Research Papers

Effect of Al2(SO4)3  Application on Fluorine Forms in Paddy Soil and Fluorine Absorption by Rice Plants

Expand
  • College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China;

Received date: 2011-07-16

  Revised date: 2011-11-27

  Online published: 2012-07-10

Abstract

The variation of F content in rice plants and in paddy soil at different Al2(SO4)3 application levels was investigated in a biological pot experiment. The results showed that rice plants absorbed F extravagantly, and the order of F content in each part was as follows: husk>brown rice >root>straw. At a given   F level in soil, the concentration of F in each part was firstly decreased and then increased with rising Al2(SO4)3 application level. It minimized at 0.4% and 0.6% of Al2(SO4)3  levels, showing extremely significant difference with the blank control. As Al2(SO4)3 application level increased, the contents of free F and water soluble F were gradually decreased. The linear analysis showed that the two forms of F was negatively correlated with the amount of Al2(SO4)3 . But there was significant positive correlation between the content of residual F and Al2(SO4)3. The content of exchangeable F in soil   firstly increased   and then decreased with the increase of Al2(SO4)3 application amount and peaked at 0.2% Al2(SO4)3  level.  However, the exchangeable F content in soil at 0.2% Al2(SO4)3 level  was not significantly different from that of the control, and was extremely significantly differed with those at 04%-0.8% Al2(SO4)3 levels, indicating that Al2(SO4)3 mainly depressed the exchangeable F. The contents of complex F, Fe/Mn binding F and organic F were also firstly increased and then decreased with their maximum appeared at 0.4% and 06% Al2(SO4)3  levels. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significantly or extremely significantly negative correlation between the concentration of F in each part and the contents of Fe/Mn binding F, organic F in soil. Thus, at 0.4%-0.6% Al2(SO4)3 levels, equivalent to the F∶Al quality ration of 6∶1- 4∶3, the F concentration in each plant part was relatively lower, which indicated that its defluoridation efficiency was better. At the same time, the contents  of water soluble F, exchangeable F were lower and the contents of Fe/Mn binding F, organic F were higher which reduced F infiltration to groundwater and lower the F intake by people and animals  eating cooked rice and drinking groundwater.

Cite this article

LIU Jinhua, ZHAO Lanpo* , WANG Hongbin, ZHANG Zhidan, ZHANG Zhongqing . Effect of Al2(SO4)3  Application on Fluorine Forms in Paddy Soil and Fluorine Absorption by Rice Plants[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2012 , 26(4) : 445 -450 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.04.009

References

\[1\]蔡宏道. 现代卫生环境学. 北京:  人民教育出版社, 1995: 616659.

\[2\]Ammerman C B,  Henry P R. Effects of fluorides on animals:  Dietary and mineral supplement considerations//Shupe  J  L.  Fluorides:  Effects on vegetation,  animals and humans.  Salt Lake City:  Paragon Press, 1983:  281290.

\[3\]谢正苗,吴卫红,徐建民. 环境中氟化物的迁移和转化及其生态效应.环境科学进展, 1999, 7(2):4053.

\[4\]Anderson M A,  Zelazny L W,  Bertsch P M. Fluoroaluminium complexes on model and soil exchangers. Soil Sci Soc Ame J, 1991,  55:  7175.

\[5\]Becker D E,  Griffith J M,  Hobbs C S, et al. The alleviation of fluorine toxicosis by means of certain aluminium compounds. J Anim Sci, 1950,  9:  647.

\[6\]Maclean D C,  Hansen K S,  Schneider R E. Amelioration of aluminium toxicity in wheat by fluoride. New Phytol, 1992,  121:  8188.

\[7\]Stevens D P,  Mclaughlin M J,  Alston A M. Phytotoxicity of hydrogen fluoride and fluoroborate and their uptake from solution culture by Lycopersicon esculentum and Avena sativa.Plant Soil,  1998, 200: 175184.

\[8\]杨杰文,  蒋新,  徐仁扣, 等. Al与F的络合作用对土壤吸附Al和F的影响. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(2): 161165.

\[9\]王海华, 朱茂旭, 蒋新, 等. 氟与红壤相互作用过程及环境意义. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25(4): 974978.

\[10\]丁瑞兴, 黄晓. 茶园土壤系统铝和氟的生物地球化学循环及其对土壤酸化的影响. 土壤学报, 1991, 28(3): 229236.

\[11\]谢忠雷, 孙书田, 陈卓,等. 氟铝交互作用对茶园土壤铝吸附特征及形态分布的影响. 吉林大学学报:理学版, 2008, 46 (3): 565570.

\[12\]王凌霞, 付庆灵, 胡红青,等. 湖北茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟分组. 环境化学,  2011,  30(3): 662667.

\[13\] Shu W S,  Zhang Z Q,  Lan C Y. Fluoride and aluminium concentrations of tea plants and tea products from Sichuan Province,  PR China.Chemosphere, 2003, 52: 14751482.

\[14\]曹玉和, 齐佳伟, 熊绍礼. 吉林省氟中毒病区水文质地特征及防氟改水对策. 中国地质, 2010, 37(3): 690695.

\[15\] 赵兰坡, 王宇, 马晶,等. 吉林省西部苏打盐碱土改良研究. 土壤通报,  2001,  32 (1):  9196.

\[16\]杨秀敏, 王春, 王志, 等. 利用高氯酸作为氟离子选择性电极法的新介质测定食品中的微量氟.河北农业大学学报, 2006, 29(1): 107110.

\[17\]吴卫红, 谢正苗,  徐建明, 等. 不同土壤中氟赋存形态特征及其影响因素. 环境科学, 2002(2): 104108.

\[18\]于群英, 慈恩, 杨林章.  皖北地区土壤中不同形态氟含量及其影响因素. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(6): 13331340.

\[19\]赵玲, 金彬, 马永军,等.水稻对氟化物吸收分布积累规律的分析.农业环境科学学报,2005,  24(增):  5255.

\[20\]Lindsay W L. Chemical equilibria in soils.  New York: John Wiley & Sons,  1979.

\[21\]Farrah H,  Slavek J,  Pickering W F. Fluoride interactions with hydrous aluminum oxides and alumina. Austral J Soil Res, 1997, 25(1): 5569

\[22\]Horner J M,  Bell J N B. Effects of fluoride and acidity on early plant growth. Agric   Ecos Environ, 1995, 52:  205211.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.