Research Papers

Osmotic Regulation Substance Contents and Activities of Protective Enzymes in Leaves of Different Hybrid Rice  Combinations as Affected by Shading

Expand
  • 1 College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural Universitity/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Cultivation in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Wenjiang 611130, China;2 Sichuan General Popularization Centre of Agricultural Technique, Chengdu 610041, China;

Received date: 2012-01-09

  Revised date: 2012-04-11

  Online published: 2012-09-10

Abstract

Effects of shading at flowering and grain filling stages on osmotic regulation substance contents and activities of protective enzymes in leaves of different hybrid rice combinations  were investigated by using Ⅱyou 498, Gangyou 188, Dexiang 4103, Gangyou 527 and Chuanxiang 9838 as test materials. The results showed that the content of malondialdehyde of Gangyou 188 was significantly increased under shading, whereas the content of malondialdehyde of Ⅱyou 498, Dexiang 4103, Gangyou 527 and Chuanxiang 9838 had insignificant difference compared to the control. The content of soluble sugar was significantly decreased in Ⅱyou 498, Gangyou 188, Dexiang 4103 and Chuanxiang 9838 under shading. However, the content of souble sugar was not significantly increased in Gangyou 527 under shading. The content of soluble protein in the leaves of different  hybrid rice combinations tended to decrease  under shading. The activities  of protective enzymes in leaves varied among  different  hybrid rice combinations  under shading. Taking both the contents of osmotic regulation substances and the activities  of protective enzymes in rice leaves  into consideration, Gangyou 188 and Gangyou 527 had strong ability to adapt themselves   to weak light conditions. The damage mechanism of leaves of different hybrid rice combinations under shading was discussed.

Cite this article

LIU Li1 , WANG Li1 , DENG Fei1 , HUANG Yun1 , LIU Daiyin2 , REN Wanjun1,* , YANG Wenyu1 . Osmotic Regulation Substance Contents and Activities of Protective Enzymes in Leaves of Different Hybrid Rice  Combinations as Affected by Shading[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2012 , 26(5) : 569 -575 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.05.009

References

\[1\]彭国照, 杨秀容. 四川盆区水稻气候年景及产量模型研究. 中国农业气象, 2001, 22(4): 610.

\[2\]任万军, 杨文钰, 张国珍, 等. 弱光对杂交稻氮素积累、分配与子粒蛋白质含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(3): 288293.

\[3\]Murty K S ,Sahu G. Impact of lowlight stress on growth and yield of rice// Weather and Rice. Metro Manila, Philippimes: International Rice Reseaach Institute, 1987: 93101.

\[4\]Tsuneo K. Effect of the shading and rachis branch clipping on the grain filling process of rice cultivars differing in the grain. Jpn J Sci, 1986, 55(2): 252260.

\[5\]Kumudini S, Omielan J, Hume D J. Soybean genetic improvement in yield and the effect of lateseason shading and nitrogen source and supply. Agron J, 2008, 100(2): 400405.

\[6\]Ding S S,Su P X. Effects of tree shading on maize crop within a poplarmaize compound system in Hexi Corridor oasis, Northwestern China. Agric Syst, 2010, 80: 117129.

\[7\]Lazaro L, Abbate P E, Cogliatti D H, et al. Relationship between yield, growth and spike weight in wheat under phosphorus deficiency and shading. J Agric Sci, 2010, 148: 8393.

\[8\]任万军, 杨文钰, 徐精文, 等. 始穗后弱光对不同基因型水稻叶片特性的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2002, 20(3): 205208.

\[9\]霍晓玲, 黄云, 邓飞, 等. 弱光胁迫对不同基因型水稻稻米淀粉RVA谱特征值及直链淀粉含量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6): 685688.

\[10\]李天, 大杉立, 山岸徹, 等. 灌浆结实期弱光对水稻籽粒淀粉积累及相关酶活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(6): 545550.

\[11\]王绍辉, 郝翠玲, 张振贤. 植物遮荫效应的研究与进展. 山东农业大学学报, 1998, 29(1): 130134.

\[12\]贾传华, 郭太君, 王冈, 等. 不同遮荫处理对兴安桧叶绿素含量和保护酶活性的影响. 吉林农业大学学报, 2010, 32(3): 264267.

\[13\]丁四兵, 朱碧岩, 吴冬云, 等. 温光对水稻抽穗后剑叶衰老和籽粒灌浆的影响. 华南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2004, (1): 117121.

\[14\]Okada K, Katoh S. Two longterm effects of light that control the stability of proteins related to photosynthesis during senescence of rice leaves.Plant Cell Physiol, 1998, 39(4): 394404.

\[15\]李合生. 植物生理生化试验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002.

\[16\]熊庆娥. 植物生理学实验教程. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 2003.

\[17\]刘媛媛, 滕中华, 王三根, 等. 高温胁迫对水稻可溶性糖及膜保护酶的影响研究. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 30(2): 5963.

\[18\]关欣, 陈温福, 殷红, 等. 不同年代水稻品种齐穗后叶片保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用比较分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(5): 351354.

\[19\]周源, 董玉芝, 朱颖, 等. 五种不同基因型新疆鸢尾的叶片膜保护系统对土壤水分胁迫的响应. 北方园艺, 2010(11): 116118.

\[20\]蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 491500.

\[21\]朱维琴, 吴良欢, 陶勤南. 氮营养对干旱逆境下水稻体内可溶性渗透调节物质的影响. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2003, 29(5): 479484.

\[22\]侯永平, 陈年来, 康恩祥, 等. 低温弱光对西葫芦幼苗渗透调节物质的影响. 中国瓜菜, 2009(1): 812.

\[23\]孟雷, 陈温福, 李磊鑫, 等. 减弱光照强度对水稻叶片气孔性状的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 33(2): 8789.

\[24\]杨妤, 田茂洁, 蒋雪梅, 等. 缓苗期遮荫对雌雄银杏幼苗抗氧化酶系统及生化物质含量的影响. 光谱实验室, 2010, 27(3): 918921.

\[25\]Longstreth D J. Nutrient influences on leaf photosynthesis: Effects on nitrogen phosphorus and potassium for Gossypium hirsutum. Plant Physiol, 1980, 65(3): 541543.

\[26\]Boardman N K. Photosynthesis of sun and shading plant// Winslow R B. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. Californias: Annal Reviews Inc, 1977, 28:355371.

\[27\]潘晓华, 刘水英, 李锋, 等. 低磷胁迫对不同水稻品种叶片膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(1): 5760.

\[28\]黄俊, 郭世荣, 蒋芳玲, 等. 遮荫处理及恢复光照对白菜生长及活性氧代谢的影响. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(5): 753756.

\[29\]Dhinsa R S, Dhindsa P P, Thorpe T A. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxidation dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot, 1981, 32: 93.

\[30\]徐莲珍, 蔡靖, 姜在民, 等. 水分胁迫对3种苗木叶片渗透调节物质与保护酶活性的影响. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(2): 1216.

\[31\]董伊晨, 刘悦秋. 土壤水分对异株荨麻(Urtica dioica)保护酶和渗透调节物质的影响及其与叶片光合和生物量的相关性. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 28452851.

\[32\]史玉炜, 王燕凌, 李文兵, 等. 水分胁迫对刚毛柽柳可溶性蛋白、可溶性糖和脯氨酸含量变化的影响. 新疆农业大学学报, 2007, 30(2): 58.

\[33\]夏新莉, 郑彩霞, 尹伟伦. 土壤干旱胁迫对樟子松针叶膜脂过氧化、膜脂成分和乙烯释放的影响. 林业科学, 2000, 36(3): 812.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.