌含量，叶片的叶绿素含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性、过氧化物酶(POD)活性、丙二醛(MDA)含量在pZn2+ 11.0与pZn2+ 9.7条件下的相对值可作为耐低锌基因型水稻的筛选指标；2)在低锌条件下所有亲本及F1各项指标变化趋势相同，但IR8192、IR36、IR36×IR8192、IR36×IR26的叶绿素含量、SOD酶活性降幅较小，POD、CAT、APX活性升幅较大，MDA含量升幅较小，表明上述基因型水稻的耐低锌能力更强。低锌胁迫下POD、CAT、APX活性增强，可以更有效地清除活性氧，SOD活性则最先下降；3)除根长、APX活性外，在低锌条件下，IR36×IR8192、IR36×IR26各项指标变化幅度均表现出超亲优势，而Ce64×IR26则表现出偏中亲优势，推测水稻的耐低锌特性主要受基因的显性效应控制，并存在基因的叠加效应，可以通过耐低锌亲本间的杂交获得具有更强耐低锌能力的水稻基因型。

关键词： 水稻; 农艺特性; 抗氧化酶活性; 杂种优势; 锌

本文引用格式

孟杰,王人民, 万吉丽,付力成 . 不同锌效率水稻基因型及其杂种一代幼苗生长和抗氧化酶活性对Zn²⁺活度的反应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(3) : 289 -296 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.03.012

Abstract

Studying the physiological mechanism of genotypic difference in tolerance and the tolerance of F1 hybrids to low zinc stress in rice is one basic work to improve rice zinc efficiency as well as to solve the problem of rice zinc shortage. The Znefficient rice cultivars IR8192 and IR36, Zninefficient rice cultivars Ce64 and IR26, and their F1 hybrids of the crosses IR36×IR8192, IR36×IR26, and Ce64×IR26 were grown in chelatorbuffered nutrient solution at both low zinc level (pZn2+110) and normal zinc level (pZn2+9.7), respectively. The relative values of both parents and F1 rice seedlings under pZn2+110 to the ones under pZn2+9.7 in plant height, sheath height, shoot and root dry weights and zinc contents, chlorophyll content in leaves, and activities of SOD, CAT, POD, and MDA could be used as the screening index of Znefficient rice. At low zinc level, the four cultivars and their F1 hybrids showed similar trends in all the indices. However, IR8192, IR36, IR36×IR8192 had smaller decreases in chlorophyll content and activity of SOD, greater increases in activities of POD, CAT and APX, and a smaller increase in MDA content, suggesting that these rice genotypes had a stronger ability to resist low zinc stress. Under the low zinc stress, POD, CAT and APX were the main active oxygen scavenging system, while SOD protective enzyme system was firstly weakened. In the low zinc stress, except root length and APX activity, the relative values of the traits in IR36×IR8192 and IR36×IR26 showed overparent heterosis whereas Ce64×IR26 were close to midparent values, which indicates that lowzinctolerance was controlled by dominant effect and there existed duplicate effect of gene. Therefore, rice cultivars with stronger ability to resist low zinc stress could be obtained by hybridization of Znefficient parental rice.

Key words： rice (Oryza sativa); agronomic traits; antioxidant enzyme activity; heterosis; zinc

参考文献

[1]Dong Y J, Ogawa T, Lin D Z, et al. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for zinc toxicity tolerance in rice seedling(Oryza sativa L.). Field Crops Res, 2006, 95: 420-425.

[2]Cakmak I. Possible roles of zinc in protecting plant cells from damage by reactive oxygen species. New Phytol, 2000, 146: 185-205.

[3]Khan M U, Qasim M, Jamil M. A system of farming response of rice to zinc fertilizer incalcareous soils of D. I. Khan. Asian J Plant Sci, 2002, 1(1): 1-2.

[4]Alloway B J. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrient. Brussels: International Zinc Association(IZA), 2004: 1-128.

[5]Lombnas P, Singh B R. Varietal tolerance to zinc deficiency in wheat and barley grown in chelator-buffered nutrient solution and its effect on uptake of Cu, Fe and Mn. Plant Nutri Soil Sci, 2003, 166: 76-83.

[6]孙学成，谭启玲，胡承孝，等. 低温胁迫下钼对冬小麦抗氧化酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学， 2006， 39(5)： 952-959.

[7]Schutzendubel A, Polle A. Plant responses to a biotic stress: Heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization.J Exp Bot， 2002(53): 1351-1365.

[8]Yang X, Romheld V, Marschmer H. Effect of bicarbonate on root growth and accumulation of organic acids on Zn-inefficient and Zn-efficient rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Plant & Soil, 1994, 164: 1-7.

