
Chinese Journal OF Rice Science >
Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with N Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation
Received date: 2014-07-27
Revised date: 2014-12-02
Online published: 2015-05-10
The rice tillering dynamics, photosynthesis variations during late growth stage, dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and rice grain yield were analyzed at various N application levels with straw returning to the field in a fixed field experiment. There were four straw returning treatments and four N application rates in this trial. Straw returning treatments were 0 kg/hm2 (S0),4000 kg/hm2 (S4),6000 kg/hm2 (S6),and 8000 kg/hm2 (S8), respectively. N application rates included 0 kg/hm2 (N0),90 kg/hm2(N90),180 kg/hm2(N180),270 kg/hm2(N270), respectively. The results showed that 1) compared with S0, straw returning without nitrogen application obviously inhibited tiller generation and reduced maximum tillering number at rice early growth stage, while increased dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and flag leaf photosynthetic rate at late growth stage, and increased rice grain yield by 2.22%-4.44%. 2) Without straw returning, tiller number was significantly increased with the rising N application rates, and peak tillering time was 7-14 days earlier than N0. Dry matter accumulation and nitrogen absorption during different rice growth stages and rice grain yield increased with the rising N rates, and photosynthetic rate of rice flag leaf maintained a high level at late growth stage. 3) At the same nitrogen application level, rice tiller generation under S4 and S6 treatments was enhanced comparing with S0. Nitrogen absorption at rice mature stage under S6 treatment was significantly increased by 36.58% compared with S0, and photosynthetic rate of rice flag leaf at late growth stage under S6 treatment were higher than S0, while rice tiller generation, photosynthetic rate of flag leaf and nitrogen absorption under S8 treatment did not show favorable results comparing with S6. 4) Straw returning coupled with nitrogen application significantly affected rice effective panicle number and rice grain yield. To compare with N0,S0, rice grain yield at different nitrogen application levels coupled with straw returning was increased by 9.59%-23.51%, and rice grain yield under N180S6 was up to 10.56 t/hm2. It was concluded that appropriate straw returning amount coupled with appropriate nitrogen application rate enhanced rice tillering and effective panicle formation, increased rice nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation, and then increased rice grain yield.
Peng-gang PEI, Jun-hua ZHANG, Lian-feng ZHU, Zhi-hua HU, Qian-yu JIN . Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with N Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015 , 29(3) : 282 -290 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001G7216.2015.03.007
| [1] | 安成立,杜建,岳秀琴,等.作物秸秆高效综合利用途径探析. 中国资源综合利用,2004(1): 25-27. |
| [2] | 高利伟,马林,张卫峰,等.中国作物秸秆养分资源数量估算及其利用状况. 农业工程学报,2009,25(7): 173-179. |
| [3] | Lal R.World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel.Environ Int,2005,31(4): 575-584. |
| [4] | 陈中玉,张祖立,白小虎.农作物秸秆的综合开发利用. 农机化研究,2007(5): 194-196. |
| [5] | 高祥照,马文奇,马常宝,等.中国作物秸秆资源利用现状分析. 华中农业大学学报, 2002,21(3): 242-247. |
| [6] | 徐玉宏. 我国秸秆焚烧污染与防治对策. 环境与可持续发展,2007(3): 21-24. |
