研究报告

优质水稻品种越光(Koshihikari)中控制稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值的QTL分析

展开
  • 1南京农业大学 作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室/江苏省植物基因工程技术研究中心, 江苏 南京210095; 2中国农业科学院 作物科学研究所, 北京100081;*通讯联系人, E-mail: wanjm@njau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 1900-01-01

  修回日期: 1900-01-01

  网络出版日期: 2010-03-10

Analysis of QTLs for Starch RVA Profile Properties in the Superior Rice Cultivar Koshihikari

Expand
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement/Jiangsu Plant Gene Engineering Research Center, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: wanjm@njau.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

  Revised date: 1900-01-01

  Online published: 2010-03-10

摘要

利用南京11 × Koshihikari RIL群体在南京两年的种植结果,检测与稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值峰值黏度、最低黏度、最终黏度、崩解值、消减值、峰值时间和糊化温度相关加性和上位性效应QTL,并分析其表达稳定性。结果表明,7个稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值在两年中均呈连续分布,且存在超亲遗传现象。共检测到8个具有加性效应的QTL与稻米6项淀粉RVA谱特征值有关,两年中能重复出现的QTL有6个,即qTPV6、qFPV6、qBDV6、 qSBV6、qPKT6和qPT6,分别控制最低黏度、最终黏度、崩解值、消减值、峰值时间和糊化温度,两年的平均贡献率分别为46.4%、60.3%、31.1%、71.9%、385%和12.4%,而qSBV8和qPT5仅在1年中被检测到,环境稳定性差。此外,还检测到5对影响稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值的QTL具有上位性效应,互作既发生在相同染色体上也发生在不同染色体之间,但贡献率较小,且受环境的影响较小。控制稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值的稳定、主效QTL,可为Koshihikari中稻米优良蒸煮食味品质相关基因的育种利用提供基础。

本文引用格式

张永生,江玲,刘喜,刘世家,陈亮明,翟虎渠,万建民 . 优质水稻品种越光(Koshihikari)中控制稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010 , 24(2) : 137 -144 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2010.02.06

Abstract

Additive QTLs, epistatic QTLs and expression stability of QTLs for rice starch RVA profile properties were analyzed using Nanjing 11/Koshihikari RIL population in Nanjing in 2006 and 2007. The studied RVA profile properties involved peak viscosity (PKV), trough paste viscosity (TPV), final paste viscosity (FPV), breakdown viscosity (BDV), setback viscosity (SBV), peak time (PKT) and pasting temperature (PT). The normal distribution and transgressive segregation were observed in the seven RVA profile characteristics of the RIL population in two years. Eight additive QTLs were detected for 6 RVA profile characteristics, and 6 QTLs with main effect (qTPV6, qFPV6, qBDV6, qSBV6, qPKT6 and qPT6) were repeatedly detected in two years, which controlled trough paste viscosity, final paste viscosity, breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity, peak time and pasting temperature, with average contribution rates of 46.4%,60.3%,31.1%,71.9%,38.5% and 12.4%, respectively. qSBV8 and qPT5 were detected in one environment, indicating that these two QTLs were easy to be influenced by environments. Otherwise, five QTLs with epistatic effects with little contribution rate were detected in the same chromosome or between different chromosomes, which were little affected by environments. The QTL analysis for RVA profile properties in rice could lay the foundation for utilization of superior cooking and eating quality related genes in Koshihikari in molecular breeding.

参考文献

[1]Juliano B O. Rice Chemistry and Technology. 2nd ed. St. Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists. 1985.
[2]Bao J S, Harold C, He P, et al. Analysis of quantitative trait loci for starch properties of rice based on an RIL population. Acta Bot Sin, 2003, 45(8): 986-994.
[3]Bao J S, Wu Y R, Hu B, et al. QTL for rice grain quality based on a DH population derived from parents with similar apparent amylose content. Euphytica, 2002, 128: 317-324.
[4]Bao J S, Xia Y W. Genetic control of paste viscosity characteristics in indica rice. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 98: 1120-1124.
[5]Bao J S, Zheng X W, Xia Y W, et al. QTL mapping for the paste viscosity characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 280-284.
[6]Gravois K A. Genetic and genotype×environment effects for rough rice and head rice yield. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 907-911.
[7]Gravois K A, McNew R W. Combining ability and heterosis in United States southern longgrain rice. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 83-86.
[8]Gravois K A, Webb B D. Inheritance of long grain rice amylograph viscosity characteristics. Euphytica, 1997, 97: 25-29.
[9]Wan X Y, Hu P S, Wang H L, et al. Analysis on stability of AC, GT and PC in rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Agric Sci China, 2005, 4(2): 81-86.
[10]Wan X Y, Wan J M, Weng J F, et al. Stability of QTLs for rice grain dimension and endosperm chalkiness characteristics across eight environments. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110(7): 1334-1346.
[11]Wan X Y, Wan J M, Su C C, et al. QTL detection for eating quality of cooked rice in a population of chromosome segment substitution lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 110(1): 71-79.
[12]内久满. 食味と耐倒伏性との组合せ育种の可能性. 北陆作物学报, 1991, 26: 142-148.
[13]Dellaporta S L, Wood J, Hicks J B. A plant DNA minipreparation: version Ⅱ. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1983, 1(4): 19-21.
[14]Temnykh S, Park W D, McCouch S R, et al. Mapping and genome organization of microsatellite sequence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 697-712.
[15]McCouch S R, Kochert G, Tanksley S D, et al. Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet, 1988, 76: 815-829.
[16]Panaud O, Chen X, McCouch S R. Development of microsatellite markers and characterization of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLPs) in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Gen Genet, 1996, 252: 597-607.
[17]Zhu J. Demonstration of new software of QTL network and cluster project//Abstract of Plant & Animal Genomes ⅩⅤ Conference, January 13-17, 2007, San Diego, CA, USA[EB/OL]. [2009-05-15]. http://www.intl-pag.org/15/abstracts/PAG15_w29_196.html.
[18]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, et al. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet Newsl, 1997, 14: 11-13.
[19]International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. The mapbased sequence of the rice genome. Nature, 2005, 436: 793-800.
[20]万向元. 水稻品质性状QTL稳定性分析与精细定位[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2005.
[21]李欣, 张蓉, 隋炯明, 等. 稻米淀粉黏滞性谱特征值的表现及其遗传. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18(5): 384-390.
[22]舒庆尧, 吴殿星, 夏英武, 等. 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征与食用品质的关系. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31(3): 25-29.
[23]吴殿星, 舒庆尧, 夏英武. RVA分析辅助选择食用优质早籼稻的研究. 作物学报, 2001, 27(2): 165-172.
[24]McCouch S R, Teytelman L, Xu Y B, et al. Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res, 2002, 9(6): 199-207.
[25]Lee M H, Hettiarachchy N S, McNew R W, et al. Physicochemical properties of calciumfortified rice. Cereal Chem, 1995, 72: 352-355.
[26]Jane J, Chen Y Y, Lee L F, et al. Effects of amylopectin branch length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem, 1999, 76(5): 629-637.
[27]Han X Z, Hamaber B R. Amylopectin fine structure and rice starch paste breakdown. J Cereal Sci, 2001, 34: 279-284.
[28]Jiang H W, Dian W M, Wu P. Effect of high temperature on fine structure of amylopectin in rice endosperm by reducing the activity of the starch branching enzyme. Phytochemistry, 2003, 63: 53-59.
[29]Hirano H Y, Sano Y. Molecular characterization of the waxy locus of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol, 1991, 32 (7): 989-997.
[30]Matsue Y, Odahara K, Hiramatsu M. Studies on relationship between the palatability of rice and protein content. Jpn J Crop Sci, 1995, 64(3): 601-606.
文章导航

/

浙ICP备05004719号-5
公安备案号:33010302003356
地址:浙江省杭州市富阳区水稻所路28号 邮编:311400 电话:0571-63370278 E-mail:cjrs@263.net
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: