研究报告

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice Growing Season

Expand
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province / Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in the Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangzhou 225009, China; 2 Agriculture Committee of Wujiang County, Wujiang 215200, China; 3 Agriculture Bureau of Guannan County, Guannan 222500, China; These authors contributed equally to this paper; *Corresponding author, E-mail: qgdai@yzu.edu.cn

Received date: 1900-01-01

  Revised date: 1900-01-01

  Online published: 2011-01-10

Abstract

In contrast experiments in sandy soil and clay soil, effects of nitrogen application rates on the concentration of NH4+N in surface water, the loss of ammonia volatilization from paddy field, the production of rice, the nitrogen utilization efficiency and the nitrogen content in soil profile were studied. The concentration of NH4+N in surface water and the amount of ammonia volatilization losses all increased as the nitrogen application rate increased, and peaked at 13 days after nitrogen application. The loss of ammonia volatilization from clay soil was lower than that from sandy soil. The amounts of ammonia volatilization losses after nitrogen application at different stages were as follows: N application for promoting tillering > The first N topdressing for promoting panicle initiation(applied at the last 4thleaf stage) > basal fertilizer > The second N topdressing for promoting panicle initiation(applied at the last 2ndleaf stage). The total loss of ammonia volatilization from clay soil was 10.49-87.06 kg/hm2, accounting for 10.92%-21.76% of the nitrogen applied; the total loss of ammonia volatilization from sandy soil was 11.32-102.43 kg/hm2, occupying 11.32%-25.61% of the nitrogen applied. The amount of ammonia volatilization and the concentration of NH4+N in surface water reached their peaks at the same time after nitrogen application; the maximum appeared at the tillering stage with their ratios from 23.76% to 33.65%. With the increase of nitrogen application rate, rice production and the nitrogen accumulation in plants increased, but nitrogen use efficiency decreased. Rice production and the nitrogen accumulation in plants in clay soil were slightly higher than those in sandy soil. Soil nitrogen content in the depth of 4050 cm was the lowest; soil nitrogen content in the same layers increased with the increasing nitrogen application rate, and soil nitrogen content in clay soil was higher than that in sandy soil. From the view on ammonia volatilization, it is found that the amount of ammonia volatilization would increase quickly when the nitrogen application rate exceeded 250 kg/hm2 in rice growing season. However, from the view on rice production, the suitable nitrogen application rate should be about 300 kg/hm2. Therefore, considering highyield and environment protection, the appropriate nitrogen application rate was from 250 to 300 kg/hm2 in the condition of the experiment.

Cite this article

YE Shi-chao,#,LIN Zhong-cheng,#,DAI Qi-gen,JIA Yu-shu,GU Hai-yan,CHEN Jing-dou,XU Lu-sheng,WU Fu-guan,ZHANG Hong-cheng,HUO Zhong-yang,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan . Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice Growing Season[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2011 , 25(1) : 71 -78 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.011

References

[1]彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 等.提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略.中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103.
[2]田光明, 蔡祖聪, 曹金留, 等.镇江丘陵区稻田化肥氮的氨挥发及其影响因素.土壤学报, 2001, 38(3): 324-321.
[3]蔡贵信, 朱兆良.稻田中化肥氮的气态损失.土壤学报, 1995, 32(增): 128-135.
[4]高文伟, 黄炜, 贾宏涛, 等.追施氮肥对土壤氨挥发影响的初步研究.玉米科学, 2009, 17(4): 112-114.
[5]苏成国, 尹斌, 朱兆良, 等.稻田氮肥的氨挥发损失与稻季大气氮的湿沉降.应用生态学报, 2003, 14(11): 1884-1888.
[6]邓美华, 尹斌, 张绍林, 等.不同施氮量和施氮方式对稻田氨挥发损失的影响.土壤, 2006, 38(3): 263-269.
[7]田玉华, 贺发云, 尹 斌, 等.太湖地区氮磷肥施用对稻田氨挥发的影响.土壤学报, 2007, 44(5): 893-899.
[8]宋勇生, 范晓晖, 林德喜, 等.太湖地区稻田氨挥发及影响因素的研究. 土壤学报, 2004, 41(2): 265-269.
[9]曹金留, 田光明, 任立涛, 等.江苏南部地区稻麦两熟土壤中尿素的氨挥发损失.南京农业大学学报, 2000, 23(4): 51-54.
[10]李菊梅, 徐明岗, 秦道珠, 等.有机肥无机肥配施对稻田氨挥发和水稻产量的影响.植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(1): 51-56.
[11]张淑艳, 松中照夫.不同施肥法及土壤对氨挥发影响的比较研究.土壤肥料科学, 2003, 19(6): 176-178.
[12]吴萍萍, 刘金剑, 杨秀霞, 等.不同施肥制度对红壤地区双季稻田氨挥发的影响.中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(1): 85-93.
[13]宋勇生, 范晓晖.稻田氨挥发研究进展.生态环境, 2003, 12(2): 240-244.
[14]彭世彰, 杨士红, 徐俊增.节水灌溉稻田氨挥发损失及影响因素.农业工程学报, 2009, 25(8): 35-39.
[15]陈振华, 陈利军, 武志杰, 等.辽河下游平原不同水分条件下稻田氨挥发.应用生态学报, 2007, 18(12): 2771-2776.
[16]黄进宝, 范晓晖, 张绍林.太湖地区铁渗水耕人为土稻季上氮肥的氨挥发.土壤学报, 2006, 43(5): 786-791.
[17]张静, 王德建.太湖地区乌栅土稻田氨挥发损失的研究.中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(6): 84-87.
[18]李菊梅, 李冬初, 徐明岗, 等.红壤双季稻田不同施肥下的氨挥发损失及其影响因素.生态环境, 2008, 17(4): 1610-1613.
[19]张启明, 铁文霞, 尹斌, 等.藻类在稻田生态系统中的作用及其对氨挥发损失的影响.土壤, 2006, 38(6): 814-819.
[20]Lin D X, Fan X H, Hu F, et al. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen utilization efficiency in response to urea application in rice fields of the Taihu Lake Region, China. Pedosphere, 2007, 17(5): 639-645.
[21]Fan X H, Song Y S, Lin D X,et al. Ammonia volatilization losses from urea applied to wheat on a paddy soil in Taihu Region, China. Pedosphere, 2005, 15(1): 59-65.
[22]叶全宝, 张洪程, 魏海燕, 等.不同土壤及氮肥条件下水稻氮利用效率和增产效应研究.作物学报, 2005, 31(11): 1422-1428.
Outlines

/

Tel: 0571-63370278 E-mail: cjrs@263.net
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.