Research Papers

Effects of Rape Straw Manuring on  Soil Fertility   and  Rice  Growth

Expand
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou  310006, China;  2 Key Laboratory of Southern Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing  210095, China;

Received date: 2010-12-10

  Revised date: 2011-08-01

  Online published: 2012-01-10

Abstract

In order to definite the effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and  afterreap  rice growth, four   planting models were designed  in year 2004-2008 in  Fuyang, Zhejiang Province, China, including fallow(CK), Chinese milk vetch(T1), returing burned  rape straw to field after harvest(T2), returning infullblooming rape to field(T3). The results showed that  under  the T3  treatment, the organic content, total N content,  and total P content increased, the bulk density and  soil specific gravity of the soil decreased, improving paddy field fertility, physical traits, soil urease and acid phosphates activities in  afterreap rice growth period. Under T3 afterreap rice growth was improved and the yield of all rice cultivars increased. This attributes to increased number of effective panicles in hybrid rice Nei 2 you 6, Liangyoupeijiu and Xiuyou 5, and to increased number of grains per panicle in  conventional  rice cultivar Xiushui 5. In photosynthesis traits, after returning rape as green manure, rice leaf area index, flag leaf length, width, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate and biomass all increased. Results showed returning rape as green manure to paddy field is a very good biofertilization method.

Cite this article

WANG Danying1, PENG Jian1, XU Chunmei1, ZHAO Feng1,2, ZHANG Xiufu1,* . Effects of Rape Straw Manuring on  Soil Fertility   and  Rice  Growth[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2012 , 26(1) : 85 -91 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.01.014

References

\[1\]李纯. 春油菜作绿肥的研究. 作物研究, 1989,  3(1):  2122.

\[2\]景泰来.  春油菜绿肥翻压套种马铃薯. 中国蔬菜, 2007(10): 5253.

\[3\]鲍士旦.  土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.

\[4\]关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法.  北京:  农业出版社, 1986:  274300.

\[5\]赵兰坡, 姜岩. 土壤磷酸酶活性测定方法的探讨. 土壤通报, 1986, 17(3): 138141.

\[6\]吴传云.绿肥作物轮作覆盖在免耕中的重要性.农机科技推广, 2005(1):  4546.

\[7\]刘国顺, 罗贞宝, 王岩, 等.绿肥翻压对烟田土壤理化性状及土壤微生物量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2):  9598.

\[8\]陈启德, 曾庆曦, 刘志明.稻田种植绿肥的增产效果及对土壤肥力的影响.西南农业学报, 1995, 8(1): 117123.

\[9\]符冠富, 王丹英, 徐春梅, 等. 稻田冬季保护性耕作条件下的土壤酶活性与水稻成熟期叶片衰老和籽粒产量之间的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(1): 4350.

\[10\]王忠英, 王向阳. 硫代葡萄糖苷及其降解产物异硫代氰酸盐. 生命的化学, 2005, 25(4):  342344.

\[11\]李锋, 张春雷, 李光明, 等. 油菜硫苷组分含量及抑菌活性研究.武汉植物研究,2006, 24(4): 351356.

\[12\]Kirkegaard J A, Sarwar M.Biofumigation potential of Brassicas:1.Variation in glucosinolate profiles of diverse fieldgrown Brassicas.Plant Soil, 1998, 201: 7189.

\[13\]Monreal C M, Bergstrom D W.Soil enzymatic factors expressing the influence of land use, tillage system and texture on soil biochemical quality.Can J Soil Sci, 2000, 80:  419428.

\[14\]Rosa E A S, Heaney R K, Fenwick G R, et al. Glucosinolate in crops plants. Hort  Rev, 1997, 19:  99183.

\[15\]Decker K L M, Boerner R E J, Morris S J.Scale dependent patterns of soil enzyme activity in a forest landscape.Can J For Res, l999, 29(2):  232241.

\[16\]邱莉萍, 刘军, 王益权,等. 土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究.植物营养与肥料学报,  2004, 10(3): 277280.

\[17\]张玉兰, 陈利军, 张丽莉. 土壤质量的酶学指标研究.  土壤通报,  2005,  36(4): 598603.

\[18\]安韶山, 黄懿梅, 李壁成, 等. 用典范相关分析研究宁南宽谷丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤酶活性与肥力因子的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(5): 704709.

\[19\]Bergstrom D W, Monreal C M.Increased soil enzyme activities under two  row crops.Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1998, 62:12951301.

\[20\]王芸, 韩宾, 史忠强, 等.保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响. 水土保持学报,  2006, 20(4): 120123.

\[21\]李腊梅, 陆琴, 严蔚东, 等.太湖地区稻麦二熟制下长期秸秆还田对土壤酶活性的影响.土壤, 2006, 38(4): 422428.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.