| [7] | Tanaka H,Kyaw K M,Toyota K,et al.Influence of application of rice straw, farmyard manure, and municipal biowastes on nitrogen fixation, soil microbial biomass N, and mineral N in a model paddy microcosm.Biol Fert Soils,2006,42(6): 501-505. |
| [8] | 肖小平,汤海涛,纪雄辉.稻草还田模式对稻田土壤速效氮、钾含量及晚稻生长的影响. 作物学报,2008,34(8): 1464-1469. |
| [9] | 朱强根,朱安宁,张佳宝,等.保护性耕作下土壤动物群落及其与土壤肥力的关系.农业工程学报,2010,26(2): 70-76. |
| [10] | Zhang B,Pang C,Qin J,et al.Rice straw incorporation in winter with fertilizer-N application improves soil fertility and reduces global warming potential from a double rice paddy field.Biol Fert Soils,2013,49(8): 1039-1052. |
| [11] | 俞映倞,薛利红,杨林章.不同氮肥管理模式对太湖流域稻田土壤氮素渗漏的影响. 土壤学报,2011,48(5): 988-995. |
| [12] | 王秀斌,徐新朋,孙刚,等.氮肥用量对双季稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(6): 1279-1286. |
| [13] | 高菊生,曹卫东,李冬初,等.长期双季稻绿肥轮作对水稻产量及稻田土壤有机质的影响. 生态学报,2011,31(16): 4542-4548. |
| [14] | 叶文培,谢小立,王凯荣,等.不同时期秸秆还田对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学,2008,22(1): 65-70. |
| [15] | 徐国伟,吴长付,刘辉,等.麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33(2): 284-291. |
| [16] | 马义虎,顾道健,刘立军,等.玉米秸秆源有机肥对水稻产量与温室气体排放的影响. 中国水稻科学,2013,27(5): 520-528. |
| [17] | Soon Y K, Lupwayi N Z.Straw management in a cold semi-arid region: Impact on soil quality and crop productivity.Field Crops Res,2012,139: 39-46. |
| [18] | 徐国伟,吴长付,刘辉,等.麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响. 作物学报,2007,33(2): 284-291. |
| [19] | 顾志权,李庆康,赵强基.苏南稻麦二熟区秸秆全量机械还田技术. 土壤肥料, 2001(5): 23-26. |
| [20] | 马宗国,卢绪奎,万丽,等.小麦秸秆还田对水稻生长及土壤肥力的影响. 作物杂志,2003(5): 37-38. |
| [21] | 王卫,谢小立,谢永宏,等.不同施肥制度对双季稻氮吸收、净光合速率及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(3): 752-757. |
| [22] | 赵锋,程建平,张国忠,等.氮肥运筹和秸秆还田对直播稻氮素利用和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学,2011,50(18): 3702-3704. |
| [23] | 赵步洪,王朋,张洪熙,等.两系杂交稻扬两优6号源库特征与结实特性的分析. 中国水稻科学, 2006,20(1): 65-72. |
| [24] | 史鸿儒,张文忠,解文孝,等.不同氮肥施用模式下北方粳型超级稻物质生产特性分析. 作物学报,2008,34(11): 1985-1993. |
| [25] | 胡钧铭,江立庚,莫润秀,等.优质籼稻桂华占、八桂香花后干物质积累与转运及灌浆的动态特征. 中国水稻科学,2009,23(6): 628-632. |
| [26] | 李志勇,陈建军,陈明灿.不同水肥条件下冬小麦的干物质积累、产量及水氮利用效率. 麦类作物学报,2005,25(5): 80-83. |
| [27] | 胡茂辉,张海清.不同种植模式下秸秆还田对水稻生长发育和产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2012,24(3): 61-63. |
| [28] | 汪军,王德建,张刚.太湖地区稻麦轮作体系下秸秆还田配施氮肥对水稻产量及经济效益的影响. 中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2): 265-270. |
| [29] | 徐国伟,谈桂露,王志琴,等.秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对直播水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响.中国农业科学,2009,42(8): 2736-2746. |
| [30] | 张媛媛,李建林,王春宏,等.氮素和生物腐解剂调控下稻草还田对水稻氮素积累及产量的影响. 土壤通报,2012,43(2): 435-438. |
| [31] | 许有尊. 秸秆还田及有机肥对水稻生长和氮肥利用率影响的研究. 武汉:华中农业大学,2009. |
| [32] | 葛立立,马义虎,卞金龙,等.玉米秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻产量与米质的影响. 中国水稻科学,2013,27(2): 153-160. |
| [33] | 袁玲,张宣,杨静,等.不同栽培方式和秸秆还田对水稻产量和营养品质的影响. 作物学报, 2013,39(2): 350-359. |
| [34] | 徐国伟,谈桂露,王志琴,等.秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对直播水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响. 中国农业科学,2009,42(8): 2736-2746. |
| [35] | 余延丰,熊桂云,张继铭,等.秸秆还田对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2008,47(2): 169-171. |
| [36] | 张洪熙,赵步洪,杜永林,等.小麦秸秆还田条件下轻简栽培水稻的生长特性. 中国水稻科学, 2008,22(6): 603-609. |
| [37] | 吴建富,曾研华,潘晓华,等.稻草还田方式对双季水稻产量和土壤碳库管理指数的影响. 应用生态学报,2013,24(6): 1572-1578. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |