中国水稻科学

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻穗分化第一期的形态特征观察

徐雪宾 1;韩惠珍 2   

  1. 1 华南农业大学农学系, 2 生物技术学院,广州 510642
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1997-01-10 发布日期:1997-01-10

The Morphological Characteristics of the First Stage of Rice Panicle Development

Xu Xuebin; Han Huizhen   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1997-01-10 Published:1997-01-10

摘要: 用双目解剖镜及扫描电子显微镜对第一苞原基与剑叶原基的形态作了观察比较,确认在剑叶原基高于生长锥顶部之前,两者在形态上没有什么区别。分析了当前盛行的第一苞与生长锥中轴的夹角呈钝角、剑叶原基未超过生长锥顶部时分化的是第一苞原基等等鉴别标准不符合实际的原因,主要是忽视了水稻同一品种(组合)在相同条件的田块的植株群体内,各主茎的总叶数至少有n和n-1叶两种叶数的事实所导致。并提出丁颖等的幼穗发育8个时期的第一期应更名为苞分化期。苞分化期的起点是一、二苞原基出现,接着是三、四…苞原基出现,终点在一次枝梗原基出现之前。一次枝梗原基出现为第二期的起点。此结果使丁颖等稻穗发育刚开始时期的鉴定标准具有可操作性,使幼穗发育期全长及8个时期各期的起点、终点都有了明确的界限。

关键词: 稻穗分化, 稻穗发育, 稻穗形态建成, 叶龄余数

Abstract: Comparing the morphology of the first bract and flag leaf primordium by binocular dissecting microscope and scanning electronic microscope (SEM), no any difference is observed. The prevailing views that first bract holds an obtuse angle (the angle between the first bract and axis of apical cone is larger than 90°) is not true, and that when the first bract primordium appears the flag leaf primordium does not grow over the apical cone is not true too. These mistakes are caused by neglecting the fact that there are at least two kinds of leaf number of main culm (n and n-1)in the same variety and the same plot. The name of the first stage of panicle development should be changed into bracts differentiating stage. The beginning of this stage is the appearing of the 1st and 2nd bract primordium(Fig. 4 & 6). Then,the third,fourth...bract primordium follows until the primary branch primordium appears. The appearing of primary branch primordium starts the second stage of panicle development (Fig. 5). This conclusion makes the discriminating standard of the beginning feature of 8 stages of rice panicle development to be practicable.

Key words: panicle differentiation, panicle development, panic1e morphogenesis, remainder leaf number