研究报告

氮高效水稻基因型鉴定与筛选方法的研究

展开
  • 1江西农业大学 教育部作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室, 江西 南昌330045; 2南京农业大学 农业部作物生长调控重点开放实验室, 江苏 南京210095; *通讯联系人, E-mail: chjfkarl@163.com

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

  修回日期: 1900-01-01

  网络出版日期: 2010-03-10

Methods for Identification and Screening of Rice Genotypes with High Nitrogen Efficiency

Expand
  • 1Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: chjfkarl@163.com

Received date: 1900-01-01

  Revised date: 1900-01-01

  Online published: 2010-03-10

摘要

采用掺沙土培法,以10个氮效率存在显著差异的水稻基因型为材料,分析了6个氮水平下水稻拔节期、孕穗期、抽穗期和成熟期的氮吸收效率(NAE)、氮利用效率(NUE)和氮收获指数(NHI)的基因型差异,建立了氮高效水稻基因型鉴定与筛选的方法。结果表明,水稻NAE随氮水平增加先升后降,以中氮(0.177 g/kg,以纯N计)为最高;水稻NUE和NHI随氮水平增加而下降。水稻NAE随生育期推进而上升,水稻NUE的大小则为拔节期>抽穗期>成熟期>孕穗期。基因型和氮水平对水稻NAE、NUE和NHI的影响达极显著水平,以氮水平影响最大,基因型次之。基因型×氮水平互作对NAE和NUE的影响达极显著水平,而对NHI无显著影响。NAE和NUE的基因型差异均以拔节期最大,这一时期为水稻高NAE和NUE基因型鉴定与筛选的最佳时期。土培盆栽下,水稻高NAE、NUE和NHI鉴定与筛选的最适土壤有效氮含量分别为0.157 g/kg(拔节期)、低氮(拔节期)和0.277 g/kg(成熟期)。

本文引用格式

程建峰,蒋海燕,刘宜柏,戴廷波,曹卫星 . 氮高效水稻基因型鉴定与筛选方法的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(2) : 175 -182 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.02.12

Abstract

Genotypic differences in nitrogen absorption efficiency (NAE), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen harvest index (NHI) were investigated in ten rice genotypes with different nitrogen efficiencies at the elongation, booting, heading and maturity stages under six nitrogen levels in a pot experiment with sandsoil mixtures at various ratios. The results showed that NAE firstly increased and then decreased with increasing nitrogen rates, and the peak NAE was found under medium nitrogen rate (0.177 g/kg); but NUE and NHI of different rice genotypes decreased with increasing nitrogen rates. NAE of different rice genotypes increased with growing process and NUE followed a trend as follows: elongation stage >heading stage > maturity stage > booting stage. The effects of genotype or nitrogen level on NAE, NUE and NHI were significant at 0.01 level, which showed an order of nitrogen levels>genotypes> genotype×nitrogen level. The effects of genotype×nitrogen level interaction on NAE and NUE were significant at 0.01 level, but the effect of that on NHI was not significant. The elongation stage was the most suitable stage for identifying and evaluating NAE and NUE of rice because the differences of those traits among genotypes at the elongation stage were maximum. The optimum available soil nitrogen and stage for NAE, NUE and NHI identification and screening of rice in the experiment were 0.157 g/kg at the elongation stage, low nitrogen at the elongation stage and 0.277 g/kg at the maturity stage, respectively.

参考文献

[1]Vlek P L G, Byrnes B H. The efficiency and loss of fertilizer N in lowland rice. Fertil Res, 2000, 9: 131-147.
[2]Broadbent F E, De Datta S K, Laureles E V. Measurement of nitrogen use efficiency in rice genotypes. Agron J, 1987, 79: 786-791.
[3 ]De Datta S K, Broadbent F E. Methodology for evaluating nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotypes. Agron J, 1988, 80: 793-798.
[4]De Datta S K, Broadbent F E. Nitrogen-use efficiency of 24 rice genotypes on an N-deficient soil. Field Crops Res,1990, 23: 81-92.
[5]Guindo D, Wells B R, Norman R J. Cultivars and nitrogen rate influence on nitrogen uptake and partitioning in rice. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1994, 58(3): 840-849.
[6 ]Wu P, Tao Q N. Genotype response and selection pressure on nitrogen use efficiency in rice under different nitrogen regimes. J Plant Nutri, 1995, 18(3): 487-500.
[7]Tirol Padre A, Ladha J K, Singh U, et al. Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency. Field Crops Res, 1996, 46: 127-143.
[8]Singh U, Ladha J K, Castillo E G, et al. Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in medium- and long-duration rice. Field Crop Res, 1998, 58: 35-53.
[9]Inthapanya P. Genotype differences in nutrient uptake and utilization for grain yield production of rainfed lowland rice under fertilized and non-fertilized conditions. Field Crop Res, 2000, 65: 57-68.
[10]Piao Z Z, Cho Y I, Koh H J. Inheritance of physiological nitrogen use efficiency and relationship among its associated characters in rice. Korean J Breeding, 2001, 33(4): 332-337.
[11] 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗. 水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3): 233-238.
[12]江立庚, 戴廷波, 韦善清, 等. 南方水稻氮素吸收与利用效率的基因型差异及评价. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 466-471.
[13]朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗, 等. 水稻氮素利用效率的选择效果. 作物学报, 2004, 30(7): 651-656.
[14]Ladha J K, Kirk G J D, Bennett J, et al. Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved lowland rice germplasm. Field Crops Res, 1998, 56: 41-71.
[15]程建峰, 戴廷波, 曹卫星, 等. 不同类型水稻种质氮素营养效率的变异分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(2): 175-183.
[16]程建峰, 潘晓云, 刘宜柏. 土壤条件对陆稻根系生长的影响. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(4): 590-598.
[17]Huggins D R, Pan W L. Nitrogen efficiency component analysis: An evaluation of cropping system differences in productivity. Agron J, 1993, 85: 898-905.
[18]Balihar V C, Fageria N K, He Z L. Nutrient utilization efficiency of crops. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2001, 32: 921-950.
[19]Ehdaie B, Shakiba M R, Waines J G. Sowing data and nitrogen input influence nitrogen-use efficiency in spring bread and durum wheat. J Plant Nutri, 2001, 24: 899-919.
[20]SPSS11.0 Standard Version. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 2003.
[21]Graham R D. Breeding for nutritional characteristics in cereals//Tinker P B, Launch A. Advance in Plant Nutrition. Vol. 1. New York: Praeger, 1984: 57-102.
[22]Saric M R. Progress since the first international symposium: Genetic aspects of plant nutrition, Beograd, 1982, and perspective of future research. Plant & Soil, 1987, 99(1): 197-216.
[23]Vose P B. Screening techniques for plant nutrient efficiency: Philosophy and methods//El Bassam N. Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990: 283-289.
[24]Harvey P H. Heredity variation in plant nutrition. Genetics, 1939, 24: 437-461.
[25]Gerloff G C, Gabelman W H. Genetic basis of inorganic plant nutrition//Wardlaw I F, Passioura J B. Transport and Transfer Processes in Plants. New York: Academic Press, 1976: 101-112.
[26]李久生, 李蓓, 宿梅双, 等. 冬小麦氮素吸收及产量对喷灌施肥均匀性的响应. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(8): 1600-1607.
[27]Athilde O, Krapp A, Francoise D V. Analysis of the NRT2 nitrate transporter family Arabidopsis structure and gene expression. Plant Physiol, 2002, 129: 885-896.
[28]Ishimaru K, Kobayashi N, Ono K, et al. Are contents of Rubisco, soluble protein and nitrogen in flag leaves of rice controlled by the same genetics? J Exp Bot, 2001, 362: 1827-1833.
[29]Moll R H, Kamprath E J, Jackson W A. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron J, 1982, 74: 562-564.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: