研究报告

Effects of RowSpacing on Yield of SuperHighYielding Early and Late Rice

Expand
  • 1Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation of Double Cropping Rice, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, China; *Corresponding author, E-mail: xhuapan@163.com

Received date: 1900-01-01

  Revised date: 1900-01-01

  Online published: 2011-01-10

Abstract

With the same planting density(3×105hills/hm2 for early rice and 2.5×105 hills/hm2 for late rice), the effect of rowspacing on the yield of superhighyielding rice was studied at three nitrogen application levels with early rice Ganxin 203 and Luliangyou 996 and late rice Tianyouhuazhan and Ganxin 688 as materials. Narrow rowspacing was favorable for higher yield of the four tested materials with no nitrogen application. With the same nitrogen application levels, medium rowspacing produced higher yield for Ganxin 203, wide or narrow rowspacing for Luliangyou 996 and Tianyouhuazhan, and narrow rowspacing for Ganxin 688. Number of effective panicles was the main factor responsible for the effect of rowspacing on yield for both Luliangyou 996 and Tianyouhuazhan, but number of grains per panicle for Ganxin 203, and seedsetting rate for Ganxin 688. Different responses to rowspacing among different materials could be attributed to the number of grains per panicle and panicle forming rate, which were lower for Ganxin 203 and higher for Luliangyou 996 and Tianyouhuazhan, and to higher leaf area index for Ganxin 688. The appropriate rowspacing was 33.0 cm×10.0 cm or 20.6 cm×16.0 cm for early rice Luliangyou 996, 25.4 cm×13.0 cm for early rice Ganxin 203, 40.0 cm×10.0 cm or 20.0 cm×20.0 cm for late rice Tianyouhuazhan, and 20.0 cm×20.0 cm for late rice Ganxin 688.

Cite this article

LIN Hong-xin,PAN Xiao-hua,SHI Qing-hua,PENG Chun-rui,WU Jian-fu,LEI Xiang-liang . Effects of RowSpacing on Yield of SuperHighYielding Early and Late Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2011 , 25(1) : 79 -85 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.012

References

[1]夏松年. 单晚杂交稻宽行窄株法高产栽培途径. 安徽农业科学, 2002, 30(6): 901.
[2]潘圣刚, 曹凑贵, 蔡明历, 等. 栽插密度及方式对杂交水稻“红莲优6号”产量和品质的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2006, 28(6): 845-849.
[3]闫川, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 等. 行株距配置对水稻茎秆形态生理与群体生态的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(5): 530-536.
[4]王夫玉, 张洪程. 行株距配比对水稻群体特征的影响. 甘肃科学学报, 2001, 13(2): 38-42.
[5]吴洪恺, 纪凤高, 文正怀, 等. 水稻栽插不同株行距配比方式初探. 耕作与栽培, 2000(1): 17, 22.
[6]伍玉春, 吴薇, 牟锦武, 等. 早熟杂交水稻黔优107不同栽插方式和密度试验. 贵州农业科学, 2008, 36(3): 37-38.
[7]黄家林, 陈兴华. 安县沿山冷凉地区水稻宽窄行栽插的农田小气候效应及其推广应用. 锦阳农专学报, 1993, 10(2): 17-19.
[8]王建林, 徐正进. 穗型和行距对水稻冠层受光态势的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(5): 422-426.
[9]张洪程, 王夫玉. 中国水稻群体研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(1): 51-56.
[10]张俊宝, 曹海峰, 孙淘, 等. 水稻三超宽行栽培对水稻生育及产量的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(2): 15-18.
[11]姚永平, 宋子洲, 叶静. 水稻宽行配置扩行增产机理研究. 耕作与栽培, 2000(6): 41-42.
[12]徐正进, 陈温福, 张龙步, 等. 不同穗型水稻群体生态环境的比较研究. 植物生理学通讯, 1990, 32(9): 191-195.
[13]王建林, 徐正进, 衣先众. 插秧量与行距配置对北方杂交稻和常规稻产量及其构成因子的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(6): 631-637.
[14]苏祖芳, 杜永林, 张亚洁, 等. 栽插行距对水稻产量结构和叶面积组成的影响. 江苏农业研究, 1998, 19(1): 23-27.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.