[9]Yang X, Romheld V, Marschner H, et al. Application of chelator-buffered nutrient solution technique in studies on zinc nutrition in rice plant(Oryza sativa L.). Plant & Soil, 1994, 16(3)： 85-94.

[10]王人民，杨肖娥. 不同锌离子活度对水稻根和叶生长生理特性的影响. 作物学报， 1999， 25(4)： 466-473.

[11]陈文荣. 水稻锌高效营养生理机制研究[D]. 杭州：浙江大学， 2008： 22-23.

[12]Zhang S, Hu J, Zhang Y, et al. Seed priming with brassinolide improves lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) seed germination and seedling growth in relation to physiological changes under salinity stress. Aust J Agric Res, 2007, 58: 811-815.

[13]李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京：高等教育出版社， 2002： 167-169， 164-165.

[14]朱广廉. 植物生理学实验. 北京：北京大学出版社， 1990： 25-30.

[15]Trevor E, Kraus R, Austin F. Paclobutrazol protects wheat seedlings from heat and parquets injury is detoxification of active oxygen involved. Plant Cell Physiol, 1994, 35: 45-52.

[16]李为观, 杨寅桂, 江彪. 热胁迫对耐热性不同黄瓜品种及其F1代叶片膜透性和保护酶活性的影响. 中国瓜菜, 2008(2)： 1-5.

[17]Oh S A, Park J H, Lee G I, et al. Identification of three genetic loci controlling leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant, 1997, 12: 527-533.

[18]Smirnoff N. Environment and Plant Metabolism: Flexibility and Acclimation. Oxford: Bios Scientific Press, 1995: 217-243.

[19]Bowler C, Montagu M V, Inze D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1992, 43: 83-116.

[20]Gechev T, Willekens H, Montagu M V. Deferent responses of tobacco antioxidant enzymes to light and chilling stress. J Plant Physiol, 2003, 160: 509-515.

[21]Prasad T K. Role of catalase in inducing chilling tolerance in preemergent maize seedlings. Plant Physiol, 1997, 114: 1369-1376.

[22]Sato Y, Murakami T, Funatsuki H, et al. Heat shock-mediated APX gene expression and protection against chilling injury in rice seedlings. J Exp Bot, 2001, 52: 145-151.

[23]Clark B. Plant genotype differences in the uptake, translocation, accumulation and use of mineral elements required for plant growth. Plant & Soil, 1983, 72: 175-196.

[24]郑小林, 彭克勤, 胡笃敬. 籽粒低锌与高锌含量基因型水稻锌营养特性的比较. 植物资源与环境学报, 2000, 9(3)： 26-29.

[25]Wang R M, Yang X E, Yang Y A. Analysis of genotype differences of rice response to low Zn activity and some morphological characteristics. Chin Rice Res Newsl, 1998, 6(3): 11-12.

[26]Chen G C, Wang R M, Yang X E. Physiological characterization of Zn-efficient rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotype at different Zn2+ levels. Rice Sci, 2003, 11(1/2): 47-51.

[27]Cakmak B, Torun B, Erenoglu L. Morphological and physiological differences in the response of cereals to zinc deficiency. Euphytica, 1998, 100: 349-357.

[28]徐建明, 李才生, 毛善国. 锌对水稻幼苗生长及体内SOD、POD活性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(3)： 877-878.

[29]吴振球, 吴岳轩. 铜锌对水稻幼苗生长及超氧化物歧化酶的影响. 植物生理学报, 1990, 16(2)： 139-146.

[30]Dirk I, Marc V M. Oxidative stress in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 1995, 6: 153-158.

[31]汪炳良, 徐敏, 史庆华, 等. 高温胁迫对早熟花椰菜叶片抗氧化系统和叶绿素及其荧光参数的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(8)： 1245-1250.

[32]Yu Q, Osborne L, Rengel Z. Micronutrient deficiency changes activities of superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in tobacco plants. J Plant Nutri, 1998, 21: 1427-1437.

[33]Wu F B, Zhang G P, Dominy P. Four barley genotypes respond differently to cadmium: Lipid peroxidation and activities of antioxidant capacity. Environ Exp Bot, 2003, 50: 67-77.

[34]陈飞, 汪芳, 许金婕, 等. 大、小麦籽粒发育过程中锌、镉的转移与积累. 浙江农业科学, 2007(2)： 189-192.

[35]王人民, 杨肖娥, 何慈信. 不同锌离子活度下水稻锌高效基因型农艺特性的遗传分析. 作物学报, 2003, 29(2)： 181-187.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献